Project Cars--You Get to Vote on "Hold 'em or Fold 'em"

1273274276278279853

Comments

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well lemme see...if the crankshaft sensor is bad on one bank, which is common enough, that requires a new sensor (clackety clack---the adding machine) AND a new harness for that sensor is required by BMW (clickety click-click) plus labor to wire it into the main harness (cluckety-cluck-cluck) and we come up with a grand total of........

    $3,800.

    Now if we should need a head gasket on one side only that would be 15 hours labor plus $3890 in parts (refurbish one cylinder head), so that's (in California) $6, 424.

    You know, this car is looking better and BETTER :D
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    "...clickety click-click..."

    So, for roughly the cost of a Hyundai Accent, or maybe a little more, you can drive, and be seen, in a uber luxo-barge. That's a cheap price for feeling important. Of course, there's maintenance to consider, but the extra cost of feeding and maintaining the BMW will be partially offset by the fact that, while the Hyundai depreciates, the V12er is nearly fully depreciated.

    Conclusion: If you buy the BMW and fix it up, also buy an Accent as a backup. Keep the Accent in the garage and the BMW in the driveway, to impress the neighbors. Use the Accent as your daily driver, and drive the BMW on special occasions, to limit expenses.

    Now, if you buy what I've just written, there's a bridge that I'd like to sell you.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    You could make a planter out of it.

    Actually I shouldn't joke. My friend has a V-12 rotting in his driveway right now for similar reasons. He loves the car but cannot justify any further expense. It's a wonderful car to drive. I taped over the check engine light and that seemed to help a lot.
  • jlflemmonsjlflemmons Member Posts: 2,242
    And on my '02 Blazer xTreme, the crankshaft position sensor from AC Delco cost $48, and took all of 5 minutes to replace. Then again, it doesn't have a V12 engine.

    But it does start every time, and runs quite well, thank you very much. I also laugh that here in Austin, there are BMW's of all flavors EVERYWHERE. I swear I think they are more common than Chevys. Must impress the neighbors, you know.

    Everywhere I go in the xTreme I get folks asking where I got it because they are very rare in the southwest. Currently there are eight listed for sale within 500 miles of central Texas, most are hacked up, and one even has had Buick portholes added to the fenders!

    Keep your bimmers, I like driving down the road and not constantly passing myself. Although, the local police know exactly who owns the Victory Red, low slung Blazer that has been scooting around town. :shades:
  • gsemikegsemike Member Posts: 2,438
    What's the xTreme package? I've never heard ot it.

    Thing is, before they get endlessly miled up BMWs are very much reliable and drive beautifully. My friend has a 2000 BMW 328 ci and at almost 100k, all it's needed were rotors once and 1 sensor. It's still a great car to drive.
  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    Surely some other masochist would buy it as a parts car to keep their 750 running.

    I sometimes think about branching out in the BMW world past my 3-series. If you had $10,000 to buy any BMW built since 1990 and use as a daily driver, what would it be? Second and third choices?
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,109
    who used to be into old cars, but awhile back bought a V-12 BMW. Strangely enough, I haven't heard from him since. I wonder if it requires so much attention that it takes up all his spare time?
  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    He's probably starved to death in his garage after being entangled in myriad wires and such.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    "Strangely enough, I haven't heard from him since."

    My experience suggests that people love to talk about their successes, but rarely acknowledge that, "you know what, I made a mistake in buying that V12 money pit; I had to get an evening job to cover the the cost of ownership...", or words to that effect. The prices of used luxury cars, not so much the entry level luxury ones, but the high end ones, are really appealing. People think, "hey, I/we can afford that. You know what, honey, for what we'd pay for a new Camry/Accord/Impala, we could own this beautiful pre-owned S-Class/7-Series/XK/or whatever...I'm tired of driving an ordinary -------...Let's go for it!....What do you say?..." The trap for some of these people is they underestimate the cost of ownership of an out-of-warranty luxo barge. I've came close to being seduced by an old LS400 and a Q45, because they're so much car for the money. Fortunately I pinched myself just before bidding.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I'd probably buy either the old style 735, automatic, or a 3 Series IS, manual transmission, with as few goo-gahs attached as possible. In the case of the 3 Series, if i could find no evidence of a recent radiator, water pump and thermostat replacement, I would do all three things immediately.

