Subaru Crew - Future Models

1679111239

Comments

  • iscottsiscotts Member Posts: 28
    I can't believe that Volvo is higher in the public's general esteem than Subaru. I'm British, and I always viewed Volvos as tanks. They've smoothed somewhat, but only somewhat.

    As for VDC being too expensive, when you are shopping in the 20's you are predominately looking for value/power. When shopping in the 30's, power/prestige/value, in the 40's it's prestige/power and beyond that it's just prestige.

    I've said it before and I'll say it again: Subaru can only garner a prestige perception if they are in that bracket to begin with. Hey, if it works for mundane cars like Volvo and Saab, who knows?
  • nematodenematode Member Posts: 448
    Here's mine
    The H6 will not sell well until its selling below $30k. Still, I think it will move because some Passat 4-Motion buyers may come over. If as iscotts mentioned its just a tool to get into the $30k market then it will probably work. I think they will attract some Passat AWD buyers but will not attract any Acura, Lexus, Volvo, SAAB, or Audi buyers. To me that puts them in a very small market so perhaps limited supply was part of the plan to see if things work before they really get their feet wet. I really dont know.

    For those who care:
    McIntosh is known for all kinds of high end stereo components including speakers for home and auto. In my opnion their home speakers on par with, but not better than, Bose, Mirage, Polk, and perhaps some Advent stuff. I have only heard their car speakers one time as aftermarket in a 911 Carrera 4. They sounded fine but I was too busy driving the car to really listen to them. I dont get to dirve really fancy cars often so I was distracted. Their amplifiers have been reviewed very well and cost $$$$$$$$$$$ but I cant tell the difference. I think the the McIntosh system in the VDC could eventually be one of its selling points.
  • nematodenematode Member Posts: 448
    You wrote: "What a load of bull about being unable to lure some Audi customers. Do you think Audi had any customers before the A4 was released not many years ago?"

    I dont agree. The A4 was a revolution not evolution. If you remember the 80/90 that became the A4/A6 it was night and day. I had the 80 (free) it was a piece of junk. The A4 play in a differnt league. I think the VDC was evolutionary. Subaru already makes good (great???) cars. They added more power, stabiity control, climate control, better stereo to the OB Ltd and raised the price $4000-5000.
  • francophilefrancophile Member Posts: 667
    The H6 won't be a really big hit until they put it in a sports sedan, and the sooner the better!

    From a Legacy GT owner,
    WDB
  • fudd2befudd2be Member Posts: 50
    Just an interesting tidbit - McIntosh is actually now owned by Clarion. Hmmmmm....

    Side point - at work we use an old (solid state, however), McIntosh 300W per channel stereo audio amplifer - probably from the 80s. It weighs just over 100lbs. Pretty amazing amplifier. I have never heard sound from it, but always am analyzing its output on oscilloscopes and signal analyzers (frequency spectrum analyzer). Its the only amplifier we have that can drive the big loads (<0.5 ohm) we need to drive without breaking a sweat.

    -Howard
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    I hope Patti from SOA will read this... after all, I just bought my 3rd Subaru!

    As much as I like my new Forester I should say that a few good things that my Subaru Loyale'92 had, were lost in Subaru Forester'01:
    a) oil pressure and voltmeter gauges: much nicer to have a gauge than an idiot light!
    b) you could not lock the door with ignition key inside (very nice feature for forgetful folks like me);
    c) instrument panel had display of the gear you're currently in (no need to look down on the shifter);
    d) display of doors ajar always showed which door(s) are not closed (now I have to run around checking)
    e) back seats were more comfortable
    f) cargo space was much bigger
    g) lockable (from inside) gas lid

    remember, the low-end Subaru car that cost under $10K had all these features back in 1992, how come high-end model of 2001 ($25K) does not?

    Of course, Forester has a lot more safety equipment, and a better (hopefully) drivetrain, but still...
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Subaru also deleted from the newer models:

    Hill-holder clutch

    Dual-range transmission

    Auto-up driver's front window... all very worthwhile and useful items!

    Bob
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Auto-up window,
    "door unlocked light"
    guages for oil pressure, volts, etc.
    gear selector indicator on the dash,
    headlight washers,
    locking gas cap from inside
    far more cumfy seats than the current models

    Almost all these items are missing on the newer ones... Then again in '88 it was a $20k car, so that could have something to do with it.

