Pontiac Bonneville

1626365676885

Comments

  • ezraponezrapon Member Posts: 348
    Maybe it never was all the way full? Does the pulley cause undue wear or stress? Probably no stress on internal seals in the lube end. A little extra RPM and boost wouldn't seem to cause excess oil consumtion. I would find out if there is a synthetic oil replacement. How hard was the checking process?
  • twobrownstwobrowns Member Posts: 52
    I usually trade about every two years before I have 50000 miles on my car. My 01 ssei bonn. has given me 47000 miles of trouble free enjoyable driving. I was shocked at the wholesale value when I considered trading on another bonn.Can you believe $13000.Car listed for $34000.Pontiac does have a 3000 dollar rebate which helps but maybe I should consider something that does not depreciate as much.My wife drives an avalon which I traded her camry on which was 3 yrs old at the time and only loss about 50% of its value in 3yrs.
  • smfransmfran Member Posts: 432
    You say the Bonneville listed for 34,000 and after 2 years and 47,000 miles was only valued at $13,000.00 in a trade. The Avalon you said was valued at 50%. Was that also of it's list? What were the miles on the 3 year old Avalon?
  • mfahey1mfahey1 Member Posts: 419
    was easy and done in about 2 minutes. It only took a 5/16" allen(curious in these metric imes) to loosen a small plug at the base of the extension. Now I wish I had done it sooner.
    A recent article in the paper said that used car prices had been dropping about 5% each year for the last 3 years, partly as a result of all the cars coming off lease and partly because of all of the incentives on new cars which has a corresponding effect on used values.
  • theicemantheiceman Member Posts: 736
    The "Fuel Used" is the next selection after "Fuel Range" on the DIC. At least it is on my '00 SLE. I reset the "Fuel Used" every time I gas up (you've got to hold the "Reset" button for a good 5 seconds). I am therefore able to compare what I pump into the car with what the Bonneville is measuring as the denominator in the mileage equation. As I suggested earlier, I've found about a 4% discrepancy between the two over time. As the DIC is reading 23.2 mpg since new (that is 55,000 kms), I multiplied the 23.2 by 0.96 - or 22.27 mpg.

    That's a good 10-15% better than my gutless Villager ever got - with the Bonnie being driven in a far more "spirited" fashion.

    ice
  • mfahey1mfahey1 Member Posts: 419
    That's interesting in that my DIC and I assume all of the American ones don't have that feature. Just interesting that the Canadian and American ones would differ in something like that.
  • ezraponezrapon Member Posts: 348
    Mark, what feature does your DIC not have? I have fuel used and fuel range on mine. Blue book on mine was (on the Kelly Blue Book site) 13 and change. Wow! last time I checked it was 19,000. My last couple of extended warranties have been GM and have worked perfectly They were, however quite pricey. Anyone had any luck with non-GM warranties?
  • tpkentpken Member Posts: 1,108
    Whogault I missed your question earlier - sorry. The Impala forum has a lot of posting activity relative to the intake manifold issue - someone there suggested that an antifreeze odor after driving is symptomatic of the leak. I haven't noticed that (yet).

    Trying to figure out what the sporadic noise is that I hear in the front end - clunking - sometimes when turning the wheel, other times just driving on secondary roads that may be a bit bumpy. I had the cracked windshield replaced about the same time as the pwr steering fluid filled - no more noise. I had thought it might be the intermediate steering shaft problem that plagues some GMs.

    Tires - Dan - are those Nokians all seasons or winter tires?

    Residual value - Yep - it really sucks! Glad I only paid $16K for my '00 SE as a 6 month old preowned - in fact it was 2 years ago this week that I bought the Bonne. It has 64K miles now and I doubt I get more than 8K for it in trade.
  • mfahey1mfahey1 Member Posts: 419
    Going by memory
    1. Average mpg
    2. Instantaneous mpg
    3. Distance to empty
    4. Battery voltage
    5. Tire pressure
    6. Oil life
  • evandroevandro Member Posts: 1,108
    I'd add gallons used up...
  • theicemantheiceman Member Posts: 736
    The Nokians are all season performance tires that are also rated as winter tires - so much so, they bear the "Severe Service" emblem. Read on: Nokiantires.com: Severe Service

    Sounds too good to be true, doesn't it? A V-rated performance tire which is quiet, has long life expectancy AND is also an excellent snow tire. I still have my doubts and will withhold my unequivocal endorsement until they've seen 2 winters but so far, I am simply amazed: We've had a number of small snowfalls over the past two weeks and these things have just chewed them up. Ice? No probs. Wet? ditto. Dry? They excel.

