Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Jeep Liberty Diesel

1457910224

Comments

  • caribou1caribou1 Member Posts: 1,354
    With 4WD LO gear engaged, I had my 4 tires ripping on dry pavement when trying to extract an old tree. The automatic did this without any suffering at 1500 RPM. The load kept the truck still from idle (900 RPM) to slow free spinning of the wheels (1500 RPM). For those of you who don't believe in automatic transmissions, this is hard to beat...
  • jefferson1964jefferson1964 Member Posts: 330
    *(ENR) Diesel engine has a Job #1 of 10/25/04

    http://www.arifleet.com/production.html
  • flyer1flyer1 Member Posts: 1
    I went to my local dealer here in Indiana was told that the CRD Liberty would be available in August.
    Thinking about trading in my 2003, 3.7 auto.
  • 2003_vtec2003_vtec Member Posts: 7
    If Job One is sometime in October, that will be quite a trick! (to have CRDs in August). Dealers are completely useless sources of information.
  • moparbadmoparbad Member Posts: 3,870
    July August timeframe is when the pricing and ordering for Liberty diesel are expected to be available.
  • djasonwdjasonw Member Posts: 624
    Anyone know if they're going to offer stability control as an option. I sold my gas version last winter and really haven't missed it. I really enjoyed the car, but even with 4WD, the tail was very happy in the snow and wasn't as stable as my Prius which has vehicle stability control. OTOH, my audi allroad was fantastic in the snow (had stability) even with the OEM crappy tires. I have no idea WHY Chrysler is so far behind the times and does not offer stability. Not even sure if you can get it in their top of the line Grand! Jeeeshh!!
  • sebring95sebring95 Member Posts: 3,241
    The fact that you're relying upon the stability system simply means you're driving too fast for conditions. It really is designed to help you when you screw up, not to help your constant screw-ups, lol! The main part of the stability system is the ability to cut power/apply brakes to slow you down when you're going to fast for conditions. Two pedals are there for you to use to do the same thing!

    I would imagine those very cheap highway tires that come on Liberties were likely the biggest culprit of slipping/sliding. That and the aformentioned excessive speed in relation to said tires.

    That being said, i'm sure when the new models make there way out Jeep will have this added. I wouldn't look for that feature on the diesel Jeep.
  • caribou1caribou1 Member Posts: 1,354
    My Liberty CRD 4WD came with the locking differential (Trac-Loc?). This cannot work in conjunction with the stability control device that commands the brakes individually. The only combination I found useful in snow is the 4WD/ full time. Beware of the ABS: when you are still in "Drive" and the ABS takes action, everytime the brakes are released to retreive adherence, the transmission keeps pulling. This becomes hazardous going downhill because you can't stop the truck. The remedy is to shift to Neutral to get a short stopping distance. This is the only weak point I found on the Liberty. In principle there is a remedy to this: DC engineers need to feedback the ABS "ON" signal to the tranny.
  • tn8806tn8806 Member Posts: 3
    If I had known that this was going to come out, I would have waited and bought the diesel. I am also considering trading in my 2003 3.7 auto.
  • vnfvnf Member Posts: 1
    sebring95: Totally agreed with your statement!

    djasonw: Ever tried to run an RWD Bimmer in snow? Stability control or whatever, it will just not run properly. So, slow down.

    VNF
  • jchagtdijchagtdi Member Posts: 55
    Did anyone else notice under the PT Cruiser they have a job date listed for a 2.4L turbo diesel??? I understand that this 2.4 is not especially refined or clean, but could DC really be bringing this to North America???

    Jeff
  • vigilantevigilante Member Posts: 1
    #364 of 366 Re: Stability Control [sebring95] by vnf Jul 14, 2004 (4:58 pm)

     sebring95: Totally agreed with your statement!
     

    djasonw: Ever tried to run an RWD Bimmer in snow? Stability control or whatever, it will just not run properly. So, slow down.
     -------------------------------------------------------

    umm, actually I have; quite a lot. It works better than you think. The important point is to have a really good set of tall, sharp snow tires. The traction control or limited-slip or whatever, works great.

