Did you recently rush to buy a new vehicle before tariff-related price hikes? A reporter is looking to speak with shoppers who felt pressure to act quickly due to expected cost increases; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com for more details by 4/24.

Subaru Crew - Meet The Members

1192022242558

Comments

  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    ...this has turned into an interesting discussion!

    Kate & Petterson 10 -- Thank you ! I couldn't have said it better!

    Daytime running lights - and why I like them: Out where I live (somewhat in the sticks), there are several very heavily shaded back roads with somewhat hidden intersections. When cars (especially cars with very neutral colors - grays) travel down these roads -- they almost disappear into the background, and are VERY hard to see. Cars equipped with DRLs don't have this problem.

    I agree, most of the time DRLs are not necessary, but there ARE times when they are very helpful -- and that's when you need them.

    Bob
  • miksmimiksmi Member Posts: 1,246
    bra·chyl·o·gy (br-kl-j) n., pl. bra·chyl·o·gies.

    1. Brevity of speech; conciseness.
    2. A shortened or condensed phrase or expression.

    hehe Randy, glad to see someone was paying attention. nvy's "Hit!" comment tickedly my funny bone so I being a guy I couldn't let him bask alone in the glory of his artful mot. Voted off the island.. you are too much! :)

    ..Mike, a.k.a. Dr. Thesaurus

    ..Mike

  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    We do have a blue high beam indicator, but mine is never illuminated because low + fogs is better.

    I take that back, when an inconsiderate slob is hogging the left lane and won't move I sometimes flash 'em. During the day of course, at night there's never enough traffic around here to be a problem. I hate left-lane blockers but I'll pass on the right if I must! (Note: I quickly get out of the way of people going even faster than me.)

    Bob, I'd turn on my headlamps on that sort of road too. Not much of a problem with heavily shaded roads here in Kansas though. ;)

    -Colin
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Let me see, when I was 25 Columbus had just discovered America.

    Bob
  • abhidharmaabhidharma Member Posts: 93
    Thanks for the explanation.

    I was worried that nvy was perhaps suffering from some sort of fungal infection, and perhaps even Subaru-related.

    Now that THAT is cleared up, back to the land of the SIR-concised.

    Randy
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    ...you visit the Aztec board? You must be a glutton for punishment.

    Bob
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I was so curious I just took a peek. Looks like only 1 in 10 posts is actually related to the vehicle itself. I never knew a car could incite an e-riot! Pontiac should be happy -- any car that can cause that sort of love/hate reaction is surely breaking new ground. It will be interesting to see how the Aztek fares in 6 months or so . . .

    Crew, be thankful you bought a Soob!

    Craig
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Colin - Unfortunately, you would be in the minority.

    I have yet to see anyone turn on their lights on those dark shaded roads. Unlike rain, people just don't turn on their lights when they encounter these poor visibility conditions. I'm sure that those kinds of roads have led to many an accident.

    That the problem with not having DRLs. Drivers may not be aware that the vehicle they are driving is hard to see. They may see just fine - but other drivers may not see you - and you won't know that, until it's too late.

    Speaking of DRLs: Why do the new Legacys and Outbacks have them, and the even-more-recently-freshened-up Forester doesn't??

    Patti - what's the scoop here? Seems like Subaru is giving out mixed messages here. Will the redesigned "New-Age" Impreza have DRLs?

    Bob
  • armac13armac13 Member Posts: 1,129
    reject the cruise engaged light, dislike the cruise engage switch (why does it exist?), consider DRL's a necessity (but then I'm Canadian, eh) and just to show my Forester and I really do belong here, my middle name is Dave.

    Ross
  • thors_hammerthors_hammer Member Posts: 32
    Opinions (for what they are worth)
    Definite thumbs down to:
    Cruise engaged lights
    Cruise engage switch
    Door Locks that are pushed "up" to lock
    Fake hood scoops (my own personal crusade)

    Definite thumbs up to:
    Blue "Hi Beam" light
    Real hood scoops

    Definite thumbs sideways to:
    DRLs

    Expanding on some comments:
    I like "up" for unlock. Unlike some of you, I learned to drive on an old farm truck with manual door locks. Traditionally, you pull the lock "up" to open it and push it "down" to lock it.
    DRLs would be great if you could turn them off. I have to go past a sentry to get to work. If I have DRLs on at night, it blinds the sentry. I have to partially engage the emergency brake to get past the poor guy without wiping his eyes out.

