Toyota Highlander

11516182021211

Comments

  • skyrebskyreb Member Posts: 129
    I have been away for a day or two, so just read 2 days worth of post.
    Here is the Northeast, there is no movement from MSRP. Visited dealer today where we had ordered a V6, AWD, non limited, but with the Convenience, Preferred, and Towing packages. Tomorrow we will drive off in exactly what we wanted for about $850 below MSRP. Not as good as some of you have done, but that seems to be the best I could hope for in the NE.
    The dealers are selling all they can get, so there is little incentive to cut cost. We reviewed the availability list (vehicles in route from Japan) and there were a number of HL's equipped as above, in all colors, so yes, they are making many that are not "Limited's."
    We got the gray interior. I much prefer that to the beige, but to each his own. As we test drove it today, I was very impressed with the feeling of quality, fit, finish, power, smooth ride, and quiet interior. The wind was blowing 30-40 mph, and it was rock steady, and quiet.
    Happy motoring!!
  • hugotunghugotung Member Posts: 6
    I test drove a Highlander AWD V6 this morning. The vehicle felt quite solid and I liked it overall. However, I noticed that when I hit the breaks with moderate force and brought the Highlander to a complete stop, it produced an audible thump in the rear after stopping. After I raised my concern about the thump with the sales person, he asked a service manager to test drive with me. After observing the thump for several times, the service manager was confident that it was the normal behavior of the vehicle due to the recoil of the rear suspension and bushing, there is nothing to worry about. Had anyone, especially the owners, experiencing this. Thanks.
  • jomabu1jomabu1 Member Posts: 37
    Our Highlander is a V6 AWD. It doesn't have VSC or limited slip although they would be nice to have. I drove throught the passes very carefully especially since I had my wife and 6 week old son on board. The current issue of Car and Driver has an editorial article on driving in the snow. To summarize it, snow tires were more desirable than 4 or AWD in the snow. Hope this is helpful.
  • jomabu1jomabu1 Member Posts: 37
    If you are interested in what I bought and what I paid check post #588. I also have some posts on the Yahoo Owners club board.
  • carolvtcarolvt Member Posts: 1
    I called my dealer as I have a 'date' to try one out tomorrow. I asked him where the HL is
    assembled and he said "Somewhere in the US but
    we don't know where." I'm very interested in
    knowing as I like to purchase vehicles made
    in the US. I'm on my #2 Avalon and have had
    great luck with it - but I like the versatility
    of the SUV. I'm not afraid of trying the HL
    in it's first year as experience from myself
    and many friends is nothing but positive
    with Toyota quality. This will be interesting
    as I'm trading a 2000 Avalon XLS with
    7,140 miles on it !
  • skyrebskyreb Member Posts: 129
    Admittadely, more heresay than known fact:
    The Highlander is assembled in Japan. An earlier post mentioned it is assembled at the same plant as the Lexus.
    First year production? It is my understanding the vehicle has been available in Japan prior to importing them to the US.
    Happy motoring.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    A dealer claimed it was built in the US? Good grief. Its no wonder we have the reputation we do. There are plans to build them in the Ontario Canada plant in the future, but for now, they are built in Japan only.
  • alex_huynhalex_huynh Member Posts: 8
    Hi, I just bought my new highlander and I am concern about the break in period. I accelerate very slowly and it seems like the transmission wants more speed to shift to the next gear. I can feel the transmission trying to shift over. Is this bad for the transmission? Also, where I park my HL it is on a little bit of an up slope so I use the manual brake b/c I thought it is bad for the transmission or whatever that has to hold the HL up on a slope. Is the manual brake necessary or putting it in park is normal? Thanks.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    Always use it. Beyond reducing the strain on the transmission, it is safer and each time you set it, you are adjusting the brakes.
  • jmcgradyjmcgrady Member Posts: 3
    We are considering the purchase of a Highlander, but are leery of its towing capability. It is rated at 3500 lbs. We have a 2500 lb boat and are afraid that the vehicle would be under-powered pulling this load. Anyone owners using their vehicle for towing? Also, AWD vs. FWD for towing?
  • a2esqa2esq Member Posts: 26
    I was going to get an Escape XLT loaded (I get the Xplan discount so this would have only been $23-24k) but now I am fearful of the reliability. Now I am considering the V6 AWD HL, the MDX (base model but it's loaded) or a Pathfinder AWD LE (if the incentives are right). I don't like the backseat of the Pathfinder but the options, off-road capability and price seem attractive. I like the HL but I cannot get the options I want (leather, VSC, moonroof) without spending around $32-33k. I also am a bit unclear on the HL's snow/mud capabilities. For a bit more the MDX gives all the options, but I cannot test drive one due to demand. Any ideas? I may just go with less options on the HL and live with it.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    It depends on how often you plan on towing. I am not a fan of using ANY unibody construction vehicle for frequent towing. I am certain the HL with the V6, AWD would do fine for occasional towing but if you do it a lot, anything without a frame will eventually show excess wear. If you plan on doing a lot of towing, consider vehicles like the 4Runner or Sequoia. Avoid the HL, MDX, Pathfinder and the other car based SUVs. If you are talking about infrequent or short trips, the HL will have plenty of power for a 2500 pound boat.
  • cricket12cricket12 Member Posts: 1
    Does anyone know if the daytime running lights can be turned off? My dealer says most of the Highlanders are coming in with them, and I was just wondering.
  • drew_drew_ Member Posts: 3,382
    Regarding your questions about AWD and VSC, you may want to check out and respond to my message over in the 4WD vs. AWD discussion topic. Here is the link to my response posted in there:
    drew_ "4WD & AWD systems explained" Feb 21, 2001 7:26pm


