Subaru Crew - Meet The Members

1111214161758

Comments

  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    After browsing the Subaru Crew for a while, we finally bit the bullet and took delivery of a winestone '00 OB Wagon last night. Can't thank everyone enough for sharing their knowledge of their Subaru's here - it really helped!

    When's it going to snow?
  • vince14vince14 Member Posts: 55
    Hello everyone, Juice and MIke, I've not posted here for months, extremely busy, and I figured you all need a break.... anyway, up to 18000 miles of my 2k OB LTd, 25 mpg, mostly heavy-footed highway.
    Only major problem was the cd changer needing replacement.
    Still think its a great looking car, black is a tough color to maintain, wish I has a little more power, think there is too much vibration and roughness and I hate the split on the front bumper that makes it look like its falling apart. I do miss my Forester, too, though I think I would have tickets by now, the super responsiveness made me too aggressive.
    Regard all, Vince 14
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Congrats! It's a nice car, and a nice color.

    Enjoy the ride.

    Craig
  • dzartmandzartman Member Posts: 112
    Did someone mention that SOA will introduce a low range tranny in OB's in 2001?
  • originalbitmanoriginalbitman Member Posts: 920
    Well my 2000 Legacy GT wagon seems to have found a nice spot at perhaps 1/4 inch lower on the drivers side. I think I have taken my last measurement and I am sure you are all happy to hear that. I have over 500 miles on it now in a little over a week and must say I have enjoyed every one of them. This thing handles wonderfully... either that or I have been driving my '83 Honda wagon and '49 Stude pickup too long.

    My latest nit to pick is the rocker panel aero cladding. Not sure I wouldn't like the car better without it. Anybody know how it is attached? Are they glued in addition to the fasteners? Also, if I add the Borla headers will I void any part of my warranty?

    Thanks again... this is a great board.

    Bitman
  • evernden1evernden1 Member Posts: 2
    I'm considering a new ob 2000 (auto). I am hearing stories of being underpowered. Can any on help with this. evernden1
  • evernden1evernden1 Member Posts: 2
    I'm considering a new ob 2000 ltd(auto). I am hearing stories of being underpowered. Can any on help with this. evernden1
  • originalbitmanoriginalbitman Member Posts: 920
    We had the same concern when we were considering the Subaru. We ended up renting a 2000 OB auto packed it full of all of our camping gear, our dog and an extra 50 pound bag of cat litter for a trip to the Sierras. Drove interstate and 2 lane up to 6000 feet without a problem at all. Plenty of power to keep up with traffic (75+) and to pass. It never struggled once during the climb.

    We now own a 2000 Legacy GT. We bought it with a stick not so much for power as for fun to drive. And it is. We love it.


    Bitman
  • mcj13mcj13 Member Posts: 85
    Some folks just want more power and some (fewer) folks need more power, but by 2000 all the Legacy's and the Outback wagon have the larger engine and plenty of horsepower for most purposes.

    Unless you need or really want more power, you're just wasting money at the pump.

    If you can, try a test drive like Bitman's--ideal.

    Mary
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    Aha! And here I thought I was the only Stude-Sube owner out here. Is yours a 2R5? We can take this offline since this is a Subaru forum.

    Ed (a/k/a lark6)
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I ended up with a trooper cause of the lack of get-up and go on the legacy/OB. It's fine if you don't regularly haul a tons of people. It was great with me and a single passenger, once I loaded 5 200lb guys in it, it couldn't get out of it's own way for stop and go/on ramp acceleration. Just make sure to test it in the conditions you'll use it in most and take it from there.

    -mike
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    re#696 dzartman:

    Actually that would be going back to the past. Subarus throughout the 80's and into the early 90's had dual range trannies. They went away for North America but the rest of the world still has them. I imagine they'll come back to the US if there's demand and market.

    -Colin
  • originalbitmanoriginalbitman Member Posts: 920
    Yup 2R5. Email me at mike@bitman.com and we can chat.
    Bitman
  • originalbitmanoriginalbitman Member Posts: 920
    Now that we know there are 2 Stude owners here are there any other Fiat Topolino owners?

    bit
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    2 Studes? Small world. Hey, my mom has a Fiat, but it's in Brazil, an Uno Mille.