    The biggest problem is simply snow depth, especially with lowered suspension.
  • playswithmudplayswithmud Member Posts: 36
    no question the US Launch is delayed very far. what the milage will be remains to be seen. The EU version is ok, but the lag on most EU CRD's is attrotious. Nothing a chip wouldnt fix.
    Tow capacity: Interesting question- the germans like to rate vehicles really high( if memory serves, they let you tote around a 2000kg trailer with your golf) but US acceptable tow performance is a different matter. While the power plant will certainly drag around more than the 5000# that the current V6 is rated for, the limitations of the chassis will likely curb it there. Wheelbase, track width, brakes, rear overhang, spring rates, etc all factor in. Allthough a split tow rating s/a on the Acura MDX might be possible: 3000# conventional, 4500# boat
    my 87 325i was awesome in the winter- sure, its no 4x4, but I'd take it over a FWD any day- for refrence, Im in MI and it hauled me and my Yakima box to the ski hill in many a blizzard. I ran Dunlop D-60's under it
  • schipperkeschipperke Member Posts: 11
    Any idea when these will be here? I have been told the middle of 2005 by a salesman (he did not really look like he was in any loop to really know)

    I want a VW TDI, but the wife is in SUV mode.
    The Diesel Liberty would be a great compromise, with the added benefit of towing and 4x4, and so-so mileage.
  • caribou1caribou1 Member Posts: 1,354
    In Europe, the 2.8 CRD Automatic sells for $53K(Canadian)tax included. The 'Limited' model sells for $58K. After almost one year, I just forgot about the price because I enjoy it every day. The Toyota equivalent to the Liberty CRD was 12K Euros more expensive.
    Referring to the article in 'auto123', the Sorento has a 2.5 Liter CRD over here. It's cheaper than the Jeep but disappointingly underpowered and hard to resell.
  • 2003_vtec2003_vtec Member Posts: 7
    If that's the price of this vehicle, they will sell VERY few of them. Where are you getting this price from? I'm sure not interested in it AT ALL at that price. A real nice gas V6 Liberty is $28K. $13,000 or so extra for a 4-cylinder deisel? No way. You'll NEVER save that much on gas.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    WOW, those seem like really high prices. Are we that spoiled in the USA on the import duties and other taxes? I cannot imagine paying that much for a Jeep Liberty. That is $40k US if I have my exchange correct. I was thinking they would be in the $32k range loaded. Thanks for the info.
  • moparbadmoparbad Member Posts: 3,870
    Price is not in US it is CAN. $42,000 is $31,750 US and for a Limited with every option including GPS-DVD Navigation that would be a bargain. The MSRP quoted is the RANGE of $26-42K CAN for ALL 2005 Liberty, not just the diesel.

    Don't get excited until actual pricing is available. The quoted article is estimated pricing in Canadian funds.
  • schipperkeschipperke Member Posts: 11
    I did notice that the web site was Canadian, and I hope you are correct that is a Canadian dollar quote. Without GPS should come in around 30K ? Still pretty high, but do able. Will they be here in late 2004 or mid 2005?
  • 2003_vtec2003_vtec Member Posts: 7
    In a post above, "caribou1" said a 2.8 CRD automatic is $53K(Canadian) or $58K for a Limited. Bank of Canada exchange rate for 7/23/04 is 1.3212. $53,000 Canadian = $40,115 US and $58,000 Canadian = $43,899 US. Is there something here I'm not understanding?
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    If the prices some are expecting are true. It looks like the Canadians are paying a lot more in taxes or import duty. What happened to NAFTA?
  • schipperkeschipperke Member Posts: 11
    Those prices are in Europe, the post converted to Canadian.
    I assume the Europeans for the most part spend Euros, so if a price in that currency is quoted we can go from there. Of course who knows what kind of tariffs them Europeans slap on Ami cars.

    Just seems like the US Jeep web site has had that diesel version posted a long time, and I have yet to get any response. I would order one for late 2004 delivery if they were making them. Reminds me of vaporware.
  • oceantoadoceantoad Member Posts: 186
    If the prices come in like the ones mentioned above, guess I won't get one.

