Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I am looking for something to get maybe in second half of 2003 or so.
I am leaning toward the Liberty or Sorento at this point. I really really like the Forester, but want something a little more rugged/trucklike for utility/offroad purposes. Otherwise, I think the Subaru is nice. I had a Subaru back around 1990 or so, and if I remember right, repair costs were through the roof. I think it was a Loyale (?) wagon. Almost a thousand bucks to fix the exhaust!!!!
There should be a turbo by about June, we expect about 200hp from a light-pressure turbo, sort of like VW's 1.8T and Volvo's 2.4T.
You could get that, add iSR 2" lifting springs and a pair of skid plates from Primitive racing, but...
For your needs I think the others may be a better choice, though. The Koreans have even moved up the reliability ratings, both CR and JD Powers. I'd take a close look at the Sorento.
-juice
-juice
We got the 03 X Forester and every trip, she sits up and watches out the rear window. No chewing yet. Haven't gone on long trips with her yet but for short trips she appears mesmerized looking out the rear view window.
As a side light the 03 X handled all the bizarre weather we had here the past few weeks in NE PA with no problems.
$24,000 + tax,tag,title no other fees. Not a bad price and the dealer was a pleasure to work with
zoom zoom zoom
I'm definitely not in the "boy racer" class - I'm the wrong sex, and I'm over 50. I did want the extra power because I drive from sea level to about 6,000 feet every day. I was tired of having a 5 speed manual that couldn't manage the drive in 5th gear - I had to downshift to 4th to maintain 65-70 mph - and I wanted an auto with enough ooomph to maintain 70 on the steepest parts of the freeway. The Forester turbo was about the best choice without going to a 6 cylinder (which is what I did).
I'm still not unhappy about my choice (even if I die every day when I fill up with gas), though I might have bought an AWD Escape hybrid if I had waited. I still think the Forester XT is a practical car.
I can speak for the 2002 CRV. I have a spriger spanieal who looks like and is almost as tall as a setter. My roomate has a Great Dane and Lab mix, mostly great dane.
I can put them in the cargo area behind the seats wth no problem. But they both can't lay down unless I slide the back seats forward 8 inches.
When you slide the seats forwards, (if I remeber correctly) the volume goes from 32 to about 40 cubic feet which rivals the large SUV's. I know you only care about usable space so I can tell you the seats slid forward will give you an additional 8 inches in one direction along the floor.
I want to be able to take people AND the dog along, not either/or.
If you slide the seats forward 8 inches it would not be comfortable for adults. But, you could slide the seats forward a few inches and you would still have the leg room of the Forester.
What kind of dog would you put in the cargo area?
Besides, how many times have you haggled for hours, only to have the dealer surprise you with a hidden fee at the end? You know what's next - they offer to split the difference as a "favor". Some favor.
No thanks, I'll go no-haggle, no surprise fees. Too bad they do not have Ford or Honda franchises, though others no-haggle dealers might.
Another idea is a pricing service, but it'll be hit-or-miss with the surprise fees.
Basically it's like Saturn, only they sell near invoice, so prices are better than MSRP. I think if you offer MSRP up front even the worst dealers will treat you nice!
-juice
I won't buy another Toyota because of the dealers, no matter what they come out with (of course, it doesn't help that I can't stand the one I have). I just wish there were more no-haggle dealerships here (Saturn is it around here). That's where I would go, if I could.
CRV Height: 41 Width: 41 Depth, seat up: 28 Depth, seat down: 52
Forester: Height: 30.5 Width: 37 Depth, seat up: 38 Depth, seat down: 68
I tried to measure the smallest distance in each direction - from the top of the back seat to the innermost part of the rear window slant, or between the wheels for the width measurement. I wanted to know how big a box I could fit in the car. Also, the CRV's rear seat was all the way back, I think, when I did the seat up measurement. Naturally, that doesn't matter for the seat down measurement.
HTH,
Tamara
I've always thought the CR-V prioritized passengers over cargo. Rear leg room is great, but consider that the Forester has 10" more depth with the seats in place, so really you have to move the seat well forward to fit anything back there.
I can fit my kid's stroller and still change a diaper behind it, all while being protected from the rain, in my Forester. And the kids don't need much leg room anyway.
With the new CR-V, at least you can slide the seat all the way forward. That would leave enough cargo room for my needs.
Height is great but only if the things you carry can be stacked. So not for most groceries. Maybe Honda should sell a shelf for such a tall cargo area, like the PT Cruiser and some vans offer.
One criticism of the Subie, though, is the width. I was hoping they'd use the rear suspension from the Outback, which allows a LOT more width between the wheel wells. Forester kept the struts instead, and they protrude more than I'd like.
For that reason, our Legacy has far more useful space (i.e. floor area). It's shorter, so the Forester is better for tall boxes, but the Legacy is much better for most other stuff.
-juice
I am trying to guess under which circumstances you need the clearance, but not AWD/4WD. Can't think of any.
You can buy a great station wagon for that price. Much better handling, faster, more comfort, quieter, more space, less fuel.
On that note, Merry Christmas to all.
- D
On the other, we probably will this year, and an AWD model will be easier to resell and probably depreciate less. Plus it'll be better in rain, or if you ever hit the orchards in the fall.
But yeah, a Ford Focus wagon is just as roomy and probably $6 grand less. A Taurus wagon will seat 7 and cost about the same, with more cargo space.
