Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

GM News, New Models and Market Share

12728303233631

Comments

  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    outside the U.S. tonight, it sure sounds like everyone now expects that GM will certainly have to declare bankruptcy. And they expect that bankruptcy to have a further cascading impact on the rest of the economy.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    And they expect that bankruptcy to have a further cascading impact on the rest of the economy.

    A few weeks ago I would have said that GM declaring bankruptcy would put the US economy into a recession. Now with what is going on it would put the US into a depression much like the old one.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...is OBVIOUSLY Bad for the U.S.! At least I tried to help by purchasing GM products my whole life!
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    This should make some people very happy. :(

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • dave8697dave8697 Member Posts: 1,498
    GM offers plenty of great vehicles. Malibu, Aura, Solstice, Trailblazer, G5, G6, G8, and many more. I just hope that the pain inflicted on this country by the foreign car buyers comes back to haunt only them. I have to pay the equivalent of a new Malibu per year for eight consecutive years to put my kids thru college. When I get thru that and am ready to trade up, will GM still be there?
  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    Has stated that bk is not an option they are considering.

    Though it may be that that statement may have been made purely to stave off any further fear, uncertainty and doubt. If the credit market doesn't get sorted out soon, the public perception will be that nobody can qualify for a loan and therefore the market will dry up - not just for GM, but for the industry as a whole.

    As an owner of 3 GM sourced vehicles - all Saturns - I'm a bit shocked at how quickly this company has spiraled out of control.

    The $64 question is this -- how much of their current situation is self-inflicted and how much can be attributed to outside factors ($4 gas, tight credit markets)?
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    >The $64 question is this -- how much of their current situation is self-inflicted and how much can be attributed to outside factors ($4 gas,

    An additional question is what will $2.50 gas or lower do to STIMULATE theeconomy from the consumer side? It will make more vehicles more attractive. It will leave more money in consumer pockets to spend elsewhere. The additional spending will help the economy since 2/3 is based on consumers--if I recall the right number. Don't hesitate to put in the right number if I'm wrong.

    Here gas is $2.79 and dropping like a rock as it should with gas price wholesale at $2.06. Add on .50 tax and it should be at $2.60

    That's going to stimulate a lot of spending that people have had to cut back. I hope it will help the auto dealers and manufacturers.

    >nobody can qualify for a loan

    Actually friends of ours are shopping for a third house on 11 acres in the $350 range. It was a builder's house which he let go in some flim-flam moves and the bank has it. The builder continues in business. The value is much higher in pre housing collapse value. I haven't seen it. Credit is no problem is you have some money and good record.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    bankruptcy is an option but only to roll up the carpets and move out. Nobody is going to buy a car from a bankrupt company.

    There are no old large manufacturing companies in the US anymore other than the big 3 that make their products here. None. They are all out of business or moved off shore. At least we still have refineries for all the imported oil.
  • sls002sls002 Member Posts: 2,788
    declaring bankruptcy in the middle of the current financial crisis would not allow for reorganization - GM would disappear. So, can they hold on long enough for the current mess to clear up :sick:
  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    imid - my comment was that the public perception was that loans would be hard to get; I realize that people are still able to finance cars, buy houses, etc. It's the media frenzy about this that are scaring people away from the car lots, IMO.

    62 - agreed; unlike airlines, who people continue to use after a CH 11, I don't see any confidence at all in a manufacturer that files BK. Will that company be around to service the product that was sold?
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    even if gas prices drop, is this a good time to be financing anything bigger than a Big Mac? The question is not really if people CAN borrow (although the ones who never should have been borrowing will certainly not be able to do so for a while), it is if the ones that have good credit and are creditworthy will want to borrow a ton of cash in the next couple of years to buy a car. I mean, they are expecting Christmas sales - a few hundred bucks per person - to be wiped out this year. If people won't buy Christmas presents, are they going to be buying cars if they don't absolutely have to?

    Analysts are saying GM's stock is so low now that it would be ripe for takeover if they didn't have so much debt. From AP:

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081010/ap_on_bi_ge/auto_stocks

    A person with knowledge of GM's plans said Friday that the company is likely to announce more production cuts and possible plant closures as early as next week. The person did not want to be identified because plans are not finalized

    GM announced a plan in July that calls for cutting $10 billion in costs and raising another $5 billion through asset sales and borrowing through 2009.

