High End Luxury Cars

1159160162164165463

Comments

  • ljflxljflx Member Posts: 4,690
    footie - not a fair or correct pricing approach. You have to go Euro to Pound Sterling with no US dollar in the middle to get an accurate price. Both the Euro and Sterling are real strong and have moved up in strength similarly so the price to a UK resident has hardly budged. The same thing would happen if you did this with Lexus where the Yen is also quite strong now. The weak dollar only has an effect here and mfrs. are not able to pass that unfavorable exch rate difference onto the customer in such a competitive enviroment. But you can't use the weak dollar to see what pricing is in foreign markets for foreign goods that have nothing do with the US dollar. Similarly if the dollar strengthened all at once those prices would stay the same in local currencies. The US translated price would drop immediately but MB would still pocket the same amount of Euros and the British resident would still pay the same price in Sterling.
  • footiefootie Member Posts: 636
    In a global market, price competition is always country dependent.

    That's why folks in Europe buy a car in one country with the lowest price and import into their country to avoid taxes. Check the web to see how popular this is over there!

    But that doesn't remove the differences in what manufacturers try to charge in each country.

    I priced the S right off the UK MB site in pounds.

    Pounds don't go through Euro's to get to dollars, since the UK isn't a part of the Euro system.

    You take the S price in pounds in the UK deduct the VAT and delivery charges and then convert to dollars . Today it took a $1.92 to buy a pound.

    MB prices in the UK for comparable cars are MUCH higher than the US ( and in much of Europe ).

    The point was 1) right now the price MB is asking for the ageing S350 is HUGE in UK 2) the spread onthe S350 to the S500 there is about the same as it is here, $20K for two cylinders.

    Those must be diamond encrusted, dilithium crystal cylinders right?

    Final point, even though some folks can afford it, and some folks willingly pay for it, there's NOTHING about an S-class Mercedes that justifies its price as a luxury automobile, particularly a V6 240 hp version for the U.S. that weighs 4000 lbs.

    Except consumer stupidity.
  • merc1merc1 Member Posts: 6,081
    Well lets just say I don't see the point of any worry about the S8 either. It is limited production hi-po model and the previous S8 was just the first generation so it has to start building its legacy somewhere. They'll be another S8 in about a year.

    M
  • flyfisher1flyfisher1 Member Posts: 38
    I would ask you to do some research and just look up the curb weight. That is all the information you need to decide that they are quite different.
    Additionally, are aluminum cars the same as steel cars? I think not.
  • flyfisher1flyfisher1 Member Posts: 38
    Can you name 1 automotive journal - just one - that claims that the Audi and Phaeton are rebadged cars? In fact, one report I read on the Phaeton used an A8 as a benchmark for comparison.
  • flyfisher1flyfisher1 Member Posts: 38
    Wow that's a big difference considering that we are talking about a car (Tucker) that is over 50 years older.
    IMHO pivoting headlights are no big deal. Additionally, they are not an Audi, BMW or Lexus item. They are produced by some supplier. For example, the new Audi's come with LED low beam and driving lights that they claim are at least as bright as Xenon's. they are, no doubt produced by the same supplier that supplies the "see around the corner" Xenon's.
    This kind of stuff is no more than "frosting on the cake".
  • flyfisher1flyfisher1 Member Posts: 38
    I couldn't agree more. I think that was an expression of ego on the part of the VW chairman.
  • flyfisher1flyfisher1 Member Posts: 38
    Your post is right on point. I agree that you got an incredible bargain on an incredible car. The problem, as I see it, is that VW over reached and you are the beneficiary.
    Those who say that the A8 and Phaeton are the same have simply not done their research.
  • merc1merc1 Member Posts: 6,081
    I have to ask if you even read my post? I at no point stated the A8 and Phaeton were just a rebadge job. Clearly stated this. You're barking up the wrong tree here. My point was that I didn't think the A8 and Phaeton were totally seperate vehicles - really no big deal to me since I happen to be crazy about both cars.

