Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
This on top of their extreme lowball on my other trade in car put me back on my heels and into a very reasonable yet stubborn negotiation. I asked that they eat 50% of their invoice to MSRP markup and I threw in a $1000 cash in good faith that it would be some of their 4500 chance they were taking. No dice. The Sales Manager had nothing to offer. So I asked the obvious question, "Why are you employed today if you are sticking to the Salesman's offer?" You could be home sitting back making money if you are not here to make a simple deal. Needless to say, I requested all of the CARS paperwork, my copies of title, insurance proof and registration back from them. They had 1.5 hours invested in paperwork, I am an easy customer and a loyal honda owner (3rd time to this dealer) and they would not work with anything. So I lost 4500 in "free money" they lost a deal over a mere $750 for a loyal customer who put 200K plus on every honda I have had. But I think the principle of no customer loyalty, the fact that I paid "sticker" for my current civic and they know it....
I am now sitting here losing sleep because of how blatantly arrogant they were on the sticker price... And oh yeah to be told if the 4500 were not there, they would give me 1800 more on my trade pretty much sealed their fate.
Doubt they will call back tomorrow, if they do, the deal is now $1000 off sticker :-). Just for the fun of it. I can take my clunker, scrap it out for 500, take the 750 deal breaker, invest it back into my 200K miler and get another 150K out of it at 41 mpg. no sweat off my back, just wanted in on the fun of CARS....
Did I mention I would rather kiss a rattle snake than deal with Sales Managers? Salesmen are fine, they work for a living. Sales Managers are the irritating ones.
Haggle.
Gross oversimplification. As Tidester said, it takes both. The consumer has to agree first. Buyers started asking for better deals the minute the second dealer opened for business.
Tomorrow any dealer can end it by following the model of Fitzmall and others and just saying "no" to any offers other than their set price.
Yes they could, and probably go out of business shortly thereafter. Many have tried, but consumers are too used to shopping around, and no dealer can set his price low enough that it can't be undercut, even if only by a small amount.
Give me your email address so I can give you the dealer's name.
Please read my experience in my posting early this evening DEALERS DEFINITELY RIPPING OFF CONSUMERS IN THE CARS PRORAM
As of now the dealer still has my UNREGISTERED NEW CAR, and I happened to get the pink slip today that I never saw coming, so at this time I'm very disturbed and unsure it is a wise decision to carry a second car payment with unclear future ahead.
Can I get out of this deal? Can the loan be stopped?
Thanks for any input.
The 60s called, they want their haircut back. :lemon:
2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible
Not true. The system of haggling over price was a direct extension from the days when the main mode of transportation had feet rather than wheels. Why do you think they call it "horse trading"?
Back then a horse might cost a buyer close to a year's pay. Most buyers would do the same thing they do today, take it out for a test drive, look under the hood (check the teeth) and hook up the plow and check the towing ability.
When satisfied, the buyer would give a low ball offer ("Well Jeb, them withers look like they got some scuffs on 'em") and the salesman would try to to build value ( "Now look Cletus, you know this is our new one horsepower model. I ain't making no money as it is").
Modern car sales are just an outgrowth of that system.
2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible
Chrysler still lists $4500 off all their cars PLUS the C4C money. If I wanted to trade my pick-up I could have gotten $5500 more than I did on the wife's PT.
Of course the inventory is very low so your choice is limited.
2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible
If I had a clunker worth more than $1500 now, here's what I'd do. Private sale it. Put it in the local paper or on craiglist. With the C4C program taking a lot of the used cars off the market you old vehicle will find a home somewhere. It may take a month or two, but who cares? Inventories are low now, and you'll not likely find the new car you want anyway. In a few months, after this C4C mess is over, dealers will be begging for your business again, inventories will be back up, and you'll be able to negotiate a good deal and not have to worry with the C4C paperwork and the lingering though of (what if the gov't rejects my deal?).
I cant see blaming the White House specifically, but who ever is managing this program seems to be "sleeping at the wheel ".
