Did you recently rush to buy a new vehicle before tariff-related price hikes? A reporter is looking to speak with shoppers who felt pressure to act quickly due to expected cost increases; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com for more details by 4/24.
FORD VS DODGE
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I mean look at the Ford Lightning and the Dodge Dakota R/T ohhhhh and wait for the new Dodge Convertible truck they're coming out with that sports a fine viper engine and monster rims!!
I am biased toward Ford but I bought a new F250 superduty 8/99. I did give Dodge a look, the biggest truck dealer around is actually Ford and Dodge dealer. I noticed the Dodge was MUCH MUCH louder than the PSD. It didn't seem like it was the same quality inside either. Last but not least, can you say "transmission rebuild please"?
That is if you go for the auto.
Doubt I'll switch to Dodge as the Ford has always been just fine. At least I know what some of Fords pitfalls are, Dodge would be a new learning experience.
Don't know if this story has gone national yet or not. Investigative reporters at a Seattle TV station discovered that Ford is installing the recalled series Firestones as SPARES on their NEW Ranger pickups. The tires have the words "Temporary Use Only" stamped on them in very small letters that you could not even see in the dark or the rain. Ford defends the practice saying they are perfectly acceptable for use as spares. LOL!!
Pass the word as you see fit.
http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/stories/03ram/ram_render.html
Yes i'm a Dodge fan go bill elliot ray evernham dodge dealers #9 intrepid 01.
you can see my car and truck here:
Racefan9's 300m / RAM
Don't think I want any Firestone tire on a new rig.
it won't last "60,000" miles are screwed up to me.
I really don't believe in 4 cylinders though. I
have an 88' Ranger STX 4x4 w/ a 2.9L V6 5 spd. that
is rebulit w/ 70,000 miles. 75% of the truck is
stock. The first engine went threw about 296,000
miles until there was no compression left to start.
The Transmission and clutch had 349,000 miles
until it was replaced. It has gone to Michigan more
than I have. It was well taken care of, but yet
beat. The paint looks great, the style looks great
with the stock Roll bar w/ offroad lights and stock
pushbar w/brush gaurds, and stock front and rear
end. I believe this truck will last until about
450,000 miles and then it will be so worn out that
I will just have to part it out. This truck has
never been in a serious accident, but just hit on
the passenger fender, which I replaced.
Also my mom just got a 2000 S-10 LS w/ 4.3L V-6
auto with 5,000 down from her father and I tell her
all the time how much it sucks. The fold out seats
in the back squeak over every bump in the road.
She went to the dealer numerous times for it and
they claim they tightened bolts, but the problem
still persists. The passenger seat has to be all
the way back because it doesn't latch. That's what
I call cheap. This truck costed $23,000 and it's
only a 2WD and no power anyhting except steering. I
changed the oil in it yesterday and I foufn out
that the oil plug had magnet on it to trap all the
particles in the engine. I thought, that's the
most intelligent idea i've heard from them. The
truck has almost 16,000 miles and I say it's okay,
but I don't think that truck will last 100,000
miles.
So if anyone would like to disagree about Ford, go
right ahead! For you Ford fans, if you would like
to know something specific about my truck, Email
me. I will be glad to answer your Emails. I do not
have pics at the time, but I'll try to get some if
you would like to see pics.
Steve O
purchased a 2001 Ram 2500 w/the Cummings Diesel
(even though I like the looks of the Ford better). So far, the truck has performed better than expected. The primary reason I selected Dodge is because I know a few guys that "hotshot" loads across the country for a living. Every one of them drive Dodge w/the Cummings engine and place an insane amount of miles on them. The second is the Dodge dealer I purchased from gave me a great deal. It may not be as "pretty" as a Ford, but my Dodge will get me there ahead of schedule with whatever I decide to haul with me.
PS - If you live anywhere near South Alabama, send
me an e-mail and I'll forward the dealer's info.
I've priced both Ford and Dodge, pretty close for
a Superduty 5.4 man.x-cab vs 2500 5.9 man.x-cab (w/few options but suspension,handling,hd-svr grp)
I own a 91 Ranger/STX 3.0 man.x-cab w/181,000 mi.
and have had fantastic service from it. Biggest repair has been the pilot bearing, died and almost
trashed the input shaft of the trans. but I caught
it just in time. I have been very pleased with Ford durability but I realize this could be an exception to the rule since this has been my FIRST
Ford. We also own a Windstar 98 but the jury is still out on that w/66,000 mi. So what to do for a new 3/4qtr. ton purchase, go with the Ford or try the unproven? My main concern is the durability of
either drive train from engine to axle. I know the
components from front to back are proven winners
on each side, but have only experienced the Ford side of the house. Help from the gallery would be appreciated. Towing 7,500lbs(trlr./car) and family
for weekend services, daily driven vehicle.
Gypsie you have a CUMMINS diesel not a cummings.
I live about 30 miles east of gypsie and I wont even make you e-mail me. Treadwell Ford in Mobile, AL has a great selection. If I were a Dodge dealer I'd make a great deal for you too, unload all the junk I could before DC shuts em down completely. You can count on Ford to be there IF you need them in 5 years. And it is the best looking truck out on the road.
Ford copied Dodge's front end on F250HD, both
very manly and macho looking. New Chevy HD's
have nice rounded timid looking front ends...
Please avoid burning up keyboards and laptops
in rebuttal, just being opinionated is all, please, please do not take it to heart...
newer Rangers have more grill enhancement just like new '01 Toyota
Tacoma....Dakota looks very truck like, almost like big brother RAMBO,
Dakota RT 5.9 is more muscular than SOHC Splashdown Ranger.....
that they are not durable. I think most agree that they have the best looks but when it comes down to it
it seems Ford gets the edge in durability. I getting a new truck in the next 6 months and have been
seriously looking at the Dakota Club Cab 4x4. I have a f-150 and had no problems other than its not an extended cab
and its a little tot big for me. The Dakota is the perfect size but I dot want to spend $22,000 on something that is
not going to be reliable and breaking down all the time. I know you can get a lemon from any brand but it seems
that Dodge has more problems. I starting to seriously reconsider getting the Dakota.
A lot of what you read here in the townhall are COMPLAINTS about vehicles.
I have a 2001 dodge dakota quad cab and have one minor issue with it regarding the operation of one of the windows.The dealer has ordered the part and will repair it when the part comes in.
I did not want a full size truck and the dakota was just the right size for me. The other option would be a toyota tundra.
Good luck with whatever you choose.
I dont regret it...