Options
BMW 3-series vs Lexus IS
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I've read a lot of comments (mostly non-favorable) about
the RFTs on the 3-series and how they probably won't
last very long.
How does that compare with the IS 350 tires? The Lexus
brochure has a disclaimer that says "Tires fitted with 17 or 18-in wheels are expected to experience greater tire wear than conventional tires. Tire life may be substantially less than 20,000 miles (17-in) or 15,000 miles (18-in), depending on driving conditions."
Any experiences with the IS 350 tires?
Comments?
Thanks!
Actually, since the purpose of this discussion is to compare the IS line with the 3-Series, the other place you posted is the right discussion to pursue this.
Here's a link: ilcgwbt, "Lexus IS 350 and IS 250" #6396, 26 Mar 2006 8:51 am
The redesigned 3 series has an appealing blend of sportiness and luxury. The rear seat is slightly roomier in the new sedan............................. The base engine is smooth, responsive, and fuel efficient. Handling is taut, agile, and fun. (Wow CR calling a car fun). The ride is compliant even with the run-flat tires. Some controls are overly complicated.
For the IS again quoting CR: ................. The new model has the interior ambiance expected in a Lexus. The rear seat is still very cramped though. Up to date safety equipment is standard, including stability control and curtain air bags. The 2.5 liter V6 is refined and gets good fuel economy, while the 3.5 is very quick. In our tests we found the transmission smooth, and the interior fit and finish was excellent. The ride, however, is jittery and handling is secure, but not sporty.
Seems like even Consumer Reports, which generally rates Japanese cars very high favors the 3 series over the IS at least when it comes to handling and ride.
I have no admiration whatsoever for CR, except for their views on ride and sporty handling :P
But I am sure the IS is a fantastic car also. You cant go wrong with the Lexus badge and 306 HP.
They liked the 3 series, as do most people, and I think most people enjoy the IS as well.
We may have our differences but we are all united with our love for sport sedans. In my case I will have to defer my love for a car that is neither from BMW or Lexus. My kids are already claiming to have backseat clausophobia in my BMW e46 so I am awaiting the introduction of the Infiniti G37(Infiniti G does have ample leg space).
Pardon me for sounding so domesticated but my wife loves minivans as much as I do so a minivan is definitely not going to be a part of our family fleet.
Therefore a G37 is our minivan compromise. Not a bad compromise at all IMO
One area in which it is hard to properly compare the cars is daily highway driving. Which car has a better suspension for isolating drivers from bad highways?
If the BMW has an advantage, would the Lexus have an advantage with tires that are similar to the BMW but 17 inch. Has anyone who has compared these cars extensively have an opinion. I believe the BMW has a slightly bigger wheelbase but obviously Lexus -- with the exception of the IS300 -- is more known for a more comfortable suspension then BMW. Short test drives from dealerships are hard to compare since you do not even drive on the same exact roads. And its obviously harder to test the IS250 with tires that are more geared to daily driving.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/sedans/reports/recommended-vehicles.htm
Neither. You want isolation, get a Buick, Camry or Avalon. If you want a sports/sporty sedan with good driving dynamics, steering and suspension feedback are an integral part of those good driving dynamics.
According to your link, the Porsche 911 isn't recommended either, but look what lists its on:
Most Reliable Luxury Cars
Highest Resale Values
And, did you notice that there isn't a single Lexus, but there are two BMW's on the highest resale value list. What's that say about which is better? (Answer: it's also only one data point to consider).
As for luxury cars...The least reliable luxury brands do not necessary have the lowest resale values. BMW and Mercedes are an example. In the luxury world, the companies with rich tradition like Mercedes and BMW still have an edge over Lexus. Anyway, I mentioned the link since someone brought up the CR's comments on 3-series & IS.
The same would apply to Lexus. While it's true that some BMWs have problems after the warranty period, so does Lexus. A brake job on a BMW isn't cheap, but neither is it on a Lexus.
My ideal car for daily driving would be a perhaps a foot longer then the new VW GTI with the DSG automatic that perhaps drove a little more aggresively then an Accord and had the interior luxury and reliability of a Lexus GS300.
I think you need to drive the 325i and IS250 over the "rough highways" yourself. One man's "bumps" are another driver's "feedback", so, as with a lot of things, it comes down to a subjective feelings and relative priorities.
I disagree. I know people who have dumped a lot of money into the Lexus and BMWs. I know people who have dumped little or no money into their Lexus and BMWs.