If the bank has not yet paid out the cash then you may be able to cancel the loan given your circumstances.
tidester, host
SUVs and Smart Shopper
What a waste of money
tidester, host
SUVs and Smart Shopper
I negotiated the price before they knew I had a clunker. I was still eligible for all of the discounts that I would have without the clunker. My biggest gripe was that the dealership refused to give me the scrap value for my vehicle in addition to the regular credit. I say report them to CARS. The CARS website says that the dealers are required to still give you the traditional rebates in addition to the clunker credit.
the expectation that a customer can walk in and pay the dealer's cost
You wrote:
I hope your intent is not to attempt to perpetuate the mythology that the invoice prices, available here and many other places, represent actual dealer cost
Clearly it isn't, that's why I said dealer's cost and not invoice price.
This is a typical comment commonly made by those who were looking to "rob" car dealers back in the late fall / winter season when dealers were desperate. Those people held dealers at their mercy demanding thousands below invoice or there was no deal. Times are different now. The market is now different. The CARS program is doing what it was intended to do, stimulate new car sales! It has worked!
If you don't want to pay MSRP for a new car, then don't buy it!!!!
Right now, buying a new car is like paying $4.50 for gas last summer and paying high market price for your lobster dinner....gotta love Capitalism!
BTW, where's your birth certificate Mr. BRITISH rover?
My dog ate it.
No seriously he did. When we moved into our new house about three years ago now we had a lot of paperwork in file folders on the table.I was in the process of transferring them to a file cabinet upstairs and had left a few things on the coffee table. I came downstairs and their he there is shredded paper all over the place. Now my dog is usually a very good dog and never does anything wrong but he loves some crunchy thin cardboard or paperboard which is what the folder was made of.
He didn't care about the paper in the folder he just wanted the folder. The original copy of my birth certificate and some other paperwork was just collateral damage.
About a year and a half ago we took a vacation to Austin, Texas and I got another copy of my birth certificate from the state. They really don't let you have the original, original certificate only a certified copy of the original.
GP
I am not going to shed a tear over the 30 beat up explorers, winstalls and rusted out jeeps we have out back. I even like the jeeps but most of these, one of them actually looks ok, are rusted out no good trash.
CARS won't allow this type of trade. Dealer says we will have to have both our names on the title and will have to wait until October, when the vehicle will be registered for a full year in the same name to be eligible.
CARS won't allow this type of trade. Dealer says we will have to have both our names on the title of the new car, and also that we will have to wait until October, when the vehicle will have been registered for a full year in the same name.
HAHAHAHAHA!!!
Are you kidding me? Inventory was low already BEFORE the CARS program was even launched!
Please tell me how paying MSRP is "taking advantage of a customer"??? When you go buy clothes and see the price tag say "MSRP $45" for the pair of jeans you so desperately need, you do not take them to the register and say "I'll give you $25" do you? NO!
Remember, you are taking advantage of the Government giving out FREE money for your POS!
Why? They are privately-owned businesses and can decide when, whether, and how long they want to participate in this program. It is not greedy to expect to receive money they were promised, in the timeframe it was promised. It would be greedy for them to expect more than promised, or faster than promised.
Additionally, there's the question of cashflow and balance sheets. Business expenses & payroll checks still have to go out the door while these deals are on hold. It's not really fair to criticize without knowing how the delay impacts these dealerships.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
Let me explain paying MSRP only for the CARS beneficiary is taking advantage. A buyer without a clunker is given the usual discount. This usual discount is withdrawn if you have a clunker and you are entitled only for the CARS rebate. Isn't that discrimination for the CARS buyers who after all resurrected the dealers from near death. If this isn't clear enough, I don't know what will be.
That totally makes sense to me, but obviously it's against CARS rules. To some extent, I feel that the dealers are caught between a rock and a hard place. Yeah, I know there is not much sympathy for dealers.
The "scrap value" and "traditional rebates" are two totally different items. I believe the dealer is not required to give you the scrap value.
For Pete's Sake, you already got an over inflated value for you car to begin with. Why hassle over $100?
