2001 - 2006 Honda CR-Vs

1119120122124125314

Comments

  • timz58timz58 Member Posts: 44
    I have spent my entire working life in a paper mill with excessive noise levels and must use hearing aids to hear normal conversations. Unfortunately, in order for the hearing appliances to be effective they are tuned to specific frequencies and amplify them significantly. The noise from tires seems to fall into this catagory and conversation on some rough road surfaces is almost impossible. The OEM Bridgestone tires were totally unnaceptable and were exchanged for a house brand tire from Superior Tire Service (A PW Northwest Chain) . Cost was about $80 for a 215/65-15 tire with a good all weather tread. So far, these have been entirely satisfactory, good in the wet weather (no hydroplaning) and a significant reduction in road noise. We experienced the same problems with the Michelin Mud and Snow tires (MX4's) that came on our 99 Accord EX and shortly exchanged those for Michelin X-!'s which were also disappointly noisy. At about 75K miles were had a set of Les Schwab Z800's (205/60-15) installed (I think these are a Toyo made under lisence to Les Schwab) and these tires are noticably quieter. The road noise in the CRV is a little less than in the Accord with both vehicles having new tires. We are very happy with both cars even with having to put up with some road noise and will probably purchase another new Honda Accord when the 04 models come out. Honda quality and reliability have sold this old timer. I hated trading in my GMC pickup on the Vee but it was a sound decision as we will probably be driving it when we decide it is not wise for us to be on the road any more.
  • bonypartebonyparte Member Posts: 30
    Okay, all this stuff about road noise has its place in terms of feeling comfortable about sitting in your car for extended periods of time, but it is nothing compared to problems with the engine. A poster on the suv.com forum has posted his new cr-v is stalling and the dealer has told him it is a problem with a sensor in the VTEC - here is the post
    "I am resubmitting this with a better subject title. We received delivery of our 2002 LX 2 weeks ago. It was the perfect car until today when it stalled while in motion. No warning! The dealer immediately blamed it on water in the gas. Not to my surprise they were wrong. After all, I drove it after getting gas last night without it dying, and it has not been below half a tank yet. The dealer has now diagnosed it as a faulty V-Tec module that was sending a false "no oil" signal to the engine.
    I have torn down and rebuilt many engines, and done my own repairs on ever car I have ever owned, so off course I am inquisitive. When asking them what this sensor does, after explaining to them that low oil does not make an engine stop, rather the engine will run until it seizes, I could not get a logical answer.
    Has anyone had a similar problem and/or diagnosis, or heard of this problem/diagnosis happening to someone else?"
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    We're glad you decided to come out of the shadows and join the discussion! Welcome aboard!

    We're looking forward to hearing a lot more from you.

    tidester
    Host
    SUVs
  • richk4richk4 Member Posts: 19
    Varmit, having owned a dozen cars (with covered wheel well openings), I have never had the engine area covered with the white salt spots that my 02 EX has after 800 miles. The tires do not have to be aimed DIRECTLY towards the openings, the turbulance of the wind from the tires in the wells directs road deposits in the openings. This is not a good thing. Honda could have easily covered these openings with some kind of flap which I intend to do. What long term effects this pollution of the engine compartment will have, one does not have to be a rocket scientest to figure out.
  • civicwcivicw Member Posts: 135
    I don't think most CR-V buyers are expecting a luxury SUV for 20K. At the same time, it's reasonable to expect that the new CR-V not be UNUSUALLY noisy. I don't want to start a CR-V vs Forester debate here, but for example the Forester has very little road noise.

    Having checked out my friend's 2002 EX, I have to say it can get pretty noisy at 65mph, but is otherwise quiet.

    It appears that people who own a Honda feel right at home with the new V, simply because Hondas do have a fair amount of road noise(I own a Civic). And I can see how owners of the old CR-V must think that the 2002 model is ultra quiet.