    -Bryan
  • aussierooaussieroo Member Posts: 78
    cruise control switch for the oz foresters is on the dash just above the coin tray.

    another good case for drl's is when driving into a rising or setting sun on straight undulating roads. On top of the rise you can see the oncoming vehicles down the rise they disappear!!

    this was particularly scary in africa where you were also contending with donkeys and goats wandering onto the roads. (elephant was never a problem. you were in reverse!!)

    when i was 25 adam was still playing quarterback for the jews.
  • amishraamishra Member Posts: 367
    Here in Ontario, Canada, DRLs are required by law on all new vehicles, completely for safety purposes.

    I'm guessing that's one of the reasons Subaru is starting to make them standard - since they are required by law in some places.

    -- ash
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    all new Canadian vehicles since 1989 have been required to have Daytime Running Lights. I too have to say that I'm really in favour of them since they make the vehicles (especially in the rearview mirror) so much more visible. It's only stoopid GM that still uses nearly full intensity high beams as the DRLs. The other manufacturers who do use high beams for the DRLs reduce the intensity to 55-75%. I notice the difference between having and not having DRLs whenever I drive down to the US.

    I believe Canadian Subarus activate all of the exterior lamps (low beam headlamps, side markers, taillamps, etc.) for DRLs. The only other few manufacturers who do this include MB, Volvo, and Saab, I believe. Audis from MY1999 onwards use the front side markers, foglamps, and taillamps.

    Also, in many situations, I've seen drivers coming down the road at night with nothing but their DRLs on (Chrysler minivans with the bright orange side marker DRLs, in particular). Without the DRLs, the vehicles wouldn't have any exterior running lamps on at all!
  • mvcorneliusmvcornelius Member Posts: 11
    I have to vote thumbs up for DRL's. I notice that other drivers react to my presence better than when I drive a non-DRL car.

    The only problem I have had is turning the light switch one click rather than two at dusk so I am driving with dim DRL's and the running lights until I think "Dang, it sure is dark out".
  • austriash1austriash1 Member Posts: 12
    I'd like to see a bigger fuel tank on the Forester (65-70 litres). Also, I find the seat bottom cushions to be very uncomfortable - far too short - (I'm only 5'9") in comparison with the Legacy I test drove just before (or the Maxima I've had for 9 yrs). Also, I don't understand why Subaru doesn't ditch the casette for a standard CD player. Positively, I love the steering feel, and the big tow capacity.
  • mikef11mikef11 Member Posts: 74
    Hi Patti,

    These are a few things I mentioned way back when you fighting fires.. Glad to hear you and your family are OK. I don't envy you the task of getting your house rebuilt however. For those of you who have already seen and debated these thoughts, my apologies.

    What I would like to see in future Subarus:

    1. Dashboard 'cruise on' indicator light.
    2. Ability to darken the whole dashboard except
    the speedometer (like Saab).
    3. One touch up for the power windows.
    4. Leave power to the windows on for 10 minutes after shutting off the car.
    5. Illuminate the key bezel (sp?).
    6. Ability to shut off the floor air to the back
    seat. Often there are just two of us in the car,
    so I would rather warm up my feet than empty air.
    Worse, if the dog is with us, she hates the heat
    and would be much happier with icicles hanging off
    her nose. A cheap little lever at the center
    console would work great.
    7. Allow the driver to turn off the ac that turns on automatically when defrost is selected. I know that the ac helps remove humidity, but when it is 30 below I want the air to be as warm as possible as fast as possible to melt the ice. If the ac must come on, then at least let us manually turn it off.

    Not all people agree with these ideas, particularly the auto ac one. In my case, apart from all my other arguments, my wife sometimes gets migraine headaches from the ac, which means there are times she cannot even select defrost.

    DRLs. In Canada, the DRLs on the new Subarus use the main low beams at reduced power and all other marker lights are off. It is a much better system than the high beams at reduced power. I am quite confident that they saved me from picking the airbag out of my teeth one day this winter when a pickup almost pulled out in front of me. He hadn't cleaned his side window properly and I very much doubt that he would have seen me without the DRLs on. FWIW, tests by Canada and Norway in the 80's showed a significant reduction in accidents when DRLs were used. I can't remember the details unfortunately.

    Thanks for monitoring all this Patti!

    MikeF
  • mccrairmccrair Member Posts: 9
    All,

    The rear hatch lock on my 2000 OB (13,500 miles, less that 1 yr old) recently broke...It is functional, but the little metal piece that covers the hole until you put the key in (I think it's to keep dirt and stuff out of the lock) came off. Does anyone know how long something like this is covered under the standard Subaru Warranty?