    Researching - curb weight differences alone don't mean a thing either way when it comes to platform sharing. There are plenty of vehicles that share platforms, and have wildly varying curb weights. It depends on equipment, drivetrains etc. etc., not just a simple glance at curb weights.

    M
  • vwguildvwguild Member Posts: 1,620
    Given the knowns...Same trannys, Same engines, same Quattro All-Wheel Drive systems...ain't much left of any substance...
  • ljflxljflx Member Posts: 4,690
    Anyone here ever own or drive a Delorean? Also anyone remember the price of one?

    http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/20/obit.delorean/index.html
  • garyh1garyh1 Member Posts: 394
    This "obit" left out the most interesting parts of his life story. This one is better, and includes a reference to the original price of about $33,000 for the car:

    http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050320/ap_on_re_us/obit_delorean_10
  • designmandesignman Member Posts: 2,129
    Hmm, conflicting information. Another source has it this way:

    MSRP
    $25K with 5-speed manual
    $25.65 with auto
    Approx. 9200 made between 1981 and 1982

    http://www.dmcnews.com/faq/hist.htm

    I seem to remember it coming out of the gate at scalper prices but it didn't last long.
  • maxhonda99maxhonda99 Member Posts: 1,289
    "IMHO pivoting headlights are no big deal. Additionally, they are not an Audi, BMW or Lexus item. They are produced by some supplier."

    You do realize many other *big deal* items are produced by outside suppliers also? How about GPS systems, stability systems, braking systems. THe list goes on and on. So I guess carmakers themselves are not innovation much if anything at all these days. It's the suppliers!

    And chances are it's not the same supplier supplying Audi, BMW, and Lexus with the same items. NipponDenso probably supplies Toyota with their lights, while Bosch probably supplies Audi & BMW.
  • ljflxljflx Member Posts: 4,690
    Like anything else in any other industry some car makers will pay extra for a one year exclusivity or a six month lead time so they can have bragging rights. Folks like us sometimes buy the marketing BS hook, line and sinker to the point of warring about it.
  • paldipaldi Member Posts: 210
    Image hosted by Photobucket.com

    I guess you can say Phaeton & DeLorean creators were cut from the same cloth. What cloth is iconoclastic egomaniac?
  • ljflxljflx Member Posts: 4,690
    Who sold the cars for him? I don't remember his distribution network.
  • rgswrgsw Member Posts: 333
    As I recall, they were stainelss steel and no paint. Made in Ireland? You can read about them at
    http://www.delorean.com/
  • stroudmanstroudman Member Posts: 192
    I remember the dealer in N.E. Atlanta had two stainless and one bright red. Must have been painted by the dealer...
  • gteach26gteach26 Member Posts: 576
    Sorry, couldn't help myself.

    Delorean... neat car.
  • merc1merc1 Member Posts: 6,081
    No news from the Lexus camp? They just intro'd two very important cars. The GS450h, and the IS350. Curiously enough the IS350 won't come with a stick, a major mistake if they're trying to tackle the 3-Series. Everyone else: C350, G35, TL, A4 3.2 and 330i offers a stick.

    This GS450h will be a V6 + electrics to produce "over 300hp" not the 400hp or so most first thought. Hardly a challenge to any German tuner cars, but a nice alternative to any regular V8 entry in the mid-level luxury class I guess. Doesn't this render the regular GS430 moot?

    M
  • sysweisyswei Member Posts: 1,804
    I'm not sure who was predicting 400hp for this car. Lexus has consistently talked about V8-type performance out of a V6h drivetrain, with 4-cylinder-like fuel economy.

