By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Actually, if there were no other cars on the road, driving a Miata in the snow could be a lot of fun (don't try this at home kids).
I haven't tried revving in in park to see if I feel the vibration then, but if I think of it I'll do so tomorrow. Perhaps it just does this at certain RPM's.
Rob
Kyle: could it be a bad engine mount?
Snow is on the way for us, so anyone considering the Pine Barrens trip gets a nice bonus. It should be nice and messy for you.
-juice
not a big problem for me, i usually drive 75 at freeway and below 60 at local.
For gas milage, my average is 26 for total 2500mi. that is 60/40 mix of freeway and local on LX 2WD.
Has anyone installed cargo cover on 2002 CR-V? How is that? Is that easy to remove when need more cargo space?
Dgiovanni - I routinely get between 24-27 mpg out of my '99 5 speed. My average over the past 2.5 years is 25.3 mpg.
To answer your question, yes, the new i-VTEC is a more fuel efficient engine than the previous B20 variant in the original CR-V. However, the '02 body is bit heavier and it's geared to allow for more relaxed cruising and take advantage of the additional low end torque. So the car only earns a 22-26 mpg range while the older model had a 22-25 range.
No vibrations in steering wheel. No loose seats. No rattle.
Actually, I'd continue to use my notebook computer for the DVD. The screen is 14.1" and it's free. What I would like is for a center console wide enough to rest the notebook on (I would secure it, but I need the space). So far only minivans and big SUVs seem to have room.
The XC90 looks interesting, too, but I bet it'll be priced to compete with the MDX. Volvo's built-in child booster seats are extremely clever.
What else? Chrysler Pacifica would be interesting if it weren't for the built-in defect of being a Chrysler product.
-juice
steve
zops: Honda says that the CR-V's tank holds 15.3 gallons -- same as the previous CR-V.
juice: Please tell us how we can get free notebook computers too.
...and color is no argument - silver all the way
Varmit - I'm hosting some Raider fans over my place to watch the playoff game tomorrow nite - my Pats better come through for me, or its gonna get ugly at the Spyponder household!
Slugline - For the first couple years (97-98), the original 2WD CR-V was rated for 22-26 mpg. I guess they thought that the lower weight would make it more fuel efficient. Later on they repealed that and reduced it to the same 22-25 rating as the other models.
As for the manual vs auto differences... typically a 5 speed manual tranny will get better mpg because the extra gear is higher than the highest gear in the auto. The CR-V is weird in that it's geared the opposite way. So the auto runs a more fuel efficient lower rpm at highway speeds. (At least that's how it's supposed to work). In real life, most of us 5 speeders got better mpg averages than the EPA estimates predicted.
Spy/Juice - I'd consider navi for the Pilot. I opted not to get it for our TL because we drive that car locally. When we take a longer trip (to places where we might need directions), it tends to be in the CR-V. We need the truck to haul other people or our stuff. So navi for the Pilot is a possibility.
It is smooth, comfortable and reasonably quiet, though some freeway pavement can be noisier. Love the moonroof, 6-cd changer, keyless entry/powerlocks. Still getting used to(right-rear) visibility when changing lanes. Haven't had a snow test yet. (I can feel the intermittent wipers in the brake pedal when stopped at a light - no other unusual sounds or vibrations that others have mentioned. )
My primary concern is the mileage. I began to consider suvs when small, more fuel efficient ones arrived - and thought Honda would be a good choice in this respect.
Reading this board, it seems some are getting the est. 22-28 mpg.
I'm almost at 1200 miles, and my last fill-up showed 19 mpg.
It's mostly gotten 20 mpg - up to 25 for 1 tank-full that was mainly highway.
I'm driving more conservatively than I did with my old manual trans. jetta.
I don't leave the defogger on much, because it uses AC. Haven't checked the tire pressure.
Anyone else seeing this low mpg ? Any ideas on how to get better mileage?
thanks for any info.
In any case, I think whoever wins is going to run into a wall in Pittsburgh...
On topic, I'm starting to see more and more '02 CR-V's around the Bay Area. They are very sharp-looking (especially the silver!)
Oh, man, I like silver, I should've called it! ;-)
I actually like the blue, if they put that on the Pilots.
Subaru won't have its big crossover until 2005. Nissan will have a new Quest, but it looks bizarre. Toyota's Highlander is nice but seats just 5.
It's funny that Honda sits on the sidelines for years, pitching Isuzus, and then still comes in with a solid offering.
-juice
But, got 27-29 mpg on a highway trip!
So did you get a chance to try out the 4WD in that massive snow we had the other day? LOL
Dave
It's true that the AC automatically turns on with the defroster setting, but you don't have to keep it running. Simply hit the AC switch after it turns on with the defogger, and it will shut off (This is true with the <'02 series, but I'm assuming it's the same with the '02).