    -mike
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    re#428,

    I was saying that the A4 was a revolution too, but my point was different. I think that since Audi won a lot of new customers, or back some from the mid 80's, then if the VDC is a truly great car for the money then people will buy it even though it's 'only' a Subaru. My point was that Subaru has a reliable, safe reputation right now. That's better than Audi's unreliable, unsafe reputation before the A4 (thanks to the unintended acceleration fiasco-- a whole 'nother subject and a load of crap if I may say so).

    -Colin
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I like the 2001 pricing, especially considering the new brakes, temp gauge, dual trip odos, and seat back pockets. This is Subaru's strength - adding little running improvement while keeping prices below inflation. Way to go, Patti.

    I pay so little attention to MSRP it's hardly worth arguing about. Retail is really a meaningless figure. Sure, the first-on-the-block set will pay it, but if it lasts more than a month I'd be shocked. The 2000 Outback sales prices dropped almost immediately.

    Colin: I actually got my guesstimates from Automotive News, my favorite source. They were spot-on, as usual.

    Can they sell at retail price? My guess is they won't even try for long. Knock about $3-4k off for real world prices, and yes I predict they will sell.

    Be careful to compare apples-to-apples, though. Sure, a BMW 323i is cheaper, at about $27k. So get the Bimmer, right?

    But a 330ix is more equivalent. I'll guess it'll start around $35k, but add leather ($1450), automatic ($1275), metallic paint ($475), moonroof ($1050), heated seats ($500), and the premium audio system ($675), and suddenly the $27k you though an equivalent Bimmer would cost you is actually $40,425. Plus luxury tax! Holy Cow!

    OK, it's not a Bimmer. But the Legacy is a bigger car, and Bimmers sell near MSRP, while Soobs sell near invoice. So instead of asking if you'd pay $9000 for the VDC over the base Outback, ask yourself if you'd pay $10,500 for the equivalent Bimmer! And getting no extra equipment, just a name!

    That's the angle, though. Look at it as a high value entry-luxury car.

    BTW, FHI does not own Isuzu, it's just a partnership to build cars at SIA. GM owns part of both, so they're "cousins" at best.

    The MD-X looks nice, but does not even offer traction control. It'll cost about $10 grand more in the real world, even with less equipment.

    Lucien: it's interesting to look at the Passat Plus. I predict it will succeed, because the 4Motion models are a hit. Funny thing is they counter-punched Mercedes, since Benz hit their turf with their A-class and Smart cars. The A-Class sells, but brings no profits so Benz may retreat. That means VW gets the last laugh.

    -juice
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    Right, plus it looks like DC is pulling the plug on the A-Class for the U.S. But then you knew that, since I got it from Autoweek, to which you OBVIOUSLY subscribe ;-)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Yup, big brother Automotive News, too(both are Crain Publications). Autoweek actually gets most of their info from them!

    No love lost on the hideously ugly A-class, though.

    Though the Smart roadsters are cute, and would make a nice 3rd commuter car. Price would be key, though.

    But gimme a WRX for that ;)

    -juice
  • aling1aling1 Member Posts: 225
    I don't think the A-class's plug will be pulled. Future (larger) versions may make their way to North America, but MB is afraid that the lower priced model may tarnish the prestigious image of their brand name that they've painstakingly preserved for so many decades. Have a look at this. The preservation of the brand name is also why MB vehicles will probably always be more expensive (and exclusive) than their Japanese competitors (rightfully so, I might add).

    Drew
  • abhidharmaabhidharma Member Posts: 93
    ...was a highly regarded audiophile company in the '50s and '60s, particularly with its tuners.

    Since that time, it has changed ownership and has lost favour with every audiophile that I know, although its tuners are still desirable, especially the older ones.

    Now, it still might put out credible equipment, but probably not much better than mainstream brands like Alpine, Bose, or Harmon-Kardon.

    Another negative is in terms of name recognition: most audiophiles who know the McIntosh name don't care that much about car stereos, because audiophile sound can't be obtained in the car environment. People who care about car stereos (and I'm talking about caring in a BIG way) tend to be younger and into more bass-heavy music and sound reproduction, and don't know about McIntosh.

    On the plus side, ANY car, with pretty much ANY half-decent quality equipment, will sound a lot better if the interior has been carefully analyzed regarding speaker placement and equipment (especially the amp/speaker) matching. Hopefully, McIntosh will do a bang up job in this regard.

    My personal opinion is that the stereo will probably be a nice feature (because of design issues, not because of equipment), but doesn't warrant a specific model identity or ad campaign.

