United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

1375376378380381406

Comments

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    Of course, there's a difference between paying for it, and giving civil servants massive unearned pensions and perks for life.

    When government starts looking to China for infrastructure, something is broken.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    You are in the thick of it where you live. You know there were many lower cost proposals for the Bay Bridge that were ignored for esthetic reasons. CA wastes more money per capita than any state in the Union. Highest expenditure for K12 education with next to the worst results in the Nation. The only thing close to paradise about CA is better weather than other places. It sucks otherwise.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Depends where you live. One views the world through the lens of their own eyes.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I agree people see things through their own eyes. Truth be known most people are blind as bats. CA is in fact a cess pool of humanity. Does not take special glasses to see we pay more in taxes and get less in return. Our housing is higher than most any other place. The cost to build is a direct result of over priced government services. When it costs $45,000 for a building permit in CA and $800 in HI for a comparable single family dwelling we are getting raped. I was looking at average property tax in various states. CA average is $2839 per year. KY is $843. Which makes me wonder why KY is doing fine and CA is BROKE. Only big difference is CA has an inordinate amount of Public employees with Union contracts that are bankrupting the cities, counties and state. Those of us with our eyes wide open vote against the Public employee Unions. May be too late for CA. Time for tax paying middle class to cut our losses and get out. Leave it for the Rich and Poor to fight over.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    You think Kentucky is well run? Yeah, good luck with that. Much higher poverty rate than California, and about the same Debt per Capita, and only 1/4 the projected GDP rate. Kentucky ranks 37 out of 50 for worst run states. Frying pan, meet fire.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Who puts out those studies. CA has the highest poverty rate IN THE USA as of 2012. The only study I could find rates CA Worst run state in the USA. Interestingly Illinois is 49th and UAW home Michigan is 48th. KY is still better run than CA. And treats retirees much better.

    http://247wallst.com/special-report/2011/11/28/best-and-worst-run-states-in-amer- ica-an-analysis-of-all-50/6/

    Yep, the bureau’s “Supplemental Poverty Measure” numbers, culled from 2011 stats, say that …

    … California has a whopping poverty rate of 23.5 percent, meaning that nearly one in every four of us is straight up poor.

    The Golden State ranks number one in poverty, then, beating out all comers (Washington, D.C. came close with a 23.2 percent rate); Florida ranked second among states.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/12/02/is-california-really-americas- -poorest-state/
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    That 24/7 report is based on a set of criteria for what they call the worst run which they don't share. I can make up a study that shows CA as the best run. It's how one twists the data.

    In fact, that article shows that CA has 14.5% of it's population under the poverty line which is 21st highest.

    The second article you post is talking about the supplemental poverty rate which takes cost of housing into account. In a state the size and diversity of California might throw things off as well. The numbers are based on the state but perhaps the high cost of housing in LA, San Jose, and bay area make it seem worse. I'm sure that housing in Stockton is more affordable than in San Francisco.

    All the numbers come from the Census Bureau:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_poverty_rate
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well you live in San Diego, not California :)
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    That 24/7 report is based on a set of criteria for what they call the worst run which they don't share. I can make up a study that shows CA as the best run. It's how one twists the data.

    Nice try at spinning away the facts. Fact is CA is the poorest managed state in the Union.

    All the numbers come from the Census Bureau:

    Yes and the CB has CA the highest poverty in the Nation. DC is the only place higher. I think CA has passed even DC up from what I am reading. The only way to figure poverty is based on the COL to income. CA also has 35% of all the welfare cases in the USA. The word is out. Come to CA hang out at the beach and collect Food Stamps and other handouts.

    Our illustrous Moonbeam also signed a law making it illegal to use E-Verify when hiring. So illegals are flooding the state taking most of the construction work. UNION JOBS that pay $30+ per hour are now being taken by illegals for $10-$12 per hour with the blessing of the state legislature and governor.