    That Impreza wagon photo was too small to tell much, but it does look sporty rather than boxy and functional. Oh well, I can always pack light!

    Ross - nice photos! Were you tempted NOT to wash it, to get comments from bystanders?

    Brian - congrats and welcome to the Crew. You'll soon be praying for snow like the rest of us, and contemplating a move to Buffalo ;)

    Low range? I may have wished for that out loud. The ST-X had it, plus 8.5" of clearance, so to me that sent a subtle hint at where they could go. It would make sense for the Outback and Forester to distinguish them from the Legacy/Impreza models more.

    Bitman: the fender flares are attached with a combination of two-side tape and a few bolts, so the rocker panel molding may mount in a similar fashion.

    evernden1: if you find the Outback underpowered, don't forget to look at the GT. It has smaller diameter tires to give it a 7% edge in gearing, plus it's lighter. While Outbacks have been clocked at around 10 seconds to 60mph, the GT in Autoweek's fleet hit 60 in 8.7 seconds. That's faster than their Passat 4Motion V6!

    -juice
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Juice,
    The GT wagon is actually heavier than the OB wagon... The OB Wagon Ltd is 50 or 100 lbs heavier than the GT wagon, but those glass rooves kill the GT Wagon's weight.

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I was comparing top-end models.

    Let's see, the brochure lists the Outbacks from 3415 to 3565. The GT is 3440 to 3505, so they overlap, with higher-end GTs having a slight advantage.

    7% is plenty in gearing, though. It makes up for about 200 pounds.

    -juice
  • aussierooaussieroo Member Posts: 78
    G'Day boys & Girls

    I am a new forester owner from Australia. Our cars are different to yours. We can get the mother of all WRX's here too. If anybody is interested just say so.
  • needarideneedaride Member Posts: 7
    My 1988 GL wagon just drove off into the sunset with a new owner. It had given me over 12 years and 188,495 miles of dependable, affordable performance. It was the last new car I bought (and may remain so). It has been on virtually every mile of paved highway in the state of Idaho (and a lot of unpaved miles) as well as all over Washington, Oregon and Western Montana.

    It brought our first child home from the hospital in a foot of fresh January snow in Sandpoint, Idaho. When it was but a few months old it crawled down the walls of the Owyhee River Canyon in Eastern Oregon to go bass fishing. It pulled my full-sized father-in-law and me right up out of that canyon, nice and easy. It has traveled 400 miles in winter storms on mountain roads. It has faced down a cow moose and her calf on a deserted logging road in northern Idaho. It has taken me skiing all around the Northwest and pulled our little fishing boat out of Coeur D' Alene Lake, Hayden Lake, Lake Pend O'Reille, and Priest Lake countless times.

    The most expensive shop bill was a little over $600 (twice). The majority were under $300, usually for the timing belts, which gave out religiously at 60,000-mile intervals. It only left us stranded once, in the middle of the night, on the Highway 95 shortcut outside of Grangeville, ID. (Thank you to the owners of the farmhouse in the middle of nowhere for being home and having a phone!)

    I had been looking to replace it because my body (not hers) had deteriorated over the years and didn't fit like it used to when it was new and I was young. I don't imagine the extra fifty pounds (mine) helped much either! A little over a month ago I pulled the driver's seat out and drilled new holes for mounting the seat to the track. It gave me almost 2 more inches of travel. What an incredible difference!

    But days later I found a beautiful ‘99 Bonneville that was too good to pass up. Very comfortable and befitting my daily commute from Vancouver, Washington through Portland, Oregon. It was too late. I had gone too far down the car-shopping path.

    There was still some hope for hanging on to my beloved Subaru. You see, we then had three cars and we agreed to put two up for sale and see which one sold first. A ‘93 Aerostar and my 'ru. Both clean and well priced. We put an ad in the paper. Within days the Subaru sold to the first caller.

    I think it went to a good home. I agreed to give it a fresh coat of wax if the new owner would let me keep it just for one more weekend. I am confident that it will have no trouble hitting 300K if they give it the same care.

