Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Tirerack charges about $ 10 to $ 12 shipping per tire. Tire mounting and balancing nowadays is about $10-$15 per tire.
I was assuming you were looking for winter tires in the following size - 215/70/15.
Cheapest from tirerack: Winterforce M+S: $41 per tire for a total of $164 for a set.
Quality tire from tirerack: Michelin Arctic Alpin: $81 per tire for a total of $324 for a set.
Shipping charges (for my ZIP code, others may vary): $30.68
$25 per steel wheel is a lot. But I'll take your number. So this is $100.
Mounting - let's say $50 for all four.
So cheapest option is: $344, most expensive: $504.
I was a little off, but then again, I am not spending $25 per wheel for a steel wheel.
But you'll be surprised how cheap a generic steel wheel can be.
It is really a question of aesthetics vs. price. That is, can you live with generic steel wheels for the few winter months every year? I personally even like the generic look.
Option # 1: Go to tirerack, select a winter package for a 2001 Maxima GLE, and you'll see their steel wheel is $44. However they mount the tire on the wheel for free, so they are really charging $30-$35 per wheel.
Option # 2: Search online and you'll find even lower wheel prices.
Option # 3: Go to a local garage in your area, and work out a good deal - they should be able to beat tirerack prices.
P.S. I just priced at tirerack a winter package for my 2001 Maxima GLE for $426.24, including a shipping charge of $58.24. My local tire place can definitely beat this price.
(I do not agree with that observation, though.)
I hope they update the grill and make the 5-speed automatic standard on the SL by 2005 instead of waiting until the 2007 or so revision.
If top performance/acceleration is not a priority I'll take the four speed transmission any day. Every time you go from a full stop to cruise you have one less shift. Which translates to less stress on the transmission, which in turn translates to better longevity.
Five speed transmissions are generally fine, but I'll be wary of using any new one before it is thoroughly tested by time - look at all the Acura TL problems.
That said, I have driven a number of Maxima competitors with automatics and have found the former Maxima to be sorely lacking as far as it's automatic. Granted, the TL 5-speed has major reliability problems, but it felt lot smoother and quicker shifting than the Maxima. So is the Accord V-6. As are the G35's. And, in performance tests, no car suffers more by equiping it with an automatic than the Maxima.
I cannot think of a single car in it's class that has a better engine than the Maxima (which I give a solid 8 out of 10), but I only rate the automatic transmission about a 5 out of 10, above its domestic counterparts, but below most of its Japanese and all of its European ones.
So, it also perplexes me that Nissan would split the model between 4-speed (presumably a carryover?) and 5-speed (presumably an improved upgrade?) automatics. This was one mechanical area that I thought warranted improvement, even more than the independent rear suspension.
However, I really like my auto transmission. I think it shifts very smoothly. Maybe I am not too picky?
Also, I killed a 17" rim last winter on a curb and the dealer wanted $375. My guess is the new 18" rims are easily over $400. These rims and tires are extremely expensive!! Good luck replacing them. FYI, I ended up buying a refurbished rim for $150.
Also, have in mind they may want you to change the pads as well. (Probably change them if you are getting new rotors, otherwise leave them alone as long as they are not almost or completely worn out.)
In your case if you've turned the rotors only once, the chances are you can get away with turning them again.
You can pay a lot less or a lot more with aftermarket parts and work done by a mechanic. Unless you know what you are doing though, it is best to stick with the stock stuff.
Finally, make sure the lug nuts are torqued to spec (80 lbs per sq. inch), otherwise the rotors will warp again in 5 to 10 thousand miles.
The ratios are closer together with less jerking and rpm drop between gears making the shifts more seamless.
It will also have a higher top gear giving it a more quiet highway drive and better fuel economy. So, it is not all about racing and saving 3/10ths of a second at a drag strip or they could go back to 3 speed automatics from the 70's.
also, haven't seen any recent pricing discussions here, curious where these cars trade. my dealer said only about $2k off sticker which doesn't sound like as much as i would like....:) lots of hail damaged cars on ebay/traderonline though!!
thanks!
Not at all. Normally the top gear (and even the one before top) is the same, and you just get more gears between first and top.
Applies to stick shift too. Take the RSX and RSX-S (we have an RSX-S in our household). First gear is exactly the same. 4th in the RSX is EXACTLY the same as 5th in the RSX-S, and 5th (top) in the RSX is EXACTLY the same as 6th (top) in the RSX-S. (I got this from the user manual which lists the gear ratios for both cars.)
German manufacturers, such as Mercedes Benz or BMW do not recommend brake rotor turning on their cars, not even once. They specify replacing rotors along with new pads.
Note: The torque units you specified as pounds per square inch should be ft-lbs.
Pounds per square inch (abbr. psi) - what was I thinking - this is a unit of pressure, and has nothing to do with torque.
