Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)

19596981001011306

Comments

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    500E....not anything related to a SEC, which at the time was a whale-like 140 car. The Porsche built 500E, the souped up 124 that cost 80 grand when it was new. I see nice ones (and that's "nice", which is nicer than "nice" to most, I think. I don't mean nice as in clean, I mean nice as in perfect) at $30K + all the time. It's still a bit for me to justify, but having 4 doors will keep prices going down I am sure.

    I likely won't buy one though, as I want to find one of these first

    Both 300SLs are awesome cars. I actually like the kind of odd 300 SL hardtop, too.

    Today I saw a lemon yellow Datsun 510 sedan and a white 710 coupe. Lucky me!
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well when you are ready to buy a 500E, let me know and I will find you one much cheaper than that. That is a silly asking price.

    Oh, I like old Datsun 510 coupes! I'd like to have one of those (fat chance finding one that isn't a)being raced or b) trashed.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    What would a minty one, full history, as few owners as possible, lowish mileage etc run? Preferrably not black as well.

    Could you find me an immaculate sunroof 300SE LWB?

    The 510 I saw was pretty decent...whitewall tires and full wheel covers too. Of course, it was a sedan. Are you sure you don't want a 710? I bet it could be had for nothing.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Nah, the first 510 is the "classic" and is the most fun to drive. The 710 is ...well...bow wow and all that.

    500E---hmmm....looks to me, just perusing the market here, if you wanted a very clean low mileage car, say 70K-80K, and you had cash in hand, you could hammer one down for around $16K-17K by grinding the owner. Money talks when it comes to big old sedans. I wouldn't even bother to answer an ad for $30K, just disregard those. Those cars are not for sale.

    A 300SE LWB is pretty rare (I presume you mean the old ones) but I think you could get one for about $7,500 or so, since the coupes are selling around $13K-$16K. Might be a troublesome car, though, and probably rusty. Take a bit of searching though. Most have probably disappeared, as 4-door are generally not saved or restored.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,425
    Four doors makes it a 144.

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,425
    In my local paper today..

    Mercedes 300 SEL '70
    6.3 green w/cognac leather
    walnut burl wood, runs well,
    $5500 (XXX) XXX-XXXX

    Whaddaya think??!!

    regards,
    kyfdx

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    I'd like a 500E with maybe 50K, one owner, immaculate, every document, preferably in a nice blue like my 126. I suspect that car might not actually exist.

    Here's a couple from ebay:

    500E

    Another...a rusty 124! I've never seen one before

    kyfdx...that sounds very interesting for a 6.3 (nice color combo), but with a price that low on a 6.3, it must have a lot wrong with it. Shifty can probably write a book about how much of a money pit those can be. I somehow have little attraction to those. They seem to have all survived, and they are just so high maintenance.

    The 300SE LWB I want isn't called a SEL, it's just an SE that was stretched a couple inches. It's a fintail W112, not a W109 like a 6.3. It was made between 63-65, production maybe a couple thousand units, of which maybe a couple hundred made it to NA. I bet there's no more than a couple dozen roadworthy ones out there today. Very complex, with air suspension, elaborate interiors, and the big old M189 3L inline 6. But really cool with all of that. Like the one in this link: http://www.300se.org/112015-12-008205/Photos_Body_008205.htm

    Click on the pics to see the coolness. I love the interior color and the wood. The site that is hosted on also has a lot of info about the W112 300SEs, for anyone who cares.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,425
    Yeah... I didn't think it was the same one you were talking about, but everything rang a bell.. and I had to go drag the paper out of the recycling bin to remember what I had read earlier...

    Close... but, no cigar

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    Thanks anyway...it could have been the one!

    The local MB specialist has a 300SE LWB...but it is way past redemption, with its missing engine and rotten interior. Sad.

    image

    image
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    The '92 is amazing, only 14k miles, eh? Obviously someone's baby and/or strictly collector car. I always think it's a bit of a shame when someone buys a car then really doesn't drive it. It's not like even this car was a particularly good investment for them either, I mean, your imaginary $80k in 1992 would have been worth a lot more invested in the stock market than $40k now, unless you were particularly foolish or unlucky.