    New California law bars E-Verify requirement for employers
    The measure has upset activists against illegal immigration who got some cities to require that businesses check the legal status of workers.

    http://articles.latimes.com/2011/oct/16/local/la-me-e-verify-20111017
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Well you live in San Diego, not California

    The only sane people in the state live South of the LA/OC border. We are outnumbered 2 to 1 by illiterates. We should form a giant Union to fight against the Evil North.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    edited October 2013
    Aesthetic reasons? The Oakland Bay Bridge is the Golden Gate's ugly sister. I imagine there would be EXTREME OUTRAGE if they had a Chinese contractor working on an icon such as the Golden Gate Bridge!

    It's too bad the Bethlehem Steel mill in Bethlehem, PA that forged much of the steel in the Golden Gate Bridge, and much of the NYC skyline, is a hulk that's been rusting away since 1995.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Unfortunately much of the faulty steel in the Bay Bridge is US sourced. Not the Cheap Chinese stuff. Makes the case for US sourcing more difficult to buy.

    Steel Rods: The Latest Metal Sourcing Debacle for SF-Oakland Bay Bridge

    The San Francisco Chronicle reported that “at least 30 of the giant bolts that hold together the new, $6.4 billion eastern span of the Bay Bridge have snapped,” and “as a result, Caltrans is considering replacing all 288 of the bolts on the new bridge before it opens” after Labor Day this year.

    The hitch is that the 17-foot-long steel bolts (rods) were made in the US.

    http://agmetalminer.com/2013/03/28/steel-rods-the-latest-metal-sourcing-debacle-- for-sf-oakland-bay-bridge/
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    But how do you know they're sane? Crazy people always think they're sane. :)
  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    Gary, look at this table;

    http://taxfoundation.org/sites/taxfoundation.org/files/docs/propertytax_county_b- ytaxespaid_average2006-08-20091027.pdf

    What you will notice is, as you say actual tax dollars are tops. Top in Ca. is Marin County. Median property tax bill is $5233 per year. 23 highest. Yet, as a percent of home value, it is .57%, or 1309 in rank. BOTTOM 50% Median home value: $912,000!!!!!

    Top one I see for Kentucky is Oldham County. Median tax bill is $2115. But, Median home value is $229,000. Median tax bill is .92%, or almost DOUBLE Marin County's.

    Another thing that has to be taken into account is the services you get for the tax bill. I recall reading about one school district in Texas wanting to arm their teachers (after Newtown Ct) because if they had a similar situation happen there, police response could be 30 MINUTES becaiuse of the vast area involved!!!

    I know I wouldn't want to live where police response was 30 minutes away for a dire emergency
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I know I wouldn't want to live where police response was 30 minutes away for a dire emergency

    Nor would I. I followed the Sandy Hook massacre very closely. It took the cops 20 minutes to respond to that emergency. The police station that recieved the calls was only 2.1 miles from the school. And this was not a poor community. CT has very high taxes. My guess is the cops were on a Union donut break.

    Top one I see for Kentucky is Oldham County. Median tax bill is $2115. But, Median home value is $229,000. Median tax bill is .92%, or almost DOUBLE Marin County's.

    The $450k home we are considering in KY will have a tax bill of about $3400 per year. Just half of what we pay the state to live in our home in San Diego. The same home in CA would cost a minimum of $2 million, with a $20,000 tax bill at least.

    What that chart does not mention is the fact that many people in CA are paying property taxes based on prop 13. So if their home was worth $100,000 in 1970 they are only paying property tax on a fraction of the actual worth. So your neighbor who bought last year and paid $912,000 is paying multiple times more than the homeowner that has lived in a comparable home for 40 years. Plus that does not include bond issues etc. We just paid $6500 property tax on our home appraised at $540,000. So that is well over 1%.

    As you pointed out a person has to be cognizant of county and city add-ons when considering a place to retire. I would not recommend CA unless you are very rich or dirt poor and able to get on the welfare roles.
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    What that chart does not mention is the fact that many people in CA are paying property taxes based on prop 13.

    I'll also add that Prop 13 was passed by the voters and that's the ONLY reason we have somewhat reasonable property taxes in CA. The CA legislature and governor HATE the fact that they can't easily jack up the property taxes at will - it takes a 2/3rds majority of the legislature.