    Drew
    Host
    Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket and Accessories message boards
  • caveman4caveman4 Member Posts: 3
    I am looking for an SUV that will perform well in deep snow (for ski trips). I am considering a new 4WD Highlander, 4Runner or RX300. Any thoughts on which one would be best?
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    I've test driven each vehicle, and you are making apples to oranges to grapes comparisons. Each vehicle has it's strong points. You have to decide what you will really use it for. I'll sum up quickly.

    MDX- for about $34.5k you get a base luxury SUV with minimal off-road capabilty. Has auto-4wd and rides well on the highway. 4 year warranty, Acura reputation.

    HL- it's strong point is that you can configure it to cost within whatever price range/feature you want. You could probably get a 2wd version with "stuff" for about $25 - 29K. But if you are interested in safety and the same luxury stuff as you would on the MDX or PF LE, then you are spending $30k - 35k. This vehicle too has minimal off-road capability.

    PF LE- this is a great combination of true off-road capability (has auto-4wd, plus 4wd-lo and -hi gears) and luxury. For about $31k nowadays you are getting leather, BOSE sound/6changer, heated seats, and seat memory. PF reliabilty is proven and excellent. You can't even get memory seats on the HL. But yes, the back seats are a bit cramped, but they have improved now that they recline. The handling and accelaration is like a sports car (really). The 240Hp engine on the PF kicks butt, body sway is minimal going through the corners. Ride will not be as comfortable as the MDX.

    You have to decide what you are willing to spend and what it is that YOU want out of the vehicle.

    Edmunds just did a comparo on mid-size SUVs.

    Good Luck
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    Well, you had me in agreement right up to the point of describing the Pathfinder's off road capabilities. Fold down the dun visor on that thing and you will see a notice from the manufacturer warning you that the vehicle is not intended for off road use. At least this was the case two years ago when I looked. Nissan must realize that unitized bodies don't do so well when subjected to the rigors imposed by actual off road driving.
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    Is the PF comparable to like a JGC in terms of off-road capability? Absolutely not, but then again not much is.

    But the fact is that the PF does have a 4-lo and 4-hi transfer case. And the suspension is a lot "truckier" and the clearance greater than the MDX or HL. I leased a '97 PF for 3 years and I can confidently tell you that I'd rather take it off-road than the HL, MDX, or what I own now the RX300.

    I know you are a Toyota dealer, so you are probably thinking, "hey, what about the 4Runner?"
    The 4runner is a very capable off-roader, but two points about the 4Runner 1)it ain't cheap 2)the engine is downright anemic compared to the other vehicles mentioned and what you are paying for it.

    Just my opinion, YMMV.
  • hutch7hutch7 Member Posts: 88
    I am considering a V6 AWD L, and have driven several at various dealerships around Atlanta. My wife drives a '99 Sienna, which she loves. But the sales force seems to be the least knowledgeable group(next to Nissan dealers) on the face of the earth. An I won't even get into the service departments I've dealt with (although all the free oil changes I get because of the 29min guarantee are nice...) How can I part with 30K and know I'll be dealing with a bunch of boobs for the next 8-10 years??? Just my 2 cents worth.
  • dianne4toyotadianne4toyota Member Posts: 343
    The Pathfinder and 4Runner are really neck and neck for pricing, and both are "trucky" ride and handling. Highlander's design elicits a more carlike feel for ride and handling, while providing the SUV appearance and utility. It's not "rugged" like its 4Runner relation, but it's a good comparison for pricing. They are really priced very similarly!