    From their press release it looks as though they're delivering: "Combined power output will be well in excess of 300 horsepower, with zero-to-60 acceleration in less than six seconds. Even more impressive is how quickly and powerfully torque is delivered during mid-range acceleration. The system's massive electric motor is capable of delivering maximum torque, immediately upon demand. This unique power delivery characteristic is most noticeable...and most useful...during 30-to-50 passing and merging maneuvers. It is an experience that must be felt to be fully appreciated. The result is a level of acceleration performance similar to a V-8 engine, with combined fuel economy in the high twenties, a level more typical of a 2.0-liter four-cylinder compact sedan, along with one of the best EPA emissions ratings in the industry." The full release is here
    http://pressroom.toyota.com/photo_library/display_release.html?id=20050323d

    It is when they couple a V8 with hybrid that we'll see more impressive things.
  • ljflxljflx Member Posts: 4,690
    The V8 hybrid in the GS will have to wait for the LS in 2007. In the meantime this V6 Hybrid slides in. I think their plan is this replaces the GS300 and the V8 hybrid (which is always where the big HP was advertised) replaces the GS430. In yesterday's NY Times Clements indicated Lexus will have full suite hybrids across the board in a few years. All the gas engines will be killed off by that. His comment wa that it would only add $1500 cost to a vehicle within a year or two and that is nothing to Lexus buyers. He's right.

    The bigger issue is what does this do to residuals of gas engines. Transition is never easy. But maybe that is also why Toyota stayed out of the HP wars. Decent mileage gas engines will hold value better. In an era of rising fuel prices high HP inefficient gas engines may get the same wrath the fur industry got in the past. Those residuals would crash.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    "In an era of rising fuel prices high HP inefficient gas engines may get the same wrath the fur industry got in the past. Those residuals would crash."

    In an era of no-gas, the vehicle you wouldn't be able to pay enough for is an alternative fuel vehicle. Even at $4.00/gallon I wouldn't buy a hybrid unless it was the same price as a 100% gas fired engine. So to me I would consider it at maybe $5/gallon, but then there would be other catastrophic issues anyway.
  • designmandesignman Member Posts: 2,129
    “Clements indicated Lexus will have full suite hybrids across the board in a few years. All the gas engines will be killed off by that.”

    I totally believe this. I wonder how long it will take the world to realize how profound this is. This will become Toyota’s biggest legacy. I just can’t wait to see how hybrid will be assimilated into the performance world. It’s just a matter of time before we see hybrids on tracks and the “green” perception is put to rest.

    “Transition is never easy. But maybe that is also why Toyota stayed out of the HP wars.”

    Maybe staying out of the HP wars is by another design, enabling them catch the competition by surprise. Coming out with more muscular hybrids early may have inspired others to get on the bandwagon quicker. For one thing, it appears BMW is virtually nowhere with hybrid. I wonder at which point evryone realizes this is not a fad.
  • ljflxljflx Member Posts: 4,690
    designman - Did you catch yesterday's NY Times auto section pullout. It said Toyota uses 4 Chinese companies (or maybe it said Asian suppliers, I forgot which) for parts and then has a German source for some of its diesels. The source - BMW.

    I agree with your logic about Toyota staying free of the HP wars.

    kdshapiro - the hybrid is inevitable and it will cost more because it adds more power as well. Bigger engines command more cost. So if you look at it from a power standpoint higher pricing is no different than today when you opt for bigger displacement. But the truth is that gas engines will depreciate faster when hybrids expand in the market and you may end up paying a multiple of that $1500 by going the gas route, assuming it even stays available in lux cars.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    It's not a fad. It's very short term though. The (few) people I know that have hybrids rate them as average. Talk about complex. The only way they get their money's worth is sitting in NYC traffic operating on electic. To pay $4,000 more to save $1,000 in gas just doesn't seem worth it.
  • dhanleydhanley Member Posts: 1,531
    Bear in mind that to many people spendng money on these cars instead of a $20K impala doesn't seem worth it either.

    It's not a money issue.
  • ljflxljflx Member Posts: 4,690
    Very short term to me means a few years. It will take 15+ years to change the infrastructure to deal with next gen technology - after the standards are set and that day is still far off. The technology is not only a long way off, but it will also require a lot of government intervention and global co-operation. Good luck with that one - look how long HDTV is taking and that is a lay-up compared to what you are talking about with new technology here. My guess - you are looking at 30-40 years at a minimum. By human life expectancy standards that's pretty long-term in my book.
  • designmandesignman Member Posts: 2,129
    It’s a resource issue. Estimates on fossil fuel availability range from 30 to 100 years. Hybrid will extend this. ANYTHING that provides better mileage will extend this. The problem is that convention is needed. Right now hybrid provides this.