    That '94, egads, did they use that for their snow time grocery getter? My mom's '88 300E doesn't have that much rust, even in the midwest, with 350k and having spent a third its life not garaged. I wonder if they dipped that thing in salt or something. Perhaps it was a coastal car?
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    And they won't get $40K out of it, that's what really hurts. Something irks me about that car too...the little dealer badge affixed to the trunk. I dunno if that is a midwest/east coast thing or something, as you rarely see it out west, but I think it looks like hell. Who wants something tacky on a car like that? I hope it is just held on with adhesives. And talking about bad investments...you could have bought a S600 sedan/coupe/SL600, kept it pristine like that 500E, and today it would be worth even less...although it cost $120-$140K when new!

    That 94 looks to have much more rust than even my 40 year old fintail. Look at the trunk...wow. Maybe it was caught in a flood or dunked in saltwater or something. I see the car is in Ohio, which can't be a good thing...but it has no plates. I've never seen a 124 with more than a little bubble or surface spot.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Bottomless money pit, a 6.3 sedan. This has the MB 600 limo engine in it, and if you want to pay $1,500 for a water pump, well, it's a free country.

    Not a car for the faint-hearted.

    RE: 500E--I don't really get your obsession with low miles here. Low miles can be a problem. It's not necessarily a good thing with a complex car like a 500E. I'd rather see you in a car that has been in steady service and has been steadily serviced.

    It's like people who make the mistake of buying cars out of museums. Myriad problems develop with seals, gaskets, rubber and gummed up parts.

    An old car is like an old boat. If it isn't worked, it rots. Time is just as good a killer as miles in other words.
  • jrosasmcjrosasmc Member Posts: 1,711
    That's what I don't get- how on earth can a W124 500E like that rust quite a bit? I always considered Mercedes to be the best company in terms of rustproofing and galvanizing their bodies. Heck, even my 1993 Volvo 850 with almost that many miles (it's at 110k) does not show any rust whatsoever, anywhere, and I maintain this car very rigorously and rarely expose it to snow.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    As my dad used to say "some people can screw up a paperclip".
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    about a car like that, with still-shiny paint, and the rust is bubbling up under it like that. That makes me wonder if maybe the car didn't get flood damaged when it was newer, or maybe it was just kept in a high-moisture area? Maybe it had a trunk leak, which kept the inside of the trunk moist?

    It's one thing for a car's paint to start fading and thinning, down to the primer, and then the metal starts to scale up. But when the paint's still nice and shiny, that just bothers me!
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...has no such signs of paint bubbling as does that '94 Benz. Something isn't kosher. Either that car's kept in a very damp place or has been flooded. I've seen many far older Benzes w/o any rusting of such sort. It could also be the result of a sloppy repaint that doesn't show in the pictures. Any way you look at it, $10K is too much for such an old car with such high miles showing this peculiar condition.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    I'm not overly obsessed with low miles. 50K on a 10 year car, with by the book maintenance should have the car in perfect order. My 126 had 160K on it when I bought it, but it had been maintained almost to the point of obsession, so I knew it was OK.

    I've only seen one other modern MB so rusty...a 90 300SEL which came out of Montreal. Apparently they use a lot of chemicals on the roads there in winter or something. This car was very rusty...the whole front end was bubbled, along with the wheelarches, area around the sunroof, and area around the rear windshield. It probably had $5K worth of rust repair on it...and who knows how it was structurally.

    That 500E has something troubling in its past. I think it would take more than a trunk leak, as the sills are rusty too. Who knows what could lurk under the car?

    Today's oddball...a very nice (condition-wise) Plymouth Arrow.
  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,669
    but not many cool or unusual cars were out. I did see a pale yellow '68 Mustang GT fastback going down the highway via flatbed. Except for the missing hood it looked in pretty decent shape.