    Here, we have a 4Runner V6 2wd with the power extras, CD/cassette, alloy wheels, tow package, roof rack, the works (for now, forget the sunroof) at an MSRP of 28405. The Highlander equipped very similarly (no tow hitch itself) has an MSRP of 28025. They have virtually the same markup margins in them. Now, the same doesn't go for the 4WD versions because they always get more extras, and 4WD in a 4Runner is a typical MSRP with the RH JU AG C7 = $31660, and the 4WD Highlander, with similar features, MSRP's at 29624.

    All 4Runners have the Skid control/traction control standard. Keep in mind that the cars are not EXACTLY equipped the same, they are very very close in extras.

    The "Limited" 2WD version of the 4Runner with EJ SR C7 MSRP's at $35760, and the Highlander Limited with side airbags and all of the other extras = $32000 or so... adding $1500 for the 4WD where the 4Runner addition for 4WD brings the 4WD Limited 4Runner to 38580.

    They are way different "beasts" and the Highlander is definitely not "trucky" or meant to be offroaded for long duration/roughness, where the 4Runner is a lot more intended for the possibility of this.

    You may have to just drive them both. I requested, and got, a lot of extra Limited Highlanders this past allocation because that seems to be what's selling like hotcakes for me here, and they average $32,000-32,500 at MSRP. I used to sell a lot of Limited 4Runners as well... the trend shifts!

    Dianne
    dianne@earthlink.net
  • 00san00san Member Posts: 14
    An earlier post mentioned that the pathfinder was not meant for off-road because of its unibody construction. I really don't think this is true. The PF performs just fine off-road. It has good ground clearance and 4wd lo. Go to this link:

     http://www.nissan.ca/eng/events/campeng/welcomes.html


    and you will find Camp Pathfinder which is a Nissan sponsored club for pathfinder off-roaders.


    That said, the PF is probably best for moderate off-road activities. For any serious off-road adventures you should stick to trucks like the Lander Rover, Nissan Exterra, traditional Jeeps and modified vehicles.


    The HL is obviously not meant for any off-road activity.

  • skyrebskyreb Member Posts: 129
    Today I took delivery of new HL (V6, AWD, moon roof, Towing Pkg, Appearance & Conv Pkg). I could not be any happier with the vehicle. Fit, finish, power, smooth shirting, handling, quiet ride, are all superb, all for right under $30k. I am so grateful the Escape purchase faltered. Buying experience (Autobytel) was flawless, no hassel, very professional. Delivered vehicle was exactly as discussed. I asked, yes, the HL is manufactured in Japan on Lexus assembly line. They share many components. This is a non limited version. I feel this trim level ofers a lot of value for the money, but shars the quality with the more expensive Limited, and/or the Lexus.
    Happy motoring.
  • hawkeye70hawkeye70 Member Posts: 43
    From the options you listed, it sounds like your HL has MSRP of $28795 w/dest charge. It seems to me like you got a good deal with those options. Just curious what color combo you chose (or accepted)? I am looking for the same vehicle in the bluestone color with grey interior. I noticed Longo's web site inventory list doesn't have any models in that color, let alone with the right options. They have quite a large inventory, also. Congrats on the new toy.
  • macmacmacmac Member Posts: 35
    I have a Millennium Silver/Charcoal. I did all my dealing over the internet. When I got to a fair price and was ready to buy I went in and talk to my internet salesman. He said that they had one in but it was sold. So I got the next one coming in from the port of Long Beach. Maybe they can help you out with the choices you want. My internet salesman was Will Amiri. Good luck
  • dhumdhum Member Posts: 5
    I will be test driving the 2001 4Runner and Highlander next week and a buy decision will be made on one of these two vehicles. I would appreciate any comments from current owners or anyone who have test drove these vehicles their thoughts on the 4Runner engine and stereo system compare to the Highlander. I love the look of the 4Runner but it is lacking in features. Is the Highlander that much better with a 220hp and JBL stereo? Thanks in advance
  • skyrebskyreb Member Posts: 129
    dhum - I would love to help, but I did not drive the 4Runner, therefore, I have no impressions.
    On the basis of the post several post back where the Pathfinder and the 4Runner are discussed, the 4Runner sounds to be more "trucky." I think it all comes down to your needs. We live in the "north country of New Hampshire, where it snows frequently (like today). We felt we wanted a more car like ride, but with 4 wheel drive. We camp and hike, but would never go off a trail into the wilds. I am certain both have their place, and the one that best suits your needs would be just right.
    If you read my post above, I could not be any happier that I am with te HL. I drove it 135 miles home from the dealer, and everything was perfect. In NH we have "Frost Heaves." These winter road imperfections will drive shake the paint off metal. I cannot wait to return the leased Ford Explorer to the dealer Monday. It is "trucky" and rides like one.
    Happy looking and motoring.
  • jmcgradyjmcgrady Member Posts: 3
    I have a couple of questions for Highlander owner/dealers: What are the fuel requirements for this vehicle (min. octane)? What does "standard" and "maximum" mean in regards to towing capacity?
    What weights are being towed with the Highlander, and how does it respond (bumper sag, acceleration, etc.)? If bumper sag is a problem, can you put air shocks on this vehicle?
    Thanks!
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    The required fuel is 87 octane. That is regular unleaded. It will run better by using a premium grade with an octane rating of 91 or higher. This engine was intended for use with premium and you will get better acceleration and fuel economy with it. You will not hurt it by running with regular because of the knock control sensors in the engine.

