Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Thanks.
Other than this, and a few minor problems, car is great!
DF
My MDX heats the seat and back of the drivers seat; but only the seat on the passenger side because of the SRS sensor in the passenger seatback. Perhaps current RL owners will chime in.
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
We had a few discussions on this forum about how the ventilated seats actually worked....that is correct... only on the Canadian cars...but the trade off is....they don't get the XM satellite radio...and one of these days my friend bodble2 from Canada will make the announcement that he bought a new RL and that's cool. by the way Bodble2 you were the only one that knew about my understanding wife ...How did you know that?
Gee, I better stop before I get one, or both of us in trouble!
Also, heard that in the near future that XM will be available in Canada...do not know about when/if in an Acura???
I think XM needs approval from the CRTC (Canadian Radio and Television Commission) I think. But I wonder if the Canadian market is big enough to justify the costs.
I don't believe the ventilated seats include the seatbacks, but let me dig around for more info. I might be wrong.
At the time I was 90+% sold on the RL and had I bought then it was the one; but I am not an impulse shopper and the research con't. Research into April led to some widespread issues regarding the RL and the discovery of the M35. Also I began considering what features really mattered to me which ones didn't. For me RealTime NavTraffic is NOT nearly as important as a RearView Backup Camera. The tide began turning toward the M35; especially in light of the obvious overpricing Acura chose for the RL.
Bottom Line: I am still undecided. Both the RL and the M35 are great cars; neither is perfect. The RL is clearly overpriced and has specialized technology that will not appeal to everyone (e.g. NavTraffic is only available in 21 major cities). Acura built it and some will come.
The Acura RL has been chosen.
Are we talking about coffee beans now?
YTD through May, RL sales now stand at 6,867. Acura still has to hustle to reach its stated target of 20,000 annual sales. Sales tend to pick up in the warmer months, and although it's too early to say, appears they'll end the year somewhere in the ballpark of 18,000 unit sales.
Of course that 225.7% increase is over last years '04 sales The May figure of 1404 is up from March's 1376 and April's 1304; no doubt due to steep/heavy discounts. May sales are lower than February's and nowehere near the highs of Nov and Dec.
It's ironic: when I took delivery of my RL in December, I pored over those manuals night after night, and now, after being removed from the car for two months, I've forgotten everything! I'll need to start from scratch. "Oh, so there's no ignition key?? -;)...and keyless entry? Wow!!"
I feel like an SWL (short-wave listener) but I check the forum a few times a day and hope to add some input in the next few weeks when I'm in the left seat again.
In the meantime, regards to all...keep typing.
George
Think how much fun you'll have all over again!! :shades:
Glad to hear you are on the mend ...
I've read elsewhere that dealers are calling the RL a "disappointment" so far. I'm not sure how reliable that classification is. Any dealers or sales persons here care to comment?
My opinion: The RL is a very nice car, BUT, if I were in the market for an Acura and wasn't too tall to fit in the car comfortably, I'd prefer the TL over the RL in terms of styling and value.
Perhaps the TL is stealing the RL's thunder?
I guess it's possible; however, I really don't think so. They're just two really different cars and appeal to different people. I test drove the TL before the RL and even though I really liked it, I never seriously considered it. After driving the RL, all thoughts of the TL went right out of my head.
The TL is sportier and possibly appeals to a younger crowd. It's also quite a bit less expensive. However, for those who can afford an RL, it offers so much more. The SH-AWD is, for me, a showstopper. After driving my RL for seven months, I couldn't imagine not having it. After that, there's the steering wheel which glides up and out of the way for my long legs, the keyless entry, the quieter ride, and just the overall feel of more luxury in the RL.
However, having said all that, the TL is an excellent car for those who don't want to drop in excess of $40k for a car.
We keep seeing opinions that the RL is selling poorly. Let's remind ourselves (again) that Honda is a relatively small company. They are 1/3 the size of Toyota, and smaller than Nissan, D-C, BMW, and Audi/VW.
I think Acura has been smart about finding the sweet spot in each segment to generate decent sales numbers and most importantly, PROFIT. It's not about volume but how much money you make. They don't need a large number of models or multiple variations of the same car like BMW, MB, Lexus, Infiniti, etc. to move product.
They would certainly benefit from a true flagship (V8) car, or perhaps a model that competes directly with the G35 coupe or maybe even a S2K-based roadster, but I believe they have appropriate "depth" to handle or achieve exactly what they want to do, especially as a "smaller" manufacturer to some of their peers.
The RL is far from perfect (but what car is?). It represents a compromise of sorts, especially in light of how well the Infiniti M is doing in the marketplace. But Acura is doing just fine, with sales 200+% over the previous model. The only benchmark that may be questioned is their stated goal of 20K sales. They're in range to get there, but it will be a stretch.
Off topic, but how about Danica Patrick and Honda's domination at Indy? I believe 8 of the top 9 finishers ran Honda power. Honda/Acura will get mileage from those feats. All from a relatively small car company.
