Welcome, Toyota Tundra - II

2456713

Comments

  • fortwhitetomfortwhitetom Member Posts: 6
    I simply LOVE my Tundra, I know of no other way to say it. I cannot wait to get behind the wheel again. The wife and I and 500 lbs of baggage just took off for 28 days and toured the Eastern USA from FL to TX then up into New England and back down the eastern seaboard to Tampa again. 99% backroads and secondary highways - very little interstate. Managed a little 4-wheeling just about every day - across prairies, on the beaches, up mountain passes and logging roads, etc. Loved every minute of it and my Tundra was flawless.

    I am tall (over 6') and my wife is large. We were both comfortable even after 10-12 hours on the road some days. The vehicle rides and drives like a car, and my wife enjoys driving it also, though she prefers not to drive at all.

    We took delivery of my SR5 4X4 4-door in May and I have logged over 13,000 on my Tundra since. I love this truck! Have yet to return to the dealer with any 'bugs'. Routine oil changes is about it. It uses no oil between changes and gets just under 20 miles to the gallon on 87 octane. I have a heavy fiberlass Leer topper on the back, and I'll tell you what - that white truck looks SHARP. I get compliments and questions about it nearly every day.

    One week after we got home from vacation, my wife went down to the dealership and traded her big Expedition in on a Limited 4-Runner, as she was quite impressed with the Toyota and had never even considered a 'foreign' car before this.

    Her 4-Runner is nice, but I like my Tundra better! (And secretly I think she does, too!)
  • RoclesRocles Member Posts: 982
    That's where you should go to bash or rally for the Tundra. We've included the tundra over there.
    Roc
  • present4upresent4u Member Posts: 52
    13,000 miles on a month and a half-old Tundra?!
  • jmccbossjmccboss Member Posts: 1
    After alot of searching, I finally fond a dealer in the Missouri/Illinois/Kentucky area willing to do something less than MSRP. I'm taking delivery of a Tundra 4x4 LTD, access cab with LA (leather), OF (off-road), CK (all-weather), and dealer installed running boards. Wasn't able to get anti-lock brakes. I'm pretty happy, as this is supposed to be my "10-year" truck and it has virtually everything I want already built in. The LTDs really come nicely equipped at base. MSRP for mine is $30014 with running boards additional. I'm paying $28,425, inluding running boards and floor mats thrown in. If the TUNDRA turns out to be as exciting to own as most seem to say, I think I'm pretty happy with the deal. Incidentally, I think I'll try a spray-on bed-liner product. I've checked out "Ultimate" and "Line-X." Both seem pretty good and the cost, while high ($400-$450) seems to be a good value. Anyone ever tried it?
  • tp4unctp4unc Member Posts: 437
    Congratulations on your purchase. My father -in-law has a Tundra with a Rhino spray -in liner.
    It cost $369 plus tax for the under the rail spray. I have three friends with Rhinos also and have heard nothing but good things about it. As soon as my Tundra arrives I'll be heading to the Rhino shop myself. I want the over the rail spray which adds another $60 to the cost. The main thing to be concerned with the spray in liners is the quality of the work done by the shop in YOUR area. There is another topic in the pickup conference with posts detailing a few problems with spray in applications. My advice, check out their work very carefully.
  • tp4unctp4unc Member Posts: 437
    Someone in a previuos post asked about 4X4 performance figures. A co-worker handed me the magazine this morning.

    Tundra V8 Access Cab 4x4:
    1)0 to 60 in 8.5 seconds
    2)1/4 mile in 16.6 seconds at 83 mph
    3)Top speed governed at 105 mph
    4)braking from 70 mph was 201 feet
    5)skid pad was .72g
    6)observed fuel economy 14 mpg(ouch!)