    This brings me to my ONLY gripe about Hondas, as a Civic owner. Why can't they make their new vehicles as quiet as a Toyota? The CR-V is nothing more than a terrific Civic station wagon, and at 20K, Honda is not exactly giving them away. SUVs have huge profit margins, and I'm sure Honda could fix this noisy reputation if they really wanted to. But with people lining up to buy the V, I don't think they will.
  • andil1andil1 Member Posts: 97
    There is a dealer in my area (suburban Chicago)that has been advertising "weekend only" specials for his cars--including $500 off MSRP for an 4WD EX. The 4WD's all seem to come through with a sticker of $22,740--I've noticed this in my Sunday car lot perusing. I've seen the dealer options increase the price to $25,000+, including the infamous "protection package" which is a mere $698 (huh?). I'm not ready to buy yet--just looking and enjoying the comments of nice folks like you on this and other Edmunds boards.
  • jgreen6jgreen6 Member Posts: 2
    I find the explanation that the rocking seats are caused by prematurely worn bushings very puzzling. My drivers seat did this from the time it was driven off the lot. I didn't notice it on the test drive, probably beacause I was concentrating on other aspects of the vehicle. The next day however it was quite apparent.

    I have not taken the vehicle in for its first service yet, but will definitely bring this up when I do. I have a silver EX, and overall have been very pleased with it. I took it on a business trip to Texas (from Michigan), and it was a pleasure to drive. Unfortunately, I was laid off shortly after returning from the trip to Texas so I will probably be selling the vehicle soon. Anybody interested in a '02 EX with 3000 miles for $20,250? Would rather not sell, but I have bad habits like requiring a roof over my head and eating :).
  • daveghhdaveghh Member Posts: 495
    If you ask yourself, "what kind of people come to these websites?"

    I would say there are two kinds of people...
    1. Those like who are researching the CRV.
    2. Those who are having problems with the crv to discuss the issues.

    My father and I both have a '02 and we have had none of the problems stated at these forumns and I have close to 6000 miles on it now!

    Hypothetically....
    Lets say that out of the 13,000 new crv's sold this month in the US, 30 people have had problems. Then half of those people like the internet, voila you have these 15 people browsing the net to discuss their issues. Ths wuld appear to the forumns that there is a "serious" isssue witth the vehicle. Would this be a fair representation of how the '02 crv's reliability? I don't think so, especially when I just gave you a "hypothetical" scenerio where 1/5 of 1% are having problems.

    Buy a crv, you will be very happy with it! I know I am!
  • bonypartebonyparte Member Posts: 30
    Road noise and there are many responses. Engine stalling and there are NO responses.
  • bonypartebonyparte Member Posts: 30
    BUT ...
    In the days of yesteryear, all an owner could do when a problem surfaced was take it to their dealer or discuss it with a few in their circle of people. While the internet has grown rapidly in the past few years, you will find that these types of forums only attract a VERY VERY VERY small percentage of the population. And many many many people still just take it to the dealer. I've visited other forums discussing other issues and it is always the case - their are a few 'regulars' because that is what they are interested in and a few that pop in and out to find out something.
    While your hypothetical is true as stated, it in no way represents what it really is. You, or me, have no way of knowing the amount of problems with this car or any other car. If you think about it, the rocking seat problem - this is almost cetainly a design problem - compared to the number of posts about other issues, this problem would rank high just based upon the people who use this forum. Yet, since it is a design problem, the number of cars that would have this would either be equal to the number sold or very close to it. In any case, a large number. But there is NOT a large number of posters in this forum.
    Reading something into a very small sampling of data is very dangerous. One can make anything out of a few samples. You may be right, but there is no way to know. Until proven otherwise, my theory is much closer to the way it is. We do not know how many people are having problems with the new cr-v.
  • carguy62carguy62 Member Posts: 545
    There are dealers in the Chicago area selling much below MSRP. Hint: One of them always has a huge newspaper ad, usually on the back page of the Trib's auto section. They say they have X CR-Vs available, call for the best price. Call 'em when you are ready to buy. Or better yet I can give you a contact, maybe I'll get a referral fee.
  • stragerstrager Member Posts: 308
    Most people know that Hondas are very reliable. Even so, this forum provides a sampling of small problems they MIGHT face after they buy the CR-V.