    This link provides a good look at their rather unique tread: Nokian WR

    Until I find reason to think otherwise, I've become a convert.

    ice
  • theicemantheiceman Member Posts: 736
    Could we possibly have a few anomolies out there?

    Mark, mine doesn't show voltage - but then I have a gauge for that - where I believe the boost gauge is located on an SSEi. Do you not have a voltage gauge on your dash as well?

    ice
  • evandroevandro Member Posts: 1,108
    AFAIK, the SSEi has a pressure gauge instead of the voltmeter in the instruments cluster, thus it was moved to the DIC. However, I wonder if the voltmeter then replaces the gallons used in the DIC or is rather added to the list of measurements in the DIC...
  • theicemantheiceman Member Posts: 736
    That substitution would make sense - your first suggestion is what I was guessing. If so, it's too bad - although the "Fuel Used" on its own is a rather useless number, it does help to calibrate the mileage calculator - as I have done. Still, I wouldn't pass up an SSEi because of its absence...

    ;-P

    ice
  • ezraponezrapon Member Posts: 348
    I guess I got lucky, my DIC has it all: instant MPG, overall MPG, volts, fuel used, distance till empty, tire pressure, and oil life. The fuel used is fairly accurate if I don't top it off. I briefly looked at Firebirds this fall, lack of the DIC was one factor against the buy.
  • mfahey1mfahey1 Member Posts: 419
    Ladies and gentlement, I have seen the absolute ugliest car I have ever, ever seen. If you thought the Aztek was butt ugly, it had absolutely nothing on the Honda Element. Words cannot possibly describe how bad it is.
    BTW, no fuel used on my DIC. My car was made relatively early in the model run if that has any effect. If I'm not mistaken, Rod's car is a 2000 and he has it. Very odd, indeed.
  • evandroevandro Member Posts: 1,108
    I do recommend those with some spare time to check out these videos from Detroit Auto Show about future products:

    - http://webevents.broadcast.com/gm/concept2003

    - http://webevents.broadcast.com/gm/cadillac2003

    - http://webevents.broadcast.com/gm/atpv2003

    - http://webevents.broadcast.com/gm/chevrolet2003
  • mlm4mlm4 Member Posts: 401
    My SSEi, built in February 2000, does not have fuel used on the DIC either. Just instant MPG, average MPG, distance to empty, volts and oil life and tire pressure monitor. What's the deal here?! Is "fuel used" described in the owner's manuals of those who have it? 'Cause it's not in mine...
  • smfransmfran Member Posts: 432
    My SSEi, built in March 2000 has the following:

    Ave. Fuel Economy
    Instant Fuel Economy
    Fuel range
    Fuel Used
    Oil Life
    Battery Volts
    Tire Pressure

    Stephen
  • mfahey1mfahey1 Member Posts: 419
    I bought my car in February of 2000(can it really be almost 3 years old?) so production date was obviously on or before. What is even more interesting now that we are diving into minutia is that the DIC crapped out a few months after I bought the car. They put a new DIC in that they ordered and this is what I got with no fuel used.
    What do you think? Class action lawsuit to make me comfortable the rest of my life for the pain and suffering in not having a fuel used readout? Actually, it would have really come in handy this fall during my last trip to Maine. I was really, really pushing it in New York to get to a particular gas station and managed to run out of fuel about 3/4 mile before the station. The DTE is of only limited usefulness in a situation like that in that it is based on the last 25 miles of driving which may or may not be a good indicator of current consumption.
  • h101h101 Member Posts: 62
    Our 2000 SSEi, built in late 1999, has no fuel used readout on the DIC... but since the car has been flawless for for 3 years now... I'll forgive it :)