    During my car search, I found this forum to be by far the most helpful, and the community of Subie owners to be by far the most devoted to their cars. I learned several interesting things. My soob had the old 1.8L engine, which was the only other knock against it. It just wasn't conducive to entering the freeways on my daily commute. But it did have the dual transfer case which I absolutely loved and I understand is not currently available. I would love to see that come back. I also have been intrigued by the rumors I've seen here about a possible six-cylinder HO engine in the future, perhaps around a 3.0 L? Now if we could just get a little more travel in the driver’s seat for us 6 ft. and up types.

    I must say that new Subarus carry a bit more relative sticker shock than they did when we had our first. It will be a while before we'll be ready for that again but I'm a true 'ru believer and I know the economy experienced over the years of ownership. (I don't think my Aerostar has had a repair bill UNDER $600.)

    We do plan to replace the van soon and I am slowly working on my better half to try to get her to drive an Outback or a Forrester. I know we can't go new but we are also not in any particular hurry so I will keep lurking here and keep my eyes out for those first lease returns of 3.0L HO Sube's with the dual transfer case.

    My apologies for the length but I knew that only Sube owners would understand the bittersweet (dare I say horizontally-opposed) feeling of a new car in the driveway, a wad of cash in your hand and watching your trusty ol' ru drive off in the arms of another.

    May the road rise up to meet you and your 'ru.

    DS.
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    I understand you very well. When my husband decided to sell his 93' Loyale wagon (1.8L was not powerful enough for him on freeway merging), I could not resist but trying to talk perspective buyers out of buying our good old soob. Still, it was gone within couple of days...

    I dread the time when I have to part with my 92'Loyale... it was my first ever brand new car, and it still (100k) runs great.
    Strangely, acceleration improved over time, and now I have no trouble merging or going steep uphill with A/C at highest (4th) setting. No repairs to speak of, just maintenance.

    Also strange, neither me or my hubby has developed ANY attachment to Accord EX that replaced 93'Loyale...
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Aussieroo: what model do you have? The 2.0l? The turbo? Got any photos to share with us?

    DS: great story. I'm sure in 5 years you're going to wonder why you ever got rid of ol' faithful.

    Accords have no character. They work like a good fridge, but how many of us become attached to an appliance?

    My cousin sold her '88 Loyale, but at least she replaced it with a '99 Outback. Plus, the loyal old friend was sold to her nephew.

    Still runs great, BTW.

    -juice
  • mcj13mcj13 Member Posts: 85
    Thanks for your sentiments, Mary
  • xsexse Member Posts: 66
    Im very interested in the Forester S w/ that gigantic sunroof.
    I really have loved the Forester for a while and like the facelift.
    Never owned a subaru and would like comments on the long term reliability, initial impressions of other forester buyers, etc

    thanks!
    ps-looking through some of the posts, its nice to come across a civil message board!
  • nvynvy Member Posts: 74
    I agree!

    Old Subarus are like family members that way.
    You won't forget them. When you depend on
    something this long......well, lets just say
    we appreciate them.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Civil? You should see the heated debate on the VDC in the Future Models topic ;)

    So you too are enamoured by the S Premium, with that gargantuan moonroof. I can't blame you, I also like the monotone look and the face lift.

    I have 29k miles and have only been to the dealer a single time, and that was for a recall. I've done only oil changes and tire rotations so far.

    I compared it to:

    Passat - fun but less utility
    Accord - snoozer
    CR-V - slow and tippy, pass the dramamine
    RAV4 - too small to be useful, a bit slow
    Durango - back breaker ride, gas guzzler
    Outback - didn't seem as fun as Forester

    So I chose the Forester and have no regrets. It's fun to drive, economical (26.4mpg since April), and offers plenty of utility (roof rack, trailer hitch just added, big cargo area).

    We have one baby and a nanny, so the four of us have plenty of space. Big families are probably better off in the Outback.

    Check out my home page directory for plenty of photos. You'll find that few people are as enthusiastic about there cars as the Crew.

    -juice
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Speaking of my home page, it's just been updated.

    Here is my trailer hitch and bike rack. I chose this because I can still use the roof for cargo, plus I could rent a small trailer if needed.

    Hmm, how about a pair of jet skis to go with the hitch?

    Also, here is my rear differential protector. This was the easier of the two to install, though I'm happy with both. The metal is impressively thick and sturdy.