    As to towing, I know you said you will be towing 2500 pounds but what I don't know is how frequently you will be doing this and how far you typically travel. The reason for the two different tow ratings is because some do not come with the tow prep package.
  • mkstringmkstring Member Posts: 53
    I've read up of the posts just now. There were some questions I'd like to answer as a recent HL purchaser.

    Cricket12 asked about daytime lamps. I believe the answer is no, and why would you want to? Personally, I think they should be standard on every vehicle. In Houston, we have a lot of overcast days, and the daytime lamps really makes the vehicle more noticeable.

    And in general, just the selling points that really led us to buy the vehicle:
    1) the FULL SIZE spare
    2) The ride on a bumpy road was superb - the sales person look us down one of those notorious "asphalt with tar patch" roads with the sides of the road being very uneven - it rode better than my 98 accord (which we traded in).
    3) the LACK of the center console. We were dead set on a Honda Odyssey until we climbed into a HL. something about being able to smack our kids easier... plus - it's room for a tv/vcr combo - although I don't know if one will fit there yet.
    4) back leg room. I rode in the back for the 1st part of our test drive, and was very pleased with the about of space I had. Did you know you can recline the front driver seat all the way back flush with the back seat (with the head rest removed)?
    5) did I mention the FULL SIZE spare? (hehe)

    We bought it because it was smaller and a lot more manuverable that the Odessey, and we just wanted easy access to the back seat. It was a little more with the options, but my wife has this "I'm old if I have a van" attitude - and she loves the styling on the HL.

    And, my salesperson didn't BS us (probably becuase the finance manager is my wife's brother), and really impressed me by showing us everything on the vehicle, not just the highlights. We were really pleased with our experience.
  • jmcgradyjmcgrady Member Posts: 3
    Appreciate the response! Intended towing use: 2500 lbs, 5-10 trips per year, 200-300 miles per trip. Any familiarization with bumper sag, air shocks?
  • rrmcdonaldrrmcdonald Member Posts: 29
    Mike - the ONLY thing our kids don't like about our Highlander -- we have a 9" tv/vcr combo we would use on trips (ok, parents who say they would never bring a tv along on trips to entertain the kids, try it first and then complain about how playing road games is better!) but alas it is too wide for the space between the seats. I think the space is about 8".
    We've (my wife, of course, while I drive the "hand-me-down") had our Highlander for a week and love it. Sundown Red V6 2x4 limited with leather, side air bags, premium JBL, moon roof, tow pep and VSC. We got if for >$1k under MSRP. The dealer, Team Toyota in Tallahassee, located it in Clearwater (we demanded red limited with VSC and side airbags) and paid to have it brought up for us and changed the tires out for the Michelins as compensation for putting on the 200 miles to get it here. They were good to work with - very pleasant experience.
  • cali5cali5 Member Posts: 15
    I test drove both vehicles a number of times. The 4runner has noticeably less HP than the Highlander. You sit up higher in the 4runner, but the ride is more truck-like. I didn't notice a difference in the sound of the stereo systems.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    The HL hasn't been out long enough to judge the rear end sag and I don't have any personal experience with air shocks.