No need for my email address as I'm a long way away from you and don't really care about the dealer you dealt with. But my email address is always in my public profile.
And your credibility goes down when you can post the information here, have been asked by more than one person, yet still don't post it.
and the insurance paper that I went and retrieved from my agent. And they said everything was fine at the time. From what everyone is telling me the contract was based on the CARS deal and nothing else, so I should not be liable for any money should this fall completely through. But I'm trying to keep my new car. It just doesn't look like that will be the case. If anyone has anything else, let me know. Thanks for your help and imput.
tazman14
Well is that not the same thing now, do the market conditions not dictate the price?
You can't be a bunch of hypocrites and only stand behind your story and scream it from the roof tops when they suit you. I don't care how you spin it, this is exactly what you have all been saying since I have been a member here but now the tables have turned for a few months and all of the sudden nobody is talking about the market dictating the price.
Sure, they can. But they don't HAVE to. The beauty of the system is that if they feel that the program is benefitting them enough, they will "shut up" and continue participating. If it's not, they'll discontinue their participation. It's really that simple, and it comes down to their choice. None of the dealerships are obligated to participate.
I feel lucky to live in a country where the government largely allows businesses the opportunity to make such decisions.
In any case, this personal crusade against dealerships isn't appropriate for this discussion - this topic is intended for people who have questions about whether the program will or won't work for their situation. If you want to discuss the merits of the program itself, or whether dealerships should/should not be obligated to participate, there are a couple of other discussions on our Auto News board - just type "clunker" into the search box to locate them.
Continuing along this line of conversation in this topic isn't an option.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
Well, actually I was. I wrote that the current market should dictate a higher price. You were confused and thought me to be one of those "hypocrites" saying just the opposite. I say rake it in while you can. :surprise:
I am. I'm telling friends that this is a seller's market, that they should wait. Unless they actually have an 18 year old pickup lying around.
There's no need to do that. You can post the name of a dealership and the town. We only ask that you not provide contact information (names, phone numbers etc.).
tidester, host
SUVs and Smart Shopper
WASHINGTON – The Obama administration plans to end the popular $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program on Monday, giving car shoppers a few more days to take advantage of big government incentives.
The Transportation Department said Thursday the government will wind down the program on Monday at 8 p.m. EDT. Car buyers can receive rebates of $3,500 or $4,500 for trading in older vehicles for new, more fuel-efficient models.
"It's been a thrill to be part of the best economic news story in America," Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement. "Now we are working toward an orderly wind down of this very popular program."
Through Thursday, auto dealers have made deals worth $1.9 billion and are on pace to exhaust the program's $3 billion in early September. The incentives have generated more than 457,000 vehicle sales. Administration officials said they have reviewed nearly 40 percent of the transactions and have already paid out $145 million to dealers.
Administration officials said applications for rebates will not be accepted after 8 p.m. EDT Monday and dealers should not make additional sales without receiving all the necessary paperwork from their customers. Dealers will be able to resubmit rejected applications after the deadline.
President Barack Obama said in an interview Thursday that the program has been "successful beyond anybody's imagination" but dealers were overwhelmed by the response of consumers. He pledged that dealers "will get their money."
Dealers have complained of delays in getting reimbursed and backlogs of vehicle paperwork getting processed in the program. Dealers have said they face a risk of not being reimbursed but LaHood has pledged that dealers will get paid for the incentives.
The administration has said it has tripled the number of staffers sorting through the dealer paperwork.
ROFL
Doesn't sound like there has been anything orderly about it so far. :P
They won't have to wait much longer. CARS is over come Monday morning. My store is no longer accepting CARS deposits after 5pm today.
Odd that they picked a time that will be kinda in the middle of the busness day for car dealers in many areas. Midnight would have seemed to me to have made more sense.
Hopefully some "regular" buyers will hit the lots in the next few weeks otherwise many of the cars Toyota, Ford and Chevy are cranking out now will still be sitting on dealer's lots next August.
Oh well.......