    The Detroit automaker had $21 billion in cash and $5 billion available through credit lines at the end of June for total liquidity of $26 billion, but it has been burning through cash at a pace of more than $1 billion a month and needs about $11 billion to $14 billion on hand to keep operating.

    Overseas sales in growing markets like Russia and South America been a bright spot for GM as U.S. sales slumped. GM said Thursday, however, that sales of its Opel and Vauxhall brands dropped more than 6 percent in Europe during the first nine months of the year — a sign that the downturn is hitting economies globally and taking worldwide auto sales down with it.

    The rapid growth of auto sales in China, the world's second-largest auto market after the United States, also has slowed sharply.


    Of the $5 billion in asset sales GM was planning, I believe $1 billion was the sale of the Hummer brand. But does it have $4 billion more in assets that it could readily sell without hurting operations?

    With a total liquidity reserve of $31 billion including the $5 billion it could borrow, and the need to maintain $11 billion in reserves, it has only about 20 months at the present burn rate before there is no choice BESIDES bankruptcy. If they manage to raise $5 billion more in asset sales, that's 25 months. I don't think they should let things go that far before they do it. It's just a waste of all that money. 25 months doesn't seem long enough to turn things around given that the present state of affairs in the economy will probably last that long, maybe longer.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    to borrow:

    GM wants to borrow about $500 million from two city pension funds. The requests come as the automaker is trying to raise about $5 billion through asset sales and borrowing to survive the worst auto sales market in 15 years.

    http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081009/AUTO01/810090474

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Sure have not seen this anywhere but Impala outsold Accord in september. And GM had 5 vehicles in the top 11.

    Chevrolet Silverado PU.... 50,428 -3.9
    Ford F - Series PU......... 32,727 -41.6
    Toyota Camry / Hybrid.... 29,486 -27.1
    Chevrolet Impala............. 27,143 17.1
    Honda Accord / Hybrid ....22,371 -36.1
    Honda Civic / Hybrid .......21,577 -12.8
    Toyota Corolla / Matrix ....21,316 -27.9
    Dodge Ram PU.............. 20,812 -30.9
    Chevrolet Malibu............ 19,725 79.0
    GMC Sierra PU.............. 18,744 1.6
    Chevrolet Cobalt .............16,521 -16.5

    Gotta believe though that they had Impala fleet sales to help.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    The word going around is that GM did a MASSIVE dump of pick-ups and large sedans to the fleets in September. I wonder if it's true, and how big it was if so. Silverado sales spiked by about 50% relative to their annualized sale rate through the prior eight months. GM has done fleet dumps in the past when they either needed immediate revenue or their market share was slipping too badly relative to their main competitors. In this case, I would suspect there was a need for immediate revenue, even if mostly profitless revenue.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...for me to snatch up a whole lotta GM stock cheap?
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    It would be highly risky. If GM was to turn itself around, you'd make out like a bandit. But if they declare bankruptcy and re-organize, your stock would be worthless. They'd issue new shares of stock for people to buy, but current shareholders would get screwed.

    If you're the gambling sort and have some money laying around gathering dust, that you're not afraid to lose, then go for it!
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    A friend told me today that original "antique" GM stock certificates are worth way more than the face value.

    Another place to wonder if it's time to buy:

    Are car stocks driving you out of the market?
  • grbeckgrbeck Member Posts: 2,358
    Only if you can afford to lose the money. The auto market looks as though it will continue to get worse. GM can only pump up sales through fleet dumping and heavy incentives for so long.

    A bankruptcy filing is a strong possibility, no matter what Rick Wagoner says. And that "loan" from the federal government is chump change compared to what GM really needs to keep afloat, let alone tool for new models. GM's situation is truly dire.
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    Ask the people who thought GM was a great buy at $20 a pop. $4.89 may not look so good when GM dips to 27 cents a share.
  • mattandimattandi Member Posts: 588
    Has stated that bk is not an option they are considering.

    Of course bankruptcy is an option. Anyone with any sense at all knows that GM may have to declare bankruptcy. GM had to say they are not considering it. Can you imagine the carnage if they had said the opposite?
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I don't think bankruptcy is a voluntary option for GM.

