Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
It did convince me however to switch to synthetic on the vehicle with the hardest working engine, and it seems to do a good job.
arjay1, 2-4% gain in efficiency IS a significant factor in the cost equation. Say you spend $500 per year, that is $10-20 savings per year which, along with things like buying fewer filters (assuming just slightly longer drain intervals) makes the syn vs. dino comparison essentially a financial wash.
When I started a new job and wanted to re-familiarize myself with Microsoft Excel, I made a spreadsheet where you could input all kinds of variables (oil change interval, price of fuel, price of oil, price of filter, etc ...) and see how your annual costs change.
After all was said and done, I was surprised that after tweaking all the variables this way and that, it added up to only about $10 either way each year ... which is a pittance when looking at how much it costs to keep a car on the road these days ... usually thousands each year, assuming you occasionally purchase new cars. >;^)
chikoo, many of us think that Castrol (and others) are pulling a fast one by selling "improved" dino oil ... which costs about half as much to make as PAO ... at a full synthetic retail price. It's just sleazy. If they publicly made a big deal about this new formulation AND reduced the price, that'd be something else entirely. The fact that they RADICALLY changed their formula AND did everything quietly tells me they are up to no good.
--- Bror Jace
Needless to say this vehicle does not get extended oil changes.
I am a FIRM believer in Mobil 1 synthetic and have used it in all of my vehicles since my first experience with it on a '94 Z 28. I immediately got quieter cold starts and about one mile per gallon better gas mileage on that Z 28 when I switched it to Mobil 1.
I have always had fairly low mileage vehicles, however, because I have traded so often. Well, now I have bought an '89 S-10 with 134,502 miles on it. I have already put about 3400 miles on it since I bought it, and at 2700 miles I had the oil changed and had them put regular 5W-30 Valvoline in it. (I had to take a trip and would have gone over 3K miles if I had waited until I got back from my trip, so I had it changed before I left.)
The truck has the 2.8 V6 engine and runs great. In those first 2700 miles, it had used only about a fourth of a quart of oil, according to the dipstick.
I have so far stayed away from my good old Mobil 1 because of that question about the seals and gaskets. Is there anything to that about synthetics allowing the seals and gaskets to harden worse than would regualar oil?
Also, has anyone any experience with Valvoline Max Life? It is supposedly formulated specifically for higher mileage vehicles. All hype????
thanks
tom
Valvoline won't release any information about what ingredients are put in their oils. I asked. I suspect they are using some hydrocracked oil in the mix. Soft seals is a characteristic of hydrocracked oil.
I was saying in my previous post that I had put 2700 miles on the truck since I bought it, and it had used about a fourth of a quart of oil by then.
I had the oil changed before starting on a trip that was going to put an additional 500 miles on it and would have caused me to go over the 3000 mile interval for an oil change.
My oil consumption has gone up some since I have started driving faster. At first, I didn't know how good an engine I had, and I didn't want to push it. As I gained confidence in the engine, I increased my cruising speed from the 60 to 65 range up to 70 to 72. The oil comsumption is still not bad, but it looks like I might have to add a quart between changes at the rate it is going now. (Or, I guess I could slow down again.)
So, should I use synthetic under these circumstances, or would the Max Life from Valvoline be a good choice?
tom
Any additional thoughts anyone?
The previous owner could have been using thicker oil already, maybe adding some STP ?? who knows??
and now that he has put newer oil that is thinner than previous and maybe is cleaning up some buildup in the rings/valve guides that had built up previously and is now seeing some oil consumption.....I have known several people who bought used cars with 100k+ miles that when they first changed the oil noticed some consumption after a couple thousand miles, also some who had severe engine probs (fatal!) after that first change to a lighter oil,,,,,no guarantee that the original owner used synthetic over the vehicle's previous life.