    I was going to point out that the Tundra beat the GMC Sierra with the 5.3 270HP V8 in acceleration, braking, skid pad , and top-speed(governed) but I won't because the Tundra is such a "little" truck with an uncomfortable back seat. Thank goodness I'll spend most of the time driving mine with a big ol' smile on my face!! Oh yeah, the Tundra will tow 400lbs( "only" 7100lbs) less than the GMC but don't tell anybody.
  • doughowarddoughoward Member Posts: 20
    are you still cruising this site in your 1999 GM Silverdudu? i knew you couldn't leave it... your like that highschool bully that can't leave the smarter kids alone. so here is my final rebuttal to your redneck response in post #51:
    "The Tundra also costs far more than the Silverado comparably equiped."
    Hey, you get what you pay for.
    "All the other "comments" apply as well to the
    Tundra, since it is large, pollutes, etc. Plus you get the added advantage of Toyota's wonderful head gaskets!
    If you'd followed the "size" debate, you'd know the Tundra is not as big and bulky as the GM, has achieved the LEV (low emissions) status (has the Silverdodo?), and the head gaskets were occasional probs in the V6 that Toyota replaced (free of charge here in Oregon!). rest assured that if my v8 has probs (which I seriously doubt it will because the Landbruiser and Lexus are living proof of the engine), then sure, i'll take a free engine. does GM have that policy with all THEIR problems?
    Finally, you said, "You have also never owned an American car in your life, so it is not worth au=rguing with you." Here, I'm glad you finally gave up, because you are wrong again. I, unfortunatley, currently DO OWN a 93 Chevy Blazer that is the biggest piece of crap I've ever owned or driven. It was recently in the shop because of a loose bolt in the trasfer case. The thing chows fuel and depreciates about $2000 every year, and now I can't even give it away. (It's been in the truck trader for 3 weeks)...
    If you (or anyone else out there) loves GM so much, give me a call on my Blazer. I'll give you a great deal on it. All my tundra needs is a new canopy. Trades welcome.
  • t100toddt100todd Member Posts: 16
    Just put my 1000th mile on my Tundra and I love this truck! Anyone who is thinking about buying a Tundra should! I use only Premium Unleaded fuel and get 12.5 miles to the gallon! I could do better but I want to have that "Domestic Feel" you know! Ha! This is the only real downside to this truck. But, if you can afford a Tundra you should certainly be able to handle the extra money for fuel! Beats repair bills!

    This truck is a pleasure to drive! Unfortunately, I had to lower myself to driving a friends GM Silverado the other day! What a piece of [non-permissible content removed]! Luckily, I only had to drive the piece of [non-permissible content removed] to lunch and back! What a boring truck! YAWN! Who designs these damn things? Could you IMAGINE a Dodge-GM merger? WOW!

    He wanted to test drive mine for a few hours so he can dump his 1998 Silverado! The power steering is going out and his brakes have been replaced THREE times!

    It looks like I'll be helping a friend buy a Tundra this weekend!

    Todd~~~
  • cwirthcwirth Member Posts: 169
    I, too, love my Tundra. Have over 4200 miles on it and it rides great. However, I get 21 mpg highway and 18 mpg combined. I use regular unleaded gas. Hope you mileage improves in the future.
  • tp4unctp4unc Member Posts: 437
    I hope I get your kind of mpg with mine! 12.5 mpg scares the crap out of me.
  • cwirthcwirth Member Posts: 169
    These are actual numbers. I have checked and
    rechecked the mileage on every tank since I purchased it two months ago today. My mileage on city only driving is about 16. I am very pleased with the mileage. I was alittle afraid when I purchased the Tundra on what mileage I was going to really get.

    Has anyone had a remote keyless entry/alarm installed in your Tundra. I was considering getting one, mainly for keyless entry. I probably can do without it but the car I traded in on the Tundra, a Dodge Stealth (I was in a sports car phase at the time) had an alarm and I got used to the keyless entry. I was thinking about going back to my dealer, who has been great so far and see what they could do in price for the Toyota VIP system. The MSRP on it was $399 when port-installed but who knows what they want for it now. Well I guess it doesn't hurt to ask!
  • toytundramantoytundraman Member Posts: 19
    I have the Securikey Alarm/Keyless entry installed by Gulf States Toyota (distributor). It was in the Extra mile package but sells for 425.00 alone. It works fine-but the neatest thing about it is all of the buttons are contained inside the key rather than a separate piece. The alarm is fine with many options available that perform other functions (like auto-start feature).
    I really like the keyless myself. Hope this has been helpful-Good luck and enjoy your Tundra-I am!
  • present4upresent4u Member Posts: 52
    Cwirth wrote:

    "...Has anyone had a remote keyless entry/alarm
    installed in your Tundra?"