    Would this be considered a wear item (covered only until 12,000 miles) or part of the New Car Basic Warranty (3 yrs/36,000 miles)?

    Thanks for your help,

    MCC
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I heartily second your opinion on the auto AC for defrost. My Honda turned on AC with the defroster, but at least gave you the option of turning it back off. That seems like a fair compromise, though I would really prefer the ability to have full control over the AC. If I want it on, I'll turn it on! When there's frost on the outside of the windshield and you're starting your engine cold, the last thing you want is to have the AC bogging the engine and chilling the vent air.

    Craig
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    I thought the DRLs for Canadian Subies turned on all of the exterior lamps (including markers and taillamps). I've seen a number of MY2K Outbacks - two of them just today - with all of the exterior lamps activated.

    Drew
  • torektorek Member Posts: 92
    As others noted, DRLs are already required in Canada. I believe that US law also requires DRLs beginning in 2002 or so. (I could easily be wrong, as this is not my area of expertise. It is true that there is a long lag between "when the laws are changed" and "when the changes take effect", so that manufacturers have time to redesign their vehicles. For some reason I have it stuck in my head that DRLs are already mandated in the US, just "not yet".)

    Chris
  • abhidharmaabhidharma Member Posts: 93
    The defrosting air will actually get hotter with the AC on, just by adjusting the cold/hot air switch.

    Randy
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    1. Knight 2000 voice for GPS system. "Your destination is on the left Michael." or, HAL 2000 for the Daves. "I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you attempt that approach angle, Dave."
    2. Oil slick dispenser for tailgaters
    3. ejection seats, with integrated child safety seats.
    4. Captains chair like the one on the Enterprise for the driver. Torpedoes optional; captain's log tied to trip computer.
    5. jumping feet like on the Mach 5. Especially for Colin.
    6. South African flame thrower theft deterrent.
    7. hygrometer and geiger counter added to guage cluster
    8. Blues Brothers Limited Outback with stereo pre-wired for large roof mounted bull horn. Half a pack of cigarettes optional, standard with cigarette lighter upgrade.
    9. DRL's that flash in time to the music on the stereo, with optional DDB (Daytime Disco Ball)

    Did I miss anything? :)
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I'm 26, so I'm sorta young...

    I don't like DRLs for 2 reasons....

    1) They don't turn on your rear parking lights, which are extremely useful in bright sunlight so people can see you.

    2) If I feel the need for lights during the day, I turn them on.

    If DRLs are a must, I'd much prefer (and not mind so much) the ones like chrysler Mini-vans in Canada and other GM cars have in the US which turn on the orange parking/turn signals.

    I especially don't like em because if you upgrade your bulbs, you are going to burn em out faster...

    -mike

    PS: The CC engage switch is so that the memory is enabled for your "resume" And CC has saved me from at least 25 tickets. I set it @ 9-11mph over the limit and just go.
  • davechendavechen Member Posts: 41
    Mike! If you *didn't* have CC, I would hope that after a dozen or so speeding tickets, you might slow down before actually *getting* 25 tickets! heheh, just giving you a hard time =p

    They probably changed this, but a Chevy Lumina I rented had DRLs that caused a dangerous situation. The DRLs always kept the headlights AND dash lights on, and nothing else. Two days in a row, as it got dark while I was driving, I did not turn on the headlight switch (and thus the running/marker/license lights) because everything that I could see in front of me (headlights, dash lights) were on already...no cue or reminder to turn the rest of the lights on. REALLY dangerous, in my opinion, as I became "invisible" from the sides and back as it got dark!
    Hope they fixed that stupid 'feature'.
    Dave C.
  • abhidharmaabhidharma Member Posts: 93
    ROTFLMAO!!
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    Forgive me for being blunt (nothing personal, really!) but that's kind of your fault for being ignorant. Didn't it ever occur to you thatyou'd need to manually turn on the switch at night?

    I believe the reason why your dashlamps were on is because the Lumina might have had an auto lights on sensor (also known as Twilight Sentinel) which automatically activated all of the exterior and interior lamps when it got dark enough. So actually, that's a good feature!! AFAIK, the DRLs in GM cars don't activate the interior lamps at all.