We can certainly start to cite on-off examples of this type of thing, but I do agree that statistically a Lexus will probably be more trouble free than a BMW, but that doesn't mean the BMW will cost a fortune or the Lexus will be trouble free.
I will try both over rough CA highways. I wish CA could learn to pave its highways like Florida...
Wrong. Just because you've got a friend of a friend who's had issues with one is no more relevant to your argument then the fact that the BMW I've had for 11 years now has cost me less than $1,000.00 in repair costs over that time. All you're doing by buying a Lexus is slightly improving the odds that you won't have a "trouble" car.
CR, which collects aggregated data on the subject, rates the 2003 BMW 3-series a 5 out of 5 in overall dependability*.
Your continuous and erroneous persistence that the 3-series is somehow unreliable is contradicted by CR and getting tiresome, to boot.
Besides, anyone that insists that reliability is that important a factor in a car purchase should avoid any car with an automatic transmission like the plague. (There's a whole industry built around repairing those things.)
*CR 3-series rating.
2003 BMW 3-Series 325i
12/08/2005
By: J from VA
Owned: 2 years
Review ID: #483171
7.9 Overall Rating
8 Styling
8 Performance
7 Interior
8 Quality
8 Recommendation
Pros:
The brand name BMW.
Cons:
We had some small problems with lights, steering, etc. Small things but we had to bring to dealer to fix. That's not quite pleasant. The car is noisy. Not powerful enough. Too expensive.
Overall Review:
Good car. But not excellent one. For the money you can have much better car out there.
----------------------------------------------------------
It might have to do with reviews like this, that give a car with several problems '8' for quality.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Date Posted
06/16/2003 Disappointed by Pathdoc
2003 Lexus IS 300
Style: 4 Dr STD Sedan Rating 7.6
Ratings Detail
Performance 8.0
Comfort 8.0
Fuel Economy 7.0
Fun-to-Drive 9.0
Interior Design 7.0
Exterior Design 7.0
Build Quality 7.0
Reliability 8.0
Rating 7.6
Review: Great handling. Needs more power. Disappointed by clunking noise when shifting 5 speed (District Operations Manager finally admitted a design flaw in dual plate flywheel) Quirky auto climate control searches for right cabin temp. Dealer service arrogant and indifferent. Not what I expect from Lexus! Now have a dashboard rattle
Favorite Features: Responsive handling. Don't see yourself coming and going.
Suggested Improvements: More power-30-50 HP. Redesign flywheel to eliminate noise. Smooth out climate control logic. Teach dealership what customer SERVICE should be.
-----------------------------------------------------------
See? Picking out a single review means absolutely nothing...
BUT! - I don't see too much in those reviews anyways because it is hardly a reliable way of judging a car's reliability out of ten. See what I mean? You helped me prove it!
NOTE: I did not mean to say that the BMW 3-Series was a car with bad reliability, but that the reviewer's car had bad reliability and did not deserve an 8/10 for quality.
NOTE: I did not mean to say that the BMW 3-Series was a car with bad reliability, but that the reviewer's car had bad reliability and did not deserve an 8/10 for quality.
I guess I'm still missing your point about how this is specific to a 3-Series.....
That IS 300 review complains about design flaw in the flywheel and a rattling dashboard. Yet they give Build Quality a 7/10?
Again, this is just one example, but people review any car the same way -- often times very "off" in their numerical vs verbal review.
My wife was a Lamborghini Murcielago and I was an RX-8 so it may be a little flawed :confuse:
Which Sports Care Are You
Me an RX-8, I dont think so?
Maybe the site is jointly funded by Lamborghini and Mazda?? :surprise:
Also the following survey question is more catered to one gender than another:
Do you like to go topless in the summer?
I re-post these comments below to support my argument that 2006 IS is a better built car than 2006 3-series in many categories. Please don't get me wrong...I am not saying 3-series has poor reliability but I can't be wrong to claim it has uncertain reliablity.
Customers Speak Out
Comments on this vehicle from our customers
Articles and reviews for the 2006 325i Sedan
Autobytel Consumer Rankings
This is how our customers ranked this vehicle. Maximum score is 100.
Average scores:
For the BMW 3 Series: 81
For all vehicles: 91
Detailed average score based on 5 reviews submitted for this vehicle.
Comfort: ( 80 )
Performance: ( 88 )
Quality: ( 64 )
Look: ( 92 )
View Customer Test Drive Reviews for this vehicle.
Submit a review for this vehicle.