I had always used Fram filters in my 89 Nissan truck, looking back now after what I know now those filters were probably bypassing half the time, good thing I always change oil at 3k . I probably put in some good wear over the first 140k miles doing that! Now I use better filters (I notice no startup rattle any more and I use 10w40 and add some STP now) engine is running much better now...) I know I am not going back to thinner oil at this point. I am just going by other people's experience (and my own)
Mechanics can put an additive in the oil to locate leaks under ultraviolet light to pinpoint the source of the problem.
I wouldn't change over to syn until all seals were checked.
If Maxlife is the quality of their other products, I would not hesitate to try it.
I think that maybe it was just on that trip I took that my oil comsumption went up a little. It seems to have leveled off now that I am back on my normal daily driving.
One of you guys said that higher speeds would not cause increased oil consumption. I am surprised by that statement, but I can't argue the point. I just assumed that the more strain the engine was under, the more oil it would use, and with the higher oil pressure at higher RPM's it would seem logical that you might push some out somewhere.
At any rate, I have just about decided that I will try the Max Life at the time of my next oil change. With the winter temps here in western Ky hardly ever getting lower than 10° F, should I consider 10W-30 rather than 5W-30?
Thanks again, and, anyone else, please jump in here with your opinion too.
tom
If the motor allowed too much pressure buildup there would be leaks at all the seals, like when the PCV is clogged you get oil leaks at the valve covers because of pressure buildup..
example is like a water hose won't bust just because you have the water turned on high, but there will be more water coming out, now if you cap the end and wait awhile it will start leaking somewhere..
Unless you have leaks that are visible, any oil consumption would be due to burning either due to poor piston ring seal/oil control or due to the valve guides/seals....
now if you use synthetic oil hopefully you get less wear at these places and your engines lasts a long long time (your crankshaft/camshaft bearings get alot of benefit from it too), the question everyone wonders is if it is really worth the difference$$$$ (change cheap oil more often or change better oil less often???)...My Nissan is at 180K now and I used regular Castrol, My last Nissan was at 189k when I sold it, only used castrol 20w50 (lived in Florida..)
I have some time now, since the oil was just changed about 800 miles ago, so let's see what happens with the oil comsumption. I honestly think that it was the trip and all the miles at higher speed that seemingly increased the oil consumption. Remember, in the first 2700 miles after I bought the truck, it only used about a fourth of a quart of oil.
On that trip immediately after my oil change, the truck used about a fourth of a quart in 500 miles.
Now that I'm back to my regular commuting, which is 27 miles one way to work, let's see what she does. I will be back to driving between 60 and 65 MPH again.
Even if I end up adding one quart of oil between changes, that wouldn't be the end of the world.
That little 2.8 runs great, so I can't believe it has lost much compression, and, therefore, I think the rings must be in decent shape. If the rings were bad on even one cylinder, you would think that the spark plug for that cylinder would eventually foul and cause the engine to run rough.
I only paid $2450 with tax and everything for that truck, and I still think I got a steal!
Here's a pic...
tom
Anyone else have experience with Max Life? This is the first negative thing I've heard about it.
tom
Also, my truck hardly ever goes less than 27 miles when I start it up and go somewhere- it's usually to work in the AM and back in the evening.
thanks
tom
As far as the condensation theory, please remember that I just had my oil changed before starting on that trip. I literally left the shop where the oil was changed and started that long trip right from there. So, there should have been no condensation at the start of my trip when the dipstick showed full (And, yes, we did check the dipstick after starting the truck and letting it run to fill up the filter and to check for leaks.)
So, I left town with a fresh oil change and the oil level exactly on the full mark.
After the 500 mile trip, the dipstick showed that I had used approximately one fourth of a quart of oil. As you said, gmlover1, that translates to a quart of oil used in 2000 miles, and that is not bad at all.
tom
Well, lo and behold, it says that I should add four and a half quarts of oil at the time of the oil change, if the filter is also changed. I always have the filter changed when I have the oil changed.
