Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car?
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
It's really more than I could hope for - some of these deals make the cars obtainable to a non-tycoon such as myself. Financing it is sometimes crazy now, unless you really want to keep it for the long haul.
I already like the faint diesel purr of the car, especially evident at low speeds.
You've been hinting it (some form of diesel) was going to happen for awhile..way to do it in style. I've driven that motor in the GL recently. It will feel like a rocket in the much lighter E350.
Having said that, the first 500 miles (65 mpg and under) are important for the brake pads, rotors, suspension and other sub systems to break in slowly. The other side is to break in the engine with slightly to moderately aggressive rpm (75% of red line with occasional runs TO redline). One key being not going a steady rpm for too long (too long being 10 to 15 mins). Some other pieces of information might be too arcane for a leased vehicle.
HERNDON, Virginia — The 2014 Audi A8 L TDI starts at $83,395, including an $895 destination charge, reflecting a $4,000 premium over the base 2013 Audi A8 L 3.0 TFSI.
The 2014 Audi A8 L TDI arrives in U.S. showrooms in the spring.
Available only in the long-wheelbase version, Audi estimates that the A8 L TDI will deliver 24 mpg in city driving and 36 mpg on the highway.
Engine options on the A8 L TDI are limited to a 3.0-liter turbodiesel V6 engine rated at 240 horsepower. It sprints from zero to 60 mph in 6.4 seconds.
http://www.edmunds.com/car-news/2014-audi-a8-l-tdi-starts-at-83395.html
I think those owners must follow the biker's theory and drive their new cars like Andretti from the get go. Seems like most manufacturers don't even talk about break in any more, and if they do, it's about the brakes, not the engine.
Fin, stomp that puppy - it's a lease after all. :shades:
So I did and it never used a drop of oil between services in the 4 years I owned it but the mpg improved noticeably from 10k miles onward.
I suppose one could read the manual and trust what the experts who designed and engineered the car say.
Nah, that's no fun.
The upshot on the gassers are full break in normally happens in 500 to 1,000 miles. On a technical side, full compression occurs. This is SO normal and to the consumer opaque; as to be almost ignored to unknown to... ubiquitous.
The upshot on the diesels are full break in normally happens between 30,000 to 60,000 miles. So in Fintail's case, this is the "assumption" for an earlier point of view. The issue here and also in the gassers there are absolutely NO protocols to measure its progression or lack there of. I am not sure how to put it in context or scale, but it does fall into the category of TMI, in most to all cases. So for example in the 2003 VW Jetta TDI broken in specification for full compression is app 550 PSI. Obviously before break in it is less than that. To almost all gasser types and the majority of TDI drivers, who the H--- cares?
There are of course downstream consequences.
So for example I agree totally with Alltorque's take about not using a DROP of oil in a so called "correctly" broken in TDI. However the reality is more like 1/4 to 1/2 qt in a 30,000 miles OCI. Anyone who is knowledgeable about gasser OCIS knows that is literally NO consumption for the TDI.
I don't know what "full break-in" is, but once you get beyond the owner's manual, it's all anecdotal. The way Seattle drivers are, Fin's more likely to have an inconsiderate texting Lexus driver total the front end than hit 300k. :shades:
If it is a Daimler diesel then I would buy one without hesitation.
If it comes from VW, a definite maybe.
I hear FIAT diesels are pretty good, but I would treat them skeptically until I saw more data.
Most Japanese diesels are pretty decent so I would consider one of them.
(18,643/68,873 units, inventory)
Touaregs are @ 42.5% TDI's.
(635/1,491)
Percentage demand for the VW JSW remains high @ 81+%.
Interesting IS the American Passat @ 32.4% TDI's
( billed as the AMERICAN Passat and is made IN the USA 6,151/ 18,965)
My 2003 Jetta TDI really looks like the "good ole hysterical days" @ 4% of total VW US sales or 9,000 units.
http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/20/2014-mercedes-benz-e-class-first-drive-review- /
It can park itself perpendicularly. Whoopee!
Considering the alternative powerplant is a (premium no less) gas guzzling, mediocorely power (compared to the diesel) to me i'm surprised the TDI didn't capture more like 65% at least.