    Randy
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    SIA is a joint partnership, but I remember reading back a while that they share stuff on the other side of the pacific as well. (I believe that the trooper and impreza lines are from a very close factory) the 2 companies don't compete against one another at all, and their dashboard designs are almost identical, knobs, switches, dials, guages, etc.

    I wish I had my sources, but I'd almost bet $ that they are related in Japan on some level.

    -mike
  • chriscoulterchriscoulter Member Posts: 17
    McIntosh name recognition is still strong for many retirement-aged gentlemen. Many of my home entertainment systems clients (now on "fixed incomes" in the six AND SEVEN figures) will ask "what do you hear about McIntosh these days?" It comes from the old chrome cadillac, oenophile, and cigar smoking, good-old-boy business execs.

    In my book, the mistique is still there for this type of american male.
    Would they buy an OB? Dunno. Maybe if they also harbor a certain mid-century sense of thrift.

    ...All this is not to mention the audiophiles in Japan who will buy old Mac tube gear sight-unseen for outrageous prices... but that is another story.
  • saedavesaedave Member Posts: 694
    With the $32k price (same as my Passat 4Mo),the Sube advantage is gone. My 97 Subaru GT wagon's poor resale value suggests that the cost per year of ownership for the H-6 models will be VERY high. The huge difference in NVH and fit and finish give VW an advantage that will be hard to overcome.The Passat wagon's better back seat was also a reason for the 4Mo. The fuel economy for the 4Mo is 25 at speed on the highway - the same as my GT wagon got. The local Sube dealer who had to be threatened to get the bad CPU replaced for the hesitation problem cinched the decision.
  • barresa11barresa11 Member Posts: 277
    First off, the VDC Soob will sell closer to cost if supply is kept current. You can't say that for Passats, especially the 4-motion. Advantage: Subaru. I found the backseat of the Subaru to be as comfortable as the Passat with one addition feature of seating theatre style, above the front seats. (IMHO)advantage: Subaru. Fit and finish, NVH, ergonomics is as good as the Passat (check out the 2000 models). Draw between the two. Don't know where you got your info about poor resale value, but the OB in particular has great resale value...quite established, can't be said yet for the 4-motion Passat. Perhaps a draw between the two. The VDC has stability control, dual sunroofs, more powerful motor. Advantage: Subaru. Passat has a sorry 24k/24 mo warranty vs Subaru's 36k/36mo. Advantage: Subaru

    As I see it, on paper and in real life, the advantage will have to go to the Subaru VDC. Of course real tests by perspective buyers and auto mags will be a better source of info. Can't wait to see.

    Stephen
  • beanboybeanboy Member Posts: 442
    Anybody know what a base Impreza will cost when the new model is released? Buddy got a '99 one for 15K new. Not too shabby for an AWD wagon with decent performance. Nothing else in that price range even comes close.

    Anybody miss the old soobie wagons? Talk about ground clearance. Buddy of mine up at Darmouth had a turbo one loaded, digital dash, sunroof and dual-range. Thing would climb muddy roads with the best of them and refused to die. Funny how a 10 year-old soobie is better off-road than an Outback or Forester.

    -Beanboy
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I just learned that Subaru has registered the following internet domain. Unfortunately it's not up and running yet.

    http://subaruperformance.com/

    Patti- what's the deal here??

    Bob
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I think those $15K Imprezas will disappear with the new model. My guess is low $20s is where the new model will begin -- assuming the base model is the now top-of-the-line RS 2.5, which is what has been predicted.

    Bob
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Passat has a sorry 24k/24 mo warranty vs Subaru's 36k/36mo. Advantage: Subaru

    Your numbers are the bumper-to-bumper warranty. What you are forgetting is the powertrain warranty, which IMO is the most important thing. (replace a bad power window motor versus an engine-- compare wallet.)

    Subaru's powertrain warranty isn't bad, 5 years and 60k miles. Volkswagen's blows it away though, 10 years and 100k miles. Plus twice the rust warranty too, 12yrs versus 6.

    saedave has a problem with this comparison though, or I'm behind the times. his dear passat 4motion was $32k for a sedan and we're talking about $32k wagon-- with obviously way more room, and more horsepower to boot. The passat wagon is ugly as sin. my question for dave is why he didn't buy an audi-- I would have if I were spending $32k.