    Ljflx is right on the money with his last post. As a matter of fact, hybrid may be around forever if it is combined with hydrogen technology. There are lots of ways to go here and from what I have read no one is up on this more than Toyota. They have fingers in several energy pies.

    Eventually, we will have a hydrogen-based economy but we all will be riding the subterranean bobsled by the time this happens. Hopefully there will be more competition hence progress when the world realizes the extent of the energy crisis. The problem is, it really hasn’t sunk in yet. It will.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    I don't disagree anything that can extend the life of fuel is good. But. Nobody on this board in their right mind would buy $3000 worth of stock if they knew they could turn around and sell it for $1000.
  • dhanleydhanley Member Posts: 1,531
    Then no one in their right mind would buy a 70K car. I mean, isn't that obvious? It's just going to depreciate AND take upkeep.

    That $3K in stock looks like a good deal by comparison.

    And just to be pedantic, you can always sell $3k in stock for $1K. I'll be glad to take it off your hands, for instance.
  • oacoac Member Posts: 1,594
    A poster (feverhart) in the LS forum obtained a read-out of the LS500 GT from a Lexus dealership. The spec sheet reads as follows:

    LS500 GT
    V-10, hybrid, AWD
    400bhp (gas) + 200hp (battery) = 600HP
    Top speed @ 202mph
    0-60 at 4s
    32-35mpg
    Priced @ $100K

    Being put through the paces right about now in Russia and elsewhere....

    A Lexus to compete against the likes of Bentley, Ferrari, Porsches, Lambos, etc.... Rarefied field indeed !
  • stroudmanstroudman Member Posts: 192
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzz... it still won't be any fun
  • sysweisyswei Member Posts: 1,804
    Right, lets all pre-judge a car whose specs are still in the rumor stage.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    You got it. Send me the three grand and it's yours.
  • princeabubuprinceabubu Member Posts: 45
    Hmmm, well the last time I checked a Bentley and a Rolls weren't drivers cars! I think this Lexi will fit right in, and hey for thousands less!
  • merc1merc1 Member Posts: 6,081
    I think it would be a very big mistake to kill off the GS430 in favor of a hybrid. Even with Toyota's reliability and what not a hybrid is still a complex and expensive vehicle to own once the warranty runs out..for those who plan to buy and keep.

    I guess I thought these hybrids were supposed to be AMG/M series competitors. We'll have to see what the hp is once they mate the next generation V8 with the electric stuff.

    M
  • merc1merc1 Member Posts: 6,081
    I think BMW and others will realize that hybrids are here to stay, but for them only as a diesel/electric combo because in Europe gas hybrids are going to be a tough sell when the first diesel hybrid appears, since diesel cars make up like over half of car sales in Europe anyway. I don't think BMW has the resources to do a hybrid gas or diesel by themselves. Not even GM or DCX was willing or able to spend the money on them by themselves, hence them teaming up. Here is where Toyota's $$$ actually shows up.

    I hardly see hybrids taking over the market because they are expensive to produce and production capacity will have to be greatly enlarged for them to gain footing in Europe.

    M
  • oacoac Member Posts: 1,594
    "Hmmm, well the last time I checked a Bentley and a Rolls weren't drivers cars! I think this Lexi will fit right in, and hey for thousands less!"

    This LS500 GT is designed to compete against the 760iL and the S600, not a Maybach, RR, or Bentley. The V12-powered/493hp S600 starts at $125K, and the V-12 powered/438hp 760Li starts at $115K. So the LS with a V10-powered hybrid/600HP car for $100K would be a screaming deal. This is the space Lexus wants to re-define itself the most. The higher status level, and if they can get this car out to the dealership, it'll certainly raise the aura around the IS and GS sedans !
  • merc1merc1 Member Posts: 6,081
    I see on the LS board you're still holding onto the notion of a 600hp LS. Its interesting you'll take the word of someone who supposedly got something from a dealer about a 2007 model year car right down the specs 2+ years in advance, but not the word of a supposed to be Toyota engineer (or someone that know one that lives in Japan) on the 2007 LS board. Too funny. Your fellow Lexi gave lame reasons as to why Lexus wouldn't do a 600hp car? Now now. Count me among those who'll be truly surprised if Lexus does a 600hp LS, and by the way hp alone doesn't equal a S600 killer. You'll get better fuel economy from the Lexus but do buyers of this ilk care about such things? For such an halo car styling, dynamics and everything else has to be in place for it be a hit, not just a lot of talk about saving fuel coupled with Lexus' less than stellar styling.

