By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
If you DRIVE it, you have lots of FUN!!!!!!!!
It is really hard to obey speed limits. But you must, or the cops will start to recognize them as potential speeders, and start watching us close.
Ken
I have never felt more confident in a car, because it's more responsive than any other car I've driven. It can do almost anything just about anytime. Just today a Ford Focus was tailgating me and I took a turn fast--the rear end swung right around for me, left the Focus a little behind. Then I gassed it and left the Focus in the dust.
So yes, it's fun and with a little practice with the 5-speed, you can have even more fun! (By the way, a few of my friends--and my fiance--say they'd probably be compiling speeding tickets if they drove the WRX, and they wonder why I haven't gotten any yet. I tell them you just have to know when to behave!)
--sonya4
I really like that this car demands driving excellence to achieve its performance potential.
Mike
WarpDrive: When I got the sti shifter trim back in March or so, it was $99 if you could find one at all. Now I think they have vendor deals on iClub for $69.
Celica 115: That *is* what the trim piece is. Nothing else. It mounts around your existing boot. I also have the MOMO Race AirLeather shift knob. Maybe you thought it was all one kit...
Stoner 420: Actually, I did take my plastic trim off of the boot. I followed the instructions about trimming the console with the Dremel. Then When I did a test fit, I didn't like how low the boot mount fit. So I took it off of the plastic, belt sanded the top lip off of the plastic, and then superglued the boot back to the plastic trim. Then I fit it all up, clamped it, and drilled through the plastic trim and boot. Then I screwed the whole thing together. Real nice fit, but did take an entire afternoon.
Steve
<http://users.bigpond.net.au/pepper/Rexilla/MY03_impLARGE.jpg>
- Hutch
Having said that—it could also be real. There's no way of knowing. I'll tell ya what though: this facelift of the WRX is reaching a state of frenzy over on the I-Club. It seems every other day a "new" image crops up, and the discussion goes non-stop... There's even a guy over there begging any I-Club members who are expert computer geeks to hack the SOJ server, to get answers! It's unreal!
Check out the latest issue of Road & Track. There's different image there (also found on the I-Club), that is also supposed to be real!
Bob
- Hutch
-mike
-mike
it would also imply there's money left over to buy gas
-Dave
Anyone else notice that in the C&D braking test, stopping distances were shorter with the ABS off (with the stock brakes)? Comments?
-juice
- Hutch
Further, I don't believe that Subaru will make any major changes to the WRX, unless they really have NO intention of bringing the STi to North America. Here's why I think that:
1: Having been in North American showrooms for only a year now, following the large media presence marking the debut, if SoA makes major changes to the WRX it would be a tacit admission that the current WRX has problems (which it does not!). Even GM kicked and dragged its heels about changes to the Aztek (reducing the plastic cladding, etc) even after the press and buyers had roundly condemned the vehicle. GM had neither the budget to alter the vehicle, nor the willingness to admit a mistake.
2: SoA, like all auto mfrs, operates on a budget that is planned years in advance, with hard&fast allocations for each vehicle line. If SoA is working to "Americanize" the STi, I would assume that that project is allocated much more in the way of resources than any changes to the WRX.
2b: in the course of normal vehicular affairs, a vehicle model must demonstrate its ability to pay for itself before it is given a new slug of funding for changes/refreshes. Ford chose to kill the Blackwood rather than pump money into it and make changes, because it could not demonstrate that it would pay for itself even WITH those changes. Even with the media attention and strong sales figures it's earned, the WRX has sold "only" ~12K units (nevermind that the WRX sold "only" as many as it did because that's all SoA brought over here), meaning it probably has a ways to go before it generates positive RoI and will justify more spending on updates/refreshes.