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    50K miles on a ten year old car is almost statistically off the charts, though. Taking a kinda rare car (actually in collector car circles over 11,000 made is a boatload) and then looking for mileage that is 1/3 the national average pretty much eliminates you ever finding one. And then if you do find one, you pay a premium price for a car that is depreciating quickly anyway, and that you don't want to put more miles on because you paid a premium for a lack of miles. I just don't see the wisdom of paying extra for low miles in a car like this.

    But, as they say, if you can pay to play, it's your game!
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    It's kinda cold here, but no sign of rain, so I braved the pre-Cub game traffic and saw a fairly nice, maroon '78 Firebird Esprit 4-speed for sale (82k miles, no price, I HATE that). Also, on the corner near my house, I spotted a Series IV (I think, it's the one with the smaller, non-slanted fins) Sunbeam Alpine (4 cylinder). Is there any visual way to tell an Alpine from a Tiger? I only knew this was an Alpine by listening to it. I guess the fact that the Tigers cost like four times as much would make seeing one an even more rare occurence. Heck, I was shocked enough to see this one, first I've ever seen, I think.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    I think a number of 500Es were babied and kept at a low mileage. They hit the market often in the venues I read, especially relative to their US sales. They exist, although I too think the prices are high, especially relative to other MBs of the day with really just as good performance. I can get a nice SL500 or S class coupe or something for the same money.

    But I'd rather spend $15K on a pristine show quality 300SE LWB than 30K+ on a 500E, honestly. I've already got the everyday car I need in the 126. A 500E is too extravagant a toy for me.

    I saw a pretty blue Austin Healy 100-4 this morning
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...are older Benzes holding their value better these days because they seem so superior to what M-B's offering these days? I, myself, wouldn't mind a having nice clean 1989-91 420SEL or 560SEL. They seem to be the pinnacle of Mercedes' craft.
  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,669
    I spotted a dark Blue 350/450SLC (didn't read the badge to see which) that looked in decent shape on the highway.

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    I saw a VERY nice gray market '80s 500SEL, in charcoal with palomino interior, one of the better color combinations, IMO. Couldn't get close enough to really check it out, it was in a gated parking lot.
  • merckxmerckx Member Posts: 565
    I saw a '71 Turbo 2002 at an Octoberfest cookout at my local BMW dealership today. My first thought was that it must be a clone, but apparently it wasn't. Aren't they quite rare? Up to know,I'd only seen them in magazines.
    Randy
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    MERCEDES DEPRECIATION: Just about all mass-produced Mercedes are depreciating. Some have "bottomed out" and won't go lower, but very few (relative to all models that were made) are appreciating in value, and those are all pre 1972 two doors of various types. The rest are just nice (or not so nice) used cars and so are worth less as they age, which is what used cars do. So, yeah, the longer you wait, the cheaper the big 4-doors will get. Gray market or heavily modified Mercedes (old AMG stuff) take the worst hit on depreciation.

    BMW Turbos: Not rare by collector car standards but rare by most American car standards--1,672 produced, 1973-1974.

    Alpines, Tigers and Algers: It's pretty easy to fake a Tiger using an Alpine (and this is commonly done as a Tiger is worth 4 to 5 times the price of an Alpine) but if you know what to look for you can spot a fake. First there's the VIN number that tips you off, but that can easily be changed, as there is only one place on the car that has a VIN number. Another more subtle tip off is that the Alpine has a trap door behind the passenger seat to access the battery. A Tiger has a fuel pump in that same place and the batter in the trunk. So you could probably spot a cut off battery box on the frame. On the later MkII Tigers, that trap door itself isn't supposed to be there, so you could spot a welded up floor. But outwardly, no, not really, you can't tell.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    I've never seen a Turbo 2002 in person either. I bet they are extremely rare, and sought after by 02 devotees.