    For folks with 600hp on their minds there is a S65 AMG, already with 604hp today. You think that if Lexus delivers a 600hp LS Mercedes will stand still? You say people underestimate Lexus' future plans but I think you do the same about the competition. These are Germans car companies we're talking about here, not Cadillac.

    M
  • ljflxljflx Member Posts: 4,690
    He got the same data I got several weeks ago and it was even deeper in nature. Do I think MB will stand still? I think MB has played its card already. The S65 is far more expensive than this car will be. What's it going to do to answer a car that matches it with later technology, that is green and costs 35% less.

    Enginneering teams are parcelled out onto different parts of a project. I've had people studying things for me in major projects and acquisitions over the years and they didn't have a clue what the bigger scope and strategy was. It's the way business works.

    I'll say what I said on the LS board again here - I think many people are underestimating what Lexus is planning for the 2007 global intro. You have a very successful lux brand established in the US combined with a parent company that has the deepest pockets in the industry (no one is even remotely close) that will become the global car sales leader within 5 years. They have a rapidly developing Scion brand and are way ahead of everyone else on next gen technology. Do you really think they are going to go global with just a basic enhancement of their US strategy given all that clout?? That would fail miserably. As designman said yesterday - they've kept all this stuff pretty quiet and snuck up to this point - but at some point the veil has to come off the secrecy.

    BMW - who knows what they will do. I said a long time ago that they are too small for some of these next gen challenges. There are many things they can lead on but not large scale structure changes like the ones coming up in the next 50 years. Either they will get acquired at some point or they will have a major long-term secure alliance if they want to stay indepedent. If this alliance with Toyota over diesels is real maybe they will strike a long-term deal with them. I don't buy for one second the "Lexus is gunning for BMW" talk. That's marketing with an intent to change the direction of the perception. But both BMW and Lexus are aiming at hurting MB. It could be "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" situation.
  • stroudmanstroudman Member Posts: 192
    What if hybrid turns out to the 8-track tape of powertrains? Behind the scenes the germans have, from where I'm watching, devoted more R/D to fuel cell and hydrogen. I's a steep bet, but who knows?
  • ljflxljflx Member Posts: 4,690
    The hybrid is today's car modified. It's not a new revolutionary development like an 8-track.

    There are already some very limited hydrogen cars in use, mainly by power companies. I believe JCP&L in NJ uses a handfull. They are quite primitive and can only go 40 or 50 miles if I remember my reading properly. But there is no infrastructure for it even if a true production car could be built tomorrow. On top of that there are countries in the world whose ability to develop hydrogen will be seriously challenged and questioned. Hydrogen development is volatile and is loaded with geo-political issues, safety and security. It will require world-wide standards. It is a lot more than producing a car. Do you want a hydrogen pumping station or plant anywhere near your house?? The transition to a hydrogen infrastructure alone will take 20 years once the technology arrives and the technology is 25-30 years away. But in reality Toyota is far ahead of everyone in hydrogen development anyway.

    I think the hybrid will happen faster than anyone thinks. The $4K price difference today will be down to $1500 or less in a year or two as production ramps up. If government incentives stay in place it will be a lot less than that.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/25/opinion/25sachs.html?
  • merc1merc1 Member Posts: 6,081
    Interesting points, as always.