    IMO the old 735 was the best car BMW ever made in its entire history.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    What about a pre-2000 5 series with the six cylinder engine? I have always found those to be some of the reliable BMWs with that sweet six cylinder and I think the line that builds the 5 series is perhaps run a little better then the 3 series. As long as you get a 5 series without too many gadgets.
  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    An old Q45 would be a dream compared to a 750iL, but they do have some problems.

    Old LS400s are actually pretty decent. I have a friend that drives pretty much non-stop for his sales job. He buys LS400s at around 10 years old and 150K miles. His sold his last one two in running condition at 400K miles and his current one is just under 300K. He is the type not to worry about interior wear and such, but his mechanical expenses are reasonable.
  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    I don't like the interior in my ' 98 3-series. The materials are pretty low quality. A '98 5-series seems a lot better.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    LS400s are utterly boring to drive though. A 750...you can fling it around like a sports car, and it hauls **s! It would humiliate an LS in every department except sensory deprivation. :P

    A 5 Series, to me, is just more complication, more gas, more weight. Of course, you do have a point, there is also more ROOM. For some reason, BMW 3 Series are *tight* in the driver's compartment and for that reason I have never owned one.

    I coulda bought a clean 5 series recently for cheap but the 18 mpg and the thought of the repair bills on a miler car discouraged me at any price. And for me it's too large a car to drive with a manual transmission, even if i could find one. I really hate big cars with stick shifts.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    1997 528 Vs 2002 530 vs 2008 335 coupe

    528i..................530i...............335is
    3,494 lbs.........3,450 lbs........ 3,571 lbs.

    The 335i is about seven inches shorter then the two older 5 series but weighs a 100 lbs more.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    335 is a porker, no doubt about it.

    A *fast* porker, but nonetheless, weight is weight....

    I like my passenger cars about 2,800 lbs, which isn't easy to find.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    Interesting comments about the 735 and the LS400.

    As for the 3-Series, I'd avoid the E36s, because they're troublesome, and go for a E-30 or E-46, depending on budget and needs. I think the E36s are being scrapped at a rapid rate, because the economics of repairing them to keep them on the road frequently doesn't compute.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    For the uninitiated, that's 92-97 BMW 3 series.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,109
    For some reason, BMW 3 Series are *tight* in the driver's compartment and for that reason I have never owned one.

    I was actually fairly impressed with the last 3-series I sat in. It was a coupe though, and not a sedan, so maybe that made a difference? With the coupe the B-pillar is still behind me even with the seat all the way back, wheras in the sedan it's going to cut into my space. The seat was low to the ground, but went well back from the firewall, giving me that stretch-out room I like so much.

    A buddy of mine has an '02 or '03 5-series. I rode in it a couple weeks ago. It was actually bigger inside than I thought it would be. Now with me up front, you couldn't get another person my height in the seat behind me, but the same can be said for a lot of much bigger cars. The EPA classified it as a compact, but it felt bigger inside to me.

    How well does an old Q45 handle? I always liked the style of the older, grille-less models.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    It handles "old Japanese".
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    Cars.com stops at 1997 so I can't put a E30 on this list

    A 1997 3 series coupe is about 3,100 lbs and I think the E30s would be around 2,800 for a coupe with a manual but over 3,000 lbs for the other models.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Yep an E30 coupe would be just about right for me, with manual transmission, sunroof, otherwise base model. It would have to have reasonable miles though. I won't go near a high miler BMW. Under 100K would be great, under 80K ideal.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    I see a nice E30 coupe on my way to work about twice a week. It is black with some attractive anthracite aftermarket wheels and aftermarket exhaust. It looks nice and sounds nice too. The guy who owns it either had a xenon light conversion done or put some very convincing fake xenon bulbs in it. I am sure it gets good gas mileage, assuming the engine isn't worked over a lot and handles great with the upgraded tires/wheels.