    The hitch and bike carrier are sold seperately, so it'll cost you more than the roof carrier, but it's also more versatile. The rear diffy skid plate is just $55 from Darlene and I'd recommend it to everyone.

    -juice
  • mr_markmr_mark Member Posts: 4
    Hello all!

    I just got my 2001 Forester S auto two weeks ago. So far I love it! Shopped around and compared it with a lot of other vehicles and chose the Forester.

    I have noticed the "click" when my auto trans shifts from second to third sometimes. I understand from reading some earlier posts that it is the transfer case changing the torque distribution front to rear?

    I ordered the hitch mount bike rack and some other goodies from Darlene on Friday. I had the hitch installed at the dealer.

    Anyway, just thought I'd drop a line and introduce myself. This is my first Subaru and I hope it proves to be a good vehicle.
  • dzartmandzartman Member Posts: 112
    Don't hold back, let us know about the WRX! also soo the Subaru Modifications topic, you'll find Scooby owners there who are more into that sort of ride than people here
  • aussierooaussieroo Member Posts: 78
    #713 juice: Its a new 2000 model forester limited
    manual (dual transmission) stop drooling fellahs we only have 2.0 litre engines and no LSD. no pics as yet.

    #720 dzartman: Check out SoAus's website following. all models of available aussie soobs are here.

    http://www.subaru.com.au
  • centavocentavo Member Posts: 24
    Do you have the self leveling suspension? I have on my Forester; just when I was ready to order a trailer hitch I received the information that there are a different hitch for this suspension. Do you have any idea?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That's interesting. I've also heard the springs are different in the rear with the self-leveling suspension, so if you get a lift kit keep that in mind.

    I didn't see where the hitch would differ, though. The mounting point are pretty far back. Who told you that, centavo?

    So, you get the low range, but the 2.0l engine? Probably because fuel costs more there. That way you get good efficiency, but enough torque when you need it with the low range.

    Mark: welcome to the Crew. You were smart to get the hitch from the dealer - I have scathed knuckles to prove it!

    You'll like the bike rack. It folds out of the way nicely, so you can access the cargo hold. It secures the bikes better than I expected, too, and should not cause any wind noise. The only con is it blocks the rear view a bit.

    If it's easier for you, just e-mail a photo to me and I'll put it up on my site for you.

    -juice
  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    Subaru of America, Inc. Reports Record Sales for July; Brand Posts Best July
    Sales Month in 14 Years...(Subaru of America) Subaru of America, Inc. (SOA)
    announced record sales figures for the month of July. Subaru recorded a
    sales total of 15,041 units for the month, an increase of 14 percent from
    the same period last year. Subaru continues to post strong sales increases,
    with year-to-date totals of 98,392 units, up 15 percent from 1999
    year-to-date totals of 85,478 units. This marks the company's best July
    total sales month since 1986.
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Just yesterday, I went to a local Japanese bookstore and bought one of those expensive magazines ($30!!) that feature a particular car model. Naturally, I picked up the one featuring the Forester. Lot's of cool photos showing pictures of various tricked-out models in Japan, tons of accessories and a DIY page.

    One of the interesting features of the magazine was an interview with three original Subaru engineers who were responsible for designing the Forester. A couple of interesting tidbits of info:

    - The Forester development team came directly from the Impreza team (not suprisingly)
    - The development of the Forester actually started before the RAV4 and CR-V hit the market (it wasn't a me-too concept as often perceived)
    - Apparently, LOTS of thought went into the 7.5" (200mm) of ground clearance. The engineers felt that this was the optimum height to trade off on-road and off-road performance.
    - The EJ20 turbo engine was the first choice of powerplants but it was tuned for mid-range torque to better match the Forester's softer suspension.
    - The 2.0L N/A engine was offered primarily for the European market. The low-range was specifically added for this engine to allow the driver to be able to have access to torque at all speeds.
    - The biggest challenge for the US market, according to the engineers, was to tune-down the exhaust note on the 2.5L engines. They apparently had to play around a bit with the exhaust to get the sound down (wonder what it did to performance?).
    - The AT shift pattern for the US was detuned so there would be less up/down shifting. Again their market research indicated that US drivers dislike AT systems that change gears too often.
  • xsexse Member Posts: 66
    checked out the S model and really love it. the leather is nice.
    i didnt realize there was so much off-road optioning on it (diff. sikd plate,etc) and the price! what a steal!
    i own an xterra also, and love it but i have to say this board is so much more open and friendly.
    i'll give my test drive impressions soon!
    thanks for all the info
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    See what I mean? They drop the low-end models, raise prices, add content, and sales go way up. They're really polishing their image.