3: Making the WRX any more powerful, or providing other upgrades to engine/powertrain, would force SoA to up the price and would also engender the sensation that the WRX is in competition with the STi. If the STi will have 270hp and MSRP at 30K, giving the WRX 240hp and raising MSRP to 26 or 27K would have a lot of prospective buyers saying "if I spend just a little more, I can get the STi," and WRX sales will suffer. If SoA improves the WRX but holds the price, they will lower their profit margin AND threaten to boost the WRX's price/performance ratio high enough that potential STi buyers decide to get the WRX as it's "almost as good." It's common practice to have a particular vehicle model that is available in many different packages (eg the dizzying array of ways to outfit a full-size Chevy truck, or the engine choices for the Mustang) but I believe SoA wants to treat the WRX and STi NOT as to differently-outfitted versions of one model, but as two separate models.
DjB
I also believe that small horsepower jumps are probable with the WRX, since Subaru has done it often in the past. Maybe not big h.p., but easily 5-10 IMHO.
-Dennis
The only thing he didn't take into account was World Wide Sales, they do sell these vehicles elsewhere besides the USA.
Any visible change in sheet metal is "big bucks" when you take into account what's involved, you have re-design, plus new tooling involved, in even the smallest changes. So, you can't really say it's not a big deal. Maybe to you or I, but to the mfgr. It is a big deal, and it must be justified by sales. We're not talking a few hundred bucks here, we're talking hundreds of thousands for just a small change. Plus the hundreds of hours involved in getting it done.
And anyone who knows anything about design, knows you can't just change one part, that part will affect several other parts. And we haven't even thought about testing yet.
Just my thoughts...
Ken
fxs Jun 18, 2002 1:06pm
I guess, if they really want to change it, they'll change it. I would guess they might leave the WRX styling the same, and debut the new styling on the STi, to get some more mileage out of the round light design.
I think it's a nice looking car or wagon, though, so I guess I just don't understand what everyone's upset about. Actually, as good as everything else in the car is, it would have to be super ugly or have some great competition for me not to consider it. 227hp, Manual Tranny, AWD, great driving environment, wagon option, what's not to like?
And yes like many of you would confirm, everyone seemed like they were driving slower. ;-) Thought about investing in a good detector before the trip but opted for good ole' fashioned luck and did fine. Saw plenty of smokey radars along the way too.
My opinion still hasn't changed. The car is still a driver's car (IMHO) begging for input. Going through the mountains (4 pax + full trunk) was literally a blast. Barely downshifted at all and those curves, wow. So I could only imagine at this point if I had 17's like most of you do. Yes the new WRX commercial is only fitting. You definitely want the tunes off to savor the twists, turns and the revvvsss. Just don't go stupid like the previous posts and discussions on invincibility.
Agile and amazing is what I could think of as I handled those left lane hogs. I'm sure they know what the WRX logo looks like on my trunk. Saw plenty of Eclipses, Acuras, Camaros and Mustangs - from my rear view mirror ;-). And yes one has to keep an eye on the speedometer coz all your other senses will not indicate how fast you're going.
I also found it kinda amusing that throughout the whole trip I only saw 2 blue sedans and 1 silver wgn. Of course we did the customary (we know what they don't) salute to each other as well. I averaged about anywhere from 24mpg to 27 mpg/tank.
The car never disappointed me at any time. I just now have all these battle wounds (bug splats) on my front end to deal with.
Gotta love this car. Anything else beyond stock is a plus and not a must. Happy motoring folks. Sorry if I still seem wired. I'll blame it on the caffeine.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again; The WRX (here in the USA) is a success, in spite of its looks.
Bob
I say face-lift it. The people that like the ovals will buy one now, and the ones that don't will wait for the new look. But both customers will buy, which is what Subaru wants.
-juice
Glad to hear you enjoyed your road trip. I'm planning mine for next week.
Hope to verify all your positive comments.
Battle wounds.... Hope all you have is bug splats and no chips. I've seen comments on this board about how bad the paint is, although I disagree, I've had my WRX for close to a year and don't have any chips whatsoever that I can find. Unlike domestic cars I've owned. I personally think the paint is holding up really well. I've hit a LOT of those nasty bugs, especially driving at night, here near the Mississippi River, we grow'em big here.
I've seen other WRX's on occasion (not real often) and waved at them, but nobody seems to be paying attention, my guess is that they are enjoying the experience so much they don't pay much attention to others.