    -Colin
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    oops, forgot to include in that last paragraph...

    before "...or I'm behind the times" I need a sentence like "and there's no Passat wagon 4motion."

    -Colin
  • saedavesaedave Member Posts: 694
    I drove the 2000 Outback to decide if the addition of the six would put it ahead of the Passat.One thing is much better...the cupholders are great (and miserable in the Passat)! Also the handling of the Outback is better over rough railroad tracks. The Passat wagon back seat IS raised theater style. The Passat has a full size spare unlike the Outback. The best alternative to the Passat 4Mo was for me the Audi A6 which has better front seats than the Passat, but has an about $6k (actual)price premium for a car that is longer, heavier and harder to park. I have owned various Audis including Quatro until their pricing got too high. The Passat's 10 year powertrain warranty increased its relative value over both the Audi and Subaru. Styling is purely subjective; I prefer either Audi or VW, but the 2000 Subaru without the hood scoop was a great improvement!
    Of course I will drive the H-6 in a year or so.
    For those who said that Subaru couldn't attract an Audi owner I'm proof that that is not the case, but all wheel drive at a more reasonable price was the reason. I'm not sure that $32k is quite low enough. Perhaps the GM connection will help enough in parts purchasing to produce some H-6 models that are below $30k.
  • glxwagon4moglxwagon4mo Member Posts: 121
    I could easily name half a dozen cars/trucks that are currently out on the market that are "ugly as sin" AND that most people would agree on. The Passat wagon and Outback would not be one of them. Personally, I prefer the clean line of the Passat over the SUV-like lowerbody clading of the Outback -- but again its a personal choice and one thats a difficult to make a stand on. (BTW, number one on my 'list' right now is the Aztek).

    George
  • barresa11barresa11 Member Posts: 277
    I know that which speak of regarding warranties, Juice isn't the only one living,breathing cars :-) My point is that a 24k/24mo warranty regardless of what it covers is shameful and doesn't bode well (hypocritically speaking)with the included longer powertrain warranty, etc. Secondly, the rear seat in the Passat is not as high up in sight line as the OB so my observation stands. The overall ride of the OB is better than the Passat. Believe it or not, rough road behavior is much more of an advantage in the real world. Have you seen our Nation's roads?! The biggest advantage, next to reliability for the Subaru will be the lower actual real-world price point. As Juice has repeatedly pointed out to everyone (rightfully so), the actual selling prices for Subaru's are closer to cost than retail. The same can not be said for the Passat's, especially the 4-motion. Also, let's not forget the overwhelming amount of arrogant VW dealers that feel their vehicle is worth anything they determine you should pay. This attitude has shown to continue well into their service bays...no thanks!

    The Passat is a wonderful vehicle (I also love the styling...beautiful) but to insuate that it may be the overall better vehicle, especially on a Subaru forum will be met with a dearth of resistence. Being a proud, thoroughly reseach prone, new Soobie OB Ltd owner, I think that I made the more value added purchase. I see no reason why, when compared to the 4-motion Passat, the VDC OB won't continue in the same vein.

    Stephen
  • glxwagon4moglxwagon4mo Member Posts: 121
    That's definitely the downside of VW !! Probably a result of the success of the various models. If you read the VW Vortex boards that is the one thing you can count hearing people gripe about -- and its not only with the sales people refusing to budge much from retail, it goes all the way up to VWOA customer service (by some people's account). Judging from some buyer's account, it has caused them to look towards other makers such as Subies.

    George
  • barresa11barresa11 Member Posts: 277
    I know what you mean. I've visited the VW Vortex board and some of the topics in Edmunds Townhall. There is always some mention of this. It's a shame because a lot of the time it drives (pardon the pun) potential buyers to other makes. I say it's a shame because the Passat is a wonderful vehicle! I really hope that VWOA addresses this problem. (well, maybe not completely because I think a few customers found their way to Subaru's) :-)

    Stephen
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Check it out guys. Autoweek, current issue, under Fast Poll. My letter got published (unfortunately not Subaru related). And I thought my letter to Drive magazine was my 15 minutes of fame!

    Drew: still don't like the A-class styling. Seems like a Euro mini-minivan. Popular in Brazil, though.

    saedave: your Passat is nice, but it's also a bit slow and has higher real-world prices. It doesn't have all the equipment the VDC will have, either. It should have better NVH control than the previous generation Legacy, as the current Legacy easily bests the older Passat. EPA mileage figures have gone up, and dealers are independent anyway.

