United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

15681011406

Comments

  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    I think it has a lot to do with the psychology of the average American. They like to see themselves as winners and identify with big shots like Donald Trump and Bill Gates with whom they have little in common. They hate to see the reality of themselves as having far more in common with "losers" like the poor schlub who lost his job at the steel mill or the lady who works at Wal~Mart and has no health insurance.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    who is going to buy the stuff like automobiles if regular folks in this country and other 1st world country's like Canada, don't have good paying jobs

    That reminds me - the Canadian auto workers split off from the UAW twenty years ago. Anyone familiar with how they are managing with the auto industry?
  • jd10013jd10013 Member Posts: 779
    Don't worry, the scenario you hope for will eventually be reality.

    to tell you the truth, it already has. only about 10% of the workforce is unionized now, and most of that is government and education. As I said, the UAW is just a throwback to a bygone era, an era marked by some of the worst economic conditions ever seen. Stagflation, the misery index, double digit inflation and interest rates (theoreticly impossible, don't know how carter pulled that off) and double digit unemployment. the more unions that dissappeared the better the economy got. any institution that artifically inflates wages and holds down productivity will do no good for the economy.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    jd10013,

    I find your observation absolutely hilarious when host STEVE, gave several links telling quite the opposite story. Are you sure you live in the same country as me ???? :confuse:

    -Rocky
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    Are you sure you live in the same country as me ????

    "Are you sure you live in the same country as I" (do) :)
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Euphonium,

    I don't know ? The country some have describe sounds nothing like the country where I live ? :confuse:

    -Rocky
  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    If the workers don't group togeather for a common cause who is going to look out for them ? Sure the capitalist response is obtain the neccessary skills, educate, educate, retrain, retrain, etc, a bunch of hyperbole to make your self important to your employer.

    Absolutely!!! Amazing how the double standard allows companies to spend BILLIONS of dollars on lobbyists to to convince (read: PAY OFF) federal, state, and local govenments to give them subsidies and tax breaks and make laws that benefit them, yet if a UNION tries to do this, or threatens w/ a strike, we're seen as evil, anti American, anti Capitalist (how standing up for yourself to get the best deal is anti capitalist is BEYOND me???)and troublemakers.

    When the suits say"No fair" and pick up their toys and go to China and leave us w/o a job, they say "Go to school and train yourself like we did". No mention that this training and re-training costs MONEY that we no longer have cause we're OUT OF A JOB, but that's OK, just borrow the money (let's not mention that they have investments in the credit card comapnies that charge usurious rates that they lobbied to allow and are making money hand over fist).

    What I'd REALLY like to know is how long before they take those jobs we RE-TRAIN for away and send them overseas????
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,701
    It's amazing that many people don't understand if it we not for the unions through the decades their own job's pay and benefits wouldn't be nearly what they are. But the unions have benefited everyone.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    Don't forget to tell them their little ones would still be coming home missing a few digits every now and then too.
  • jd10013jd10013 Member Posts: 779
    find your observation absolutely hilarious when host STEVE, gave several links telling quite the opposite story. Are you sure you live in the same country as me

    were you arround in the 70's? surely you don't think it was better then do you? The numbers I gave you were not made up. there was in fact 10-12% interest rates. try buying a home with those kinds of rates. inflation was likewise running in excess of 10%, and unemployment was arround 12% also. The misery index was created durring the 70's for the explicit purpose of measuring just how bad things were, and stagflation is a real word that was used to describe the economy of the time. stagnant economy with high inflation.

    There is a reason that stupid peanut farmer was trounced in '80, and why reagan was re-elected by the largest landslide in election history.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    We see eye to eye on the late 1970s. I was paying 21% for interim financing to build a couple houses. The interest was about 13% for conventional financing on a home. Killed my desire to build any more houses. People were selling their businesses and putting the money in treasury bonds at 17%. That was the low point in the last 60 years no doubt. Shows what happens when a bonehead tries to control the Fed from the Whitehouse.
  • fezofezo Member Posts: 10,386
    Let's get it straight, however. The misery index was created during the Ford administration.