    I do think you're looking at from just a hp/price standpoint and I think it will take more than that and a fuel economy edge to crack the market at the high end, especially on a proposed 600hp car. Mercedes has played their hand as far as the S600 and S65, you're right they aren't going to get any cheaper. However we really need to see what the S-Class in general brings to the table as far as performance, it could be lighter, better geared or anything...better than the current generation, thus improving its performance also. As far as what a S600 or S65 costs now its the same situation as the LS430 vs the S-Class or the 7-Series, on paper the value of the LS should have stopped the sales of the S-Class, but it hasn't far from it. It will be the same thing when this super hybrid appears. Mercedes' isn't going to lose the ability to sell S600s or S65s just because a Lexus may come close to the performance at a cheaper cost - there is much more to that in this class and especially at these prices. The whole car has to be right and appeal to the enthusiasts buyers that care about 600hp. This is where the current LS also loses out to the enthusiasts. I hardly see the next LS being some great looking car with class leading dynamics, but again that is pure speculation at this point and just my opinion.

    You mention Scion, I don't see the relevance here. Nissan is gunning for that just like Infiniti is dashing any hopes of Lexus being a sports sedan at least with the GS/M situation so far. I don't think Toyota and especially Lexus can just look at competing with Germans anymore. They'd better watch their back because Infiniti is out to erase any notion of a Lexus being sporty in the entry and mid level sedans sector.

    Toyota is ahead in hybrid tech for sure, but technology in general I don't think so. BMW, Mercedes, Audi all push that far more than Toyota does by not being scared to introduce it to the market, for better or worse. I'm not talking about just hybrid tech either, which is what you seem to think is more important above all else.

    Interesting take on BMW. BMW and Mercedes have been competing for years and years and yet Mercedes still holds the card worldwide. Mercedes does and BMW follows. Now that Mercedes has shown the R-Class, BMW has announced a new vehicle (to be know as the V5) to compete. Mercedes did a ML in 1998, BMW does a SUV in 2000. Mercedes is hardly in the shadow of BMW. These two have been complimenting each other in product for the last 40 years and when DCX's MB unit is back to health BMW's small advantage will be gone like it has been all these years. It wasn't until MB got into trouble did BMW pull ahead in some markets, but with their idrive/styling they imo lost the chance to detrhone MB, especially at the upper ranks. Watch this new S blow the 7-Seires away, not hard to do if the 5-Series/E-Class situation is anything to go by. BMW is slipping more than you'd like be believe. The 5-Series is no longer the segment leader in the press' eyes. Getting beat by the E-Class at every turn, not to mention the Infiniti M as a "sport" sedan. I've never seen a 5-Series place 3rd or 4th in a comparo, let alone a brand new 5-Series. Yes the 5 is still the drivers car, but the Infiniti has seemed to match that and the A6/E-Class aren't stylistically challenged and the E has all traditional buttons, no idrive. The 7-Series had a mess of an introduction. The new 3-Series has more competition than every before, even Lexus. BMW's slight advantage on the reliablity charts and sales are their only advantage and at some point Mercedes' product onslaught will catch up with them, imo. Their new styling theme has turned off a many of buyers around the world, but so far they've managed to gain new buyers I guess with certain models, not all. I think if MB feels the heat from Lexus so will BMW they are more or less in the same competitive boat. Especially since Lexus thinks they have a sports sedan in the GS, the IS hasn't been driven yet so the verdict is a long way out on it. Hoever the lack of a manual in the IS350 is big mistake. I can't believe that after the way the previous IS300 hit the floor with a thud because of not having a manual Lexus would do the same thing over again. Here is what I meant by execution as opposed to just saying that Toyota has so much money and can do what they want. All the money in the world is pointless if the execution is off. Everyone else in the IS' segment offers a manual, even stodgy old Mercedes, but they've seemingly decided not to on their top IS model. The GS isn't a 5-Series competitor either like Lexus promised. From what I've seen on the GS boards buyers either love or leave it over a variety of issues. Hardly the second coming of the mid-size segment, the Infiniti M beat them too it.

    I don't see BMW being bought by anyone. The family that owns them, I can't think of the name right now, probably wouldn't go for it unless BMW was in deep, deep trouble. If I'm not mistake I think BMW had one of their best years ever last year?