The boys at the shop where I had the oil changed only added four quarts. I told them that's what it was supposed to get, because I thought that was right at the time. My cousin has an 87 S-10 with the 2.5 four cylinder engine, and we looked in his owners manual, finding that the 2.8 L should get four quarts with filter change. Maybe they went to a bigger filter between '87 and '89? I did have an AC filter put on (PF52).
But here's the funny thing... after adding only four quarts, starting the engine and letting it run a few minutes, and finally checking the oil level on the dipstick, we saw that the oil level was exactly on the full mark at the top of the cross-hatched area that indicates the "normal operating range."
What's the deal? If we had put four and a half quarts of oil in the engine, like the owners manual says we should have, then wouldn't the oil level on the dipstick have shown that the engine had too much oil?
Did my truck really use that "fourth of a quart" of oil on that 500 mile trip, or did the engine simply not have enough oil to start with?
Dazed and confused
tom
How much oil do I have them put in? I will have the filter changed, like I alays do. Should we only put in four quarts and, if the dipstick shows that the oil is exactly on the full mark, just call it good with the four quarts?
Should we put in the 4.5 quarts like the owners manual says and not worry if the oil level goes above the "normal operating range?"
I have always heard that too much oil "ain't good."
Heck, maybe that's not the right dipstick for that engine. I have no history on that truck at all, and it's possible that the previous owner for whatever reason got a different dipstick.
tom
Al
i'm considering switching to Castrol Syntec.
I was wondering whether it could last that long, or whether its lifespan was limited to 3000miles/3months.
any help would be appreciated.
btw my car is a 99 mazda protege
One other point: Syntec and Pennzoil are not true synthetics. They have taken advantage of loopholes in the law to call it a synthetic.
Mobil 1, Quaker State, Valvoline, Amsoil are true Synthetics. You might as well get one of these at the same price as Syntec.
The Synthetic Oil board has information on the subject.
If the manual says 4.5 qrts I would put that in and or go though the process of exact measuring which will take some effort the first time. Also, the amount of time you let the oil drain makes a difference,. quick lubes maybe 5-10 minutes. I let mine drain overnight and I will bet I get 2-4 more ounces of oil that drips out overnight, not much but if you are measuring half quarts 16 ounces, it does make a little difference. Two of my cars call for 4 and 5/8 quarts which is 4 qrts 20 ounces but with the overnight drains it takes 22 ounces to bring it up to full.
For the post looking to use Castrol Syntec, false and misleading adverstising. This is the kind of marketing that makes the american public furious, should be fraud in mu opinion!
Back to earlier points, I think the fact that oil consumption goes up when the RPMs increase is attributed to a lot of factors all happening at once. In addition to what has already been mentioned, don't forget that mineral oil and its multi-viscosity additives thin out at higher RPMs and higher temperatures. Don't assume this is a steady progression, either. Graphing the oil's ability to hold up under heat and stress caused by higher RPMs will show plateaus and drop-offs. With your driving habits, you might very well have discovered a point where the oil's protection begins to fail considerably. Remember these 5W30 (and 5W20!) everyday oils are essentially economy lubes for the everyday user. they are NOT designed for serious, high-performance (high-RPM) applications.
Vidtech, really? I had an Acura Integra which saw synthetic oil 90% of its life. I sold it to a close friend and it now has 170,000 miles on it and was starting to go through oil. When he switched over to Valvoline Max-Life the car began to use less oil (a combo of leaking and consumption). Really, knowing Valvoline's impeccable reputation, I would still recommend using this stuff in an older engine.
As for oil consumption, my Honda Civic made it to 100,000 miles without me having to add even a drop of motor oil between changes ... and I went about 6,000 miles between oil and filter changes. It sprung a light, weepy leak but switching to Redline Synthetic oil has seemed to stop this.
Bror Jace
I am seriously beginning to think that I may not have the right one. I have just completed another long trip, and it appears that the truck used not a bit of oil since that initial drop from the first trip.
