By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
:oO
-juice
Frank
I'm actually doing a road rally this weekend up in Cromwell, CT. Most likely I'll navigate and my uncle will drive since he's not good with directions.
I'll be sure to let you know how it goes, should be a blast.
-mike
For some people, one is enough. I've tried Fords twice. Family members have had a few others, a pair of Tauri, a Sable, and a Cougar.
The Escape looks great on paper, but I would not take the dive for a third time. Heck, if you need to seat 7 people and want an SUV, it's hard not to end up with an Explorer.
Fords do seemingly offer a great value, and that kind of sucks you in. You just have to look beneath the surface, IMO.
-juice
-hutch
Frank
How are the AT3s?
Frank: I would not write a vehicle off. But it would be a factor in my decision making process.
-juice
-mike
Then the bean counters stepped in and mandated the torsion beam rear suspension from the Quest minivan. Pitiful, it's not even independent. On the former 4 door sports car.
Talk about killing a performance icon. OK, it was FWD but at least it had a limited slip diffy.
-juice
I'm quite interested in the new altima. Might have to stray away from the subie fold and pick one up eventually.
-mike
http://www.auto.com/industry/nissan15_20010815.htm
Bob
Bob
The new Altima looks good. It's going to put pressure on the mainstreamers. Subaru is more niche-oriented and won't be as affected.
-juice
The Altima does look quite nice. It looks more interesting that Accords and Camrys plus it's got plenty of power. I'm guessing it's going to sell quite well.
The SOJ site was working fine when I just checked.
Ken
Greg
P.S. In desperate need of sleep. Hmm, if I fold the back seats down.....
I'd still put an inflatable mattress on top, though.
-juice
Greg
- hutch
http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1995-04.html
LOL Ralph.... LOL
-juice
Bob
Ed
http://www.subaru.co.jp/
Here is what I'm looking for:
XT6, 88-91, AWD, 5-speed prefferable, Automatic ok too. Under 130K miles preffereable.
Thanks, hopefully you guys can help me out on this. Also if you know anyone who wants to buy a good commuter car, my MX6 will be going out the door as well.
-mike
~~~
I know it wasn't long ago a question 'bout performance driving school was asked and answered; but... thanks to the SEARCH (or lack thereof) function haven't found the post(s).
What is the name of the 'school' in the NY Tri-State Area again? Got 2 weeks to burn next week.
TIA
David aka Hypov in Brooklyn, NY
-juice
But you should come to some auto-xs in Englishtown and Giant's stadium!
I go regularly to E-town and G-stadium for them.
-mike
http://www.racenow.com/
Frank
Bob
Ed
-mike
...at 6-7pm Pacific/9-10 pm Eastern. Hope to see you there!
http://www.edmunds.com/chat/subaruchat.html
What gives?
-mike
Liberty: drove the Limited off-road, the Sport on-road. Off-road course fun and not too difficult. The 4-banger Sport is woefully underpowered for the weight; hard to tell if the V6 is adequate given that I had to keep it in 4 low for the entire drive. Good turning radius and the very short overhangs (plus that low range) allow it to do things I never would in my Forester. Headroom worse than Forester. Odd interior surface textures (like a golf ball over center a/c vents) a potential haven for dirt. Nice liftgate and floor cargo ties but SOMETHING forces continued use of external spare. (Edit: not an IRS, but Liberty has IFS and a solid axle link-coil rear.) Aluminum trim on Limited, though metal, looks cheap and nasty (like WRX), also hard to keep clean. Uncomfortable flat seat cushions, especially in Limited's leather. Weight good for off-roading and good towing rating (thanks, Drew) but EPA estimates - even for 4-cylinder - not so good (20/25 and lower). In short, an improvement over Cherokee but a lot heavier and more expensive.
Did not drive the other two Jeep models.
On the Chrysler track I drove the 300m and PT Cruiser. 300m very nice, elegant interior, odd steering wheel position, a lot of FWD torque steer. PT a real slug, poor visibility, poor ergonomics (window switches under a/c vents, long reach for shifter), sloppy handling, good cargo area in that it's very configurable. Seems to me DC should offer a panel van conversion with no rear seats for commercial applications.
Ed
PS: Forgot to mention the ridiculously bad rear cupholders - mounted low and to the rear in the door panels. Sitting in the rear seat and having stuck a water bottle in one, I couldn't see it, much less reach it, with the door closed. Front cupholders consist of 2 cutouts in the console, which have removable rubber liners to adjust size and for cleaning(?). I'm sure some folks will appreciate that.
-mike
Ed
Edit: okay, done. IFS and solid axle with link-coil rear.
-mike
-mike
Ed
-mike
In addition rear mounted makes having a hard cover a necessity given the malicious mischief that goes on in this world.
Ed
-mike
I thought your review was tedious until I came to the postscript describing the most important of a vehicle's characteristics, da cupholder. That brought a tear to my eye. Ya done good, my son.
..Mike
..Mike
Ed
The hand model went on and on about 17 cup holders.
So my buddy asked during the Q&A session...
"Why do you need 17 cup holders if it only seats 7-8 people at most? That's 2/person. And as a followup, does it come with a portopotti, cause with 17 cup holders I'm gonna need to tinkle a lot!"
-mike
For a spare under the car, just use a cover. I've heard this helps.
Ed: I mostly agree, except for the brushed metal trim. The WRX' trim is cheapo painted plastic, while Jeep uses real textured metal, far nicer.
You didn't comment on the handling, though. I thought it felt tall (because it is). I can't imagine using that roof rack.
-juice
..Mike
..Mike