    Involuntary maybe....
  • mattandimattandi Member Posts: 588
    I can go with that. Taken at face value, I think their statement was an honest statement. Should bankruptcy occur, for GM or any of the others, it will be when they don't have any other viable choice. I do not think they are at that point, but I admit that I do not know just how close they are to that point.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    The burn rate of their cash must be high, and they don't have as much to burn as Ford.
  • mattandimattandi Member Posts: 588
    Yeah, I think their biggest obstacle is time. Can they keep breathing long enough or will they just run out of money? The car market will eventually turn around, and GM has some promising things on the horizon (even some current product is pretty good). It seems to be a matter of surviving to that time. There is also the issue of whether their business plan/model is enough to carry them through and forward.
  • torque_rtorque_r Member Posts: 500
    Yes I read about that. I am not sure if this is the solution. GM is finally getting leaner, better and more efficient. The merger will make GM go back to the 80s era with too many brands, models and overcapacity. This is a hurtful step for the automotive employees.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    If a merger is contemplated it needs to be with someone with nonunion plants to improve flexibility.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • jaguar8jaguar8 Member Posts: 1
    yea the story on yahoo is really shocking!! I think the american auto industry is going out the same way the british auto industy did!! THEY ALL STARTED TO MERGE AND CREATED ONE BIG COMPANY AND THE IT FAILED!...I wonder what Ford is going say about this...? :sick:
  • plektoplekto Member Posts: 3,738
    What they need to do:

    1 - Bring over cars directly from Europe. Get a waiver from our government to allow Euro crash tests to function as U.S. ones for a while and cut the myriad of red tape and other testing and political nonsense. If the bean-counters and stupidly anal ENCAP guys over there say it's safe, I'm inclined to believe them.

    2 - Get a waiver between the EU and U.S. for their vehicles so that they CAN just bring them over, change a few lights and gauges, and push them out the door in a few *months* and not by waiting until next September.

    3 - STOP SELLING TO FLEETS. This is the #1 problem that they have. They churn out zillions of no profit models to a government that is essentially also bankrupt. This means that they have larger plants, more workers, more outsourcing, more parts, more insurance, more operators to run Onstar... on and on it goes.. And, they basically are doing "busy work" at most plants.

    No wonder their secondary costs are exploding. This also causes their resale values to hurt. When half of a models for sale used are ex taxis and rentals, good luck if you bought one as an individual in getting anything other than auction value for it used.

    They need to move away from the image of being the best used deal in the world to the best NEW deal, money-wise. Nobody sane buys a new GM(or Ford) any more, because the depreciation is like falling off a cliff. Money's far too tight now to be throwing away thousands a year in depreciation.

    4 - Simplify.
    - GMC - all trucks, SUVs, and commercial vehicles.
    - Chevrolet - all cars. Not one truck, SUV, or van.
    - Cadillac - luxury.
    Saab, Isuzu, Buick, Pontiac, Saturn... all the rest of the crud... pick the one model out of each that you care about and toss the rest.

    Consumers need a new image - a simplified and easy as a brick to the head to understand image.

    Trucks/etc - GMC.
    Cars - Chevrolet.
    etc.

    Then go Honda on options - A, B, or C. Pick a package, no alterations allowed. Pick a color. Give the consumer an easy to sort and recognize set of choices that is at most a few decisions long. This also helps resale value greatly and reduces tooling and assembly line costs

    GM needs to think more like this and less like a hodge-podge of conflicting pet projects and 70 year old executives who can't be bothered to change their ways.
  • steevosteevo Member Posts: 389
    Chrysler has essentially been for sale ever since Cerberus bought them from Daimler.
    Effectively, they have no business being a business anymore. They do not have even 1 vehicle of any type that is its class leader. Not ONE.
    GM and FORD at least have the potential to compete with Toyota,Honda,Nissan-Renault, etc....
    Chrysler is toast. They have been on borrowed time for 20 years.
    The only entity that has something to gain here is Cerberus.
  • dtownfbdtownfb Member Posts: 2,918
    You must be clairavoyant. Announced yesterday that Chrysler and GM have been involved in merger talk.
  • dave8697dave8697 Member Posts: 1,498
    what about a GM / Chrysler merger?