    You're doing a pretty fair amount of towing. 10 trips a year at 200 to 300 a piece is a good work out.

    I want to be careful how I word this next part because I don't want it to be misinterpreted. That much towing is going to put a lot of strain on a unibody constructed vehicle. I'm not saying the HL can't handle it, but each time you hook up, you are pulling directly on every body part in the vehicle. This will not hurt a unibody if done infrequently or for short trips. I honestly think you would be pushing the limits with this or any other unibody SUV or van.

    Others may disagree with this theory and that will not bother me. Of the unibody vehicles on the road, I am confident that the HL is very well constructed but I really think you need to look at something with a frame. Have you considered the 4Runner?
  • mcw31762mcw31762 Member Posts: 15
    Curious if there is a noticable difference between the 4x4 and front wheel drive?
    My husband is pushing the 4x4 but I drive 3 miles to work everyday and then just
    weekend driving...although the price difference isn't all that much.

    So is it worth it to get the 4x4 over the 4x2? He says the resell value would be better,
    but of course I'm not worried about that now!

    I test drove the 4x4 and must admit...it was quiet, smooth and handled great!

    Any thoughts would be appreciated...thanks!
  • dianne4toyotadianne4toyota Member Posts: 343
    Thoughts: a 2WD depending on where you reside is just about $1500 cheaper than a 4WD. On a purchase or lease, this equates to about $20-30 a month difference in expense. Over time, it does add up, but the reality of it is that if you reside in a high 4WD market area, you are way better off for resale value sticking with a 4WD. Doesn't really make the car higher, but the value of a 4WD is better at the end, possibly as much as the amount of the cost of the 4WD.

    I know that when I advertise a 4WD SUV for sale in classifieds online or other areas, I pull a lot more people throughout the country and Northern CA for these than when I advertise a 2WD SUV.

    Dianne
  • mcw31762mcw31762 Member Posts: 15
    I appreciate your thoughts! I just wish I lived in California, I'd be buying one from you! I live in Missouri and looks like I'm going to be able to order one for $2000ish over invoice.

    I guess I already knew my answer about 4x4 or 4x2....so we'll probably go with the 4x4. Dealers are playing tough around here, not wanting to budge off the sticker. I finally went through autobytel and got the deal from a guy 100 miles away...worth the travel time!

    Thanks for letting us know there are fair dealers out there!
  • drew_drew_ Member Posts: 3,382
    on right now. See you there!
    /direct/view/.eea61db


    Drew
    Host
    Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket and Accessories message boards
  • shortysweetieshortysweetie Member Posts: 1
    If you are considering the 4Runner a new redesigned model will come out in the fall of this year. Standard will be a V6 engine. My 2 cents is 4Runner is for off roading and drives like a truck. HL is for driving around town and drives exactly like a sedan.
  • nofeernofeer Member Posts: 381
    Toyota has wanted to build the rx300 in northamerica i believe its still built in japan. i think that toyota understands that HL may take sales away from the rx, but the rx is a lexus with lexus quality service and has NAV (no lexus link, onstar yet i quess) maybe my info is old. But i would think to lower the cost of building the rx, we should here shortly about a redesign based on the HL soon. Because basically if you don't need nav (you can have it added from an alpine dealer)
    the HL actually is slightly roomier than the rx. I would be hard pressed to spend the extra $$$$ for the rx. i hear that lexus is making some great deals on the rx, usually that's before a major redesign or competitive pressure.
    with all the suv's in toyota lineup, there is big pressure not to buy the LC and get the sequoia instead (that's what my friend did and saved 10k)

    I think toyota will in the next year or two consolitdate it's suv line to fewer platforms.

    So here is my prediction
    HL and Rx on same platform built in northamerica
    LC--LX470 switched over to Sequoia based suv.
    The seqouia is larger and doesn't need premium and gets better mileage.

    do you all think they will drop the LC or LX470 and base the lx on the sequoia?

    too bad that lexus or toyota won't sell a high tech diesel as i hear are available in europe.

    what toyota needs is the rx longer with a 3rd row seat like the MDX.