    New CR-V buyers, after forking over a lot of money usually want to say that they are in love with their vehicles. If that was the only type of post allowed, this board would be useless. Better to be a fully informed buyer.
  • tmeframetmeframe Member Posts: 80
    I've scheduled having Dynamat installed on large panel areas. The Dynamat will lower the resonant frequency of that area of the panel by making it more rigid. I believe the main frequency makeup of the road noise component will be reduced significantly. Another plus, it'll improve acoustic bass-response in the system with Kelton Sub.
  • bonypartebonyparte Member Posts: 30
    How much does something like that cost?
    I know this will seem like whining, but shouldn't the noise dampening be done by Honda when they are built?
  • tmeframetmeframe Member Posts: 80
    This is not a luxury SUV, so I'm sure Honda is keeping costs down.

    As far as the Dynamat installation, that depends on who you get to do it. The Dynamat is sold in preset kit sizes and rolls. I prefer just to buy it rolled. It's probably around $200.00 for enough Dynamat to do the CR-V. Any reputable stereo-shop has a hourly rate that they'll charge. I'm expecting a total cost of less than $800.00 before all is said and done.

    Before it's done though, I'm ordering a complete set of interior panel clips, so the one's that are popped will be replaced with new ones on panel reinstall.
  • sluglineslugline Member Posts: 391
    Well, if you take that Civic wagon, jack it up by almost a foot, then bulk it up until it weighs a hundred pounds more than an Accord, how much of a "Civic" is really there now? :) I could just as easily ask why the Acura RSX costs as much as it does when it's nothing more than a terrific Civic hatchback? :)
  • bonypartebonyparte Member Posts: 30
    I appreciate all the input I've received, good and bad. I'm not hear to slam Honda, REALLY. If 13000 cars have been sold in Jan, it would be great if 13000 owners would give us feedback. That is not going to happen. With the reach of the web, it would be great to have some kind of national database where car owners could provide feedback, good or bad, so that everyone could have a guide onto what is right or wrong with a specific car. We still pretty much have to depend upon reviewers and a small percentage of people who use forums like this. I cannot say the new CR-V is a great car, or a lousy car, based upon the posts here. And I wasn't trying to do that. Just trying to get a feel for what would be the 'best' car to purchase.When the car I ordered arrives, I am going to insist that I drive it at highway speed for a lenthy test to get an idea about noise level. Everyone's tolearance is different. As for mechanical problems - as long as they are not major design problems with the engine/transmission, minor problems can be fixed. I'm looking forward to the new CR-V - I like the way it looks, inside and out.
  • civicwcivicw Member Posts: 135
    My only point was that I would like Honda to pay a little more attention to soundproofing their cars. Noise aside, to me Hondas are as good as BMWs.
  • martin44martin44 Member Posts: 25
    Has anyone put 16" or even 17" wheels on the new CRV?
  • carguy62carguy62 Member Posts: 545
    This is my first Honda with VTEC (actually second, but that's a long story). I hear things like "when the VTEC kicks in" and similar. I am now past the break in point and I was trying to be careful on the RPMs (had a few slips but not too bad). So when does the VTEC "kick in"? I know it's at higher RPMs.

    I'd love to hear a discourse on the VTEC (in fairly simple terms, I'm a scientist but not a rocket scientist), but only if this is the appropriate place. If there's another topic, let me know.
  • tiresnsuchtiresnsuch Member Posts: 1
    I've had my CR-V since Dec 2001. Here are my thoughts:


     - Overall: a great value

     - More horsepower than pre-2002 CR-V.

    Horsepower is adequate--not great. I lived in Europe and

    owned European cars for many years, so I'm biased to more

    power. But then again this is a 4 cylinder that gets

    great gas mileage.

     - 4 cylinder is fine, unless you plan to haul/tow on a regular basis--look at Xterra,

     Ford, Mazda, or Liberty if that's a concern

     - Real-time 4WD does well in the northeast snow/rain, even with the

    factory-equipped (poor quality) tires

     - Lots of discussion at this forum:

     http://forums.vmag.com/suvcrv0999/

     about tires, etc. tires pulling to the

     right. I have 3,000 miles on my CR-V and it

     DOES NOT pull to the right.


    Speaking of tires, some things that annoy me about the 2002 CR-V:

     

     - the smaller tires, which diminish (in my opinion) the CR-V's stance as an SUV. After you

     consider that 90 percent of SUV owners never take their SUV for off-roading purposes, the

     tire size thing doesn't seem too bad. Still, if you park the CR-V next to a Ford

    Escape or Xterra in a parking lot, the tire size difference and its effect on the vehicle's

    overall look is apparent.