    Carter just continued the mess that was there.
    2015 Mazda 6 Grand Touring, 2014 Mazda 3 Sport Hatchback, 1999 Mazda Miata 2004 Toyota Camry LE, 1999.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    That leaves a lot of room for debate that is far away from the UAW problems. I don't think Ford or Carter did any thing to help the working man much less the Union worker. I know for a fact that Carter wiped out a lot of small farmers with his ignorance. My farming experience was trashed by high interest and a poor economy.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I agree both indeed had some bad judgement on domestic issues. It didn't get much prettier in the 80's as that was the era of Reaganomics, and manufactoring took some major blows as Reagan, introduced tax breaks for off-shoring business which lead to a major decline in union membership. I talked to dad about the 80's at GM, last sunday. I didn't realize dad, was called back and laid-off so many times. He said their was 3 major lay-offs that were for extended periods of time. He said though he went through a few periods of working for a few weeks and then bam back to being laid-off. I was like wow I thought it only happened to ya like 2 or 3 times. He said that is one reason why so many took the buy-out in the 80's and got more stable jobs.

    I dropped off my resume at Delphi, yesterday. My step-dad thinks they will be hirring within' the next year once these new contracts get off the ground. There are some with recall UAW seniority rights from Coopersville, that are making the transfer.

    -Rocky
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    The 80s was not great for the Unions. It was great for the country to get back to respectability in the World. People became proud to be American.

    We lost most of our Union members when the Pipeline was completed in 1977. The Local 959 went from 25k members to about 12k members.

    My view of the UAW: There control over the operation of the factories was bad for the auto makers and the Union. When the Big 3 needed to modernize the UAW had too much say over what could be done. The Union made it easier to go build factories in Mexico or Canada than fight the UAW over updating the factories in the USA. I also blame the UAW for not being farsighted enough to cut out health benefits for retirees. That is a license to steal for the insurance companies. And that is exactly what they are doing. When you have a goose that is laying golden eggs you protect it. The UAW was not protecting the Big 3 as they could have.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,701
    >He said that is one reason why so many took the buy-out in the 80's and got more stable jobs.

    Some here just worked two jobs reducing the hours on the second job if they were working at the auto-related plants.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...when my Dad was laid off, he would often work odd jobs doing plumbing or electrical work. My Dad really had a talent for electrical work. He should've become an electrician and left that cruddy plant that treated him like crap behind. In the end, they let him go at 60 and he had to start all over like he was 18 again.
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    It is not uncommon for a person 60 and older to go into a different line of work resulting in much financial success.

    "Experience is knowing when you have made the same mistake twice." ;)
  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    Uh, did anyone forget that gas prices went from like 35 cents in 1972 to $1.30 a gallon in 1980???
    Last time I checked, UAW leaders diddn't wear turbans ;)
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    When intelligent and informed union negotiators consider the present status, I would be dissapointed if they urged a strike. In these times it would be preferred that the union gratefully accept what management offers and continue to be submissive in the workplace. Of course the above assumes the union leaders are intelligent and informed. ;)
  • im_brentwoodim_brentwood Member Posts: 4,883
    I take it you haven't paid attention to Ron Gettlefinger lately, eh? ;)

    Delphi: "Were trying to exit bankruptcy and save the company"

    Ron G: "We're sick of Delphi, if they dont give us what we want we'll go on strike"

    Yes, you do that. You shut them down and put them out of business... lose even more jobs, that'll teach em! Solidarity brothers, we'll win the fight!

    Yes, and lose the war, but who's counting?
  • fezofezo Member Posts: 10,386
    Yeah, I can't believe that the UAW isn't a bit less clueless on the vulnerability of the whole house of cards.

    They can negotiate what would be a pretty decent contract and help the situation or they can go on with their long ingrained habit and kill the company.