The increase is over the outgoing RL though. I think they could have re-introduced a 1991 Legend and achieved the same results. :P
I remember last year my dealer had brand new RLs sitting on their lot with about $12K discounts posted on the windshield!
The last time I heard those words "Ramp Up" I got excited beyond words. Bottom line...it allowed me to go forward into an early retirement.
George you are missed ...heck feel free to drop us a line anytime and I can imagine you are really ready to get behind the wheel again. I was just thinking about something that I did recently and never heard you talk about it before. Inside the owners manual packet you received a Gift Card for a Free Surround Sound Disc from 5.1 Marketing and Sales. It was attached inside the case that holds the DVD-Audio Demonstration Disc..check it out if you haven't already. Really spectacular sound!
I hope those quadricepts heal strong my man.and remember...that RL front seat has a lumbar support that adjusts extremely well! In my living room hangs a picture of a couple of kids looking through the window of a candy store. I'll be thinking bout ya pressing your nose against the window.
BTW, I just clocked 12,000 miles, got my second oil change (Mobil1, 0-50W), and to date, have experienced absolutely no problems! I think the performance has improved significantly lately...The responsiveness seems more immediate and agile and the acceleration has more "intensity". Call me crazy if you must, but the car feels "lighter" to me...LOL!
Interesting indeed. Of course Acura had to drastically drop the price to get those sales and that is a fact. The RL sold for nearly MSRP through February and sales dropped significantly after the initial sales rush of Nov/Dec. Yes sales rose in May after dealer started knocking $4-5K off the MSRP. I know for a fact that M's are NOT being discounted that much yet.
Touche'
hahahahaha
Are you serious? They have:
MDX, TSX, TL, RL, Pilot, Ridgeline, and Accord all on the same platform. With the Accord alone, you can get DX (Yes, last time I checked, you could still get an unbadged DX. Admittedly that was quite some time ago.), LX, or EX. You can get a 4 or 6 cylinder. Cloth or leather. Coupe or Sedan. With or without navigation. That's a lot of variations of just one car, let alone the others.
Then you have:
CR-V, RSX, Element, and Civic all sharing a platform, with nearly as many variations as the Accord. So I would say Honda is the king of variations of a car, but Nissan is poised to possibly overtake them with their FM platform.
Acura has one version of the MDX, TSX, TL, and RL. (Discounting manual transmissions, which represent <10% of sales.)
Infiniti offers 4 versions of the M. Lexus offers 3 versions of the GS. Mercedes offers at least 3 versions of the E, BMW offers at least 4 versions of the 5, and Audi offers 3 versions of the A6 (counting the avant), and possibly more later if they offer FWD.
You're right that Honda offers multiple lines off the same platform, but my point above still stands. The ES330 and Camry are similar under the skin, and there are also similarities between the RX, Highlander, and even Sienna. And Nissan has many offshoots from their FM/VQ platform. But let's stick to luxury performance cars here.
If Acura wants to be a real player, it needs to listen to its potential customers, too. There are tens of thousands of people out here who say, "I would buy an Acura, but ." How many times have we all read or heard that Acura needs a V8? How many times have we read that they need RWD? Do the powers-that-be at Honda need to be cracked up side the heads with a small block V8 and RWD chassis to get the message??? If the Acura division won't take the market seriously, how can it expect potential customers to take it seriously. Infiniti seems to have gotten the message and look at the dividends it's getting from it.
What has Acura done to get in the game or set itself apart from the competion? NavTraffic?? Please. I would think that people would know they're city well enough to know when and where traffic will be. How often would the vast majority of RL owners be traveling outside their city to need NavTraffic? Besides, that's not even their product; it belongs to the Navteq corporation which XM jumped in to get a lead on it (Sirius will be offering it soon enough). SH-AWD? Tests show that it still doesn't put it ahead of its competition. I think its biggest raison d'etre is to combat the viscious torque steer of a 300HP FWD platform by bleeding some of the power off to the rear wheels, in essence, torque steering one rear wheel or the other.
I would say they have the quality aspect cornered, but the RL electronics seem to be proving to be as buggy as a Mercedes.
Um, I think you turned left when you meant to go right. This one's about the RL. But that's fine, carry on! :shades:
From reading the posts here, I'm not sure NavTraffic works all that well. However, assuming it worked as intended, it would be a great asset, no matter how well a person knows their city. In the DC area, traffic tieups can occur at the drop of a hat in a spot or time that rarely has backups. One day recently, I-95 was backed up for miles on a Saturday afternoon due to a paving project. How could knowing your area well help you there? And this happens frequently. In LA, traffic is notoriously unpredictable and I can imagine that NavTraffic would be very helpful there.
Maybe some areas have very predictable backups in very predictable areas, but I venture to say that many, if not most, metro areas don't.