    FWIW, my ML's DRLs activate all of the interior and exterior lamps at all times once the vehicle is put into gear, so there's actually no need to even touch the light switch unless one wants to use the high beams or foglamps (at which point you need to manually turn on the headlamps first). The DRLs deactivate automatically once the transmission lever is placed into the Park position.
  • mikef11mikef11 Member Posts: 74
    Drew. In my '00 Outback, only the headlights come on at low power as the DRLs. Is it possible the cars you saw had all their lights on? I know the two dealers in my area both recommended that we leave the headlights turned on at all times as Subarus are smart enough to turn the lights off when you turn the car off. I don't like that idea as it puts more load on the engine when starting.

    Mike (paisan). DRLs also often protect you from the "other guy" who doesn't turn on his lights when visibility is poor.

    DaveC. Maybe your experience explains why I see a number of cars who forget to turn on their lights at night. More than once I noted the car had a digital dash so the driver was obviously not aware that he had no rear lights.

    MikeF
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    Wishing you 100 model years more of Subaru's!
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    laughing at your post! I couldn't help it, but a loud chuckle escaped from me causing a bunch of sleepy morning heads to turn and stare.

    I especially like the lights going to the time of music. Let's see, in my family we would be jumping time from Metallica to N'sync - what a strange trip it would be down the Atlantic City Expressway!
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    thoughts - but to clarify -

    Bob - I'm not sure (I'll check) but it may have something to do with where the vehicles are produced. Since the "Legacy" lines are mostly manufactured in the U. S. (including exporting to other country's), it could be that they are just ahead of the game vs. vehicles produced in Japan. That's my guess anyway. I'll try to get the "real" answer.

    Chris - you are right. DRL's will be required in the U. S. by law in 2002.

    Drew - maybe you saw vehicle's with the regular/low lights on?? I know I am guilty of just leaving my lights on. For years, I have preferred being able to be seen and it's habit now. I just leave 'em on and I don't really think about it. + you can move those left lane hogs. Go flying up with the lights on and they think you are the police and move over. Kinda fun once you pass them and smile!
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    I'll send your suggestion on up today. Thanks for sharing it!
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    to your doggie concerns! I appreciate all of your suggestions and I'll forward them up right away.
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    Hmm, I guess it is possible. I'll have to follow a few more MY2K Outbacks to satisfy my curiosity :-). I know for sure that the '99-'00 Impreza's DRLs are low beams only though; I'm quite certain that pre-'00 Legacys/Outbacks had full exterior lamp DRLs though.

    I posted this message a while back in your absense, so here it is again.

    A couple of years ago, the TV programme "Wild
    About Wheels" aired a small section of the
    IMSA-certified Subaru comparison tests at Willow
    Springs
    . From the short amount of footage that I saw, the Legacy GT/Outback did extremely well vs. the competition. The tests were informative and quite entertaining.

    I was wondering if it is at all possible for you
    to make this video available to us. I'm sure that at least a number of people would be interested in seeing it.

    Drew
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    On the Australian spec Legacy Sedans, they have rear wipers. I'd love to see a rear wiper as at least an option on US sedans. I'm assuming they don't have em cause of the rear defrosters manuf. feel that they don't need em. Just something I've gotten used to with my SUVs and I wish my XT6 one. I always go reaching for the dash when I can't see out the back in the rain.

    What are we going to do after patti get's all of our suggestions implemented? :)

    -mike
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    Hey Drew! I'm asking around about this footage. I probably won't have an answer 'til Monday or Tuesday. I'll let you know!
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    Hey Mike! I agree! I'd love a rear wiper. And...about "implementing" your suggestions - Ugggghhhh - I hope I never let you folks down, but I can only promise to spread the word - Ohhhh the pressure!!!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Patti - did you get any sleep last night? 4AM posts? The funny thing is there were people here to chat with!

    paisan: Rain X works wonders on my windows. It's the rare product that does exactly as advertised. I rarely even have to use my rear wipers, and with a wind deflector there I could probably give it up entirely.

    Loosh: way to go, keep 'em coming. The best part was the subtle mention of "Dave" by HAL. Think about it Patti, you could save development costs since we pretty much all have the same name!

    OK, I'm exxagerating. You'd need two versions, one for "Dave" and one for "Mike". :)

    Mike (Smith): and here I thought that was a typo. I was quiet to be polite!

    Colin: that's right, nothing wrong with driving 85mph in the left lane, so long as you move out of my way so I can pass! ;)

    Bigger gas tank - good idea. 400 mile range is good, but 500 would be better. Even a tiny bit more is good.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Patti - Is that for MY 2002, or anything sold after 1/1/02?

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    BTW, #1 topic folks! Woo-hoo!