    Cool info, Ken. I remember the Streega concept that preceeded the Forester (anyone else?). Subaru often has ugly concepts that look much better in production, the opposite of most car companies. I like the ST-X right off the bat, but the Fleet-X and Forester Woody hurt my eyes.

    I'll bet they looked at the Explorer and Blazer, which had the highest volume when the Forester was being created. They managed to match the higher SUV's ground clearance while maintaining a low center of gravity. The handling was what sold me on the Forester, especially compared to the RAV4 and CR-V. I'm glad they fought over that.

    The 2.5l has tons of potential. Maybe that silencer box up front does subtract a couple of ponies. Remember Mitsubishi's variable exhaust noise on the 3000GT? Too bad it didn't help power any!

    -juice
  • mybabyumybabyu Member Posts: 3
    Hi guys --what a pleasure to have read all the commentary for a year -- finally decided to give up my 1985 GL 10 wagon with only 109,000 california/Iowa miles on it. I know saying goodbye won't be easy... there's nothing really WRONG -- the mileage is exceptional --except the rust will continue... I'll probably have to leave it in the center of town with a "free to a good home" sign on it and then quickly walk away... am moving to the mountains of North Carolina and about to purchase the 2001 S Forester and am debating whether to get the Premium package or not -- I don't really love the
    monotone -- any thoughts on other extras? Am working with a nice dealer in Omaha -- Stan Olsen Auto-- will let you know the price,etc.. mel
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Mel: you sure you don't just want to keep it? Another idea is to donate it - you get the tax deduction and warm feelings all over. :)

    Premium package: YES, PLEASE! That moonroof is SWEEEEET! You'll be envied, trust me. The side air bags are a plus, and I really like the monotone (but not the gold accent wheels). For the price of the package, it's the best deal Subaru offers period.

    -juice
  • aussierooaussieroo Member Posts: 78
    centavo: yes i do have the asls and i would not think it would need a special TOW BAR nothing in the documentation here suggests that you do.

    juice: yes our juice is expensive by comparison with the us (as high as 60 cents us per litre) compared to europe we get ours at givaway prices. you would need three jobs over there to run a bicycle let alone a car
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    If you're choosing between S and S Premium, I'd suggest Premium: side-airbags alone justify the difference in price. I also did not like wheels on S but really liked wheels on S+. The golden accents are VERY subtle and wheels on S+ look basically silver, however, spikes on S+ wheels are more stylish as compared to S.

    I think two-tone schema makes sense only of cladding/bumpers are unpainted (like on L), for practical reasons. I was in doubt about monotone schema myself but it grew on me, and now I'm happy I got S+ not S.
  • mybabyumybabyu Member Posts: 3
    Thanks, Juice and Kate5000 for the Premium S + support. Haven't seen it yet but am now very interested (my dealer is four hours away so I am relying on internet site pics)--- just hope it doesn't look too boring -- i do like the idea of the side air bags -- strange how they can only be found with a moon roof and special paint! Am also thinking of the interior upgrade i.e. armrest extension, wood trim, cargo net, etc and premium sound, trailer hitch, air filter, cargo cover,flor mats, and probably leather seats -- any thoughts on these add-ons? The premium sound may be a waste from what I've read here -- I want the trailer hitch for a bike rack one day -- also what is a rear differential skid plate and do I want it? Mel
  • 2ndwnd2ndwnd Member Posts: 145
    >>The premium sound may be a waste
    from what I've read here -- <<