    Bill, Madison, WI
  • tpkentpken Member Posts: 1,108
    Dan - Thanks for the link. Looks very interesting. I'll start checking the ara here for availablility and pricing. Whenever I get to the point that I jst can't stand these Aquatreads anymore I'll consider those for sure. These tires I bought a year ago have turned out to be a definite mistake.
  • theicemantheiceman Member Posts: 736
    I'm interested ken - please provide details.
  • whogaultwhogault Member Posts: 27
    Okay. I bought the 2000 SSEi because I really had tremendous respect for the 94' se I had been driving for the previous 3 years. The 94' is VERY roomy, the 3.8 litre bulletproof and able, and the ride satisfying and comfortable. I wanted to get a more luxurious, fatser, better looking vehicle ( at the time, business was better than it is now-but that is another forum) and I fell for the 2000. Being 6'4" and 275lbs, with more legs than torso, finding a car today that is comfortable, does not have a center console that cuts into the right side of my right knee, and will fit the rest of my family if need be, 17 yr old at 6"5", 13 yr old at 5'11" and a wife at 5'10 is quite a task. Even though the SSEi did not really fit because both knees get sore, I bought it. While there are many, many aspects of the driving experiance I like, I have had problems which have been chronicled in this forum.
    I just test drove a Nissan Murano. Wish it was a choice two years ago! This vehicle is a beast. It was equiped very similarly to my full boat SSEi. Leather, power this and that, bose stereo, etc. It is as fast as the SSEi 0-60, ie., mid-7 seconds. It has what I would subjectively call "50%" more room for the front seat passengers. My knees touch NOTHING on either side. The rear seat passengers have an equal amount of "more" space and the seats recline wayyyy back for snoozing. My head does not hit the roof on slight bumps. The rear compartment is twice as big as the SSEi's trunk, and if need be the rear seats fold flat for about 80 cf of space, which as an unfair comparison, no sedan can do. The tranny, a CVT, is smooth and gets the most out of the engine, always shifting to keep the engine in the meaty part of the power band. MPG should also be better by a couple miles in each category if Nissan is to be belived. Will it be problemless? Who knows? It is fair to compair a sedan to an SUV? Maybe not. But if you want what I want from a vehicle, comfortable space, 5 passenger capabilities, power enough for a fun ride, handling to make driving interesting and interactive, utility to be more when needed, economy ( a relative term, no?) and reliability, then perhaps so. If I followed my own advice to friends and family, I would have gotten a mini-van like my wife drives. Overall best use of space on the planet! But after all, I am still a child......
  • theicemantheiceman Member Posts: 736
    Minivans make a lot of sense - it is a good use of space for many people. For many, though, it means a lot of extra weight and interior space which has to be pulled around and maintained - for a functionality that sees limited use.

    If you're a family of five with kids in the teen years, I'd say that a minivan is getting darned close to essential.

    I just can't like them. I had a '95 Villager which was problematic (and the problems - including tranny - came from the Nissan rather than the Ford components). I probably would have lived with the problems if I had loved the vehicle - I never did. It was a practical family hauler that was useful when the kids where newborns and visits to the inlaws meant packing strollers, diapers and collapsible playpens. As soon as those days were gone, I bought a sedan again - my current '00 SLE.

    A minivan or an SUV are different types of rides compared with cars. We each have our own preferences and needs vis-a-vis appeal, handling, performance, comfort, fuel economy, affordability, dependability, utility, garage size constraints, etc. Each car out there represents a compromise on these. For me a large car represents the compromise that currently best suits my preferences.

    Currently.

    ice
  • theicemantheiceman Member Posts: 736
    I've been intrigued by the Murano but have not yet seen one up here - let alone sat in one. One question I do have (and I realize this isn't a Nissan board) is about the visibility out the rear. Any comments?

    ice
  • tpkentpken Member Posts: 1,108
    Whogault - We have both a 2000 Bonneville SE and an older (95) Suburban. Teenagers closing in on 6 feet sure need their space and the cargo room makes travelling with lots of luggage very easy. Gas mileage is of course the downside, so whenever it's just my wife and myself plus perhaps 1 or 2 kids we'll opt for the Bonneville. That 9 passenger SUV sure comes in handy though when more family or friends are coming along. The towing is another thing I needed and get from the Suburban. IT's nice to have both.

    That Murano is a looker! I could see one of those in the driveway after we get the kids up and out!
  • tpkentpken Member Posts: 1,108
    Ice - the Goodyear Aquatread IIIs have not worn all that well. There is some feathering that has produced a vibration. It has been fine for the last 6K miles since rotation of the feathered fronts to the back and now it's time to move them back. I'll let you know the result. Perhaps the rear wear has straightened them out? We'll see.

    Traction on wet has been as good as I expected and dry handling good as well. The winter driving on snow was fine last year but now, 25K miles later is another story. They definitely will have to be replaced before next winter - after all they'll have 40K+ on them by fall.

    Road noise (slight hum) at highway speed is sometimes noticeable and the gas mileage suffered 2 mpg or so compared to the trashy OEM Firestone Affinities.
  • ezraponezrapon Member Posts: 348
    Mark, my 2000 was delivered early 2000. I have the extended DIC, but no On Star. I wonder if there is a correlation. I guess we will never solve the DIC mystery. I hope this doesn't develop into full blown DIC envy! I saw a Murano here this week. It had manufacturer's plates. I don't know if they are in the showrooms or not.
  • theicemantheiceman Member Posts: 736
    It's been darned cold so far this month and there's no end in sight - odd, as we normally get a mid-January thaw up here. We're talking overnight lows approaching -30°C (even colder with the wind chill) and today's high is a balmy -20°C (that's -4°F for most of you).