Now, I'm wondering if the truck actually used any oil on that first trip, or if it was already low because we only put 4.0 quarts in it instead of 4.5 quarts.
Like I said, we ran the engine a couple minutes after completing the oil change, and then checked the dipstick. I saw with my own eyes that the indicated level was right on the full mark. Could this somehow have been a false reading???
Oh well, we'll see about that part number.
BTW, that little S-10 performed flawlessly on this second trip. I got 27.0 MPG going up to Illinois and 25.6 MPG coming back, but that tank included some in-town driving before I started the return trip.
tom
So, I am now wondering if the fact that the enigne had not been warmed up prior to the oil drain might explain why I got a "full" reading on the dipstick after only 4.0 quarts had been added instead of the 4.5 quarts called for in the owners manual. Could there have been a half a quart of oil left in the engine, since the egine was still cold?
Whatcha think, Guys?
tom
Looks like it would be appropriate to have discussions about filters in the same message board with oil discussions.
My question is about filter by-passing. How much of the time is the typical spin-on full flow oil filter actually operating in the by-pass mode?
I know there's a valve in the bottom of the filter that opens to allow the oil to by-pass the paper element when the restiction is above a certain level. This allows unfiltered oil to get back to the engine, which is a whole lot better than no oil getting back.
I guess this happens when the filter has been in service too long and gets clogged, but I think it also happens on cold starts when the oil viscosity is very high.
How long on cold starts is the filter by-passing?
How about these very high efficiency (therefore high restriction) filters? Are they in the by-pass mode more of the time than less efficient, lower restriction filters? If so, are they any better than a lower efficiency filter in the long run?
I know that Motorcraft filters up until several years ago were partial flow filters, where about 15% of the oil went through a very efficient cotton batting that gave fine filtration, and the other 85% of the oil went through something that just caught the "nuts and bolts." I guess the Fords lasted as long as any cars, so the filters must have done the job.
How 'bout some input here?
tom
Doubtful any filter gets enough contaminants to actually go into bypass mode at full warm up.
What is PROPER Oil Level?
Proper Oil Level is perhaps the most important but also the most often overlooked aspect of engine maintenance.
Many self proclaimed automotive experts and maintenance fanatics incorrectly promote the idea that more is better than less.
This is only partially true.
The maintenance of proper oil level is very important for minimizing of "Oil Consumption", minimizing the engine mechanical wear and avoiding serious mechanical problems.
Excess oil level causes excessive oil consumption and oil burning during combustion process. Oil burning causes fouled plugs, and greatly increases emission of exhaust pollutants. Too much oil in the exhaust can lead to plugging or damage of catalytic converters. Serious excess of oil in engine (two quarts or more) can cause engine fires for various reasons. Serious mechanical damage such as cracked piston rings can result from excess oil level.
Oil level therefore must never be above the FULL or MAX mark on you dipstick. If you accidentally add too much oil, drain the excess at once. This is one instance where more is not better !
Proper oil level is between the MIN (LOW or ADD) and MAX (FULL) marks on your dipstick.
The area or distance between MIN and MAX marks usually represents one quart or one liter in most cars (one quart is slightly less than one liter, 1 quart = .946 liter;
or conversely one liter is 1.8 ounces more than one quart).
When adding oil never add full quart if the oil level is at or above the MIN mark.
Add about 8 ounces or 16 ounces, wait few minutes check the oil level, and add more only if necessary.
The ideal oil level is just slightly above the MIN mark and well below the MAX mark, this will minimize oil consumption and minimize engine wear.
Oil level too low, that is one quart less than minimum will in some engines cause damage, but most engines can operate on as little as two quarts or less without any damage.
Oil capacity of 4 to 6 quarts is typical for most engines, although some small foreign cars use only 3 quarts, some large engines and trucks may use 8 quarts or more.