    I really love the premium sound system in my 2000 Legacy, but I've never had a high end car audio system before, either original or aftermarket.
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    That should be "Au contraire" :-) Hey, something good did come out of my high school french classes taken a long time ago.
  • dzartmandzartman Member Posts: 112
    What are those 20001 Forester S going for these days?
  • xsexse Member Posts: 66
    read the forester review at edmunds road test area. it was for 1999, but they gave a really bad review i thought!
    maybe truthful in a sense... i would (am) actually only consider the forester. to me it makes sense practially, economically and yes, emotionally it is just cool!
    seems like it is just as powerful as the outback- same engine? the forester is an even better deal then.
    i did notice the back seats were pretty tight...any feedback on longer trips?
  • stargazer3stargazer3 Member Posts: 2
    My wife and I just bought a 2000 Legacy GT and we
    just love that car. We live in the mountains of Tennessee and I have already had a chance to test it out in the snow. I was amazed at how well the car performed in the snow. I have a 4wd truck and the GT felt more stable and handled better that my truck but the car has already developed chips in the paint on the hood. I do not know it is just real world driving or is it a problem with the paint.
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    As for options for S+, I personally picked 2 packages: F3 and F4, at invoice price, plus tweeters, also at invoice ($65). If you order options in packages, you get some discount, although not tremendous.

    Altogether I added:
    -- cargo cover
    -- security system
    -- cargo net
    -- air filter
    -- armrest
    -- exhaust pipe cover
    -- autodimming mirror-compass
    -- tweeters

    btw, floor mats are included in standard price.

    I did not care for faux wood trim, in fact, I hated it, so I passed on it. I'm not an audiophile (mostly listen to books on tapes), so I passed on premium sound, but added tweeters in case I listen to music.

    I found cargo net VERY VERY useful, in fact, I don't know I lived w/o it before. No more Coke bottles rolling around on the back.

    I don't know if tweeters made much difference. Sound is OK, but could be better, so if you're audiophile, go for premium sound.

    Mirror-Compass was fun for a while, but novelty wears off quickly. I did not get a chance yet to test its autodimming quality.

    Security system just came in the package, but it gives me a little bit of peace of mind (Subaru is no longer the least stolen car in US)

    I ordered armrest because w/o it center console looks kind of unfinished, plus it gives me a nice little storage area.

    As for leather seats, I wanted them but decided to pass on it for now. The reason: every single dealer told me that leather on S+ is not factory installed, but they (dealers) contract leather installation to some local shop. In fact, they get S+ with normal upholstery, rip it off and install leather. I felt bad about good upholstery going to waste.

    I decided I will run the car with upholstery as is for a while, and if I later find fabric deteriorating, I'll replace it with leather from the same local shop that dealer uses. BTW, cheap upholstery on my Subaru Loyale'92 is still in great shape, although the car was never garaged, and fabric never got treated with any protecting coating.

    Another and most important reason was that I did not trust local leather shop will install leather in a way that would not adversely affect side air-bags mounted inside the chair. Since side air-bags was important part of my decision to take S+ over L/S, I decided not to take the risk.

    Hope this helps

    --Kate
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    Many Forester reviews were so-so in early days. One of Carpoint reviews rated forester 6 of 10, but recently upgraded to 7 of 10. At the same time, they rated Escape 8 of 10. On the other hand, Motor Trend did not like Escape that much...

    I'd be cautious about reviews. We bought Accord EX in 1997, lured by raving reviews, and we're not really happy with it. On the other hand, we bought cheap Subaru Loyale in 1992 which never got any good reviews in both handling and reliability areas. Guess what: 100K problem-free miles later, it handles great, and with puny 1.8L engine easily outruns many more powerful cars on the road.
  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    Most auto reviews are written with the reviewers
    personal likes and dislikes being the main focus.
    If you look at several reviews from several sources, you will generally see a wide range of results. At best they give some ideas of what to look for on your test drives. If you don't find the minuses noted in the reviews that important, discount that part of the review. I wouldn't make a decision on any car based on someone else's likes or dislikes.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    I agree with tincup, I think auto reviews are vaguely useful but the real decision to buy or not to buy should come in after you personally drive, look around, and price the models you're interested in.

    -Colin
  • abhidharmaabhidharma Member Posts: 93
    I agree with Colin about reviews being "vaguely useful", but no substitute for extensive test driving.

    I find the magazines' long-term testing to be the most useful -- finding out about quirks and long-term livability is really useful.

    Randy
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.