    So in summary, in CA:

    Property taxes - reasonable, due to Prop 13
    Gasoline taxes - among the highest in the country
    Sales tax - >9% depending upon county, usually 10% or above; among the highest in the country
    Income tax - top marginal tax rate is 13.3%, more than 2 percentage points higher than the next highest state, Hawaii.

    I don't think we have much UAW here any more, either...
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I don't think we have much UAW here any more, either...

    My bet is GM and Toyota were happy to get out of CA. The 4500 UAW members in the Fremont area are probably on the welfare roles to survive. The smart ones took the settlement and got the H*** out of CA. Now the UAW wants a bite of Tesla pie.

    The United Auto Workers has set up an organizing committee at the Tesla Motors plant in Fremont, CA, but says it is meeting with resistance from management despite CEO Elon Musk’s pledge to let the workers decide whether they want union representation.

    UAW President Bob King tells WardsAuto his group is actively looking to recruit workers at the Tesla factory, which is building 400 battery-electric vehicles each week. The plant employs about 2,000 people, but not all are production workers the union is targeting, he says.

    “It’s growing fast,” King says of the support for the committee. Establishing a pro-union committee is only the first step in any UAW organizing drive.

    The UAW has met with Musk, and King says the Tesla founder was “very open and said he would respect what the workers wanted. But his operating management has done the opposite. The operating management has taken a very anti-union stance.

    Musk has hired a union avoidance specialist (union buster) to head HR. He has also rehired former NUMMI managers (non-union) to be used to keep out the union. Rehiring the managers is a classic union busting move. They know who the pro-union workers were and who were the "scabs". They will hired based on a certain profile.... unquestioning obedience.

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023735861
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    Nor would I. I followed the Sandy Hook massacre very closely. It took the cops 20 minutes to respond to that emergency.

    That a BS number. CNN erroneously reported that it took 20 minutes and the conservative blogs and web sites ran with it. In reality Newtown police were on site in under 3 minutes and inside the school in under 5. Even examiner.com - Anschutz's conservative website - reports a short response time based on the actual timeline.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/dispatch-release-911-calls-of-connecticut-shooti- ng-at-sandy-hook-elementary
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    If that is so what happened from 9:20 when the shooting started until the 911 operator supposedly got the call at 9:35? You do know the State of CT has done everything in their power to block the information on those 911 calls and the response time? The state is covering up the information. Why didn't the cops go in through the door Lanza had already shot up? They claim they could not get in the building. You can believe what you like. I know from my experience with getting our local sheriff to respond, you are better off armed and ready to take on intruders.

    Union cops are less than reliable cops. Public employee unions should be banned as FDR believed.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    According to multiple reports the shooting started at 9:30 - not 9:20. You can believe whatever you want.

    I know from my experience with getting our local sheriff to respond, you are better off armed and ready to take on intruders.

    There's a big difference between living way out in the county and having to rely on a sheriff. Newtown is a small, suburban town and had 14 officers on duty that day. It takes less than 7 minutes to get across that town with blue lights flashing.

    This will be my last post on this as it's way off topic.
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    Now the UAW wants a bite of Tesla pie.

    The UAW is like cancer trying to get into your body.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    bit over the top, eh? I should link you to all the anonymous Tesla workers complaining on line about working conditions--but they aren't substantiated, so.....
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    edited November 2013
    bit over the top, eh? I should link you to all the anonymous Tesla workers complaining on line about working conditions--but they aren't substantiated, so.....

    I don't think it was over the top for GM and Ford and Chrysler. The costs, benefits, and "job banks" were a union run amuck, holding the companies hostage to be able to produce product if they didn't get their way. It wasn't about working conditions, it was about "give me more...". Not the same thing at all.

    If Tesla is following all applicable laws, then the employees are certainly free to quit and find another job. That's how the free market works. If there are people ready to fall in line and take those jobs for the same pay, then I'd say that's quite ok. There are certainly lots of other jobs that are unpleasant in various ways, yet employees don't unionize or get ridiculously militant as the UAW has been in the past. Heck, I type a lot for a living and I got a sore index finger joint. I suspect I should have a union protecting me!
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    The UAW is like cancer trying to get into your body.