    I found a Tundra without the Toyota VIP system, and demanded it at bargaining time with the dealer because a 4x4 Toyota worth 30k without some type of theft deterrent here in Southern CA is as dumb an idea as a football bat. They must not know us very well in Indiana, the apple-cheeked rubes.

    My dealer standardized on the Pursuit system, and if you have the Tundra power convenience package, it allows keyless entry. I've never had it before. It's neat:

    'Bweep! Bwip!'


    --Prez.
  • davidcalhoundavidcalhoun Member Posts: 13
    $2000 per year doesn't sound bad. It cost money to own and operate any vehicle.
  • kirbytkirbyt Member Posts: 39
    Does anyone have any experience with the ABS option. Considering this as a must have, but limited units coming out of plant with other options.

    The $75 option for the cloth captains chairs are not powered as the Limited units have power. Has anyone determined the comfort over the stock bench seat?

    Trying to put together a build list to submit at the dealer?

    Thanks to all for good comments and I hope I don't see the 12.5 mpg or it's going to be history.

    Kirby
  • tp4unctp4unc Member Posts: 437
    I thought I wanted the CC too until I drove one with the CC. I found the right arm rest to be uncomfortable for me. I chose the bench seat instead. I have heard people complain about a vibration with the pull-down console in the bench but I don't think it will affect me(if my truck actually has the vibration at all) because I rest my right arm on the pad most of the time. I have had no experience with the ABS. Good luck with your negotiations.
  • doughowarddoughoward Member Posts: 20
    dude, are you driving with the parking brake on?
  • doughowarddoughoward Member Posts: 20
    ABS, alarm, bench seat, i gottem.
    i haven't needed ABS yet (the brakes work too well... so well that I drive with one foot on the brake all the time... but I'm getting only 8mpg.
    just kidding, t100todd).
    my alarm was a $350 alpine with Keyless Entry. nice unit, and a good deterent here in "where'd my car go?" Portland.
    the bench seat is plenty cumpfy and i'm 6'3".
    no more vibro in the console. bummer, my girlfriend misses it.

    once again, i suggest a bedcoat and bug guard (it didn't save my windshield, but it might save yours, or at least the paint!)
    does anyone know who makes the best canopy?
    they're all scrambling to make one, I just don't know whose brand is best?
    gotta run, my tundra needs a drive.
  • tp4unctp4unc Member Posts: 437
    I sure like A.R.E. products.
  • arkie6arkie6 Member Posts: 198
    t100todd,

    You stated that you only use Premium Unleaded Fuel in your new Tundra. Why? According to the Tundra V8 owners manual that I read, the truck only requires 87 octane (Regular Unleaded), and the manufacturers are usually conservative with the fuel rating to cover worst case conditions (high loads and high ambient temps). The engine design (compression ratio) and fuel management system are optimized for this fuel rating (unless its a 1999 Chevy/GMC engine - see posts on engine pinging), and using a fuel with a higher octane rating than this will not improve performance and will waste money (in your case it appears to have killed your gas mileage - 12.5 MPG - since the posts and magazine articles that I have read are showing 16-20MPG for the Tundra V8 4X4).

    For more than you ever wanted to know about gasoline, and then some, check out the following:
    http://www.cs.ruu.nl/wais/html/na-dir/autos/gasoline-faq/.html

    Gasoline octane is covered in part 3 of 4.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    That's funny, the magazine articles, Car and Driver included, another one too, show the Tundra 4x4 V8 getting 14 mpg in their tests, exactly what the EPA number said.

    I think those Toyota folks, the ones bashing the domestic brands, are overstating their fuel mileage and losing credibility.

    The fact is, 14 mpg is not very good for a $30,000 lightweight truck with a full size fuel appetite. Something is not right, because for all the complexity of overhead cams and 32 valves, domestic brands like the GMC/Chevy are getting more power and better economy with much simpler, longer lasting engine designs.
  • jcm1jcm1 Member Posts: 48
    here we go again.........................................
  • barlitzbarlitz Member Posts: 752
    I have a lightning with the 5.4 triton supercharged.I'm getting 18 miles to the gallon and that's with sunoco ultra 94.
  • tp4unctp4unc Member Posts: 437
    Those big 4x4 GMs never have to stop for fuel. Sort of like a Chevy Sprint or a moped. Yeah, right! I'll take 14 mpg for a new engine. I am sure it will improve as the engine is broken in. Now 12.5 is another matter entirely.
  • tp4unctp4unc Member Posts: 437
    I'd be really happy with 18 mpg!
  • cwirthcwirth Member Posts: 169
    Quadrunner500 said:

    "I think those Toyota folks, the ones bashing the
    domestic brands, are overstating their fuel mileage and losing credibility."