    Overall I think between Mercedes, Lexus, BMW and Infiniti the ones that will have the most trouble are Cadillac (already running into price resistance on their XLR and STS) and Acura, the latter which is challenged to get past their entry-level and barely mid-level image. Audi, however hasn't shown their hand just yet, the A8 is only the start. Watch Infiniti and Audi too. Everything isn't hybrids you know.

    BTW, did you take that trip yet? If so did you rent the 300 or the Pacifica? Really curious to know what you'd think of either. Anway, see you all Monday.

    M
  • ljflxljflx Member Posts: 4,690
    The Quandts are the family and have a 55% or so controlling interest. I would say a long-term alliance is more likely. BMW and Toyota actually bring plenty to the table for each others needs to form such an alliance. This stuff is going to be very expensive. I'd separate out ground breaking new platform technology changes from new and innovative technology brought to existing platforms. Big difference. This is manufacturing so development costs like the ones we are talking about here can only be handled by the giants that are highly capitalized. If it were computer technology there would be room for a smaller guy to shock the system. But it doesn't happen in heavy manufacturing.

    Trip is a month from now.

    I don't necessarily think that any entry to the S600 space or even the space above that (Bentley etc.) is anything more than just another car choice. That is a small market but you have to be in it if you are dead serious about playing at the exalted levels. The thing is that price on the Lexus (personally though I think it will be over $100K) is pretty close to highly optioned S500's. I think Audi has price issues too. No one I know will ever think of going beyond A8 territory in price. Audi just lacks the name here.

    Lastly - it would be hard to imagine that two different dealers in two locations had spec data like that from any source but Lexus themselves. I think that car or a 550HP version of it, along with the LF-A is coming to market. We'll see.
  • rcf8000rcf8000 Member Posts: 619
    MB is certainly giving Lexus a lot of pricing room for a higher level car than the LS430. I recently was in the market for a high-end vehicle and seriously considered the LS430 and the S500. I ended up buying an LS430 with the Custom Luxury package. MSRP is about $67,000. The MSRP of an S500 equiped similarly would be about $98,000. I liked the S500 better than the LS430 in some important ways, but in most respects the LS430 is a superior vehicle, imo, not even considering price. I could see a market for a Lexus with a price just below $100K, but what features would such a car have that would justify the price? More power, sure, but how much could they charge for that, especially if it is achieved via the hybrid route.
  • stroudmanstroudman Member Posts: 192
    -anybody in the market for a $100k+ car, and wants to whine about mpg, needs to have all their money taken from them, their shirt pulled over their head, and beaten soundly. Just kidding. No really

    -One of the reasons BMW sold so well last year is they had a nasty lease deal on the 3-series, and Mercedes wasn't willing to give much chase to it. The 3-series BTW, has become the choice of discerning sorority girls everywhere. When you absolutely, positively have to appear hardworking and successful before your fellow sisters, accept no substitutes... Daddy's buying!

    -The 300C and Magnum w/hemi are brilliant.

    -Make a trip up to your local Bimmer dealer and look closely at the materials inside the new 5 and Z4. Or better yet, find someone in a 6 month or year old one, and see how well it's holding up. Yeesh. At least the new M went in the right direction.

    -With all the choices in the luxo world these days, the oldest tradition in the car business, Mercedes-Benz, is still, IMHO, the most interesting.

    The ES330 is perhaps the ugliest, ill-proportioned luxury car I've ever seen.
  • stroudmanstroudman Member Posts: 192
    -The new lexus GS looks like a 5/4's maxima
  • michael_mattoxmichael_mattox Member Posts: 813
    Stroudman:

    The ES330 is similar to a C or E class Mercedes just much better equiped more refined and yes does offer significent Luxury features...But it is not a high end luxury car which is what we are talking about here....It's subjective beauty is not relavent...

    The Electric motor in a hybrid not only adds good MPG but also tremendous power....isn't that what guys want that can afford an over $100,000 car.

    The S class Mercedes is more interesting looking but that beauty is only skin deep...I would also note that the guy that can afford that price car often does not need to show off his wealth...He doesn't need a showy every day driver...There are lots of sporty Showy sports cars he can put in his garage as a toy.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.