By the way, getting the lug nuts torqued to spec didn't help in my case.
Changing the rotors to a different brand didn't help either (actually I think the OEM rotors are just fine).
Changing the pads to ceramic ones that are supposed to be very easy on the rotors (as they do not produce much heat) proved to be of no help either.
I am starting to think that that the problem may be with the calipers. Maybe even a perfectly true rotor is out of round relative to the pad when installed on our wheels.
I'd like to try resurfacing the rotors with an on-the-car-lathe which is supposed to make the rotor true relative to its axis of rotation when installed (and therefore true relative to the pad), but I can't find anyone who can do this job in my area. I think even a brand new rotor needs to be resurfaced with an on-the-car-lathe in my case, as I believe it will be out of round even right from the start.
I also have a 00 SE and the weakest point on the car is the tranny.
Do a google search and you'll find lots.
You can also check out the other Maxima web sites for more specific information.
I wish I could test-drive a newer model to appreciate the difference.
Did Nissan change their brake / rotor design between between 1995 & 00/01? I have a 95 SE w/ 144k miles and just had the front pads replaced a second time; the rears were replaced once at 110k miles. The rotors have never been turned or replaced and were deemed "fine" as of my most recent regular service. Did Nissan cheapen the brake system or am I just lucky?
One comment on correct torquing of lugnuts: Just one uneven tightening with an impact wrench can be enough to warp your rotors. Subsequent retorquing to spec does nothing because damage has already been done. You cannot straighten out a warped rotor just by correctly tightening the lugnuts. You simply must insist on use of hand tools when having wheels reinstalled. Removing wheels with an impact wrench is OK, but not installing them, unless they use a torque stick which assures even torquing, but I would not trust even that.
The new front pads do not have holes for the anti-rattle clips, so I assume they are no longer necessary with new pads. You must reuse the metal spacers installed on the original pads. The rear ones are pain in the butt. It is very difficult to get the calipers of the rotors and you need a special tool to rotate the piston in. The front pistons are just pushed in with a C-clamp (a big 9 inch one in this case).
The cost of Nissan brake pads was $ 130. I wonder what the price would be if they added an extra squealer per set.
One more comment: Glazed rotors are usually an indicator of high heat which is typically produced by warped rotors. The remedy for that is the turning job as above.
Just my 2c
And with the traditional off-the-car method I seem to get at the most 10-15K miles before warping the rotors. By the way the replacement new rotors lasted 7K miles before the front started shaking. I pushed it to 10K miles but then I had them warped so badly the whole car was shaking when applying the brakes even at 20 mph.
My car is at the dealer right now (2001 GLE) - 4th brake job in 2.5 years and 49K miles!
My car has a manual transmission and I suspect that this is one reason why my brakes last a long time. With a manual you simply use engine and downshift into lower gears to slow down. This avoids overheating of brakes in prolonged braking situation. My other car (99 Mazda 626 V6 too has a manual transmission and the original brakes and rotors are still good at 72K miles.
Saving on brake wear and tear is one of the benefits of driving a manual. However, I do believe that the new rotors are simply junk. Also, every time you have a rotor turned, you make it thinner and even more susceptible to warpage. So it is a no win situation when even new ones warp after 10k miles. I would try to find higher quality aftermarket rotors, like Brembo.
petition as I'm trying to get Nissan to issue a recall for these
defective parts!!!
Thanks
http://www.petitiononline.com/NIS_IGN/petition.html
In your case it appears that they did not properly tighten the axle to hub nuts at the factory. The torque on these should be about 170 to 230 ft-lbs and this is about twice as high as your wheel lugnuts. So if they were tightened properly to begin with, there would be no need for the cotter pins, which are there as a last resort to prevent the nut from backing completely off, if it got loose somehow. Some cars, like Mazda, do not use cotter pins, but instead the nut itself has a collar on one end which is staked against the notch in the axle shaft to prevent the nut from backing out.
On a typical rear wheel drive car, the front wheel bearing nut is kept from backing out by a cotter pin, but in this case, the nut is a little more than fingertight. So the cotter pin is a must. A special type of nut called a castellated nut is used. In case of your front wheel drive Maxima, the high torque on the axle nut should not even require a cotter pin. My Suzuki motorcycle rear axle is held in place with a single nut torqued to about 90 ft-lbs and it does not have a cotter pin to keep it from backing out. And if this nut came loose the consequences would be a lot more severe than on your car.
I mentioned several times that I believe that the Nissan quality is slipping. I have been very fortunate with the 98 Maxima SE which has been troublefree to date. Nothing but routine maintenance.
any thoughts? thanks
seeya
The replacement gas charged lift supports from Auto Zone:
Mighty Lift, part # E 95784, Made in USA. Cost: $ 20 a piece. That's less than 20% of the Nissan price.