    No one is losing credibility, my mileage numbers ARE actual. I have been monitoring each and every tank of gas since I brought my truck home on June 3rd. Highway = 21, city = 16, combined = 18. There are real numbers not something made up to make everyone think the Tundra is better than any other make.
  • toytundramantoytundraman Member Posts: 19
    After monitoring 2000 miles in my tundra (4x2/Access), I have averaged 16mpg. City-14; Highway-18. And I use the V8's power as much as I can if you know what I mean. Hope this helps the debate.
  • capt2capt2 Member Posts: 57
    After first 1000 miles, with the AC on All the time, (4X4/Access V8) I do about the same...average of 16 in combo driving, using regular gas.
  • pickup2pickup2 Member Posts: 13
    Dealers in So. Calif. like most places in the U.S are getting MSRP for the Tundra. Longo Toyota, which I understand is the largest Toyota dealer in the U.S., is apparently accepting $500 less than MSRP. Unless Tundra sales declines, dealers will be unwilling to accept the discount they offer on other models.
    Future buyers have the power to make this come about. Now is the time. Toyota production is increasing. If, for the next month or so, buyers refuse to purchase the Tundra at MSRP, you will see a crack in the firm pricing structor. You could save over $2,000. You have the power, it's up to you.
  • eostereoster Member Posts: 54
    I just filled up my Tundra yesterday for the first time. 15.5 mpg mostly around town miles with the AC on all the time. more than satisfactory. I had a few Ford E250 with 351 Winsor w/automatics for one business I owned. 8 to 9 mpg empty 6 to 7 loaded. I have starting play with the tire presures to deal with the minor but annoying steering vibration. Reducing the tire presure a couple of pounds seens to have helped some.

    So far the Tundra is the best truck I ever owned.
  • hall2hall2 Member Posts: 40
    I put 900 miles in my Tundra now. I got 16.666 mpg highway&city with ac on. I don't peel out at the stop light, just a gentle acceleration ahead of the other guy.
  • doughowarddoughoward Member Posts: 20
    hey dave,
    here's some food for thought about vehicle depreciation ...
    sure it's inevitable, but $2000 a year, every year in the life of the vehicle
    makes for a [non-permissible content removed] investment. (i.e. I bought the S-10 Blazer for $17,000
    new in 1993. Now I may get $7000 for it. That's $1667 per year depreciation).
    that's $4.57 per day, thrown away, man.
    maybe you've got that money to piss away, but I don't, and you must have missed my earlier post that mentioned I sold my 1986 Toyota XCab
    4x4 for a $1600 depreciation....
    AFTER 7 YEARS! That's $229 per year.
    I don't expect that much from my Tundra,
    but I'm sure I made a good investment again.
    Hmmmnnn. So will I buy GM again?
    now you get the idea.
  • barlitzbarlitz Member Posts: 752
    Large pickups hold about 77% of there value after 3 years and compacts hold about 64%, and then you have to figure in milage and overall condition of the truck. I'm sure if you check out any newspaper ads for 97 and 96 trucks the #'s versus sticker will be pretty close.
  • present4upresent4u Member Posts: 52
    ... I don't hear anything.. Do you?

    Wait.. I do hear something... Sounds like air escaping from an overinflated bicycle tire...

    Sounds like:

    "Biiiiiiiiiiitccccccchhheeeeesssssssssssss..."