     - the dash-mounted transmission shifter, which

     I've mistakenly hit for a turn signal. The emergency brake handle location also took some

     getting used to.


    Compared to other SUVs/mini-SUVs:

     - Yes, Honda is putting out a Honda Pilot/V-6/

     3rd row seat, etc. Approx out-the-door-price

     is $30,000 with all the accessories. Pilot is more in the category

    of the Toyota Highlander--more power, larger, more luxurious/expensive.

     CR-V price with accessories (EX version) is $22,000-23,000

     even at MSRP. OK some dealers are taking advantage, so this might vary by which area of

     the country you live in.


     - I priced the Toyota RAV4; a RAV4 with all the bells and whistles that come with a CR-V

     EX (6-disc changer, moonroof, privacy tint, etc)

     would be in the $ 26-28K range.

     - If you think about it, for all the changes in the 2002 CR-V,

    its price is only $1,500 - 2,000 more than the 2001 (EX) model.

     

     I owned a Honda Accord for 7 years, and took it to Germany where I lived for a while. On

     the German autobahn, it didn't pass any BMWs or Mercedess, but it was no slouch. I sold

     that Accord and missed it. Owning a Honda now (the CR-V I bought last Dec), I remember

     the joy of owning such a reliable, well-made, and fun-to-drive car.


     I'm not too mechanically-inclined, but I've changed oil/oil filter on this CR-V--very easy to

     do. I'm using synthetic (oil) because I plan to keep this car for a long time.


     Balance what I got versus the price I paid, and taking into consideration my needs

     (99.99% city and long drives; almost never go off-road, small family), the Honda CR-V

    suits me very well.

  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    The suggestion about excessive wear of the seat bushings comes from the owner of a '99 model. It's probably not even the same part for the '02. Also, it was a suggestion for people to check on, not a diagnosis based on fact. Just an idea worth sharing.

    Bonyparte - If you look hard enough, you'll see that the little mark on Cindy Crawford's cheek is actually a mole. Also, one of her eyes opens wider than the other. It must be very difficult for her to live her lifestyle with such terrible deformities.

    If you look hard enough, you'll find a post from the owner of a '99 CR-V owner who had her car declared a lemon. That was the same year it was ranked the most reliable SUV on the US market. Look for the number of people that have '00 models who had the PTTR issue. Then find the most reliable vehicle (in any class) for that year.

    Here's the deal... Look hard enough and you'll find all kinds of problems. People love to complain. It's a bigger national sport than baseball. But until we have data (not anecdotes), you will never know. Running around the internet trying to take a survey isn't going to do anything other than add hype to problems that may or may not exist.

    To answer your question about adding sound dampening, they did. There is more in the new CR-V than the old one. However, they cannot coat the entire car with it. It's heavy and it's expensive. Quite frankly, they have more important things to correct.
  • hpc1hpc1 Member Posts: 7
    please look at my post a little far back about ed napleton in chicago. they are in oak lawn, and ask for john folga. like the post by carguy62, there are dealers willing to go far below MSRP, more than $300 to $500. john was one of them and he's been very easy to deal with so far. you can even e-mail with him. just checkout the ed napleton web site.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Rich - I have a '99 with full wheel wells AND a skidplate. I occasionally have sand and pebbles on the top of the engine. I am aware of what air currents can do in the engine compartment. Have you considered that maybe those holes in the wheel wells actually provide an outlet for the air currents to flush the compartment? Who knows?

    You are correct. This is not rocket science. All we have to ask is one very unscientific question... Does a problem truly exist, or do we just have an unproven theory?
  • bonypartebonyparte Member Posts: 30
    "Running around the internet trying to take a survey isn't going to do anything other than add hype to problems that may or may not exist."
    Have to respectfully disagree - problems exist on their own, not what someone does to research them.