    Old 126 cars do hold their value well for their age and compared to other comparable lux cars from the same period, but it's nothing special. They are still very common and all, they have held up so well. They can also take a lot of neglect before they give up the ghost, so there are sickly ones plying the roads. That ends up driving down values for all, as they are not economically feasible to get right once they've been ruined. They cost a fortune to fix if they are ruined, and maintenance isn't cheap, but if you maintain them, they will go forever. Mine has almost 180K on it now, and it is in awesome condition. Prices on late cars are almost comparable to early 140 (92-on) cars, so they might equal out in time. I've seen immaculate 560SELs still fetching 12K, and you can get a 140 for that pretty easily. SECs still bring a premium too. I think they really were the pinnacle of MB craftsmanship and quality, with style too. They are a timeless design...they still look like 'old money' even today.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    to cheating on Chrysler, and going back to GM! At the Carlisle PA swap meet, I was a '96 Buick Roadhazard- er, I mean, Roadmaster ;-) It was a dark metallic greenish-gray that I find attractive, close to that new "magnesium" color Chrysler is using on their new RWD cars. Interior was a generic leather that I can't even remember now. Might've been beige, putty, taupe, whatever. Who cares, it's all the same thing! Anyway, aside from the typical GM quality issues, like poor ergonomics, Playskool-looking interior materials, etc, I was actually strongly tempted by it. It had about 89,000 miles on it, and they were asking $4995 for it. I dunno what a truly fair price would be for it, but I probably came closer than I should have to making an offer!

    And that wasn't the only thing that tempted me that day. A bit later, Grbeck and I saw a dark brown '77 Olds 98 coupe. It had a beige landau top that needed to be replaced, but the owner had new material in the trunk. It had around 80,000 miles on it. Interior was fairly basic for a car like this...power windows, but non-power door locks, and something I've never seen before...a TWO WAY power seat! It only had a fore/aft adjustment, no front/rear tilt. What's the point? I'm sure a 6-way would've only been a few bucks more.

    The owner only wanted $1800 for it. I was thinking that it might make a good spare car, but realistically, I already have enough of those! Body looked rust-free, although the rear bumper was starting to show through. The a/c blew, but it wasn't a "cold a/c" (I know Shifty would like that term ;-) And it just had an Olds 350 under the hood. I've heard these things could move out pretty nicely with the 403, but I guess a 350 should still be adequate. Probably no worse than the 360-2bbl in my '79 NYer.

    There were also two Pontiacs of that era: a '77 Bonneville sedan in an emerald green that I really like, but it was a base model, and an '80 Bonneville Brougham coupe, brown, fully-loaded. Main problem with these two was that they both had Pontiac 301's, an engine that, rationally or not, I have a fear of! The '77 had a 2-bbl and the '80 had a 4-bbl. The coupe was really nice, and under the hood looked almost brand-new! The sedan was okay, but looked like it might have been repainted toward the back. And the interior had that typical problem where the different vinyl and plastic trim pieces seemed to fade at different rates, to different shades.

    One other period car that was pretty sweet was a 1981 Electra Park Avenue, black with the Buick Magnum wheels, and a beige leather interior. The owner wanted $3995 for it. It also looked darn near new. It had a 307, which I guess would be a little taxed in a car that heavy. My grandma's 85 LeSabre, which was a few hundred lb lighter, seemed adequate with that engine, but I think that was about the threshold for it.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    it does look like those R-body NYers are coming out of the woodwork! I especially like that black '79 with the pimpy red interior. It has the extra-wide 15x7 road wheels, with the deep turbine-style hubcaps that I like. I think the standard-sized wheel on these cars was something like a 15x5.5 or 15x6. I think they might have been part of something called the "Open road" handling package which would have also included a thicker sway bar up front, and a sway bar in back, and more responsive steering.