    I've had to park the Bonneville outside a few times recently - overnight once and a couple of times for a complete working day. Because I typically park indoors (heck, I've never used the block heater!), I was concerned that I had overpampered the thing. Nothing doing - the Bonnie has started smartly each time. Perhaps locating the battery under the rear seat has something to do with it.
     
    Any other cold weather experiences?
  • mfahey1mfahey1 Member Posts: 419
    At work, this site comes up perfectly normal but all of a sudden, the bookmark on our home computer no longer works and the site looks like it is italicized 4 point font. Anyone with any suggestions?
    I want my daily fix of Edmunds.com this weedend.
  • theicemantheiceman Member Posts: 736
    Hard to know. Does your computer have the block heater?

    >:)
  • smfransmfran Member Posts: 432
    It's cold here in Boston too and when the overnight temps drop below 15F, my DIC shows "Service Theft System" when first starting up in the morning. I push the "select" button and the message disappears until the next time the car is left in the extreme cold for an extended period of time.

    As I stated earlier, my DIC from early 2000 has fuel used. I do not have OnStar.
  • smfransmfran Member Posts: 432
    I'm considering the GMC Envoy to replace my Bonneville in May. Is the Murano a similar vehicle and in the same price catagory?
  • regfootballregfootball Member Posts: 2,166
    I had eagle aquatreads on my old SHO

    fabulous tire.....excellent wet traxion...snow or rain,

    as long as you had tread left. Mine only went about 30k miles before the tread was gone.
  • smfransmfran Member Posts: 432
    I noticed the Murano is featured on the Edmunds home page. I can't consider it vs. the Envoy because it is much smaller. Besides, when I showed it to my wife, she did not like the looks. Plus, I'd be hard pressed to leave GM and especially my Pontiac/GMC dealer. They treat me like a valued customer at all times and are extremely cordial.
  • mfahey1mfahey1 Member Posts: 419
    Computers. Can't live without them and can't live with them. I'm on our other computer at home which is Windows based using IE and this site works fine. Our Mac is only acting up on the Edmunds site, both the Bonneville one and the Caravan one. It was so bad, I thought I could just make out a crack about a block heater so I figured I had to try the other computer to see if my eyes were deceiving me.
    I was watching Car and Driver this afternoon when they were at the SEMA show. The editor was practically drooling over the GXP and said he couldn't wait to get his hands on one. The one on TV was a gorgeous charcoal metallic that might just look even better than black.
  • richm4richm4 Member Posts: 169
    Maybe it's my imagination, but when I was looking at a side view of it in one of the car mags, for just a second, it somewhat resembled a stretched out AMC Gremlin.
  • scscarsscscars Member Posts: 92
    Richm4, glad to see that you noticed the Murano's resemblance to the 70's-era Gremlin too. I saw an orange Murano last Friday at a Chicago-area restaurant and the rear C-pillar had that J-shaped sweep that reminded me of the Gremlin I drove in college 27 years ago. The Murano is a very unusual looking SUV, although I would think Nissan enthusiasts would think it looks like an SUV version of the 2004 Maxima from the front. It also seemed quite short in comparison to my '02 SLE.
  • theicemantheiceman Member Posts: 736
    I was noting recently that my cupholder holds coins (we have larger $1 and $2 coins here in Canada) and my cel phone adapter. Now that my wife and I aren't commuting together (I'm not a coffee drinker), I no longer find the Bonnie's front cupholders to be irksome. In fact, it's absolutely perfect for the extra-long coil of the adapter.

    We've had one of those windshield fluid Januarys: a number of small snow falls requiring the salt/sand trucks to be out almost constantly. I saw this premium-priced -45°C teflon based fluid formulation. It claimed less streaking, faster evaporation, faster melting of ice, etc. so I bought it. It was horrible - it left a streaky film that at night would diffuse the lights of oncoming cars to the extent that my visibility was impaired. After a couple of days I pumped it out of both my and my wife's cars and went back to the -40°C stuff we usually use.

