By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Question 1: Would anyone have links to photos that show the actual car in those colors?
Also, what are people's opinions regarding resale for cars with multiple color combinations (i.e. Titanium Gray w/ Chapparal leather, etc.)? I talked to a dealer and he said "the general rule is that a car with 2 colors (for instance, a red car w/ red/black interior) is fine but a car with 3 colors (like the example above) will usually sit. Of course, someone may just come into the dealer and jump on it because they love it, but generally speaking those are harder to re-sell (you may have to swallow an extra $500-$1500 at resale time). The "safest" triple combo is silver w/ red/black leather (like the S2000)."
Question 1: Is this a fair comment?
I don't like anything that has been done with the GTP in the last three years (or the new design coming up). I think all the BMWs, Audis, VWs, and Nissan Maxima and Altima are a little plain. The 350Z is a two-seater. I haven't been trading in because I basically couldn't find a car I liked...now I have.
Somewhat off-topic: I've looked at the Mazda Canada site and the car is selling significantly cheaper over there. Does anyone know how easy it is to jump the border and buy a car? What fees are involved with bringing it back?
Suit claims automakers, dealers conspired to stop Canadian imports
Lawsuits filed over auto prices
Car firms tried to kill exports, suit says
The actual lawsuit
1) The 350Z felt more raw and powerful
2) The RX-8 was more like a BMW 3-Series
3) These two cars are extremely different but both enjoyable in their own ways.
Would be curious as to whethers saw the article and their thoughts.
indirect, maybe...
Based on that, how common will the car be on the street by its 2nd production year?
Also, Big H, are you considering waiting for the 2nd prod year due to possible mech issues are you probably going to dive in?
I think I like that Winning Blue color the best - sense is that Nordic Green will be a little sedate for this type of vehicle. Titanium Gray is pretty nice as well w/ red/chap leather - gives it a real modern look.
My guess is that they will take care of their customers with deposits first.
damn real life interfering with my dream... >:(
Rest assured there are many things that can and will change/affect our lives over the next few years. Neither of us may end up buying the RX-8 or mabe we'll choose some other model (perhaps an RX-8 derivative). Oftentimes I think most of the fun is in the anticipation of buying - the looking around, test driving, reading, comparing, dreaming, and likewise. I bought a home less than a year ago (I used to work for Enron in Houston but relocated to Dallas) and spent about 6 months looking. Homes can be just as interesting. The main difference is that there are an infinite number of "models" out there. Take your time. The RX-8 will only get cheaper while you look for the home.
BTW agree that pinstripes ruin the intended looks of a car!
second year production 30,000 units and this includes a possible coupe and convertable.
first cars are expected to show up at dealerships in june-july of 2003.
guess who won? ;-)
here's the article, as kindly scanned by someone:
http://www.rx8forum.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2942
some performance numbers (for those that thinks numbers on paper are more important than driving dynamic as a whole) as tested by C&D on the RX-8:
weight: 2940 lbs. (lighter than a Boxter!)
skid pad: 0.91g
0-60mph: 5.9s
1/4 mile (everyone's favorite :rolleyes:): 14.5 @ 96mph
The RX-8 was not designed to be a drag car, obviously. A better indication of its real abilities would be a measurement of the speed it carries through turns (which is important when you have low torque).
This has been the trend for some time. Take a look at Edmunds' 2000 sport coupe comparo. Edmunds brought the cream of the crop of import coupes to do battle--RSX-S, Celica, Prelude, etc., and they all put up marvelous track times. Edmunds also brought along two similarly priced domestic V8 muscle cars for kicks, and those cars utterly destroyed the imports on a track. And no, it wasn't just drag racing. Unless one is driving 500 laps in a really tight circle (think Nascar but a 100 foot diameter loop) torque and horsepower still count for something.
So if the RX-8 is to be judged, it should be judged on its feel, its occasional grip on curves, its quality, its utility and its style. It shouldn't be judged on its track times or 0-60 times; it may not have the muscle to win the former and trying to win the latter will only result in a wrecked transmission.
That's not to say that Mazda is wrong to try the 4-door sports car concept, but I'm really hoping that a lighter, 2-door version comes out soon.
If you go on kazaa or something, you can download Japanese TV clips of top-end Japanese sports car reviews and races. Interestingly, in every one of those, the current RX-7 (still made in Japan) convincing wins every track trace, and it does so over the very best that Japan has to offer--NSX Type 0, Skyline GT-R, EVO7, etc.
LOL
nobody will buy the car unless it has the back doors.
In the 4-door configuration, it's a way for the Renesis to gain attention and acceptance in the marketplace, which will pave the way for the success of a more overtly sports-minded model.
It's intellectually dishonest to beat up the RX-8 for not being a "great sports car" when that was never the goal of the company that built it.