    "Quite frankly, they have more important things to correct"
    What would these more important items be?
  • hpc1hpc1 Member Posts: 7
    please look at my post a little far back about ed napleton in chicago. they are in oak lawn, and ask for john folga. like the post by carguy62, there are dealers willing to go far below MSRP, more than $300 to $500. john was one of them and he's been very easy to deal with so far. you can even e-mail with him. just checkout the ed napleton web site.
  • richk4richk4 Member Posts: 19
    Varmint, I'm not sure what you gage as being a problem. All I'm trying to do is keep my engine as clean as possible. I cannot for the life of me believe these openings help "clean" the engine compartment. The force of air from the tires, say going 50 mph is going to go IN these openings not out. I know grime builds up on the engine as a vehicle ages, this is not my concern. Engines can be steam cleaned. There is a lot of snow in my area, (western N.Y., seven FEET in five days during Christmas time). A lot of road salt is used. This has been a warmer winter here also, thus the roads are very slushy.
    If I had my engine steam cleaned every morning and drove a lot during the day, my engine would have a mess of road salt deposits at the end of the day. This to me IS a problem. I really like the V and would buy it again. Yes I have the clicking noise and rocking seat but these to me are minor gripes. And I believe I can solve THIS problem by installing boots in the wheel wells. Thanks for your input.
  • theracoontheracoon Member Posts: 666
    bonyparte:

    "Running around the internet trying to take a survey isn't going to do anything other than add hype to problems that may or may not exist."
    Have to respectfully disagree - problems exist on their own, not what someone does to research them.


    Unless of course someone becomes overly concerned about a single instance of a reported problem, and starts posting on every message board they can find in an attempt to make it an "issue".

    Varmint:

    "Quite frankly, they have more important things to correct"
    What would these more important items be?


    Dagnabit! Now you've started bonyparte on another witch hunt!!!

    ;)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    V8 engine and mud digger tires! They're oddly missing from the spec sheet! ;-)

    Cut me some slack, it's Friday.

    -juice
  • theracoontheracoon Member Posts: 666
    Well, if the holes in the fender linings were the only openings into the engine compartment I might agree.

    But there's that big hole underneath that has your suggested 50 mph wind blowing by it as it passes under the vehicle, and the fairly large one above the front bumper that forces air through the radiator and into the engine compartment. Seems to me the force of the air coming straight in through the radiator would cause engine compartment air to be forced out the holes in the fender linings.

    Hmmm...I wonder if that would cause the inside of the alloy wheels to corrode faster!!! ;)

    And I live a short distance East of you, and while we haven't had nearly as much snow, they do use about the same volumes of salt. My '99 EX with no holes in the fender linings has salt residue on the underside of the engine hood. Doesn't take holes to toss moisture around. JM2C.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    What, you don't wax your wheels? Seriously, it works great.

    -juice
  • scnamescname Member Posts: 296
    The hole in wheel well does let dirt in , reach as high as lower half of vaccume booster drum. This photo was taken after 1000 miles and a few rain puddles.


    http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/scname2002/lst?&.dir=/hitch&.src=ph&.view=t&.last=1


    I don't think this is a problem, there's nothing in the back of the engine bay/ firewall that lookes moisture or rust prone. A few metal tubing and pipes look like the non-rusting kind.

  • h1vch1vc Member Posts: 295
    Mind telling me the dealer carguy62? THanks.
  • canadianclcanadiancl Member Posts: 1,078
    Funny, but I've never really concentrated on Cindy Crawford's mole! I usually look at ... never mind. Don't want to get nasty email from honourable Host!
  • richk4richk4 Member Posts: 19
    The air passing under the engine, or coming through the front grill is not carrying large amounts of road salt. The TIRES are what throw most of the road salt in the engine area. Aside from the salt deposits on different parts of the engine, the areas just INSIDE the A shaped openings are especially heavy with them suggesting the openings are the source. Doesn't look to me like air is rushing OUT these openings. As far as what parts of the engine can be damaged from corrosive salt doesn't it make sense to keep out as much out as possible? There are sections of sheet metal in the engine area and even some pieces of sheet metal in the wells that are not undercoated. These are prime rust areas.
  • theracoontheracoon Member Posts: 666
    And as I said, my '99 EX with _no_ holes in the fender linings gets salt deposits on the underside of the engine hood. Seems to me what your so concerned about is less salt than my '99 EX experiences.

    The engine and underside of all vehicles are explosed to road salt. It's something you have to live with if you live in the snow belt.

    JM2C
  • theracoontheracoon Member Posts: 666
    Yes, it does make sense to keep as much gunk and grime out of the engine compartment, and in fact away from the entire vehicle. And I'm sure Honda does their best at designing their vehicles to extend the usable life of the vehicle.