    Is that what you hear? I recommend ignoring it.
  • willbtwillbt Member Posts: 6
    For those on the fence over Toyota or Chevy, here's some food for thought. I have a 95 Chevy Z-71, loaded. I loved it for the first year, even though it was in the shop 4 times for warranty work (window motor, battery, complete AC system, and radio overheating). It was hard to admit that my new truck wasn't the best thing on four wheels at that time, but the ensuing years have left me with a severe disappointment in the truck and Chevy service. I won't bore you with all the other trips I've had to make to a mostly unfriendly and unsupportive Chevy service department. I'm in the military and have moved around enough to have five different dealerships work on my Chevy. Every trip is a hastle or argument over what the warranty will cover. Now that the warranty has been expired for over a year, I'm very tired of having to pay to get this thing fixed. Major problems with Chevies: Brakes. The front disks are terrible. Ask any independent brake shop about Chevy truck brakes. Pitman and Idler arms go out at about 40k miles leaving excessive play in the steering. Most Non-Chevy service folks will replace these with aftermarket parts that carry a lifetime warranty for $300 - Chevy wanted $380 for the same pitman and idler arms that are expected to last 40k miles. Radio overheating is very common and, according to the Chevy service tech that fixed mine, has melted tapes into the radio - on mine it caused the tape to stretch and warp and was extremely hot to the touch.
    Now you're wondering why I'm bringing all this up? I'm selling my Chevy and have a Tundra on the way. I did look at the 99 Chevies. Some things to note. Same radio. I asked about the brakes, the sales guy said the front disks were basically the same, just disks in the back now too. No major changes to the steering system, he said, either. Supposedly, since my 95, the only changes are engines and interior/exterior styling. Now granted, all this was from a sales guy, but it was enough for me to steer clear of another Chevy. On the flip side, the Chevy engine/transmission has been trouble free and extremely reliable - I will give them that. About the Tundra, I have a loaded Limited in the two-tone green/grey on the way, but I won't get into prices because I have a connection in Toyota who took extremely good care of me. I also looked at the Ford Super Duty 250 crew cab - nice looking truck with tons of room, but decided I wanted not only a nice truck but a company who would take care of me after the sale and a service department I may never have to see. Another selling point was the Toyota V8 engine. They are using it in the Landcruiser, Lexus, and Toyota Ski boats. Hope my experience might help those still trying to decide what to buy.
  • fortwhitetomfortwhitetom Member Posts: 6
    I have kept scrupulous mileage records on my Tundra (4X4 Access Cab) since taking delivery. First tank was disappointing @ 14.5 mpg. Tire pressures were not even and way too low for my liking (they are rated for 51psi max). Immediate increase in mileage to 16.5 - 17.5 average. Installed a cab high topper, and loaded with gear and two big passengers got a max of 18.9 mpg and the worst was 15.2 mpg. The overall average after 12,000 miles, including all of the low readings, is 17.7 mpg. Driving is 20% interstate and 80% secondary roads - very little actual stop and go city driving. I hear the 2 wheel drive versions get a little better mileage, but I think this is damn good for a truck of this size that is so much fun to drive! Hope this helps.
  • tp4unctp4unc Member Posts: 437
    What tire pressure are you running now?
  • judyannjudyann Member Posts: 1
    Started at 50psi but ride was too rough. I am currently running 45psi and ride is still a little rough but acceptable.
  • davidcalhoundavidcalhoun Member Posts: 13
    I have a Toyota ski boat on order. The biggest reason I went with the Toyota, is this fantastic engine.

    doughoward, Perhaps you thought I was a "Toyota Basher". You are totally mistaken. I have owned several Toyotas and hope to add a used 95 Tacoma X-cab (If my brother-in-law orders a new Tundra). I'm sorry that you felt compelled to "curse" at me both here and in my e-mail. The longer you keep a vehicle, the better (less $$$$) your depreciation will be. I am glad that you did so well with your 86 Toyota, and I wish you the same success with your new Tundra. Maybe I should have said, "$2000 per year doesn't sound bad when you look at ALL the manufacturer's vehicles". If you are looking for a fight, you will have to look elsewhere.
  • seanemac1seanemac1 Member Posts: 1
    I drove both back to back... I was planning on buying the Siverado, drove it and decided to check out the Tundra (just so I knew the Silverado was better) first...

    Well I left the dealer with the Tundra. The ride was substantially better, the perceived power was much better, and the vision was much better. Also it is a lot nicer to look at and the seats are vastly supperior. I miss the extra rear cabin space of the Silverado but that is about it.

    These trucks are not even in the same ball park... there is a reason why the Chevy dealers need to discount their trucks several thousand dollars to sell them (like at invoice).