    DRLs: I know I'm in the minority, but I'm against DRLs for a simple reason: I used to own motorcycles.

    Honestly, it was the ONLY thing we had to stand out. If you think people miss huge cars, imagine motorcycles. It's like people are blind! If you're drowning in a sea of DRLs, motorcycles lose their relative advantage in visibility.

    OK, it will prevent car accidents, but it could increase the number of motorcycle accidents, and those are more likely to cause deaths.

    -juice
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    I think it's a time zone thing. I got in here bright and early 6:00 AM EDT - had to get my son to the area for his first football practice (he LOVED getting up at 4:00). So, no I wasn't in here at 4 - but at 6, I couldn't wait to log in and see what was happening. I'm trying to do this first thing in the morning so that I can devote some attention to it.

    DRL's - that would be for MY 2002 vehicles.
  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    As a motorcyclist myself, I agree. Also one reason DRL's help in this country now is the low number of vehicles that have them. The rear high mounted stop light had the same impact before it became standard equipment, now people ignore those.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I too used to ride motorcycles. In fact, I've got over 50K miles of motorcycle experience. I've also been to see the Daytona 200 a couple of times, as well as a number of other AMA/non-AMA races/events.

    Having said that I have to disagree with you that there will be more motorcycle accidents once DRLs become law. Bikes will still be visible to motorists. True, everybody will now have lights -- so now everybody will be more visible.

    Except for bicyclists -- who will now be less visible because they won't have lights. All drivers will be expecting to see vehicles with headlights, which will put bicyclists at a greater risk.

    Bob
  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    People don't see motorcycles under perfect conditions, Anything that decreases making motorcycles stand out will increase the number of accidents. Making lights on mandatory was instituted for just that reason. Why do you think that most motorcycles have done away with headlight on-off switches? Not trying to knock you but I tend to take this rather seriously as I still do ride motorcycles.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I can see your point. Maybe they now will require motorcycles to have flashing lights (just joking!)

    Bob
  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    Actually there are headlight modulators available, but many states have made them illegal. Enough on this, back to Subaru's :)
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    As I've said before several times, traffic is light were I live (it exists, mind you) and I still am leery about motorcycling.

    I first rode at 5 and raced dirtbikes until 14 (I guess I wised up young). I still have a YZ250 that I ride infrequently-- more often now that I found out a co-worker has 40 acres nearby and has a dirtbike track on part of it!

    I ride my dad's Ninja 600 infrequently but have been secretly lusting after a friend's TL1000 since he's trying to sell it. Low miles and I can get it cheap (compared to new-- utter robbery compared to what *I* think bikes should cost).

    I agree that DRLs will take away some of the advantage that motorcycles have, but the most important safety feature is the rider himself. Make yourself visible, never stay in blindspots, don't let people tailgate you (it's not that hard, twist the wrist) and don't be reckless.

    Oh yeah, and I always wear a helmet, long pants and almost always long sleeves. If I rode everyday I'd own leathers.

    -Colin
  • drgordodrgordo Member Posts: 6
    After monitoring the posts by the Subaru Crew here and other message boards for the last 6 months, we purchased a 2K Outback to replace my wifes aging Tracer. AWD was imperative here in snow country and the deal offered by Morries Subaru in the Minneapolis area ($200 under invoice)made it easier to accept. The Fleet Manager, Scott Putnam, was easy to work with and maintains a web site (subaru.net). Thanks to you all for your informative and very helpful insights into Subaru. I had to overcome some resistance to Subaru as I can remember the infamous Subaru 360 and the rent-a-racer tracks in SoCal where 360's replaced go karts for wannabe racers.
  • barresa11barresa11 Member Posts: 277
    Congrats on your new Soobie purchase! I had to laugh at your confession(?) about your prejudice of Subaru's. I kept thinking: you have a lot of Subaru history to catch up on! :-) Anyhow, I've had my OB since Feb and have a little over 5000 miles. I love it and have no regrets. Maybe in about 4 years I'll upgrade to the H6 model. I know that when it comes time to buy a new vehicle I will be looking at Subaru first. Keep us updated on your experiences with your new "baby".

    Stephen
  • miksmimiksmi Member Posts: 1,246
    Re: #1126 ROTFLMAO² Lucien!

    Gordie, Congratulations and welcome! Please hang out and by all means, post about your experiences!

    ..Mike

    ..Mike

  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Here's a question for the Legacy OB and GT owners -- the OB is marketed with a "heavy-duty" suspension. What exactly are the differences between the OB and GT models?
This discussion has been closed.