    That is actually not a bad analogy. The UAW and most unions are NOT all that interested in helping people have a better life. They are interested in building up their ranks and power. I have been in the middle of many campaigns to get people to sign cards and force an election. It is reminiscent of a feeding frenzy by a pride of lions over some poor critter. There are groups of employees that are exploited by corporate greed. Many times that same group become exploited by Union greed.

    I don't think Unions should be allowed to actively recruit people in any business. If the employees feel they are getting a raw deal they should get together and discuss it. Then find a Union they feel will treat them right.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Will this be like radiation therapy for the UAW cancer????

    Court rules Michigan right-to-work law applies to state workers

    The UAW is the bargaining agent for 17,000 Michigan state employees and was a lead plaintiff in the lawsuit challenging the right-to-work bill. The contract covering Michigan state workers is the union’s fourth largest after Ford, Chrysler and General Motors. The unions are considering an appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court.

    The ruling was another setback for the unions, which have proven incapable of mobilizing mass opposition to the right-to-work legislation. Instead, they have limited opposition to legal appeals.


    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/08/17/mich-a17.html
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    The workers, who guard a Dearborn-based Ford plant, alleged that the agreement forced all employees to pay full dues into union coffers and membership played a deciding role in bonuses and promotions.

    “These are bullying tactics unions have chosen to use and obviously an investigation should be launched,” said Annie Patnaude, deputy state director of Americans for Prosperity-Michigan. “Unfortunately, a lot of this has been going on, explicit and implied threats if workers exercise the new freedom.”


    http://freebeacon.com/guards-allegedly-forced-into-union-day-before-right-to-wor- k-implemented/

    If you are a CA tax payer it is the PE Unions that bully the tax payers. Time for a revolt against the Union corruption controlling too many states.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    sore index finger joint

    I think that would be the Service Employees International Union. ;)
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Cancer kills the host, so I think the analogy is much more apt for unregulated capitalism.

    I'd use a UAW analogy more akin to wearing 30 lbs track shoes in a marathon race.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    edited November 2013
    Cancer kills the host, so I think the analogy is much more apt for unregulated capitalism.

    You mean like the UAW killing GM and C? This country became the most powerful on earth with unregulated capitalism. Regressive regulations has it killed the entrepreneurial spirit that made this the greatest country on earth. Now we are on life support from our enemies. While Unions like the UAW made it smarter to use foreign labor. GM is still on Chemo paid for by the tax payers thanks to the UAW. Of course the Feds picking corporate winners and losers with cash infusions has not helped at all.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited November 2013
    Put down the expresso and step back from the hyperbole counter again please. :D

    "Even the roar from Congressional critics about assembly line largesse seemed to miss the fact that (according to the UAW) labor costs account for about 10 percent of the cost of producing a vehicle; the remaining 90 percent includes research and development, parts, advertising, marketing and management overhead." (CBS)

    "And the most recent hourly unit labor cost per new car is about fifteen percent."

    Change in Car Production Costs: the Effects on Dm, Dl, Oh (articlesbase.com)
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    That gave me a good laugh. According to the UAW labor costs are only 10%. Wages are not the big issue. Work rules, jobs bank, legacy costs, strikes for stupid reasons. The UAW workers are not anything special. They are just low education jobs paying more than most manufacturing jobs. Those layed off were given time off with pay. Time they could have spent getting more education. Most didn't so Obama gave them 2+ years of vacation pay.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited November 2013
    oh goodness no! We do not have "unregulated" capitalism in the USA, thankfully. Pure unshackled capitalism is rapacious and always leads to disaster. Ask a Native American looking for a buffalo.

    Nobody killed GMC, unless that emblem I saw on a 2013 pickup yesterday was an aftermarket item.

    If a UAW job is so cushy, maybe you'd be tempted?
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited November 2013
    Fine, it's 15% from my second link.

    Of course, labor is the first thing slashed when profits fall (except executive compensation of course - you know, the people supposedly guiding the company to higher glory).

    To quote Mr. Iacocca, if you can find a better number, link it.