    I have been thinking more and more about a 2500 Dodge Ram with the Cummins. I will be looking at them even closer if the above prices are correct.

    Still have my 2002 Wrangler and plan on keeping it for the play vehicle. My other vehicle will be a dog carrying, grocery getting, pulling the stock trailer or 18 foot trailer with tractor and front end loader, type of vehicle.

    That truck is looking better and better. If I got the Liberty it was going to be maxed out for towing and at those prices I won't even consider it.

    Still a happy camper.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    The Dodge Ram with Cummins is on my short list also. It does not sound like the Liberty will get that great of mileage gain with the CRD. I'm sure you can get a Ram 2500 diesel for under $40K. I know in CA it is one of my only options. My dealer says they are not going to get the Liberty Diesel, as of today.
  • caribou1caribou1 Member Posts: 1,354
    Here is the official Jeep price list in Euros. It covers all taxes except the set of licence plates.

    http://www.jeep.fr/la_gamme/cherokee/tarifs/tarifs.asp

    Other SUVs sold here are not cheaper when a realistic comparison is made. We get what we pay for. In a previous post I wrote that my Jeep had something of the old BMW series 5 (it's all black inside). After almost one year are no squeaks or imperfections of any kind. The assembly and the feel of the materials is top quality. But of course I'm talking about the one sold over here...
  • schipperkeschipperke Member Posts: 11
    OK, the Limited at 35,550 euro includes the 19.6% tax. Strip the tax and it is 29,724 euro, convert this to the US $ and it is pushing $36,000. Using the same formula, the Wild Dream (?) with a 2.8crd comes in at $29k. Uh, Wild Dream?

    Lets not forget, those are 2004 prices
  • scott919scott919 Member Posts: 17
    I've been reading these posts for about six months now after learning jeep was going to produce a diesel suv. About 4 weeks ago I requested info on the liberty crd from the jeep web site. I have yet to receive any info. But two days ago I received an email from the Research Project Dept.at D.C. asking me to participate in a survey. I am a 2001 dakota owner and have had some recent service work done and thought it would pertain to that, but i was wrong. The survey asked how much did I think a diesel engine option in a mid sized suv should cost. It was a specific question stating that it was a 2.8 liter 4 cyl. turbodiesel engine. What i was willing to pay, at what point was it too expensive that I would not purchase and at what point was it too cheap that I would think that it was so cheaply made that that too I would not purchase. They dont even know what to charge. But I do know this, I know an engineer for D.C. and he told me that it costs less than $300 to produce the 3.7. gas engine. The diesel engine production numbers will be far less than that of the 3.7 in that its mass quantities have made it very cheap to produce. though the diesel should still be quite affordable if D.C. isn't too greedy.
  • sebring95sebring95 Member Posts: 3,241
    My other vehicle will be a dog carrying, grocery getting, pulling the stock trailer or 18 foot trailer with tractor and front end loader, type of vehicle. If I got the Liberty it was going to be maxed out for towing and at those prices I won't even consider it.

    You won't like towing that much weight with the Liberty either. I pulled a 15' trailer with a Kubota/front loader and it was more than that chassis was capable of. Might be ok for short trips if they're very infrequent. I'd go with the truck myself, I'm not impressed with small SUV's for towing at all.
  • jboehmjboehm Member Posts: 44
    I got the same survey email, very interesting. It also gave some specs, don't know how accurate they are going to be. It stated 22/27 for the Diesel. It first asked what I thought I would pay then it gave it's own pricing and asked if I thought it was too much or not. It started out with the Diesel engine only then went on to a package that included the engine, full time 4-wheel drive, chrome wheels, 4-wheel ABS. The highest price it went to was $2500 or $3000 for the package.
  • puffessorpuffessor Member Posts: 1
    Will the CRD Diesel be available on the 2005 Jeep Liberty Renegade? I thought I read that somewhere but now I can't find out.