    I'm willing to bet a lot of money Honda didn't put the holes in the fender linings to intentionally increase the amount of gunk that gets into the engine compartment. :D

    Since Honda hasn't decided to officially share the reasons for the design, we can only speculate as to why the holes are there. But let's not assume that it's a design flaw because there's some extra salt buildup inside an already exposed engine compartment.

    JM2C (Just My 2 Cents, FWIW)
  • richk4richk4 Member Posts: 19
    You mention salt on the underside of your hood. I wish that was the only area I had road salt. You did not say if you had any salt on your engine. On mine, from the valve covers down. Mucho salt. As I mentioned in a previous post all my previous cars after driving in about 42 winters never had this much crap on the engine. Yes I know snow belt driving problems. And my point again is instead of having to live with this problem, all I'm trying to do is minimize it by putting boots in the wells.
  • richk4richk4 Member Posts: 19
    to theracoon. I have never said the well openings were design flaws. The reason for them is the new design of the suspension. To create more interior room the openings are to accomodate the tie rods. The salt problem is just an unfortunate by product.
  • theracoontheracoon Member Posts: 666
    Sorry, I wasn't explicit. Let me rephrase...

    ...my '99 EX with _no_ holes in the fender linings gets salt deposits through out the engine compartment, even on the underside of the engine hood.

    Better?
  • theracoontheracoon Member Posts: 666
    My apologies, you are correct and I was wrong. You did not say the holes in the fenders were a flawed design, you said they were a "problem"...

    "...I believe I can solve THIS problem by installing boots in the wheel wells."

    So you're changing the design of the wheel well linings by covering these holes you see as a problem with "boots".

    You also said:

    "There are sections of sheet metal in the engine area and even some pieces of sheet metal in the wells that are not undercoated. These are prime rust areas."

    Do you have proof that Honda didn't add undercoating, or are you making it up to try to prove your point? Please cite references, as I would like to contact my lawyer about a possible class action lawsuit if Honda has failed to properly rust coat exposed pieces of sheet metal on it's vehicles.

    Thank you.
  • richk4richk4 Member Posts: 19
    If you know any people that own an 02 CR-V, or if not go to a Honda dealer. Look under the whell well openings and lift the hood. There are sections on the back firewall, sections on the inside of the A shaped well openings, and a section of bare sheet metal in the well itself. This is all the "proof" I can give you. I think installing rubber boots in the wells is not "changing the design" Does adding rubber floor mats on the interior of the vehicle for protection "change the design"? I think not.
  • tomsrtomsr Member Posts: 325
    Will I be sorry?The service department at Acura was never crowded and they always washed your car
    after a service.Now I see the Honda service dept
    is a lot busier. To encourage you to bring it back they make every other oil change free as long as you own it.The only gripe I have with the car is a personnel matter,It was suppose to be detailed but there was dust all over the dash
    and some white overspray on the door panel and dash which I cleaned off with PK plastic cleaner.
    It is no wonder America can't make a decent car
    when people have no pride in their work.As far as
    the car goes I hope it perks up after the breakin
    period when I can floor it.I love the visibility
    and nimbleness in suburban settings.Will take it
    on a freeway jaunt this weekend and see what it is like for longer distances.The Rav 4,Santa Fe,
    Escape,all felt smaller inside but the Escape did have one killer stereo.I paid $22740 and include the pro pack ($600),Those items in propack cost
    about $300 if bought on internet.The closest
    competition is the Santa FE LX V6 ($21500)internet price plus another $1000 for a moonroof.
    So they are almost equal.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Tomsr - I've taken my CR-V to the Acura dealer where we have my wife's TL serviced. Your dealer may work on both as well.

    Bonyparte - Yes, Honda does have "real" problems, but we'll never get around to discussing them while you're whipping up a frenzy over solenoid clicking and a car that stalled.

    FWIW, I'd recommend that you look at something in the $50K range. The kind of quality you are expecting does not exist in an entry level car.

    CanadianCL - Yep. It's a mole. But if you ask anyone in the industry, they'll tell you that it gave Cindy's face character and helped launch her career. Now younger models are painting them on to look just like her. As for the eyes opening wide on one side, look in the mirror. Your's do too. Just like mine and everyone else's. But when you look for faults as hard as Bonyparte, you'll see faults and miss the rest.