    CR says the V6 Passat has 14% more problems than average, vs. 30% less than average for the Outback. 4Motion will only make that rating worse.

    Like I said, the Passat is nice, but isn't is a little silly to claim victory over the VDC, especially considering you haven't driven it?

    As for image, Subarus are "inexpensive and built to stay that way", but wasn't VW the "people's car" too?

    For the record, I find both Passat wagon and sedan handsome. Also, the Forester has a full size spare, but I've never used it.

    beanboy: yes, the vintage Soobs are great off road. Lots of lift kits available, too.

    -juice
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Well let's see.... The trooper has awsome back seats, they actually recline almost flat back. I haven't seen this in any other wagon/suv ever. Great for long trips.

    I hate the subie wagon dual moon roof things. The front where I spend 99.9% of the time, doesn't open. How else could this NYC driver flip people off out the roof? :) Seriously though, the flip up sunroof is lame, they need a roof like the one in my Trooper (it's about 3.2ft wide x 3.2 feet long) it's absolutely huge.

    -mike
  • saedavesaedave Member Posts: 694
    The Passat probably has more electrical problems than the Sube..like any European make including MB. On my 93 Passat I had such problems.However my experience with Subaru service was the worst of any car I have owned: 97GT wagon had intermittent transmission failure to upshift (probably dirt in solenoids) at 10 miles on the odometer and the dealer refused to even check it out fully because it didn't occur when they drove it casually.I also had one of the CPUs that misinterpeted the signal from the knock sensor. A factory rep drove the car and confirmed that there was a hesitation problem, but the dealer did nothing for almost a year. The dealer only replaced the defective CPU when I informed him that I would begin proceedings to implement the lemon law requiring buyback.
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    "But then you knew that,
    since I got it from Autoweek, to which you
    OBVIOUSLY subscribe ;-)"

    Your fastpoll response was what I was referring to....
  • francophilefrancophile Member Posts: 667
    Volkswagen = "People's Car" in a near-direct translation of German to English. I don't think it was ever a sales/marketing handle.

    Cheers,
    WDB
  • francophilefrancophile Member Posts: 667
    ...is it just me, or did anyone else look at that side view of the Mustang FR500 (July 3 issue, page 4) and see a striking similarity to the '00 Legacy GT sedan profile (sans spoiler)?

    Hmm. A Legacy *coupe* could be a very interesting concept to explore, should Subaru desire to!

    Cheers,
    WDB
  • armac13armac13 Member Posts: 1,129
    Yes "People's car" F. Porsche designed. Hitler wanted a "car in every garage". VW was offered to the British at the end of WW II as part of war reparations. British rejected the useless, ugly design - there was obviously no market for the beast.

    Ross
  • aling1aling1 Member Posts: 225
    It appears that Motor Trend may be wrong (ha, big surprise) about the next gen-7 series having a 36 volt power system. The Euro mags and thecarconnection.com all report it as having a 48 volt power system: Click here.

    The C-class, CLK-class and S-class will all receive AWD as an option for MY2002. This means that with the exception of the SLK, SL and CL-class, the entire MB lineup will have 4-matic!! Not quite the 100% adoption rate of Subaru, but close enough.

    Drew
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    paisan: the 2000 and earlier Foresters also have back seats that recline. Only the 2001s offer the huge moonroof, so I guess you can't get both.

    lucien: you are VERY perceptive. I didn't realize you had already seen it. Funny thing is, I read over it and didn't notice it was my letter until later!

    They even spelled my name correctly, which Drive failed to do.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Here's an update on the new Impreza from down under. This is an interesting site. There are a number of Subaru-related articles if you start searching for Subaru.

    Bob

    http://www.drive.com.au/news/default.asp?section=news&page=http://drive.fairfax.com.au/content/20000714/news/news3.html
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Hmm, controversial?

    You know what, if we get the real turbos, I probably wouldn't care if it looked like an Aztec.

    OK, maybe not an Aztec, but still...

    -juice
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    For those of you that don't follow (or can't keep up with) the iclub, someone linked to a some pictures of "the new impreza". I'm still not sure until I see official Subaru release info, which should happen in Japan in about a month.

    But here's the discussion. Some folks are pretty passionate about it, tell me what you all think:

    http://www.impreza-rs.com/NonCGI/Forum1/HTML/011190.html

    -Colin
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    My personal take on it follows...

    Pro: profile, fender bulges, C-pillar, hood w/functional scoop, overall look is nice and tight.