    I think BMW would have a much bigger hit on their hands if they had designed the 1 series to have the same look, size and feel of the E30.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    "It handles 'old Japanese' ".

    The early Qs handled considerably less old Japanese than the LS400s. They made a decent attempt at engaging the driver instead of isolating him from the driving experiencing. The old Q45s are seriously quick too. Unfortunately, the cost of maintenance was "old German-like," which is why you very rarely see a Q45 today.
  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    Or '98s and 2 dr '99s. Only the earliest of the E36 were troublesome. After the first couple of years, they have typical average BMW 3-series reliability, maybe even slightly better than average.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    So you say, and I haven't actually jumped out of an LS into a Q and back again, but my recollection is that it's still the same kind of detached, boring ride of "old Japanese". Maybe it handles better but exciting it ain't.

    Of course, you can SCARE yourself in any car, if you try hard enough. :P

    The Q45 seems like the old Subaru SVX--- a curiosity worshipped by a small cult and ignored by the rest of the world. It's the car everyone praises and nobody wants!
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,109
    so are they really that much of a reliability/maintenance nightmare as they age? Maybe I'd be better off just sticking with my old Mopar and GM disco-era love-barges?

    Funny, but I kinda like the old Sube SVX too. What was that other little wedge-shaped coupe they had? XT or something like that? They were kinda neat, too. I mean, I don't aspire to own one anytime soon, but I guess I sort of admire them from afar.
  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,159
    "How well does an old Q45 handle? I always liked the style of the older, grille-less models. "

    Have you sat in one? I found the headroom amazingly tight, but I have that problem...
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,109
    It's been ages since I sat in one. I can't recall headroom being a problem, but I might have just put the seat back in an overly reclined, gangsta-lean position to offset that.

    My '76 LeMans is actually pretty tight on headroom. I think the top of my head is only about an inch from the ceiling. It doesn't actually touch, but it's close enough that I'm aware it's there.
  • jlflemmonsjlflemmons Member Posts: 2,242
    2002 Blazer xTreme

    Basically, it is a two-door Blazer with a factory lowered suspension and ground effects, bigger alloys, bigger sway bars. Same drive train as the rest, but the programming on the ECM is different. Shift points are a bit higher and crisper, that sort of thing.

    While not the most delicate handling beast on the road, it is a hoot to drive.
  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    You are far better off with your old cars. Q's that have't been through the ringer are hard to find at this point. A old J30 (if the style is your taste) is a much better bet for cost of ownership, but they have all been pretty well abused also. Plus, they have a small back seat and a tiny trunk for a 3500-3600 lb car. Unlike, the Q and the LS, you can actually hear the engine.
  • srs_49srs_49 Member Posts: 1,394
    I drive an '87 BMW 325 everyday to work. It's not a project car, but my daily drive. It's got around 185,000 miles on it - hard to tell exactly because the odometer hasn't been working. It's a little slow by today's standards, but still handles well. But, not something to own unless you have fairly deep pockets or can do much of the work on it yourself.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,647
    I think a lot of those ended up in the northwest. Back when I was in school an acqaintance got a part time job as a car salesman, and actually made enough to buy one of those (but the pickup version). A few years back a co-worker had a Blazer version, too. I notice those on the road now and then.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    When I was seriously considering a early '90s LS400 or Q45, weeks passed between my driving them, first the Lexus, then the Infiniti, and it was a long time ago, so I accept your comments about the Q to be more accurate than mine, Shifty. I guess I really wanted to like the Q, for the reasons you stated (yeah, I'm afraid I like the Subie SVX too), so that probably clouded my perception regarding the handling.

    In terms of maintenance and repair costs, the regular Q is on the high side, but the Touring model, with its fancy suspension, is prohibitive.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I asked my friend Jim Askim of Askim's Auto Works, who are Subaru experts, about buying an SVX, and he threatened to hook my private parts up to a battery charger if I did :cry: And this from a man who works on Peugeots! A crushing condemnation, to say the least.