    Just a warning - in case you see similar stuff on the market where you are.

    ice
  • smfransmfran Member Posts: 432
    I've found that the cheapest windshield washer fluid you can find works best. This may be one of those cases were you can not reinvent the wheel!
  • theicemantheiceman Member Posts: 736
    I tend to agree - but I have to get the -40°C stuff up here because if it's -25°C outside and you're doing 100 km/h, the wind chill effect renders the -30°C stuff useless.

    Heck, I can remember when -20°C fluid was the standard winter stuff and the -30°C stuff was premium.

    Thank the powers that be for that change.

    ice
  • yoggieyoggie Member Posts: 1
    Has anyone out there bought the 2003 Bonneville?
    I'd appreciate hearing what you have to say about it... (I'm considering purchasing the SLE in the next six weeks or so)

    Thanks...
  • tpkentpken Member Posts: 1,108
    I'm driving to the Valley Forge Pa area tomorrow for an overnight and all day training on Wed at our corp HQ. Haven't had the Bonneville on an extended trip for FAR too long! Can't wait to head out tomorrow.

    I was going to get the tires rotated but have decided to wait until I get back as I do not want to encounter increased vibration for the trip. It's riding great right now and I don't want to be kicking myself for screwing up a good ride this week. These Aquatreads have about 26K on them now but still sufficient tread for wet weather although the snowy rides are less controlled now. Thankfully the Suburban is a champ at that stuff!
  • mfahey1mfahey1 Member Posts: 419
    I have been a long time subscriber to CR and have always found it helpful when considering the purchase of items about which it would be nearly impossible to uncover useful information about prior to the purchase. That said, I am really disgusted about the February comparison between the Avalon, Park Avenue, Town Car and Grand Marquis.
          The article simply isn't an apples to apples comparison and to me, smacks of bias on the design of the comparison. Among the items that CR takes into account are price and fuel economy. Why would you then compare the NA Avalon to the supercharged Park Avenue? Why would you compare the Avalon to cars that cost as much as $20,000 more? If they had compared a NA LeSabre to the Avalon, instead of the Buick getting only 1 mpg better fuel economy, it would have been 2-3 and the price gap would have been far less, making the Buick that much more competitive. I would maintain that someone buying a Park Avenue or Town Car is not looking for the same things that an Avalon has, not that any of them are bad cars. Reward the Avalon for the things it is good at such as reliability and fit and finish but give credit where credit is due to the Buick for fuel economy and decent reliability.
         I may just do something I have never done before and write a letter to them complaining about the bias of the test. Anyone else see the article and have a similar reaction?
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,701
    I quit reading consumer reports as a serious source long ago when I figured out if it's good, cheaper to buy parts for, costs less to have the dealer replace it, and originates with an American name company, consumer reports doesn't like it as well. They complained about the side vent glass blocking vision on LeSabre; they loved the Odyssey by HONDA which had the same style of vent with an extra piece blocking vision. Never mentioned the extra block to vision.

     I send in their free trial offers and cancel upon first billing every time I get one. That take them 3 or 4 issues to get it cancelled out of their system. That's the best way I know to hurt them.

    I do explain their bias to others as much as possible, including the bias in their subscriber-reported used car ratings.

    I'll look for their slant in the article. Thanks for mentioning it.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • ezraponezrapon Member Posts: 348
    Checking the resale and trade in value (via MSN's Kelly Blue Book) of a 2000 ssei was disappointing to say the least; it was about 4 grand lower than a local Kelly Blue Book site. Interesting, it listed the SLE at about 2 grand more than the SSEi. That can not be possible...can it?
  • smfransmfran Member Posts: 432
    Although I agree with mfahey's comments, I must state that my 72 year old father traded his 2000 NA Park Ave. for a 2002 Avalon and likes it much better. The overall quality and fit and finish are superior. He has not owned a non GM car since 1968 and wonders why he did not consider an Avalon ( or Cressida) years ago.
  • tpkentpken Member Posts: 1,108
    What a great drive! The Bonneville was flawless the entire trip of 800+ miles with 67K now on the ticker. Gas mileage isn't what it used to be (ave 25 mpg at normal speeds of 75-85) but that is largely the tires. The pickup is still fantastic and there were no issues of any kind the entire trip. Had it briefly up to 90 without realizing I was going that fast then backed it down to 75 again (reluctantly). Yep - I still love my Bonne!

    I know - it's amazing I haven't gotten a ticket!

    Now back to w**k (sigh)
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,701
    Could some of the drop in mileage be due to winter formulation gasoline with
    its higher volatility for easier starting in winter but less btus and lower mileage?

    Didn't you mention in an earlier post about rotating your tires before the trip?
    How many miles do you go between rotating the tires?

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.