I intend to record our mileage also, not that it really matters.
Later,
Ken
One of the WRX sedans I encountered was merging on the onramp as I passed by heading for a mountain climb. He was about 10 cars behind as I glanced back. I was keeping pace with a Merc Marquis heading the pack as the road started twisting and lost sight of the others behind. A couple turns later, here was that blue brother on my tail. Kinda chuckled thinking "well who else did you expect?" I guess we all drive with the same smile on our faces. Kinda expected 5th to bog down a bit on the climbs but it did just fine, not too high and not too low. Later, f.
ABS was developed to prevent blown tires on aircraft and has been shifted to the auto industry to increase controllability at max braking--not to shorten stopping distance.
dop50--When my dad got his new RX-7 in '79, fellow RX-7 drivers would wave as they passed. This continued for a couple of years until the novelty wore off.TC
Will they get in the way while driving in snow? Thanks.TC
Another thing to consider is driveways, ever turn into a drive and hear that awful scraping sound? And don't forget about those parking lot blocks that stick up just far enough to create havoc.
Just a few thoughts on the subject.
Ken
sensei - Thanks for the trip report!
-Dennis
Perhaps a pro using threshold braking and perhaps even a little skidding can simply stop shorter than a computer pumping to lock/release the brakes.
-juice
-Dave
As for waving to other WRX drivers...Around here they just tap their horns at each other. I had one guy wave at me but that was about it. Do people wave more in other places?
By the way, I was asked yesterday by a delivery person if I wanted to sell my WRX! I said not yet, but I'd let him know in a few years...
--sonya4
hypov "Subaru Impreza Outback Sport (Wagons & SUVs Boards)" Jul 28, 2002 6:46pm
-Dave
TC - wow you're talking about your dad's RX7. I still have my '80 RX7 bought in '80. dop50 has a good point. And yes, airdams they're called. They were a popular aftermarket add-ons for RX7's back then coz if you've driven one, they needed it. The car felt light up front once you went >75mph. The WRX I don't think needs it unless you're heavy into looking coooollll. The car is pretty stable let's just say 75mph and beyond. It even kinda taunts you to find out. Yeah the waving will probably wear off too but for now, hey, we'll enjoy the moment.
hypov - Can't blame you there, instinct is still a good gauge. Gotta make sure first it is a hand that's being waved ;-).
Have a good day folks!!
I read your post -- pretty funny! Perhaps the OBS thought that you were pointing out something wrong with their vehicle and stopped?
Way back in early 98 when I got my Forester, we Forester owners would just nod at each other. We simply "got it" from back then. ;-)
Ken
I'm pretty sure they had thought something to be wrong with their vehicle. It was spanking (using it politely) new. Guess they wasted no time and missed my thumbs up gesture.
-Dave
p/s I think I'll just go with the thumbs up.
Generally, when any group has a vehicle in small numbers (new, or limited edition: WRX or Ferrari), they will greet the other drivers who have "seen the light." While the Miata still had pop-up lights, drivers would say 'hi' by raising/lowering the headlamps. Sometimes, people in Corollas who admire your new (or specialty) ride will wave.
But ... drivers of new BMW lines (Z3 when it first came out, for example) and also of Porsches of all sorts ... ignore pretty much everyone. I guess they're real special, but only to themselves;-)
Go Bluejays.
Joe W.
That was the last time.
-juice
Oh well.
-mike
Ed
-juice
I'm just a subie newbie compared to most of you. But I've also been around the block a few times. I usually hang on to my cars >10 yrs.
Just wasn't as jazzed with my '80 RX7 when I picked it up as I still am with this one.
So what about that Edmunds decal you're talking about. Haven't heard of that one?
cptclt - I'm with you man !
- Hutch
I drove my dad's 79, had an '81 "S" and an '86 "GS". The '86 is still the best car I've owned--the quality was the equal of the Lexuses. It had an extremely solid feel with great balance. Needed more motor, though--couldn't afford a turbo model.