From the tone of your post, I'd guess that you really do want AWD, but price is an issue. So consider also the Legacy L Special Edition, which has AWD, ABS, 2 moonroofs, CD, outside temp gauge, 16" alloys, 4 disc brakes, cruise, keyless, and power everything.
Since you're in MD, check out fitzmall.com. $20,161 includes freight, with tax that would still be about a grand cheaper, plus you get AWD. This is a no-haggle dealer, so if you're interested e-mail me (it's in my profile) and I'll put you in touch with a salesman who treated me right.
-juice
-Frank P.
-juice
I agree that the Legacy AWD wagon is a better idea than the Escape.
The SUV's of today are what are supposedly taking the place of yesteryear's wagons, but not doing much of a good job at it. They don't hold or tow as much, don't hold as many people or are near as well riding.
The floor space with seats down was enough to hold a sheet of 4x8 plywood/sheetrock/paneling. We used to load it right up to the back headrests, or until the front wheels almost came off the ground. You wouldn't believe how many bricks one could hold/haul!
I gave a "hay ride" to the whole group, it was a hoot. We were able to get to the most remote apple trees, and got the best apples. You definitely need the clearance, and probably AWD if you don't want to get stuck far from any help.
AWD gives you an extra margin that lets you do the things you want to do. You could walk, I guess, but it was blistering hot that day and we had 3 kids with us, enjoying the A/C during the ride.
So driving on an orchard or farm, up a gravel road or trail, snow or rain, lots of opportunities to use the AWD come up.
-juice
-mike
One lives in Florida, and basically loves Isuzus (it's his 3rd) and wanted something roomier than his old I-Mark and Stylus. So the Rodeo was the affordable option for him. He loves it.
The other lives in DC, and regrets not getting 4WD.
-juice
-mike
He didn't really get it for image or utility, he got it because he loves the Isuzu brand and it a loyal customer.
I'd take RWD over FWD any day.
-juice
Trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find a decent RWD car which I can afford.
-juice
I can't imagine a RWD VW or Acura RSX, nor would I want one.
Bob
The problem with FWD is packaging. You gotta cram the engine, tranny, and differential in one tiny little engine compartment. That usually forces a very high-mounted engine block, almost always transverse, above the tranny and diff. The half shafts are usually not of equal length (hence torque steer), and access is tough because there isn't any room left over for your hands to reach anything.
So you end up with a high center of gravity, torque steer, front tires that wear twice as fast as the rears, and dull understeer.
It's safe and leaves you with more passenger space, so it's fine for mom's family car, but on mine I'll take RWD.
Mount the engine longitudinally, nice and low. The tranny behind it, not below. The diff in the rear, nice and easy to access and service everything.
A RWD Acura RSX would probably handle as well or better (with a fixed roof) than a Honda S2000. People would flock to it.
-juice
Personally my next car may be a CTS V8 or IS400.
-mike
It can take on the Altima and Mazda6, but not the G35 or BMW 3 series.
-juice
most people would say one of the real "advantages" of FWD, is packaging. In fact, that was one of the main reasons everyone switched to FWD. There's no driveshaft or rear differential to worry about. You can get as much interior space into a "smaller & lighter" FWD, than RWD.
I've never heard anyone say anything negative about how an Integra or RSX handles. In fact, they are almost always praised in that aspect. Even the new '03 V6 Accord is praised in terms of handling—and with no torque steer.
Frankly, you couldn't give me a RWD vehicle. Well... you could "give" me one, but I would never buy one again.
Bob
Mustang (not GT though), the MB C230 bases at about $25,000, so it might be hard to talk them down below $20,000. You couldn't pay me to own a C230 though.
From the passenger perspective, packaging is great with FWD. No tunnel down the center. It's what allows a flat floor on Civics.
Look at all the great handlers you're excluding: Miata, 3 series, Z, etc.
-juice
Haven't tried the 6 but I probably will. We owned a 626 and that thing was nose heavy and understeered rather severely, so hopefully they cured that. Actually that's what I base my complaints about FWD on.
-juice
I'd give anything to have something like an 86 SVO with 15 years worth of improvements into it.
I remember looking maybe 10-15 years ago for a 4 cylinder, rwd, turbo car, and came up with a pretty short list. Turbos are mostly gone, and so is RWD. The only cars you find those on are pretty pricey.
I would love to see a RWD RSX or RWD Accord class Honda type of car for less than $25,000.
Now, as far as SUV's,...
You can still get a RWD Wrangler for less than $20,000 I think.
-james
What I will admit to, is that FWD and RWD feel different. As to which is more fun, it depends on who you talk to, and what pushes their "fun" button.
Bob
I don't doubt that a Mini is a hoot, just imagine what it would be like if it were RWD! LOL
-juice
When I moved to Phila I had a RWD with studded snow tires that were great. The state thought they tore up the roads so they outlawed them for all but emergency vehicles.
I then drove a FWD in 10 inches of snow for some one else and it made a believer out of me. If you live up north there is a world of difference between RWD and FWD. Enough to affect the purchase of a car to account for winter driving.
The recent weather here again made me a believer about AWD in bad weather.
If some one gave me a RWD or FWD I'd make do.
If I have to purchase a car i'll go for AWD, FWD and RWD in that order. My old man said buy flexibility not limitations.
In cold climates, choose AWD. In warm climates, it doesn't matter, so go ahead and get RWD if you can.
-juice