I had an E Class Mercedes and the repairs were too much to bear from day one. I eventually got to know all the mechanics by their first names.
But since last October with my RL, I've not had a single problem or concern. Just compliments everywhere I go about its looks and features. And it still corners like a bat out of hell!
It's been worth every penny I spent. I don't care how well it sells. It's an incredible car.
Actually, if you chart Honda's development in the automotive biz, they have always been behind the curve. For example, they were late in introducing a fully-automatic transmission, late to offer a V6 in the family sedan segment, late to the minivan scene, late to come out with a legitimate SUV, late to the pickup truck party. Currently, I think they are lagging in bringing a V8, and a wagon, to market. However, where they have excelled is, even though they tend to be late to the party, once they get there, their products tend to hit a sweet note, or a niche, with the consumer, witness the Ridgeline. Part of the reason for that success, I think, is that while they lag in the macro sense, they tend to be pioneers in coming out with nifty features, ie. 4-wheel-steering, ATTS, SH-AWD (which is the natural development from their ATTS), foldaway third seat, variable valve timing, trunk in a pickup bed, etc.
The RL, past and current, for whatever reason because it's not like the car is not a good product, has been one of their few endeavors that hasn't quite hit its mark. Perhaps it needs a bit more separation from its stablemates (V8? RWD?) other than price-wise. But I don't pretend to know the solution. I think they face a similar problem with their coupes (CL, Accord). Again the problem, I think, is there is insufficient product separation. The coupes are (were) neither significantly faster, nor sleeker than their sedan counterparts. The Accord coupes in the mid-90's, in particular, were a joke. They were nothing more than the sedans minus 2 doors!.
Cstiles makes an important point here that does not seem to be reflected in the monthly sales records. The RL sales are compared against those of the other manufacturers but each of them have 3-4 models grouped together against the single RL model. The better comparison would be the monthly sales of the RL compared with the M35 AWD (or at least just the M35), the 530 (soon to have AWD) or the GS 300 AWD. Those number comparisons would be more relevant.
However, I am not much interested in the sales numbers no matter how they are broken down. Its what car suits me now for what I am looking for and that has been since last October the RL. Maybe next year it will be something different or maybe it will be another new RL in a few when they do an inevitable upgrade of some sort that gets my attention. Let the accountants play with the sales numbers as for me a car purchase is more a matter of combining practical needs with the emotional charge I get from a car, not how it is selling versus its peers.
It's all just fun to talk about. Everyone can drive what they wish. I don't think that its Hondas goal to be first place in sales, they are leaving that to Toyota, who in my opinion manufacture very reliable and absolutly boring cars. [lexus included]
For what it's worth, I think the M45 is a great car but M35 or RL? RL no question. I do think your right about die-hard Honda fans. Anything they come out with There fan base is going to like. I must include myself. I sit in an Acura and it's like home
"I sit in an Acura and it's like home."
I couldn't express it more succinctly - it's like home. As I've stated in earlier posts, I've owned three Honda Motorcycles, three Accords and three RLs. Without question, I'm in Honda's/Acura's thrall. Before I saw the new RL, I was apprehensive. What if I didn't like it? I've waited patiently for nine years and never considered another badge! I was unable to picture myself driving a Lexus or an Infiniti, though I knew this exclusivity was wholly irrational. Is it the reliability factor? Are the interiors so compelling? - I don't think so. Then what? I'm still unable to distill my feelings and come to a simple understanding. Bottom line: I'm comfortable in my enslavement. -;).
"I sit in an Acura and it's like home"
(we drove to the theatre in the RL :P keeping with the forum subject matter.)
I never suggested that Honda is perfect, nor that they are better than other luxury brands. But I strongly disagree with your comment that they are an "Also Ran." I'm also not convinced that they absolutely must offer a V8 or RWD chassis to effectively compete, although such developments would be desirable and positive. But are they necessities? I wouldn't quite go that far.
I definitely foresee a RWD Acura sedan in the future, but I doubt Acura engineers are staying up nights sweating over that. Do you believe that Audi must also deliver a RWD chassis, and do you call Audi an "also ran?"
Let's just say we disagree on some basic points. And that's okay.
Re "Cinderella Man":
I received word Friday during my visit to the surgeon, that my brace is ready to come off and that the physical therapist can begin to wean, me though I need to wear it during the weaning process when she's not present. I've not been to the movies in ten weeks and look forward to rejoining the living and mingling with the crowd again. When I was ten, in 1935, I recall hearing the Braddock fight on the radio! and recall seeing the newsreel in our local movie house. I am looking forward to seeing Russell Crowe in action.
Ellen is driving us to NYC today to brunch with friends on Madison Ave. It's my first sojourn to the city, sitting in the front passenger seat. By the way, I couldn't find the gift certificate for that special DVD recording that you referred to. I do have the audio demo, but no coupon.
I hope that this finds you well, and that your recent scare is a thing of the past.
George