Even the Passat's 32.4%...again, given its hwy fuel ratings are even higher than the smaller/lighter Golf and Jetta in stick form, why not 55% or more? Especially since one of the engine alternatives is a (perceived...but I don't agree) inferior 5 cyl gas. And you might say, well autos still dominate in NA, and you'd be correct, but interestingly enough, in my area (cottage country north of Tor ON) of the Passat owners I've talked to at a gas stn or parked next to me in a mall, the majority have all been sticks.
Good for them I say...maybe there is hope for us NA's afterall, not only for sticks but greater diesel acceptance too. Just think..never mind the word acceptance, hell..let's shoot for insistence..
The bumper on that pictured car is a bit much for my tastes. I am also somewhat traditional, would rather have a normal grille on a sedan.
Here, here! I think the day is coming when there should be a licensing restriction placed on those who use nanny devices, in order to protect the rest of us from them driving real cars.
On the Touareg, I was offered from mild to wild, in terms of getting close to: to EXACTLY what I would care to want, that was available.
As the old car also took premium, I suspect the fuel cost savings is close to the decreased consumption.
As you probably have noted, I take more the longer term and tank full to tank full approach. So for example in your case, I would be looking for (whatever) average x 50,000 miles (est lease period) mileage). In my case, I have stated per 100,000 miles. It really does not matter, anyone can tailor it for their use as a tool. So for example, if one does 10,000 miles, 15,000 miles, 20,000 miles per year, so be it.
I am only in a 20K mile lease, and as I live close to work, I doubt I will exceed it. But with MB bringing a 4cyl diesel to the US, that might be the replacement, assuming that finances remain stable.
I think that would hit a sweet spot, in that it could stand up to hot hatches, but still manage to be economical.
Cool, but how much?
Talk to your city council. If Los Angeles can do it Seattle should be able to.
Every L.A. Traffic Signal Now Synced
The last of the city's nearly 4,400 traffic signals were synchronized yesterday, marking completion of a project designed to lessen the amount of time that drivers spend in gridlock.
The Automated Traffic Surveillance & Control system, a $410 million effort to coordinate traffic signals across the city under a centralized system, could reduce the average amount of time drivers spend in traffic by one day per year, according to city transportation officials.
http://www.kcet.org/news/stories/every-la-traffic-signaled-now-synced-say-city-o- fficials.html
But if I am lucky, it might put me in an even more efficient yet nearly as powerful car in the future.
If the Feds had any honesty about saving fuel, they would require cities to optimize their controls, or lose funding if they refuse.
C250 diesel?
How long is your lease term?
Isn't that what you were defending the lazy French for doing. Incentive is dead in both the Government and corporate world. That is the liberal plan.
Just because a little country like Germany with OUR help is able to reach a better balance does not make it a better system. If we pulled out of Germany and put proper tariffs on their vehicles, they would be in dire straits. Of course the same goes for any other large trading partners. China, Korea and Japan come to mind. If we gauged our enemies by our trade deficit with that country, Germany would be our 3rd worst enemy behind Japan and China.
23 Civic Type-R / 22 MDX Type-S / 21 Tesla Y LR / 03 Montero Ltd
Not for US consumption, naturally.
The E is nice, but I am already realizing it might be larger than what I need - feels a lot bigger than the W210.
We could provide better domestic trade and industrial, not to mention social standards if we stopped being on 90 fronts at once, all so a select few industries can reap windfalls - and also gave up the fantasy that eventually everything will work its way down.
Germany isn't begging us to remain there - the inflated ego of our authoritarian sector keeps us there. We aren't there out of altruism, it's special interest profit and ego. We need to provide trade corrections (tariffs and more) on those who do not play by first world standards. If anything, first world Europe defines those standards. Imagine if we spent (relatively, of course) what they spend on foreign aid to troublemakers/competitors and defense, not to mention vice law enforcement.
23 Civic Type-R / 22 MDX Type-S / 21 Tesla Y LR / 03 Montero Ltd
There's a difference between jealousy and intolerance of arrogance and hypocrisy, and cynicism about lies regarding failed trickle down theory. I suspect I see the reality of the private sector working world more than those not involved today.
You're more likely to be struck by lightning on the same day of the same month every year for 25 years than to become a Zuckerberg (who wasn't exactly born working class to begin with). If it was so simple, why aren't the still-dependent aging children of silent generation oldsters who preach independence and self reliance for others becoming Zuckerbergs right and left?