    If people spend their gas savings on other consumables it could help. nearly 70,000 GM trucks a month when gas was $4.20?
    The ratio of truck cylinders to civic cylinders that month? 7 to 1. which way does that point US fuel economy?
  • chuck1chuck1 Member Posts: 1,405
    The American car buying public have REJECTED European transplanted cars for the most part.

    Saturn - Not selling much of either Astra or Aura.

    Ask Ford about the Contour, Festiva (1st generation) Merkur, etc.

    Bringing over Euro spec cars doesn't work.
  • daddysangeldaddysangel Member Posts: 14
    matandi, Ditto on that. Saw a sound bite on this evening's late news re: GM & DC talking about merger. At the time, I wondered what the buzz would be here. Also on the news, local gas was $2.619. YIKES. How long will that last? Did a quick read on Reuters link. It sounded like a loose-loose proposition to me.
    :confuse:
    DA
  • mattandimattandi Member Posts: 588
    what about a GM / Chrysler merger?

    Like I said earlier, I didn't see that one coming, but it isn't a completely surprising development. Consolidation is a typical response to economic troubles. There are some very interesting possibilities.

    If it would be a straightforward swap, which I'm not sure it would be, but if it was, Cerberus gets GMAC which they are probably better positioned to handle, and I have to believe they want out of the car business. It has got to be hurting GM to keep servicing that troubled fanancial arm. GM gets the auto operations of Chrysler, and there is simply no denying that is where GM has been king for a long time, regardless of what we think about how they have held that position.

    Combined Hummer-Jeep becomes a very intriguing property. Probably would have a lot of cache on the market. I think GM would off-load it as quickly as possible.

    GM gets Chrysler's work on plug-in hybrids to go along with the Volt.

    Chrysler benefits from GM's leadership in trucks and SUV's. Even though it is a shrinking market, that market will always be with us. GM gets Chrysler's work on technologies that Chrysler brings to the table, primarily diesels.

    GM would obviously have to deal with the issue of inherently competing brand/models/nameplates, but they're juggling too many brands/nameplates/models as it is anyway. On the flip side they pick up some promising stuff they just don't have in their line up, minivans, mid CUV that has a practically stand alone price point.

    Unclear if GM could/would maintain any strategic partnerships Chrysler has been developing, but if they could, that could be interesting. Even the combined giant still wouldn't have a serious competitor in the small sub-compact segment. The Chinese love their Buicks and Chery might get excited about the association. Nissan might be more interested in a rebadged Tahoe and Silverado than a Durango and a Ram.

    Even in their poor shape, Chrysler has some market value. That could be a lot stock GM could sell, even if only at a few bucks a share.

    If any of it negatively impacts GM's cash burn rate it could be suicidal.

    Sure is fun to watch, huh?

    $2-$3 gas could be a game changer on many levels.
  • mattandimattandi Member Posts: 588
    It is a wild development. It is either completely boneheaded or brilliant. See my response to dave.

    It is also being reported that GM made merger overtures to Ford before Chrysler. Apparently Ford quickly rejected the idea.

    NY Times article
  • torque_rtorque_r Member Posts: 500
    So what if that happens? We will have the all-new 2013 Chevy Malibu, followed by Saturn Aura, Pontiac G6, Buick LaCrosse, Dodge Avenger, and Chrysler Sebring, all using the same platform? Yikes!

    Well, Jeep would be good for GM. Why? Because after demise of the Trailblazer/Envoy, and the possibly similiar fate for the Tahoe/Yukon, GM will be left with only crossovers. Jeep could put GM back into the game.

    GM would also return to the minivan Market, and lay its hands on the Hemi.

    Other than that, the rest of Chrylser is simply worthless, and GM would have to replace every Chrylser model with a GM-based model.
  • plektoplekto Member Posts: 3,738
    Bringing over Euro spec cars DOES work well if they bring over the decent high mpg models and market them correctly. Trying to stuff the Astra into a dying Saturn badge was a joke. It easily could have been upscaled a bit and been a nice addition - like a smaller Malibu.

    The new Ford Fiesta? Oops - we get the wrong engine, and the hot looking hatchback... nope... A hatchback that got 50mpg... yeah that would eviscerate VW's TDI sales.