    "Labor costs" btw, typically include wages, taxes and benefits. (businessdictionary.com)
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    edited November 2013
    Crappy product planning and overall defective leadership broke GM and C (and stunted Ford) more than any union. There's a huge amount of blame that belongs to the should-be-hanged white collar set that so few want to admit do any wrong. More of the temporarily embarrassed millionaire syndrome, I think.

    Entrepreneurs the world over still flock to the US to get things going. Maybe not to overpriced poorly managed southern CA, but they come to the US no less.

    If you want low regulation, move to China, see how you like it. Unregulated capitalism surely did not make the US the envy of so many.

    Life support? It's still the most stable place in the world. They don't want to park their often blood covered gold anywhere else.

    So much hyperbole.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    If a UAW job is so cushy, maybe you'd be tempted?

    Who said cushy? Many LOW EDUCATION jobs are hard work. Ditch digging is harder work and I have done that. I was smart enough to go do something else.

    Pure unshackled capitalism is rapacious and always leads to disaster. Ask a Native American looking for a buffalo.

    The country did fine without regulations on capitalism or interference by the Feds. Why don't you ask the Indians why they ran herds of buffalo off of cliffs. Lots of stupidity and waste back then.

    The worst part is the regulation got really going during the FDR presidency. And who did he pick to make the rules? One of the biggest criminal capitalist in US history. Most of the regs help the rich and hold back capitalism. Now we are bogged down with too big to fail. All resulting from over regulation and federal meddling.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    Of course, if the conditions are poor, and the employees are simply replaced at their own request or not, morale will again be a problem with the new employees, eventually productivity and quality will suffer - but it will still be a fault of the worker, not of the useless middle manager or sycophant exec, of course. Even if things are "legal", employers can still be very stupid. Sometimes I am very surprised there aren't more workplace "incidents", and I won't be shocked if that changes.

    This isn't a free market, for another thing.
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    Of course, if the conditions are poor, and the employees are simply replaced at their own request or not, morale will again be a problem with the new employees, eventually productivity and quality will suffer - but it will still be a fault of the worker, not of the useless middle manager or sycophant exec, of course.

    I'm not thinking tha the UAW was a big boost for morale, either. In the more recent years it was a club to maximize extraction of money from the company while limiting flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions.

    Contrary to some recent posts, most of us who are critical of the union are also critical of the management, too. Not at all the hyperbole that management is not being held accountable. But this is a union thread, not the "D3 Management" thread. In that hypothetical thread we would also focus on the management stupidity as a primary topic.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Not at all the hyperbole that management is not being held accountable. But this is a union thread, not the "D3 Management" thread.

    I thought it a given most management are a waste of money and Oxygen. I can count on one hand the competent managers I worked for in my 46 year career. And have some fingers left over. Many when approached by me with a comment on their inability to manage, would tell me I could have the job. I would always ask them if I looked that stupid to take a job in management. I can never remember a time I did not make more than my boss with a little OT. And no, I don't give any credit for that to the Unions I was part of. And to be fair IF I was starting a company I would not hire 90% of the technicians I worked with. The 10% could do as much work and make me money as all the losers combined. My biggest complaint of Union workers is the rut they fall into with the job protection provided by the contracts.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    My biggest complaint of Union workers is the rut they fall into with the job protection provided by the contracts.

    So, what you are really saying is that the union managers are smarter than the company managers, and are able to negotiate contracts more favorable to the workers than to the company.

    Makes sense - the workers plan to be there for decades while the managers only worry about the next quarter.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    edited November 2013
    How much of that lack of adaptation was initiated by lazy listless cradle-to-grave 37 layers of management ivory tower types who were more concerned with the trimmings in their private washroom?

    If you want to play that game. it's a UAW thread, not a "let's find one side to blame for D3 woes and never once mention the other" thread, a game played by a couple of old crones in particular. It's a UAW thread, not a blame thread. In that hypothetical thread, one could blame and blame as they wished.