The defroster will continue to defrost the windshield, it just won't remove the humidity from the cabin.
I usually leave the AC on long enough to remove extra moisture from the cabin, then turn it off to conserve fuel and refrigerant.
Ty
Your highway mileage is an indication of good mpg ahead for you. Highway trips are usually longer and allow the engine to fully warm up for most of the trip. Your city mileage probably reflects shorter trips where your engine spends a great portion of the trip warming up or does not have a chance to fully warm up at all.
Then again, in heavy Chicago traffic I would not expect to achieve good mpg. You are either sitting and idling or accelerating and then immediately braking again. The city MPG ratings don't really anticipate the kind of heavy traffic you see in the Chicago city neighborhoods.
Right? A wagon? (Ignore the minivan chassis).
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
Ty
and for those who worry about the effect on gas mileage....I seriously doubt if you could measure the difference. Modern cars use small and efficient compressors unlike those that were made 30 years ago.
Something could be amiss.
i've been a back bencher on the crv page for the past few weeks as i try to hone in on a car choice. special thanks to the regular attenders and to the edmunds hosts...you all are tremendously helpful and even a bit entertaining.
i'm looking for a commuter vehicle that can 1) fit my large 6'4" frame, 2)occasionally haul my 2 6' kids around, and 3) handle some occasional on-road snowy driving and weekend trips to the mountains.
thus far, i've narrowed to the crv with the forester being a distant second. the current back seat of the forester disqualifies it due to reason #2; however, i am intrigued by what subaru will do with the '03. we had a subie back in the 80's, and the thing was bulletproof.
hope you can help me sift through some questions about the '02 crv:
1. how can you tell if the 4wd system is engaged? is there an indicator light? is there any extra noise from the rear wheels?
2. given our tall frames, i've pretty much ruled out the EX because of the reduced headroom with the sunroof. the only feature that i would really miss is the tinted glass, which makes the V's so much better looking! has anyone out there had good or bad experiences with aftermarket tinting? a local dealer wanted about $250 for it, which i didn't think was that bad. they apparently apply the tint to the inside of the window? does it scrach? peel after several years?
3. is adding keyless entry a dealer no-brainer aftermarket?
4. i'd prefer a car with the spare tire inside and out of the way. that is not the case with the V. the leather cover on some of the older V's are kinda faded and ratty, which detracts. what colors do the hard covers come in? what would match best with the satin silver metallic?
5. has anyone had any good/bad experiences with northern front range honda dealers (denver north to cheyenne)?
thanks...looking forward to shared experiences with the V.
I have followed this board for three months.
Today I finally bought a CRV. The price is
pretty good, 750 over invoice. The only thing
makes me not very comfortable is that there is
already 80 miles on the V. But what can i say?
The car i did my test drive may be bought by
another unhappy guy for the same reason.
I also added a remote keyless entry with 299$ and
was offered a 6.99% loan rate for 4 years.
Can't wait to be seated in the car now.
Thank you guys for all the inputs. I will
get you updated.
bajie
1) There is no indicator light for RT4WD It's really not that sophisticated of a system, being completely hydraulic and not computer-driven. So all you honestly can expect is feeling the "kick in the rear" when your front wheels slip.
2) Quality of aftermarket tint depends on the installer. Be aware that dealerships frequently farm out tint work to independent shops. My CR-V had all glass (except windshield) done for $200 last year at a shop who has been in business in Houston for 25 years. It's been flawless so far and they are backing their work with a lifetime warranty. I hope you can find something similar.
3) Check out the bottom of this page: http://www.handa-accessories.com/crvelect02.html
4) Satin Silver Metallic was an available color for the CR-V SE in 2001. Its factory cover should match perfectly, but it has a list price of a few hundred dollars. I suggest acquiring any hard cover that attracts your fancy and having a body shop paint it for approximately $70 or so.
I went for a short drive and had fun playing in the snow this evening. (If you were watching the Pats vs Raiders game, you saw my backyard.) This is how I would describe the action of RT4WD. To engage the rear axle, I give it a bit more gas than necessary. When I feel the front wheels slip, I give it a bit more gas. This keeps the front wheels from regaining traction, yet the CR-V is still pushing forward with no noticeable loss of momentum. There is no "kick in the rear" unless I really stomp on the gas.
You may find that legroom for the driver is lacking in the '02 CR-V. It's not bad, but for exceptionally tall folks, there is potential for a problem. I'm 6'1" and fit comfortably, but I had the seat set all the way back. There's more legroom in my '99.
I has an 02 LX also, and am planning to get the keyless and security system from hparts.com. Can you give me some details on the keyless/alarm installation? All plug-in connectors and/or did you have to remove many panels...etc? Did it come with installation detail instructions?
Let me know...Thanks!
http://www.handaaccessories.com/crv/02CRVSECURITY.pdf