    I like to think that both sides have learned enough over the years to figure some of this out. You don't just accidentally lose half your market share.
    2015 Mazda 6 Grand Touring, 2014 Mazda 3 Sport Hatchback, 1999 Mazda Miata 2004 Toyota Camry LE, 1999.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    More talking points:

    "The use of temporary workers is actually more important to companies than eliminating the jobs bank, which gets all the attention," said Alan Baum, analyst with the Planning Edge, a Birmingham, Michigan, firm that studies product and production trends. "The companies all want to use more temporary workers," he said."

    GM-UAW Talks: Temporary Workers Are a Sticking Point

    "For the UAW, the risk of jeopardizing the turnarounds of GM, Ford and Chrysler puts union jobs in peril as well. Further, the UAW has shown extreme patience and pragmatism with auto suppliers in terms of continuing to negotiate without striking. Look how long the UAW negotiated with bankrupt auto supplier Delphi to achieve its goals without a strike."

    UAW-Big Three Talks: The Clock Is Ticking

    A MarketWatch commentator suggests there could be a short strike against GM to allow UAW workers to let off some steam.

    The political season is gearing up fast - is there any reason to think that the UAW would call a strike, even a short one, to help weed out candidates the union would support?
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I can't see a strike being in the best interest of the UAW members. I also understand the problem with temps. The temps that Toyota hires could be what pushes their workers into the arms of the UAW. There should be laws limiting temporary workers. Being a temp for 8-10 years is not right. It is a cruel tool of the mega corporations.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Delphi, went into bankruptcy to break the UAW, here in North America. The bottom line is it's foreign operations was still making the company billions and they still have several billions in disposable cash stashed away in foreign banks. Only 6 or 7 plants remain here in the U.S. and the UAW workers went from making $28 an hour to $14 an hour a 50% cut in just wages. They have no optical insurance and the health care and dental insurance they have isn't nearly as good as what my father had and don't get me started on retirement. :sick:

    The UAW-GM, workers are faced with similar terms and conditions. I doubt we will see terms and conditions as bad as those the Delphi, workers accepted. :sick:

    -Rocky
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Rocky,
    There will never be contracts like your dad and I worked under. Too many outside forces are working against the working man. I watched our health care go from 100% medical, dental & eycare for life, to 70% medical, 50% dental and $100 per year in eyecare. All under a Teamster provided plan. When I retired it was costing the company over $5 per hour for that lousy coverage. Health care costs are out of control. It is not GMs or the UAWs fault. It is our society that has to have every medical test under the sun, to cover the Drs. behind. Those MRI machines in every hospital cost over a million dollars, plus routine maintenance. Don't get me started on malpractice insurance. That costs you and I a bunch out of every office visit. You can thank hacks like John Edwards for those high premiums. He has a 28,000 square foot mansion built on malpractice lawsuits. Think anyone he represented can afford that kind of home???

    In about 1989 we lost our Fitness centers with free membership & 100% legal paid. Got 2 divorces all paid for via our free legal. Our 2006 contract was cut up after I left the bargaining unit. The guys left behind have less sick leave and vacation. It is bleak being a Union member. Even worse working for a non-union company.

    WalMart anyone????

    I have to say again. THIS IS NOT A GOOD TIME TO STRIKE. Take the cuts and see if the Big 3 gain any market share. Don't give the automakers reason to go to Mexico or China.

    PS
    I am paying for my own insurance under Kaiser. It is better coverage for less money.
  • jd10013jd10013 Member Posts: 779
    yes, you are correct
  • jd10013jd10013 Member Posts: 779
    The 80's were a tremendous time. It was the largest peace time expansion of the economy since the end of WWII. but not all of the 80's were. It did take a couple years for reagan to straighten things out. He was actually very unpopular in 81 & 82. The tax breaks worked flawlessly. The thing about tax breaks for business's is it get them to spend, invest, grow, and as a result; hire more people.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    It is basically common knowledge the "Trickel Down Theory" did not work then and it sure in the hell isn't working today. :mad:

    The bottom line is Reagan, gave tax breaks to business that off-shored or went south of the border thus that is why you saw such a expansion of manufactoring fleeing the country leaving empty buildings that once employed americans with good jobs. We once upon a time had a solid balance of service and manufactoring jobs. Now both fields have been expolited thanks to the foreign workers here legally and illegally andofcourseperforming the work over sea's. Free Trade, has been the biggest economic disaster on record.