    Is management being held accountable? Is it being bashed as much as workers? Really? Seriously? No hyperbole - on a nationwide level, the eroding socio-economic climate shows that workers are being punished for something. It also shows that "leadership" are being rewarded more than ever. From what I can see, there are companies with workers more organized than the UAW, and those companies are more successful than the D3. They have much better leadership. They also often aren't located in the US, where calling out someone with a higher salary is seen as some kind of class warfare. It's that simple. For every UAW excess there is at least one leadership failure. The UAW has long been declining in power and influence - but the dumb "leadership" seems as strong as ever.
  • scwmcanscwmcan Member Posts: 399
    In terms of dumb leadership I agree with you, and I am not going to exempt the union leadership either. Both sides were inept, but I think that both sides are much more aware of what they did wrong at this point and are more willing to accept some of the blame. I don't think there is finger pointing going on now though, I think they are trying to work together to improve the product and keep the companies and the jobs alive. Being aware of the past and not repeating the mistakes done the a re a good thing, living in the past is not.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    You need to look at film clips of FDRs funeral procession. I didn't see too many Wall St. types weeping uncontrollably.
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    If you want to play that game. it's a UAW thread, not a "let's find one side to blame for D3 woes and never once mention the other" thread, a game played by a couple of old crones in particular. It's a UAW thread, not a blame thread.

    Nice try. I think most sensible people would agree that both the D3 management and the UAW were an incestuous and tumultuous dysfunctional relationship that helped the D3 focus on anything but making good vehicles. And they spiraled down into the grave as a reluctant team.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    It takes just as much money to build an defective car as a good-working one.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    edited November 2013
    Nobody has denied that ;)

    When it comes down to it though, in my eyes, the leader is supposed to lead. D3 leadership didn't. Execs make the big bucks to not be distracted and to think ahead. They failed, as they do in so many other industries too. I suspect if the workers who build AMG engines and Rolls bodywork volunteered to work for free making so many of the D3 problem child vehicles, the situation would be no better than it is now.
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    Societal and economic trends often tend to develop and revolve over longer periods of time. I think some of the "smart" wealthy are actually starting to get concerned about the evaporating middle class. It's not just that they are essential to a successful capitalistic marketplace either. As discontent and resentment gain ground, things happen that aren't always favorable to the wealthy and that can include crime. More likely, it ranges from a growth in unions and other work actions, to legislation that may be punishing on both companies and wealthy citizens like taxes (remember, it's not just factory workers that can unionize and some of that specialized skill cannot always be off-shored). Minimizing taxes on the rich and espousing this phony "trickle down" crap may still be working. But wait, eventually the masses wake up in a society and the result may end up far more punishing on the well to do than some of the tax and regulatory matters that have been proposed by some legislators today. I think guys like Buffet, Gates and Gross at Pimco get it, but I'm not sure the John Boehner's do. Sadly, America is like many others in that it tends to be reactive rather than proactive, with a result that is less than optimal. The pendulum swings, but not always predictably or in the same pattern.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    The short way to express that (although you did it very well) is:

    "If you take too many chips out of the poker game, the game stops".
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    It'd be interesting to see how many of the wealthy are "smart". I guess we'll see how many have studied history. As soon as the "temporarily embarrassed millionaire" delusion is over, some might rue their actions and thoughts.
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    Hey fin, did you see that Comcast is trying trying to unseat the mayor in Seattle that was trying to bring a faster alternate internet provider into the city? That's why I dislike the communications cartels so much. Just like the UAW, thugs thinking of money instead of doing their customers any good.
  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    "......The $450k home we are considering in KY will have a tax bill of about $3400 per year. Just half of what we pay the state to live in our home in San Diego. The same home in CA would cost a minimum of $2 million, with a $20,000 tax bill at least. "

    I would agree that prop 13 is a big problem. Could be why property values are so high (less incentive to sell, as you get a great "deal" on taxes by living in the older home)

    My point would be what you just said; that a $450K home in Ky is comparable to a $2 MILLION home in Ca. I don't knowwhat County SD is in, but according to that table the $2mil home would have a median prop tax of $11,400 in Marin Co. the $450K home; $2565

    In Oldham Co, a $450K home would pay $4140, as opposed to $18,400
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.