By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I tried to spec a similar Civic, which I guess would be the EX-L, and got a TMV of $21,975.
A buddy of mine at the time had a '94 Civic Si hatchback and we'd go out in the country (indiana had/has plenty of straight, flat desolate roads) and drag race all of the time. We were usually neck and neck based on who got the best launch. We'd race to 100 or so, slam on the brakes, turn around and do again and again. Dumb, but it was sure fun.
That's because the Neon made you sick and you got vomit stains in the fabric, right? :P
Sorry, as a Chrysler guy, I know I should be defending the Neon, but I just couldn't resist!
That doesn't make sense. Spyker paid GM for Saab, not the other way around.
Any how, I hope for Saab owners' sake that GM steps up, though to be fair only for cars sold prior to the Feb 2010 sale.
Edit: per Rob's post they are. Good for them!
From the article:
This act of kindness is very surprising, because GM doesn’t even like covering warranties on local-made products it considers was built by “old GM.”
I expect someone shopping for a fuel miser is aiming to lower operating costs, so that's why I bring those up.
My roommate's girl friend had a Golf. You could break in to it by LOOKING at the lock and concentrating. Quality control was horrific.
Ironic that today the Golf is nicer, and the Jetta went through some serious cost cutting.
DSG transmissions are neat, but I guess the jury is still out on longevity.
I guess anymore with 5-8 speed transmissions, cheap rebuilds are likely a think of the past.
I'm pro-manual, and I always say, a new trans is a few thousand. A new clutch is a few hundred. :shades:
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/21/onstar-bringing-another-4g-lte-concept-to-ces- /
That's pretty sweet. Encourages car pooling, too.
General Motors says Chevrolet dealers have just a 17-day supply of the new B-segment bruiser.
Same price as the Hybrid, loaded without GPS!
Regards,
OW
Cool, I had an '85 Jetta and got 143K almost totally reliable miles out of it.
Sure. Way late, wouldn't you say? Good "New GM", following as usual. Let's see if the government still owns them when the turbo is available.
Let's see how Hyunkia counters by then. :shades:
Regards,
OW
This illustration looks very much like her car! The car was in incredibly awesome condition at the time, (early-late 1980s). You'd swear it just rolled off the assembly line.
Oh oh! I guess we have to refer to White House Cabinet Members as Administrative Assistants, i.e. the Administrative Assistant of Defense. How about the Administrative Assistant General of the United Nations?
I have! My girlfriend of the time had a brand-new 1994 Jetta and that car seemed to be broken every other Thursday. It was plagued with electrical gremlins, ate CV joints for breakfast for some reason, it suffered some tranny maladies, and parts and service for a supposed "economy car" were astronomical. A front brake job was $650 (in 1994). Spark plug wires were $90 for four. The (ahem) "service" advisor was so surly he made Tony Soprano look like Mr. Nice Guy. Your 1995 Neon would've been Lexus-reliable compared to her Jetta.
GM, which is poised to take back the global sales crown from Toyota Motor Corp. (7203), wants to beat Ford’s and Volkswagen AG (VOW)’s 7 percent forecasted EBIT margins, said Jim Cain, a spokesman.
Ammann has been talking about Hyundai’s 10 percent forecasted margin as a stretch goal, Cain said.
“The way we talk about Hyundai is more of a proof point that we need a sense of urgency,” he said in a phone interview.
In the first nine months of this year, GM posted an operating margin of 5 percent, compared with 6.7 percent for Ford, 7.7 percent for Volkswagen and 10 percent for Hyundai, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Boosting margins just with white-collar cuts and efficiency improvements will be difficult, especially if the comparison is Hyundai, said Adam Jonas, a New York-based analyst at Morgan Stanley. Hyundai benefits from the weak won and because the company builds many different vehicles on just a few car platforms, he said.
“White-collar cost is almost a rounding error for GM,” Jonas said in a phone interview. “Hyundai has a currency advantage and great global platform sharing. Making white-collar staffing cuts is not going to get it done.”
GM has 141,000 hourly employees and 69,000 salaried employees. At the end of 2008, it had 170,000 hourly workers and 73,000 salaried workers, according to company filings.