    However gagrice, is right about the reasons why health care is so expensive. I'll add that the illegal alien problem surely has contributed to it as much if not more to the sheer cost of health care as the uninsured. :(

    -Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    100% agree, gagrice ;)

    -Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I have to say again. THIS IS NOT A GOOD TIME TO STRIKE. Take the cuts and see if the Big 3 gain any market share. Don't give the automakers reason to go to Mexico or China.

    I personally think they are going regardless.......I however do agree the UAW, should take some concessions but I don't think it would be fair for the UAW, to roll over and die either this contract. I think because the UAW, will ultimately end up taking concessions they should get something in return. Signed promises of X amount of new plants and other investments to be built by UAW workers.

    -Rocky
  • jd10013jd10013 Member Posts: 779
    It is basically common knowledge the "Trickel Down Theory" did not work then and it sure in the hell isn't working today

    How do you figure? reagans economic expansion was the larest since the post war boom, and was a complet 180 degre turnaround from the previous 10 years. The proof of reagans policis is in the way people view him. As I said before, he was relected in the largest landslide in the countries history. only lost 1 state, and that was mondale's home state of MN. George H.W. bush was elected entirely on reagans coattails. and lastly, when the man died, he was mourned for a week, with millions lining up to view his casket.

    The only people that considered "reaganomics" a failure were a small smattering of people who just don't like republicans. The vast majoity of the country agreed 100% with his econmic policies becaue they worked.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    The only people I know that liked Ronald Reagan, are hard core pseudo-capitalist.

    The vast majoity of the country agreed 100% with his econmic policies becaue they worked.

    I think Ross Perot, explained that one to the country 15 years ago and when people were laughing at him then aren't laughing at him now. ;) We had the big economic spike in the 90's and we are sliding down the slope and are barely dodging the trees. At some point we are going to crash and burn. :sick:

    -Rocky
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    is our society that has to have every medical test under the sun, to cover the Drs. behind.

    Lots of docs own testing labs (and hospitals too) and send themselves business. It's called self-referring. As always, follow the money. Kaiser is one of the insurance companies trying to crack down on the unneeded testing (link). Lots of good reading out there about defensive medicine, but it's not related to the UAW so I'll quit there.

    Re the UAW, I'm not convinced that the rank and file would avoid a strike at all costs. Lots of them have seen their pay and hours get attacked while the middle managers and higher level folks screw up in various ways yet still get paychecks (and bonuses). Some of the rank and file think their union bosses are too friendly with management as well and are going wonder what was left at the bargaining table when a proposed contract deal is made.

    I wonder how long the billion dollar UAW strike fund would last? (Detroit News)

    Oh, and the deadline has passed - GM, UAW contract extended "hour-to-hour". (Reuters)
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Thanks for the links Steve......Sounds like things are really heating up. :surprise:

    -Rocky
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Or it could all just be eight weeks of posturing and they'll have a new contract agreeable to the rank and file by morning. :P
  • im_brentwoodim_brentwood Member Posts: 4,883
    Bingo!

    These contracts, while great for workers, are no longer sustainable. It reminds me of the buggy whip speech that Danny DeVito made in the movie "Other People's Money".

    The truth of the matter is that the market has changed drastically, and it's either adapt or die. In a perfect world it would be 1955 all over again, 97% of the cars sold here would be made here, we would be the world's dominant economy, life would be great and it would eb sunny every day.

    Guess what, that only exists in TV Land reruns anymore.

    THIS IS NOT A GOOD TIME TO STRIKE. Take the cuts and see if the Big 3 gain any market share. Don't give the automakers reason to go to Mexico or China.

    Best statement I've seen in here yet.