    Con: wing is a bit over the top, round headlights will take getting used to, taillights straight from I30.

    Overall, I wouldn't really call it controversial, though. Besides the headlights, it's basically a standard update from the current car.

    But, what really matters is what they put under the hood!

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    with similar pictures:

    http://www.new-impreza.com/latest.htm

    I have to tell you, I sometimes get real upset when I read all the idiot's comments out there with their knee-jerk negative reactions about anything that's new or different. Yes, it looks "different" from the old Impreza -- what did you expect?

    Obviously I like the styling. The tail lights could be better, but, from what I see here, it's far from "doom-'n-gloom."

    You can bet your bottom dollar that it will be a "better" car than the one it replaces!

    Bob
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    The spoiler actually is very similar to one that the WRX / Impreza GT / Turbo 2000 used to have... say, 2-3 model years ago.

    Yep, all the youngins (lol, I'm 24) did weigh in on the iclub with a lot of variations of "I hate it!"

    -Colin
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    What's with all the young "conservatives." Young people are supposedly to be more readily acceptable of "new" things. I'm 55, and I like it. What does that say about us old folks? (Be careful how you answer this. I don't know if my heart can stand it!)

    Bob
  • amishraamishra Member Posts: 367
    Just back from my local dealer..

    Base H6 Outback is $39,995 CDN (or 28500 USD)
    VDC H6 Outback is $43,995 CDN (or 31425 USD)

    They've started receiving H4 model 2001 OBs and Legacies already, but are not expecting the H6 for a little while.

    -- ash
  • amishraamishra Member Posts: 367
    I think the base H4 OB at $31,395 CDN is a steal - compared to $43,995. You had better want those luxuries and that H6 real bad to spend $12,000 + taxes extra...

    ash
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Bob,

    I can't speak for everyone but I can speak for myself. I have no idea where this "ovoid" styling is coming from, but I don't like it. (only the headlights on the 'new impreza' pics bother me btw.) I like smooth, sweeping lines, not angular but not ovoid. C5 = good. Audi TT = bad. Focus ZX3 = very bad.

    -Colin
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Right on Randy... I've been saying that subaru has outpriced themselves ala SVX and XT6...(coincidentally the only other H6 subies)

    $32K subaru doesn't = value

    The new impreza will be whatever it looks like when it gets to the dealer, there aren't any official pics yet so let's not go speculating on something we can't change.

    Personally I'm an all go, no show type person, it can look like crap but if it drives well....

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm with Bob. I'm about half way geezing, and I like the design. Usually it takes me a year or two to get used to new designs; I rarely like them right off the bat.

    Put it this way - it's nice enough that the looks certainly wouldn't keep me from wanting a WRX model!

    Wow, Colin, you sure you're that age? The Focus is a major-league hit, especially among young folk. It's only the best selling car in the WORLD! I liked it from the first peek, except the interior's too quirky for me. Plus quality is a question (I've owned 2 Fords). And no AWD.

    And the TT? Holy Cow! How individual tastes vary. The exterior took a while for me to warm up to, but the interior is awesome! It literally embarasses every competitor in its class. Heck, even the cup holders are exciting!

    And this keeps coming up, but c'mon guys. How many people are actually going to pay the full $32 grand? The first on the block, that's all. The LTDs sell for at least $3k below list, so $28-29k is more like it if you can wait a few weeks.

    And remember it comes LOADED. Leather, moonroof, AWD, H6, audio upgrades, side bags, stability control, the works. Those add usually $4-5 grand to most competitors. If you compare apples to apples, it has a $10k price advantage over most rivals - which to me equates to value.

    Heck, at least compare the LL Bean to those competitors. It's a closer match with equipment, and still has many things standard that are options in other vehicles. With discounts, $25k would be a bargain, don't you agree?

    An example is better. Take the $35,100 RX300 you mentioned. A bargain, right? Well, add roof rack, heated seats, CD changer, rear LSD, premium audio, Premium package for the leather, and a moonroof, and voila! You'll spend a whopping $41,794 and still not have traction or stability control, so it may be closer to the LL Bean.

    Plus Subaru dealers will allow more haggle room. So, drum roll please...about $10 grand more than the VDC, and $14 grand more than a close-equivalent LL Bean.

    -juice
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Easy to say not having driven it. I could likewise say that Trooper LS isn't worth it, biggest moonroof and all. ;)

    -Colin
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.