    That LeBaron wagon is pretty cool, too, although the woodgrain is really overdone. As bad as the Aspen/Volare were (although really, it was only the first two years that were the serious rusters), it seems like the more luxurious Diplomat/LeBaron were much better-built. I always thought they were more of a class act than other upscale compacts of the era, like the Granada, which was downright tacky, and the various luxury packages they tried on the Nova/Phoenix/Omega/Skylark. I saw a '77-79 Diplomat coupe once with leather seats! That must've been really rare, for a car in that class.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Yes, I really prefer warm AC...that tepid, humid air coming through the vents really helps my house plants.
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    I remember a friend of mine in grade school taking a vacation in a first-gen Diplomat (77 or 78), his parents had just bought brand new, it also had leather. Unfortunately, in the middle of summer, in the desert of South Dakota or some such noplace, the car had a major electrical meltdown of some sort, rendering both the A/C and power windows inoperable. He told me they literally had to open the doors while on the highway to get any ventilation. Nice. My aunt also had an '80 Diplomat coupe, pretty basic, slant six and crank windows, fortunately. I learned to drive on that car. Probably a good thing its 0-60 could be measured with an egg timer, not much chance of getting in trouble with that thing!
  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,669
    TThe '51 Frazier was not a HT, Fin, you can clearly see the B-post. Our first family car was a '47 Frazier that looked similar tho not a Manhattan which was the top model.

    The art-deco detailing on that Terraplane is really beautiful and I agree w you about the instrument panel, verry cool!

    That Springfield (MA/USA!) Rolls has a very nice
    shape for a 1927 car, it looks like it's late 1930s or even '40s equivalent so perhaps it was rebodied at some point. I think I like it a lot more than you do.

    Maybe someone will pay the premium for that SEL just to get the low miles but, like Shifty, I'd worry about a car that's been driven so little.

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    I kinda like that red and black 79 NYer too, to be honest. It has something about it. Compared with the competition at the time...which must have been like an LTD/Grand Marq or big Olds or Buick, it has an attraction, it's a lot less bland than the others. Maybe because it is simply less common.

    I always thought the little window B-pillar area on those Frazers of that design was removable with the windows rolled down, making it a hardtop. But I could be wrong...the car was made more than a quarter century before I was born and all haha

    That 560SEL is maybe worth in the high teens, to a 126 enthusiast. A SEC or SL with that mileage won't bring that money, not to mention a sedan. It claims to be maintained by the book, but it is still too expensive. The most beautiful blue with cream interior 89 560SEL with like 70K on it sold on ebay for around $12K several months ago. That was more like it.

    Today's oddball was a late Lincoln Versailles, the kind that was less like a Granada than the first year.
  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,669
    the "wannabe Seville" bustle, eeewwww!

    The Seville was a "wanna be Rolls" and Linlcoln imitated that look which looked frumpy and old-fashioned on a Silver Cloud which at least had the stature (height) to pull it off.

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I think buying a 560SEL for anything less than a firesale price is a big mistake personally. Or any kind of car of that sort....big, old, complex, hideously expensive to repair, and real hard to unload on somebody else if things don't work out.

    On the other hand, 560SLs, if really nice, can pull big money here in California, up to $25,000 no problem for a jewel. They were the best of the V8s SLs of that lineage/body type, and everyone knows it...so the demand is high.

    Perhaps the best and fairest observation I can offer on the 560SEL is that it does not even appear in any credible collectible car guide. There's hardly a whisper of interest I think among collectors. It's more a car for someone who wants to "look rich for cheap", or as we used to say, a "baker's car".

    Nothing wrong with that, not at all, but don't forget to practice the "cheap" part.

    Just remember, you lose an engine, it's $16,000 to rebuild it.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    Several months ago the local Kia dealer somehow got a one owner 560SL, 1988 model, diamond blue on grey, just like my car. It had like 75K on it and it was pristine, just gorgeous. They wanted only like $16K for it, and I seriously thought about it. It was on the lot for 3 days before someone snapped it up. I still think I maybe should have done it, it would have been a great pair with my 126 in the same colors.

    560SEL will of course never be a real collectible, probably never even reaching fintail status, along with the rest of the 126 sedans. But...if you can get a minty one in the low teens, you can do a lot worse for the money. I have my preference for my 6 cyl 126, though. Not as fast, but less complex and more durable it seems.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    they were showcasing Kaiser-Frazier, so where were plenty of examples around. Grbeck and I were looking at that very same thing...the little glass section where the B-pillar would normally be. 4-door convertibles also had that "feature". Now, on the convertible, at least, it only looked like there was one big screw holding that little pane in, so I guess you could take it out if you really wanted to. I have a feeling that if you did it a few times though, you'd mess it up, tear the surrounding materials, lose the screw, etc.