If you can not determine your engine's oil capacity from your Owner's Manual, install three quarts after oil drain, start engine for few minutes, stop engine wait 5 minutes, check oil level and add about half quart, check oil level again and add more oil until you reach the MIN mark. Then note how many quarts are required for your car. Do not add more than about half quart at a time and allow time for oil to drain to the oil pan, to prevent over filling.
Oil filters despite their apparent size only hold 4 to 8 ounces of oil, but the really large ones used in commercial trucks and busses can hold up to a quart.
Once engine is started as much as two quarts may be in circulation, when engine is stopped it takes about five minutes for oil to drain back to the oil pan and if oil level is checked immediately after engine is shut down, low reading on a dipstick will result even if oil quantity is adequate. Therefore be sure that enough time has been allowed for oil to drain down to the pan.
Best habit is to check oil when engine is cold and before driving in the morning, this is not only the most accurate technique to verify the oil level, but also avoids any possible burns from contact with hot engine parts.
However you must be sure that the car is level when parked, otherwise inaccurate reading of oil level may result.
Contrary to popular belief it is not necessary to maintain the oil level at the FULL (MAX) mark.
Experience and on road performance tests show that oil consumption can be as much as four times higher if oil level is maintained at the FULL (MAX) mark, as compared to an operation when the oil level is maintained at the LOW (MIN or ADD) mark on the dipstick.
Another popular argument is that engine with more oil will run cooler, but this is not true.
However, it will take longer for the oil to reach its normal operating temperature.
It is an error to assume that with the use of more oil, that the oil temperature will be reduced.
If the amount of oil increases, the quantity of heat transferred to it also increases, but the operating temperature is not affected.
Further disadvantage of using more oil than the necessary minimum for safe engine operation is that the cold running period will be prolonged, this contributes to less efficiency, cold sludge formation and greater engine wear.
Therefore for minimum oil consumption, maximum engine efficiency and maximum engine life, maintain your oil level just slightly above the MIN (ADD or LOW) mark and well below the MAX (FULL) mark.
Also remember that just because most motor oils are sold in one quart or one liter containers, there is no law that said that you must add a full quart. Add only what is necessary, be it 4 ounces or whatever.
In the past this was quite difficult advice to follow because most oil was supplied in solid paper/metal cans that had to be punctured in order to pour the oil out. Once the can was punctured there was little choice, the oil had to be poured out, be it into the engine or somewhere else.
Today the trend is to supply the lubricating oil in plastic containers with screw on/off cap, and some even have "see-through" calibrated gauge that indicates how much oil is left in the container, therefore adding only as much oil as is needed is much more practical. The plastic container can be re-sealed with the screw cap and there is no danger of spilling the remaining oil.
That is absolutely crazy!!!!!!! And, no reasons given for the statement!
I have never heard that it is good to keep the oil just above the "add" mark, though. I'm not disputing what you say, it's just that I have never heard that before.
tom
This is not the first I've heard of this procedure, over the years I've heard many mechanics and military mechanics practice this procedure with no damage to there motors one reason is that petro molecules expand when heated and actually increase the volume of oil in the crankcase thereby placing strain on the valve covers and seals in the motor
While I've always kept my motor oil level between the min and max marks I have to say I 've experienced success with less oil consumption religously monitoring my oil level.
So I believe there is merit to some of the reasons conveyed by that chemical engineer to me it seems if one aspect of reasoning worked, more than likely the other inherent benefits may follow
Additionally many of the car manufacturers I read in lookin up the oil capacity have stated that one should maintain there oil at the operating level and usually they reference the point on the dipstick between min and max, I've never come across in my years of a car manufacturer manual expressly saying to maintain oil level at the FULL OR MAXIMUM MARK or engine damage will be iminent or warranty will be voided.
I've been using amsoil 0w-30 with yrly drain. Consumption went from a pint in year (15000 miles )to half a pint within the same time frame