    TheRacoon - All this reminds me of the old days when the 1st gen CR-V was selling like hotcakes. People were buying them based on their reputation alone. We had a guy here that posted, "Don't go near the CR-V with a ten foot pole". Turns out he bought one expecting to go off-roading and was dissapointed when it couldn't handle the Jeep trails. Umm... duh!! He bought it based on the fact that everyone else seemed to like it. He didn't bother to learn about the car, he just bought one because other people liked it.

    I've read about other 1st gen buyers who assumed that reliability and quality also meant refined and luxurious. What they bought was a loud little entry level SUV with durable plastics that were everything except flashy and trend-setting.

    Everyone has different expectations. What gets me most is the, "I'm paying a lot of money", reasoning. Yes, a new car is not chump change. But I honestly can't remember the last time I bought perfection for less than $25K...
  • tragically_hiptragically_hip Member Posts: 5
    based on 6 months of lurking the Edmunds town hall and what my wife calls obsessive behavior with regard to over-researching every little aspect of a dozen different cars. FWIW, my target car over that period of time went from a Civic Ex to a Altima to a Maxima to a CRV. Thanks to Varmint, Tidester, Rebecca (her pics decided the color for me) and a host of others on this site for helping me through the process.

    With regard to the manual transmission, coming from a 93 MX-6, I'm really impressed with the short tight throws on this stick - all the other cars I drove in the under 25k range couldn't come close to Honda's feel.

    Living here in the Pacific NW, I don't have to worry about road salt but I will have to worry about bucketloads of rainfall - guess I have to hope that Honda engineers didn't blow it with the open wheel well design - just seems too obvious to be overlooked if it was a potential source for problems.

    I also highly recommend Griffith Motors in the Dalles for anyone out here in the Northwest. Just a beautiful 90 minute drive from Portland down the Columbia Gorge. None of the dealers between Seattle and Portland would even discuss coming down below MSRP+1K (with the notable exception of St. Johns Honda at MSRP and Griffith Motors at invoice + $900). They say demand's so high, even they have jacked their price by $400 since February - I think they're pre-ordered thru early Summer. These guys were class all the way and I didn't have to even put down a deposit (they said if I backed out, they'd find a buyer within days).

    I'm kind of anti-clique but this little CRV community has an appeal all its own - I hope to write and read more about people's experiences over the coming months. By the way, no seat rocking for me either. Good luck all and thanks again.

    T-hip
  • theracoontheracoon Member Posts: 666
    There's a significant difference between adding floor mats (which Honda sells as an option) to keep mud off your carpets, and adding a cover to a hole Honda specifically left in the wheel well lining. I'm sorry that you think your CR-V has a flaw that needs to be fixed.

    And, btw, just because the metal is unpainted doesn't mean it's untreated. Otherwise all steel and alloy wheels would be corroding before they left the dealer lot.
  • tomsrtomsr Member Posts: 325
    My wife has a TL too and I love that car but it costs $27000.The closest SUV with TL amenities is
    the MDX which at $35000 is a bit of overkill.So far I look forward to a drive anywhere in my CRV
    being very practical and more comfortable than
    my old CL coupe.The only downsisde is my son said it is a girl's car and the another guy said "Is that your wifes car?".Do I have to have a lifted
    gas hog rough riding beast to be a guy?I don't
    think so.
  • altoonaltoon Member Posts: 64
    I've noticed that women, including my wife tend to REALLY like the new CR-V. Many of my male friends have been polite, but notably less than enthusiastic. Just an observation.
  • bklybkly Member Posts: 5
    Hi.
    For those who bought EX in NY/NJ area.
    Black EX automatic for $23,800 including destination charge and following options: running boards, fog light kit, door visor, moonroof visor, front splash guards, wheel locks, all season floor mats, cigarette lighter, ashtray, cargo area cover, leather steering wheel cover.
    Wait time - 4 weeks.
    Is it a good deal ?
    Thanks.
  • sluglineslugline Member Posts: 391
    The old CR-V was sold with 12V sockets that were designated as non-lighter friendly. I guess Honda got a deluge of hate mail from smokers on that one. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.