GM is working to cut vehicle architectures to 14 from 30 by 2018.
GM Said to Hire Hackett to Identify N. America Job Cuts
The axe will fall. Keep trying, GM, keep trying.
Regards,
OW
Even those that spout of the superior quality of Hyundai/Kia's aren't usually so foolish as to assume that quality translates into reliability or durability on par with Honda or Toyota. They might be class leading in STATS right now (a form of quality), but reliability and quality of another sort is another thing all together.
Me... I'd probably still pick the Honda over the Hyundai, but it has my eyebrows raised.
wholly moley! Way too expensive for a small car like a Cruze. That's super way overpriced, just like the Volt.
I got my V6 Accord Coupe with Alloy wheels at the very end of 2002 (2003 model) for about that much (25K out the door with CA's super high sales tax and DMV fees).
In 1985 I wanted a nice handling smaller sedan. There was really nothing at GM that was even worth considering. I did look at the Tempo/Topaz, but those were a joke. Ended up with the Jetta, AFAIR I paid 11 or 12K for my Jetta GL. Drove it 143K miles and only real problem was a sticking fuel pump relay that would occasionally cause the car not to start if it was warm outside. Sold it in '94 when kid #2 came along and we needed a minivan.
But wouldn't you rather support your local economy by paying a bit extra for work on your car at the local mechanic than to support the Taliban by guzzling more gas!!
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking. Now granted, I do think the Cruze is a nice small car. But that same Fitzmall group I mentioned also has 2012 Altimas, with leather and a sunroof, for around $22K. $500 LESS than the Cruze, yet similarly equipped, and a larger, faster car. I think even with the turbo, the Cruze is only good for 0-60 in around 9.3 seconds. I've actually seen some tests that put the Altima 4 cyl as quick as ~7.7, but I think those are aberrations, like the mythical 3.9 second 1965 Pontiac Catalina 2+2. I think most tests of it are more like 8.5 seconds.
I guess one thing that the Altima has going against it, though, is that it's an old design, dating back now to 2007. So that might be one reason they're moving them kinda cheap.
I'm not to worried about him. I'm more worried about the billions and billions debt we keep adding every day.
$650, $90. consider yourself lucky.
Everything that breaks on the Neon is seemingly $1,000 + from head gaskets, to transmissions, to AC compressors.
I can't post pics but here's a link to the Vega - Corvette wheel in question: Steering Wheel
If the link doesn't work just google Pictures of 1976 Corvette Steering Wheel or something like that & you'll see images of it. This wheel was also used on:
1. Cavaliers
2. sport wheel option on early 2nd gen Camaro's (ref. RPO code NK4)
4. standard wheel later on with a function rubber-rimmed version
3. perhaps early 3rd gen Camaro - can't remember 100%
4. early gen S-10 trucks/blazers and full-size
The C5 Corvette's wheel also was basically the later gen S10 / full-size truck wheel. Again, this caught my eye because I've driven, worked on and cursed enough of these GM beasts to remember. I mean, no different than the Mustang & Falcon (being the same car) using the same steering wheel (Mustang just used a different center cover over the plain Falcon wheel).
There is also a write-up on CorvetteCentral about the very same thing & how to swap it to the later 77 - 82 wheel as well as the WSJ article discussing the C5/C6 sharing a wheel similar to the Cobalt.
76 CC SW Upgrade
You seem pretty up on events; are you forgetting the Fed and their QE's? Do you know any people who were typically getting 4-5% on their CD's and savings, and now get 1% if lucky? That takes a lot of food and medicine away from seniors.
Just 1 more reason I dislike the Guvmint, picking winners and losers. I sometimes feel that I could trust organized crime to be more consistent. And I feel Wall Street is more for suckers and fixed, then going to any casino.
GM is just 1 part of this corrupt corporate & political power and money grab.
I agree. They didn't do anything for me at the time either.
Well my experience with Big 3 is the exact opposite. I have had first hand experience with probably 15-20 of them over the past 20 years. The only negative experiences I can think of was a blown head gasket on a 1989
Astro that was covered by Chevy as good will at 40k. That vehicle went on to 320k.