    And those Delphi workers who took a pay cut seem to have had choices... the other choice was vote against the new contract and lose their jobs.
  • volvomaxvolvomax Member Posts: 5,238
    I am probably going to piss you off for what I am about to say,but it isn't my intention.
    Frankly, I can't see how you or anyone else who bolts cars together for a living is worth that kind of a contract.
    It isn't rocket science,or brain surgery,its assembling cars. To be fair, I also don't think the execs are worth their compensation either. the difference is,it is easier to fire the execs.
    I am a firm believer that compensation should match performance.
    If I don't sell a car,I don't get paid.
    I'm not saying you don't deserve a living wage,but union contracts have gone so far beyond that,its ridiculous.
    The UAW is blind if they think that they can continue to live in the past. the American auto indusstry simply cannot continue to support those contracts. They just can't.
  • iluvmysephia1iluvmysephia1 Member Posts: 7,709
    I agree with you completely and I think the majority of the posters here agree with you, too. What the UAW is asking is uncomprehensible in this day of intense foreign competition. If GM was taking the lion's share of the world's market and had a lot more stellar build reputation they could ask perhaps 65% of what they are striking for or feeling like they are owed. Simply as dumb as a city like OKC getting the Seattle Supersonics, these UAW workers demanding and historically getting what they've gotten.

    2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick

  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    If you don't want to piss people off, then RE-WORD your statements.

    Frankly, I can't see how you or anyone else who bolts cars together for a living is worth that kind of a contract.

    Only pompous, arrogant people make comments like that. Who are YOU to assert what someone is "worth"??? They assemble cars that cost between $15-70K, so I think getting $25-35/hr is just fine. It's not your, mine or their fault that there are 12 MILLION people here that don't belong here who use OUR hospitals as PCP's and pay NOTHING!!!! It's not our fault that someone comes out of surgery w/ a scratch that wasn't there before and thinks they're entitled to $250,000 pain and suffering.

    It isn't rocket science,or brain surgery,:

    Who the hell is a brain surgeon to hold MY life hostage for $100,000 surgery, if I can't afford to pay??? If they're worth that, then a blue collar worker is worth $30/hr!!!!

    the difference is,it is easier to fire the execs.:
    Sure, for several million dollars. You think they'll leave just because you tell them to??? Not a shot in HELL!!! Look at that fat cat running Chrysler: on a $200 MILLION golden parachute from Home Depot? Hell, fire me and give me $1 mil, and I'll go work for peanuts somewhere else.

    Think about that; ONE PERSON gets 200 MIL, and nobody says boo, yet they ask for fully paid healthcare for the rest of their lives, and EVERYBODY is in an uproar.

    I'll guarantee it costs GM MORE to pay off the last 5 guys that ran them and their mistakes plus the next 5 guys and THEIR mistakes than it will to pay the healthcare of all the unionized workers.
    Hell the $2 BILLION they pissed away on FIAT would more than pay for the VEBA GM wants to set up for the UAW.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Substitute VW for GM and you'll find similar issues. VW wants to cut pay and raise working hours. The union is fighting. I think all the EU and Japanese majors have had tough negotiations with their unions and I don't think that the UAW workers are in as weak a position as some of the pundits claim.

    Some recent links:

    Auto, electronics workers get pay hikes (Japan Times)

    Union warns Porsche on changing rules at VW (MSNBC)

    Strike closes EC’s auto giants (Dispatch Online, South Africa - Sep 13, 2007)

    "Union leaders accepted Hyundai's offer of a 5.8 percent increase in basic monthly salary for each worker, an increase in the annual bonus, and a pair of separate lump-sum payments, the two sides said."
    Hyundai has tentative union contract (Detroit News)

    Bajaj Auto offers talks with Akurdi unions next week (The Economic Times, India)
  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    intense foreign competition