    We are considering a new suv next year. looking at the HL, RX, and especially the MDX buts it's more than the HL.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    Pretty close on your predictions. My understanding is that the RX/HL will be built in the US within the next 3 years. The Land Cruiser will be coming out with a "retro" model in the next couple of years and I think the current luxury LC will disappear. The LX470 will continue on the same platform. The Sequoia will remain in its current dress for at least 5 years. The 4Runner will have a completely new model out next winter or early spring. I have no details on the new Runner.
  • ahossaahossa Member Posts: 152
    I'd like to know if anyone has test driven both vehicles on a highway at over 50 MPH? I want to know which SUV is quieter at highway speed.
  • suv2002suv2002 Member Posts: 20
    I'm leasing a '98 QX4 which ends in May 2001. The Q has run fine--other than snagging seatbelts and anemic engine--for over 50K miles.

    Here's the question: do I buy it at the end of the lease (I'm thinking $21/$22K) or move on to a new vehicle? I'm considering a new QX4, a Toyota HL and --don't laugh--possibly a 2002 Bravada. The MDX is too much ($40K from Clair Acura in MA)even though I thoroughly enjoyed the test drive. I'll test drive them all, natch, but I'd love to hear from the crew.
  • wmquanwmquan Member Posts: 1,817
    The Highlander hasn't been crash-tested yet, but as far as the QX4 and Bravada goes, please consider safety as a factor in your important decision.

    The QX4 is based on the Pathfinder, and both have been crash-tested with negative results; see www.iihs.org for info.

    GM vehicles have not done well, though the Bravada has not been crash tested. The 2001 did even worse than the QX4. The Bravada is based on the GM minivan platform, which similarly did poorly.

    The IIHS tests are more "real world" than the 1-5 star NHTSA crash tests.

    The Highlander hasn't been tested yet, but it is based on the Camry platform and shares many components with the RX300. Both of those platforms have earned excellent crash-test scores.

    The final decision is your's, of course. Hope this helps.

    (By the way, while the MDX is not an option for you, it should also do well in crash tests because of its basis on the strong-performing Honda Odyssey. Another, probably safer-and-safest SUV choice that is probably out of the price range you described is the MB ML320.)
  • drew_drew_ Member Posts: 3,382
    Just a small correction. The Olds Bravada is based on the same platform as the GMC Jimmy and Chevy Blazer. With their body-on-frame construction, they are unrelated to the GM minivans. The Pontiac Aztek and Buick Rendezvous, OTOH, are built on that (shortened) GM minivan platform. You can see the Chevy Blazer's IIHS report here:
    http://www.hwysafety.org/vehicle_ratings/ce/html/summary_midsuv.htm


    Drew
    Host
    Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket and Accessories message boards
  • dianne4toyotadianne4toyota Member Posts: 343
    They had a cool "car trivia" game there last night... was fun! :D

    Dianne
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I was cruising down the road and missed last night's trivia contest (I always score in the bottom 10% anyway). Since you had so much fun, dianne4toyota, does this mean you won (or at least beat Drew)?

    Steve
    Host
    Vans, SUVs and Aftermarket & Accessories message boards
  • dianne4toyotadianne4toyota Member Posts: 343
    I got there too late to play much, but it was neato! I didn't beat anyone! Next time, I might have to take it more seriously. Dana was a great host! :D
  • suv2002suv2002 Member Posts: 20
    Appreciate the safety update. Basically you're saying go for the HL, not the others? I love my creature comforts (and my skull too). Think it's the best combo?
  • gtalaveragtalavera Member Posts: 15
    Just recently purchased a toyota HL. The manual indicates breakin period is 1000Miles and not to go over 55MPH. Should this be followed. Also the temperature gauge is just a tad below the middle mark during normal driving, on my honda accord gauge is a little lower should this be cause for concern. This is the first time i bought a toyota.
  • skyrebskyreb Member Posts: 129
    I now have 200 miles on my new HL. I would not be concerned about the temp gauge. Mine runs right at about the mid point.
    Regarding breakin, my advise is to avoid prolonged constant speeds. I once read an article entitled "Whip those Horses." basically they prescribed a series of accelerations, and decelerations, with gradual increases of 5 mph over the first 1000 miles. I try not to stop and start the engine, rather we have taken drives, keep it runnning, and hot, and vary the speed. Brakes also need breaking in, so avoid panic stops at first also.
    I will change the oil at about 3500 miles. I think this important. There are microscopic metal filings in the oil, and it will be good to change the oil and get them out of the engine.
    The more I drive mine the greater I appreciate the design, quality and assembly. I feel like this is a "winner."
    Happy motoring
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.