Some Ford f-150's needed brake lines replaced due to rust and a gas tank.
But those were around 15 years old at the time. My business has had 3 F-150s and all were super reliable. We also had 3 Ford Windstars that were solid to 150k (2 of them being totalled). We still have a 2002 Windstar which had the subframe replaced under recall. It Still runs good at about 120K.
My son had a 2000 Cavalier served him well and cheaply for 200k.
He currentyhas a 2008 Cobalt with 80k. His only non maintenance issue was a wheel bearing.
We had a late '80s Dodge Caravan 4 cyl that went well over 200k with no problems. I also had a '96 Eagle Vision TSI which was great over the 3 years I owned it (although the A/C was serviced under recall by Chrysler)
My wife's 2008 Aura XR is a great car and the only warranty related issue was to have the intermediate steering shaft lubricated.
I dirve a 2006 silverado and has never seen a dealer for any issue. Still runs great and by the way it has not a hint of frame rust so prevalent in Toyota Tundras and Tacomas.
I have also owned foreign branded cars. VW,(I have a son who is leasing a new Jetta ...which I find kind of cheap and underpowred with flat hard seats) Nissan (Owned a Maxima which was a good car but had coil problems and a stiff ride), Mazda ( oldr pick-up with blown head gasket)
By the way my older son's friend bought an old early nineties Toyota Camry with low miles a few years ago for like $4000. Within 2 years he put that amount in it in repairs. For $8000 he could have bought a late model Big 3 product hat would have served him better.
What's up with that. My wife's '00 Impala had that issue as did my '00 Suburban. Not that it was a huge deal, but man was it annoying when it acted up. My Suburban's was replaced, but the Impala's was lubed. Then it started acting up again when it was turned in.
Seems there is a whole decade worth of ISS issues that GM hasn't fixed yet. I still hear the current Impala is still susceptible to that issue.
How did the recall work on that? A guy I know had a Windstar under the recall and the rust issue was so bad Ford bought it from him.
Back when the Corvette was only $300 more than a Cosworth Vega, they ('Vette and 'performance' Vegas) did share a wheel. Other than it was a fat wheel, I never liked that wheel. The upper spokes often hid upper gauges in the various Chevys it was used it (Chevelle Laguna S-3, Monte Carlo Custom in '72, Monza 2+2 in '75, and yes, Vega GT from '71-77). The wheel was later made a strippo wheel in the '82 Cavalier Cadet, bargain-basement Cavalier. By this time though, it was not used on a concurrent Corvette...it had been replaced a few years earlier in the 'Vette. We're talking over thirty years ago. It was presented as a relatively recent occurrence, in a discussion of recent/current 'Vettes.
So, you could never look at a new 'Vette, and go over to a new Cavalier, and say, "Same steering wheel." That was the implication. Back in the '70's, the price of a Corvette hadn't gone into the stratosphere yet, in comparison to other Chevys. It was the most expensive model, but not by double-digit thousands like later.
It was never used in the '82 Camaro, but was a staple in the generation before that.
My neighbor didn't have his replaced - Toyota just bought it back from him for about 2X the retail value. He got over $10K for a 10 YO truck with 225K miles on it. He was happy.
Ford had the van over a month. They provided a loaner car the entire time (a Matrix from Enterprise I think). The entire rear subframe was replaced and the front was inspected. They cleaned the interior and exterior before returning it to us. This is a van we use for work that we paid $5500 for a year and a half ago. It was a positive experience all around leaving me with a good impression of Ford.
I can only wish my Expedition's frame would rust out and Ford would buy it off me for 2x retail. Ford won't even step up to the plate and fix the paint that's flaking off. I've seen 2010's with bubbling paint. I got a quote for $500 to repaint the tailgate. Guess I'll just have that done in the spring if I decide to keep it.
What I meant to say is the ISS issue was still going on with current gen Impala's and Malibu's after they were redesigned. I don't know if it's still a problem, but it seemed like that issue went on forever.