    Just one brain-dead decision by both GM and Ford after another...
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Just one brain-dead decision by both GM and Ford after another..

    This, too, shall pass! No way these errors continue indefinitely. The end nears at an ever quickening pace.

    Next, they'll try get the Government to limit Toyota and Honda imports...too bad a lot are made on U.S. soil. Not an easy task when the financial crisis spans all borders and conformity will rule over opposition in the near term.

    Regards,
    OW
  • youngbloke1youngbloke1 Member Posts: 14
    >The American car buying public have REJECTED
    >European transplanted cars for the most part.

    HELLO, where have you been in the past few years?! The Ford Focus was a smashing hit when it got introduced to the States and is the only current model within Ford where demand is strong.

    Allowing US automakers to temperarily import their European Models in a limited amount without Tariff and other redtape would give them them a great breathing room......unless you want them all bankrupt in the middle of this outright ugly credit crisis where nobody is lending nobody any money.
  • dtownfbdtownfb Member Posts: 2,918
    Allowing US automakers to temperarily import their European Models in a limited amount without Tariff and other redtape would give them them a great breathing room......unless you want them all bankrupt in the middle of this outright ugly credit crisis where nobody is lending nobody any money.

    Let them go bankrupt. Why are their good cars over in Europe and not in the US in the first place? Why do we get stuck with second hand models? Bad business decisions got them in this mess. Toyota and Honda should never even had a chance to get such a strong hold on fuel efficient vehicles.

    GM is in no position to take on Chrysler. GM is fighting for their on survival. When you are drowning, you are suppose to grab a life preserve not another anchor.
  • iluvmysephia1iluvmysephia1 Member Posts: 7,709
    from Downtown Freddy Brown! :shades:

    2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick

  • chuck1chuck1 Member Posts: 1,405
    You may want look in to your facts a little more. While the current (and very old platform) of the Focus is BASED on the European model-in actuality it has been EXTENSIVELY CHANGED for the North American Market.
  • daddysangeldaddysangel Member Posts: 14
    mattandi, did read link & response to dave.

    Will have to wait until the dust has settled.

    Otherwise; my foot will be in my mouth :P

    Lurk mode on.

    DA
  • torque_rtorque_r Member Posts: 500
    Chevrolet's 2010 Camaro LS with a V-6 engine will carry a base sticker of $22,995, including shipping. The 6.2-liter V-8-powered SS performance version will have a base sticker price of $30,995 with shipping. Customer ordering begins today, Oct. 13, Chevrolet says. Production starts Feb. 16 at General Motors' Oshawa, Ontario, assembly plant. 12:01 am U.S. ET | Oct. 13
  • torque_rtorque_r Member Posts: 500
    The Detroit 3 are adding premium equipment to small cars to replace lost profits from big trucks. A small car with big profit margins? It may sound like one of those hand-is-quicker-than-the-eye magic tricks, but European automakers do it, and now American marketers are learning how. "It comes down to product execution," says Jim Farley, Ford Motor's group vice president of marketing and communications.
    autonews.com
  • torque_rtorque_r Member Posts: 500
    What credit crunch? Toyota's captive brags in a big ad blitz that it's ready to do deals

    Rich and powerful Toyota, stung by a stunning collapse in sales last month, will spend a ton of money in October on a nationwide TV blitz that brags about the company's captive finance arm. The message: In a credit-crunched America, Toyota Financial Services has plenty of cash to lend. Executives say they're trying to do what General Motors' "Keep America Rolling" campaign did after 9/11 -- get the country rolling again.
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    Excellent post plekto! This is what I mean by the fact that while GM has been making what might be traditionally considered "bold" changes, they've really been pretty sedate. The patient was starting to bleed five years ago and they should have taken your approach then.

    I disagree on GMC/Chevy/Cadillac, however. Make it only Chevy and Cadillac. Toyota does fine with trucks in that division - why GMC?
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    The 6.2-liter V-8-powered SS performance version will have a base sticker price of $30,995 with shipping.

    Wow, they're really going to be selling a lot of those :confuse: .

    Wrong product, too late. How many years has Ford's new Mustang been out?
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Concentrate on premium PARTS first! Third rate parts assembled together is what got the small three where they are now.

    Regards,
    OW
Sign In or Register to comment.