    That's it, send ALL OUR MONEY overseas, we'll just print more.
  • volvomaxvolvomax Member Posts: 5,238
    cooter,it is the market that assesses worth.
    How hard you are to replace as a worker determines your worth.Since auto assembly doesn't require any special skills or education,line workers are easily replaceable.
    Now, paying someone $25/hr isn't the issue.
    It is ALL the other compensation that is over the top.
    Compensation that people with more valuable skills don't recieve.
    I am not blaming the UAW for getting these contracts in the first place,the manufacturers deserve their share of blame.
    However, the market conditions have changed,and it is no longer realistic for the UAW to demand this kind of compensation. If they persist,they will simply find themselves without jobs,and consequently without any members.
  • volvomaxvolvomax Member Posts: 5,238
    intense foreign competition

    That's it, send ALL OUR MONEY overseas, we'll just print more.


    Don't be silly.
    Remember all the foreign automakers that have plants here?
    Why is that exactly?
    Because it makes more financial sense to build cars here than in their home countries.
  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    Compensation that people with more valuable skills don't recieve.

    You don't receive it, because you don't demand it. I demand it, I GET IT: FULLY PAID HEALTHCARE, VISION, AND DENTAL, with NO CO-PAY on PREMIUMS.

    As far as the American car market goes, I don't think GM, Ford, and Chrysler will take their toys and go running to China and India to build their cars if they don't get their way. There would be TREMENDOUS backlash if they did. In the same way Toyota, Honda, and Nissan (as well as Hyundai and the Germans) will never abandon the US manufacturing segemnt: There are too many people here that wont accept that part of manufacturing leaving the US. The [non-permissible content removed] Big 3 don't like to wave Old Glory over their products for fun, they see the value in their products being "US MADE". The main reason they aren't unionized is because considering the part of the country they manufacture in, it's tough to convince the workers otherwise. They probably have it better than they ever have anyways. If they DID unionize, rest assured the foreign manufactuers wouldn't go anywhere. Old Glory is TOO VALUABLE a marketing asset.

    BTW, it's pretty cynical to bash the UAW over a "potential" strike. While I wont say it WONT happen, considering both sides are negotiating I'd have to say the beancounters on BOTH sides have told them what they can afford, and it probably will come down to who blinks first.
    After that, both sides will go home and declare victory, saying they are satisfied w/ the new contract.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Well selling cars like you did or do isn't exactly brain surgery either but some of your colleagues make a six- figure income doing it not to mention benefits and perks.

    I'll say this volvomax, not all jobs in those autoplants are as easy as you think and many require skills or OJT to become proficient. My father's job he taught to his replacement for 4 months and the guy still was only adequate dad said at best.

    -Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    cooterbfd,

    That is probably the best post I've ever read in this forum including it's past names/titles. ;)

    -Rocky
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    If they DID unionize, rest assured the foreign manufacturers wouldn't go anywhere. Old Glory is TOO VALUABLE a marketing asset.

    I have to agree. A Japanese company that pulled up and took off if they lost an election to the UAW would be lambasted in the press. They would just have to negotiate and quit treating their employees as a disposable commodity. I would love to see a couple Toyota plants go Union. Level out the playing field.

    If our government had any huevos they would add a healthy tariff to every car built outside the USA. Especially from Japan. Play their game for a while and see how they like it.

    The Japanese do a much better job of protecting their workforce at home than we do.
  • im_brentwoodim_brentwood Member Posts: 4,883
    Hello and welcome to the 21st century.

    Here's the problem, Health car costs have skyrocketed. Foreign competition is generally not unionized and therefore has a substantial cost advantage over the domestic manufacturers.

    Long term one of two things is going to happen...

    1) Detroit will continue with their enormous retiree and current employee costs. They will continue to struggle and, eventually, end up like British Leyland (BL alone is reason enough to dislike unions). You'll all be out of work.

    2) Detroit will be forced to continue to move production to foreign countries. UAW membership ranks will dwindle.

    3) The UAW will wake up and realize that keeping their members employed is their primary objective and work with Detroit.

    Pick one of the three. But free full benefits for life is simply not sustainable with the way the market has adapted. Period.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.