Regardless of those people who are anxious for a new RX-7, I think that Mazda is making the right move by builing the RX-8 first.
But making the rotary available in a 4-seat coupe opens up a much wider audience than a pure 2-seater. If the new Renesis can finally put to rest all of the perceived 'reliability' issues with rotaries, the RX8 may be the harbinger of a whole slew of new offerings.
http://www.canadiandriver.com/news/03images/cias2_rx8_xmen.jpg
Dinu
I was browsing around, and found this link:
http://www.akimitsu.net/index-en.htm
check out this guy Akimitsu's Spirit R!!!! :drool:
But at least Mazda will get some recongnition with a wide audience for making "cool" cars like the RX8 they saw at the movies.
Mazda can sure use all the "image" help they can get.
Dinu
There's a great write-up on the RX-8 in the April issue of Automobile mag. They compare it to the 330i and the 350Z. According to the article, the RX-8 is a real sports car, but not in the same way that the 350Z is. Also, the RX-8 is an legitimate 4-passenger sedan, but not in the same way as the 330i.
They complained about the lack of torque (duh), but quickly added that the engine is more tractable around town than the S2000's because of its eagerness to rev. This car is the real deal, folks.
it's a nation-wide autocrossing tour, using spec'd Mazda6's as competition cars. $39 gives you 4 laps of seat time around the course, and all the other activities at the event.
but what does this have to do with RX-8? Well according to the site's FAQ, the RX-8 will be shown at each and every Rev It Up event location!!!!
so if you haven't seen it, go sign up and check it out after you autocrossed the Mazda6!
this show is a 3-way comparison test pitting the Mustang SVT, the G35 Coupe, and the RX-8 against each other.
set your VCR/DVR!!!!
Dinu
Dinu
*drool*
drum roll.....
20.4 City/30.2 Highway
this is for the 6 speed version, the automatic version has very similar numbers...
With a huge clutch dump, they got 0-60 in 5.9.
A 'street smart' start of 5-60 (no clutch dump) netted 7.5 seconds.
I always got a chuckle about how much money some folks would spend on a car like a Firebird that was already overpowered to get that extra .2 off the 0-60, when they probably couldn't control the car anyway.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
You can't be serious right?
IMO, Most people are afraid to use the full potential of their cars (acceleration or handling). I recall reading in one of the car magazines about a test on perceived handling limits, and the average driver thought they were about at the limit at about .4 gs or so (guessing at the number, but way under the cars limit, since even a Camry can pull .76-,8 these days).
I don't have many chances to do a full bore standing start acceleration run, but do get to excercise my Maxima in the mid range every so often (merging or passing), and even that car will move quick without having to go over 4K, and once in a while 5K.
If you need more than 7.5 to get around, then get a different car
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
The problem with that is...thats not faster than most vehicles being built today. 7.5 is a poor accleration number to 60mph IMO by today's standards. Especially considering since honda accords, nissan maxima's/altima's, dodge neon turbo's, the list goes on would have an absolute field day against an RX8 in terms of rolling starts.
Then again...An RX8 owner (or leaser), could make a fool of himself revving his engine to 8k rpm and holding it there while waiting for the stoplight to turn green.
As far as your perception of people not reaching the handling limits of their cars, well...Couldn't the same be said about top speed?
If I see a guy flying through a 35mph limit S-turn at 80mph...well I sure hope he ends up in jail before he kills someone (No matter how performance oriented his car is). The same can be said for the idiot doing 140 on the freeways.
So tell me....why should the average joe be reaching the limits of his car?
The RX-8 is not a dragster. I doubt that most people who would seriously consider one for purchase would list 0-60 times as a priority. Besides, once the RX-8 gets past 6,000rpm in second gear, there won't be too many cars it can't pull away from. Throw in some curves, and the RX-8 should fairly vanish into the distance.
basically, Sport Compact Car Magazine put the press test car RX-8 on a dyno, and found that the auxilary ports on the intake did not open at 6250rpm to allow extra breathing, thus virtually 'choking' the engine from achieving full power!
having the auxilary ports not opening has a DRASTIC effect on the high-end power output of the engine. My 91 NA RX-7 had its auxilary ports (aka 5th/6th ports) stuck, and you can feel the engine 'choke' above 6000 rpm. Once I had the ports cleaned and opening again, the car pulls HARD after 6000 all the way to redline.
basically, assuming SCC is correct, I'd bet a FULLY OPERATIONAL RX-8 can knock maybe another 0.2-0.3 second off of its 0-60 time...
Or am I thinking of boy racer? ;D
I'm sure that's true. Although, most people interested in sports cars would rather that they not be designed with the bad driver in mind.
It seems that some people prioritize acceleration while others prefer being able to handle curves at higher speeds, to each his own. I doubt that one mindset is necessarily safer than the other. I personally enjoy both.