General comments
"The car is very stylist,flashy,you can't beat the 4year 50,000 mile warranty on everything including normal wear parts such as brake pads,rotors and anything you can think. Good buy for the money."
Frederick S. (Memphis , Tennessee - January, 2006)
"Had to peel me out of the passenger seat the drive tore around hairpin turns and beyond jackrabbit starts, it was awesome! I'll probably never drive it that way but it is reassuring to know that it can handle fierce turnes and raging stops and starts!"
Chattaroy , Washington - September, 2005
"Okay so BMW is more classy than a Honda, VW, and what not (maybe?), but I have had serious problems with mine. Not just minor service requirments but major issues. I have had to have the car towed twice. The first because the car was shaking violently. They needed to replace the coils in the engine. That took a week and they did not have a loaner car for me. I had to rent one. Then it died on my in a parking lot and had to get a tow truck to the dealership. It was not the battery, they had to replace the fuel tank. Then a few months after that all the brakes had to be replaced. BMW is a great ride yes, but reliability no. "
Belmont , California - February, 2006
"The appearance of the car is beautiful and that's where it stops. The first thing you notice is the whiney transmission. It sounds like an old Ford pickup. The road noise is very loud. The car was using oil every 1200 miles and finally they replaced the engine at 10000 miles. I had the car back for two weeks and they had to replce the steering rack. I talked to BMW USA and asked that the car be replaced and they claimed that I should wait and see if other problems come up. Is this the BMW experience they talk about in their ads. The dealership has been very accomodating, but trying to get BMW to live up to commercials will not happen. This has been a horrible experience."
Nick C. (Valparaiso , Indiana - February, 2006)
"My new 2006 325i is spending it's 4th day in the service dept at BMW of Austin. The first time it was towed in, I had the harness replaced. My car suddenly died outside of Austin. Roadside assistance took 3 different tow trucks to get the car, because it locked up and shut down in park. Luckily we were on a dirt road, not the highway. The next visit was for an oil pressure issue. And it is back again for the same issue."
Austin , Texas - August, 2005
911 I told my wife in a few years maybe I can be my true self
I’m not sure if this is an in-depth Dr Phil psychological analysis, or it was created by some guy living in his parent’s basement either way it is kinda neat
That's news to me. Seeing as how I see a number of years that CR recommended and continues to recommend the 3 series.
That is exactly what I said, so I don't think you are missing the point, really.
The same thing was true of both reviews of both cars...
I don't know the real cause why CR did not put 3-series on its recommended models. This also surprises me.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/sedans/reports/recommended-vehicles.htm
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/vehicles-by-category.htm
But your right, the 3 series for this year, did not get the check. I wonder if it hurt sales? :confuse
From the Acura TL website - "suspension specifications":
Automatic
Front: 1.0 in. diameter (25.4 mm) x (4.5 mm)
0.18 in. wall thickness
Rear 0.67 in. diameter, solid (17.0 mm)
Manual
Front: 1.07 in. diameter (27.2 mm) x (5.0 mm)
0.20 in. wall thickness
Rear: 0.79 in. diameter, solid (20 mm)
Acura TL
Those differences are significant enough that Acura does not offer the Automatic with a high performance tire option. Those tires require a stiffer suspension so as to keep the tread flat on the road surface and avoid excessive wear of the edges. Something that Lexus engineers were out to lunch on when the former GS400 was offered with 17" performance tires on a soft suspension. Lexus ended up in at least one class action (a business colleage was a claimant) and gave out a large number of free (non-performance) replacement tires, plus a refund of the oxymoronic "sport" option. One would hope they learned that lesson on the IS, but they certainly don't follow BMW's mantra - "make the suspension faster than the engine".
Frankly, if you couldn't tell the difference in the driving feel, handling, body-roll etc. between a TL automatic and TL 6-speed, any opinions that you would have on Lexus vs. BMW driving dynamics have lost all credibility with me. I'd be the first to admit I can't tell the difference between a $8 and $80 cigar. But I could tell the difference between a TL automatic and TL 6-speed in a heartbeat. I don't try to opine on fine cigars....
Seriously, I own a TL 6-speed and a 911S Cab. After hearing all the rave reviews of the IS350, I did test drive one just out of curiosity. I have not driven the IS250.
If backseat size is not important to you, I would suggest comparing the IS250 (or 350) to the G35 coupe 6-speed. It has nearly 100 more horsepower than the IS250 and a sportier suspension than the G35 sedan, not to mention much better styling. I suspect the coupe might also have better resale than the sedan.
Good luck.