    I think a low miles grandpa/grandma Q45 might be okay, but I sure wouldn't want to tangle with that 7-foot serpentine belt that engine uses. This is not a Honda Civic we are talking about.

    I had a chance to buy a Q45 about 2 years ago, and I don't remember much about the test drive except that I was pretty underwhelmed. It was only $3,500 and in very nice shape but for some reason I barely drove it ten blocks and gave up on it. It WAS pretty quick, though, I do remember getting on it.
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    The Q is fine if you're into the sort of under-the-radar, sedate Japanese idea of luxury. It's basically a stripper-special Japanese limousine. They did need larger tranny coolers and like to eat injectors, though. On the other hand, 300+ horsepower and a 3.54 rear end is still fun these days.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    $10k for a Crapvette?

    Yeah but it is a !978 Vette those are really rare... :P
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    How do you "match numbers" on a '72 Chevy pickup truck?

    1978 Corvette--he'd be lucky to get $10K, but it's possible

    96 Ford Escort -- shouldn't that read "runs awesomeLY"? 40 mpg? sure, sure.

    Cost of a 1986 Porsche 944?---$2,795
    Cost of a new clutch and water pump?---priceless
  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    I can't see the ads here at work, but I have a 1986 Porsche 944. It has a new clutch and timing belt/water pump and it isn't worth too much more than that. Is this one in need of those things?
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    My interest in first generation Q45s is diminished, in terms of ownership, because of the cost of repairs and, by now, the difficulty of obtaining parts. I still find them to be interesting cars, though. Same goes for the SVX. To me, the case for throwing caution to the wind, and just buying one, is its uniqueness, and the fact that the styling, though quirky, is also timeless. The few owners I've talked to, most recently a woman who owned a FWD one, which is much rarer than the AWD, seem to have a love-hate feeling towards them. They're frustrated as heck when something goes wrong, but they have difficulty parting with their SVXs. It's kind of like staying with an abusive spouse.

    The second generation Q doesn't appeal to me, since it's less powerful and blander, styling wise, than the first generation.
  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,159
    Re: 944 - at least at $2795 you could buy it, and if you get a year out of it before something dies you're OK. Could be some cheap fun, if your lucky. If not, hello recycler.
  • occupant1occupant1 Member Posts: 412
    A serpentine belt measuring 7 feet long sounds difficult?

    Interestingly enough, I still have a spare belt from my last Ford Crown Victoria Taxicab. It is 98 inches in length, which is 8 feet 2 inches. And EASY to replace.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    Yeah but there is room between the engine and radiator on a crown vic. If memory serves, and mine usually does for vehicles I have worked on as it is nearly photographic, there is no space between the radiator and engine of a Q45.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,109
    Now that ya mention it, my tractor threw a belt a couple weeks ago, that would probably measure 7 feet long if I cut it.

    With those serpentine belts, don't you just have to loosen some tensioner, and the thing just slips right off? Probably simpler than wrestling around with the four individual belts on my '85 Silverado! I did pay to have the serpentine belt done on my 2000 Intrepid, because it looked like such a tight clearance that I could see me getting frustrated and destructive if I tried to change it myself.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    Not all serpentine belts use a self adjusting tensioner. I think the Q45 does but I can't find a decent picture of the front of the engine to confirm it. Most Jeeps with the 4.0 liter engine for example do not have a self adjusting tensioner. You have to loosen the power steering pump to remove the belt.

    I remember that the oil filter on them is a PITA to get. Depending on the year you have to disassemble the air filter box to get to the oil filter. On some other years you can get the filter from below but only after removing the belly pan and then it is still a tight fit.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    "I remember that the oil filter on them is a PITA to get..."

    Sorry, but not sure whether you're referring to the Q45 or the Jeep.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    Ahh yeah screwed up there I meant the Q45. The jeep is easy right there on top of the passenger side of the engine next to the coil.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    Thanks, b_r. I thought you were refering to the Q, but I wasn't sure.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Oh I'm talking about cam/crank timing on a dohc V-8 engine. This ain't no Crown Vict.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.