    Another thing a bit odd about those cars, on the 'vert, at least, is that it looked like there was a bulkhead running between the two B-posts (the part of the post that remains for the rear doors to attach to) and it looks like the front seat is actually stationary, built into it. This was probably done to beef up the rigidity of the car, but I'm sure it would also make it a nightmare for taller drivers!
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Did you see a Dragon?
  • jrosasmcjrosasmc Member Posts: 1,711
    Ew- So if it costs at least $16k to rebuild a 560SEL's engine, then how much would it cost to rebuild, say, an air-cooled Porsche 911 engine of '80s vintage?
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    My dad likes those...it's another one on his short list along with Airflow, bulletnose Studebaker, Hudson pickup, Cord sedan (yeah right), and other oddballs from the olden days. That was the supercharged one wasn't it?
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    see a few Dragons. Weren't those the ones that had the fake bamboo/thatched roof treatment, and also had some bamboo on the interior?
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Remember all the Kaiser Darrins that were at the Macungie show as well? They must've had all of them there.

    Too bad I couldn't make it to Carlisle. Had a doctor's appointment that morning. Was it the Fall Meet or the GM show? I had a 1979 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight Regency with all the options. Did that '77 have a 350 or a 403? Mine had the 403 - an excellent engine.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,425
    I had an '84 911 Targa... I never had to do anything worse than a clutch.. but, I used to get the aftermarket parts catalogs..

    A set of pistons was $3600.

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    the '77 I looked at just had a 350. I think for longevity, the 350 might actually be better than the 403, although it's not going to be as powerful.

    I've heard the cylinders on the 403 are "siamesed". What exactly does that mean? Does that mean that there's no water jacket between them, or does it mean that the pistons actually touch each other?

    Oh yeah, Lemko, the Hershey show is coming up this weekend, and I'm coming up again this Saturday. Let me know if you want to meet up with us!
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...the pistons touch each other. Maybe the bores are really close. Anyway, I had much luck with the 403. It was a box truck that killed the Olds.

    Geeze, I've got something scheduled this weekend as well! Maybe I can get out of it. What day were you planning on going? I'll have to look at my schedule. I believe a buddy of mine from the Cadillac-LaSalle club will be there.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    not sure what time yet, but I know with that show you have to get there fairly early, because the show cars start pulling out in the afternoon.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...but I'll have to split early too. I'll let you know.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    siamesed---means that there's no water jacket between the bores, just metal to metal touching---the bores share an outer water jacket but no galley between them. This makes for a shorter block and theoretically stronger but can cause cooling problems if your cooling system isn't in top shape.

    Porsche engine -- you can do a good rebuild for around $8,000. The 3 liter engines are great. It's rare you would need a crankshaft. These are 200K engines easy and the cranks may last almost indefinitely. The engine would be the last thing to worry about on an 80s Porsche.

    Big Benzes---my favorite older Benz sedan, if you want a combination of decent looks, reliability and the capability of pounding modern roads at high speed, would be the 300E model. It's not as clumsy and complex as a 560SEL, better supported by the dealer and aftermarket, and to add icing on the cake, often priced below a 560SEL. And almost double the fuel mileage of the 560, with only .2 of one second lesser acceleration. One of the best Benzes ever made IMO. Made up to 1992 I believe.
  • jrosasmcjrosasmc Member Posts: 1,711
    The 300E was made up to 1993, after which it became the E320 for 1994-95. I agree with you, Shifty, great car.

    As for Porsches, I once encountered an '85 911 that had 215k miles on it when I was last in California six years ago (LA). I asked the owner about it; he said he had bought it new, had never rebuilt the engine or tranny, and said that the whole drivetrain was still very stout.
This discussion has been closed.