    Anybody seen any 2005 MSRP's? Delivery schedules?
  • jimlockeyjimlockey Member Posts: 265
    There is no way a Liberty diesel will cost $13,000 more. Wrong, Wrong, Wrong. Jeep will get at least $2,000 to $3,000 more for the diesel. Who knows, it could be less, but not $13,000.
  • scott919scott919 Member Posts: 17
    I agree with jimlockey, I think there is no way the diesel option should be more than $2500. $3000 is too much.
  • mrmanmrman Member Posts: 1
    I can't believe I am reading this.... none of you know how much more expensive europe is????

    compare any cars that exist in both north america and europe. in europe the only car I can afford is a focus but here a ford focus is cheap.

    the Liberty price will be the same as the v6 and inflate if demand is big which remains to be seen. originally they were supposed to subsidise the crd but with gas going up I am guessing that will change.
  • scott919scott919 Member Posts: 17
    some people understand the price difference in u.s. vs. europe for the same model. for me its not an issue. the liberty crd has been produced for a few years now in the u.s. for the european market, I'm sure some regulatory changes (for better or worse) will need to take place for the u.s. market. i just dont want to see over inflated prices if there is good demand for the crd. yes i understand supply and demand sets the market although dc said if the demand is there they will make as many as wanted.if the prices are just too high for me i'll just wait 12 to 18 months and let the prices settle
  • sebring95sebring95 Member Posts: 3,241
    I agree the CRD will likely ring in around the same MSRP as the V6 Liberty. However, if they're anything like the VW diesels there will be zero incentives and quite possibly sell for MSRP instead of the typical invoice or couple hundred over most informed carshoppers pay. Pay MSRP and get no incentive, you're talking a several thousand $$ premium over a V6 liberty. The savings will depend upon how much better the MPG actually is, and resale value if you're inclined to think that hard.

    I recently priced a VW Passat diesel with FWD and I can buy a 4motion 1.8T gasser for less money. The 1.8T is about $2,000 more on the sticker but the diesel has no incentives and dealers try to get sticker for them. Of course in that case we're talking a least a 10mpg penalty for the gasser plus a premium fuel requirement. Break-even is about 50k miles. Will there be 10mpg between the diesel and gas liberty? I doubt it, it's an aerodynamic brick.
  • fredl1fredl1 Member Posts: 12
    I have been driving the 2.8 Diesel Liberty (known here as the Jeep Cherokee) for the past year. We pay a premium of about $3000 for this model compared to the 3.7 l petrol (gas) model and I can tell you now that it is worth every cent.
    There is no shortage of cars to buy in South Africa yet people are waiting up to three months for delivery of their 2.8 CRD's and no-one complains.
    Off-road even the famous Land Rover is no match for it and in the Johannesburg area (roughly 5000 ft above sea level) the turbocharged engine is a dream. Other cars lose up to 20 % of their power because of the altitude.
    I also tow a caravan (trailer) weighing about 1100 kg (+- 2420 pounds) with it and I get about 10.1 liters per 100 kilometers in mixed driving. The 3.7l uses about 14,3 l/100km. (work out the maths youself - 1 US Gallon = 3.5 liters and 1 kilometer = 5/8 ths of a mile.
    If you can get hold of it - buy it. I have owned both and the Diesel is far superior to the 3.7 l in almost all aspects.
  • 2003_vtec2003_vtec Member Posts: 7
    I did the math and unless I am a moron you get 21.6 mpg with the TRD and 15.3 mpg with the 3.7. They are both pretty horrible. What is your mileage w/out the trailer? It'd be nice to know for comparison purposes.
  • dwrestledwrestle Member Posts: 72
    isn't bad at all for pulling a trailor, even with the diesel engine, it's only rated for 27 Highway anyway.
  • atlgaxtatlgaxt Member Posts: 501
    15.3 mpg with the 3.7 gas V6 and 21.6 mpg with the diesel sound reasonable to me, for a small but relatively heavy and tall SUV. Before everyone gets all upset and says how poor 21.6 mpg is, keep in mind that it is a 41% improvement over the gas engine, which is nothing to sneeze at.