    I was set to buy American, but the Dodge ram was awful to drive, the Ford is just ugly and very uncomfortable, and the best of the American bunch (the Silverado) is still vastly inferior to the Tundra...

    Just my opinion...

    Sean
  • surfingsurfing Member Posts: 1
    I own a 1990 F150 XLT Lariet with less than 33,000 miles, thats not a type "O", really 33,000 miles during my ownership the A/C ha gone out, the rear view mirror has fallen off, and the passenger side electric window motor is going.
    I'm discouraged with domestics and am going to purchase a Tundra, but damb their expensive, I'm looking at the SR5 Access Cab with V8 thats it no convenience package.
    Can anyone offer a sure fire way to get the dealer to sell at invoice!
  • jcm1jcm1 Member Posts: 48
    easy one......wait a year or two....or marry his daughter!!!
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    If you think the Tundra seats are better than the Silverado, you didn't drive one. Flat, skinny, un-contoured, dinky little armrests, seat belts dangling from the floor and ceiling. No thanks.
  • womelsdorfwomelsdorf Member Posts: 1
    Well, been tracking this topic for about a month and a half now and have enjoyed, for the most part, the comments. The "U.S. vs foreign" banter was getting a bit old, but it seems to have died off a bit. Appreciate all of the useful info that has been posted to this point. I ordered a 4x4 AccessCab, V8, conv pkg, guard pkg, cd/cassette, alum wheels, and captains chairs back in May after test driving one here in Colorado Springs. Got it for about a grand under MSRP. Currently own a 92 Deluxe X-Tra cab 4x4 and am going to the Tundra due to the fact that I need more room in the back for the kids when we head to the mountains for skiing. The 92 has been great -- three years in storage while I was overseas. I kept the hoses and any rubber "lubed" with WD-40 and changed the oil when I returned -- started right up after about 3 seconds of cranking!!! Then I drove it from PA to CO. That, to me, proved the reliability of Toyota products and led me to wait for the Tundra -- that along with the fact that its a GREAT LOOKING TRUCK!! Anyway, anxiously looking forward to September when it will arrive. I've told my wife that I will probably never drive our other car again (ford escort wagon)! To you lucky bastards who are already driving your Tundra -- please keep the feedback coming.
  • barlitzbarlitz Member Posts: 752
    Is WD-40 made in the usa.
  • powercatpowercat Member Posts: 96
    F.Y.I., there is a growing Toyota T-100 and Tundra Enthusiast's web site at:
    www.wallahweb.com/t100
    Maybe we can weed out some of the bashers who can't stand to see others enjoying something they can't have, of course they would say "don't want". I asked my dealer if I could get color-keyed fender flares with my Tundra, I ordered a SR5 4X4 loaded with the TRD off-road package,with the SR5, black fender flares come with the TRD package and I think color keyed would look better (my opinion). He said he would check, anyone else tried this? 10 days and counting!

    Tim
  • tp4unctp4unc Member Posts: 437
    I did not order mine with the TRD package but I did have the color-keyed flares(thunder gray by the way) added at the distributor/port. They were a $385 "sticker item"...dealer let me have them at $275 invoice. Let us know how your situation unfolds.

    P.S. I am 7 days and counting! Thanks for the lead on the website, too.
  • toytundramantoytundraman Member Posts: 19
    Check this site out: www.tundraoutlet.com
    Interesting!
  • citroen7citroen7 Member Posts: 62
    Why has popular mechanics picked GM 1st, ford 2nd, toy 3rd, dodge 4th. Check their site www.popularmechanics.com. New reasons to buy 2000 gm, 15 more horsepower to 285, new all wheel drive option, new RDS radio, and of course the Eaton locking rear differential. Try pulling a boat out with a toy without it, you may be feeding the fishes.
  • tp4unctp4unc Member Posts: 437
    The GM products will STILL breakdown excessively. Period. I don't care if they have 400HP, new AWD, new radio, and new LSD. They will break, TOO. Enjoy your GM. My Tundra will be on the road while yours is on the lift. Fact of life. Live with it. Popular Mechanics huh? GMs should be popular with mechanics...they provide them with a steady yearly income! The only thing PM got right about the rankings was putting Dodge 4th.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.