    I'd venture to say that no real SUV (in terms of off road and towing capability) is anywhere near that. Keep in mind that due to quirks in the test methodology that benefit hybrid vehicles, the 30+ mpg EPA figures Ford is touting for the Escape are probably overstated, and my guess is that in the real world and normal driving the Escape Hybrid would be hard pressed to get over 30 mpg. That for a vehicle only rated to tow 1,000 lbs. BTW, I am basing this on numerous magazine articles that I have read in which the editors did not get anywhere close to EPA figures for existing hybrids, except under artificial test conditions.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I've never driven or ridden in a Liberty. I would think it should get more toward 30 mpg with a diesel on the highway. By comparison the Ford Excursion diesel is getting 18/25 mpg according to owner surveys. And it weighs 7000 lbs and will tow at least that much.
  • scott919scott919 Member Posts: 17
    1 u.s gallon =3.78541178 liters
    100km=62.13711922 mi.
    fredl1's 10.1 liters per 100km = 23.34 mpg for the crd
    14.1 liters per 100km = 16.6 for the 3.7
    my numbers come from YAHOO conversion table.
  • sebring95sebring95 Member Posts: 3,241
    Anybody know what the final drive ratio will be on this Liberty? That will certainly have a lot of effect on highway mpg. If the motor needs lower gears to keep the thing moving on the highway, it'll pay for it in mpg. The excursions have so much power they can lug along at ridiculously low rpms and get the 25mpg. I doubt the 3.90 or 4.10 Excursions are turning those kinds of numbers on the highway. I seen someone that had re geared to 2.90's and were getting 25mpg plus, but that makes the thing useless for towing/hauling without turning OD off permanently.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I asked my Dodge/Jeep dealer if he was going to get the Liberty CRD. He said not till CARB lifts the restrictions on diesel cars.

    2.90s, I had no idea you could get that high of a gear ratio in an Excursion. I have friends that just bought a used one. They have 6 children and live about 2.5 miles off the highway on a fire trail. They destroyed a MV in a couple years. I hope this works for them. I don't know what mileage they are getting. Theirs has the 7.3 PS diesel. If you don't plan on pulling a trailer the high gears would be the way to go.
  • sebring95sebring95 Member Posts: 3,241
    The 2.90's were aftermarket. I've heard of a few folks swapping the gears to get the mpg. I personally know some folks in the horse world that have them and they claim around 20mpg on the highway. 17mpg around town/average or towing on the highway. I think those come with 3.73's factory. I personally don't see the liberty topping much over 27mpg on the highway in real life. I could rarely break 20mpg in my old Cherokee on the highway and it usually averaged 17mpg. Same as my big honking V8 Tahoe hauling more people/cargo.
  • atlgaxtatlgaxt Member Posts: 501
    I guess it depends upon driving style. My assumption is if the vehicle averages 21.6, mid twenties on the highway is possible. This talk about the supposedly fuel efficient Excursion aside, mid twenties on the highway in an SUV does not sound bad to me.

    I currently have a MAZDA B4000 with 4wd, which is a compact pickup. I get about 15 in town and 18 on the highway in normal driving. 20 to 25 mpg in an SUV sounds pretty good to me.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    You hit my biggest gripe right on the head. I have a 4x4 Suburban that gets consistent 14/18. And your little Mazda PU gets about the same. Something is wrong with that picture. If I am going to subject myself to a small car or PU I want to use proportionately less fuel. Seems reasonable to me.
  • jayriderjayrider Member Posts: 3,602
    t/t's are built to work. Small or large. Hence, less gap in mpg twixt big and small. Gearing, weight, aerodynamics etc.

    C/t's are built for very light cargos and can achieve a bigger improvement in mpg verses even small t/t's.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Only in America. Everywhere else in the World has small diesel PU trucks that get 45-50 mpg. I think it is a combination of the environmentalists working with the Oil companies unknowingly. And the oil companies are laughing all the way to the bank.
  • ezshift5ezshift5 Member Posts: 858
    45 - 50 (easy) mpg. Had one for years; it's living on borrowed time. As you might predict, I agree with gagrice...ez
Sign In or Register to comment.