Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Evantodd, what do you think? Is there any way you might have copied gardyloo's message and posted it without realizing it?
Let me know.
I am looking for a 325xi and having a hard time finding my colors with black leather. I am now most likely waiting for 2004.
1) Have you had a chance to run them on full-soft settings yet? If so, how does the handling/ride compare to stock setup?
2) How difficult is it to make the stiff-soft adjustments? Can it be done one corner at a time or do you need to lift both fronts/rears at one time? Can ramps be used or must the tires be off the ground?
3) How many settings are there between full soft and full stiff?
thanks!
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
$30900
Should I pull the trigger and offer $30k, or wait for a better deal?
-tony
Just in general, I'd start them out around $27k to 28K on an offer.. You'll never know how low they might go, if you offer higher. Is this a BMW dealer or private party?
Good luck,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
http://www.autovisuals.com/
Have not ordered any from them yet, but it looks interesting...
The paint seems on par with traditional oem touch-up, and the pen is a marginal improvement for those of us (like me) who are useless with brushes. I have only used the red pen to date.
2) How difficult is it to make the stiff-soft adjustments? Can it be done one corner at a time or do you need to lift both fronts/rears at one time? Can ramps be used or must the tires be off the ground? ==> Adjustment is very easy as long as you can get underneath the car. One corner at a time should be OK but using jack stands or a ramp would be easier of course. The tires don't have to be off the ground.
3) How many settings are there between full soft and full stiff? there are 3 settings on each end link for the fronts and 2 on each end link for the rears. You could go stiff on one end and soft on the other, so that gives you a medium position as well, so you could say that there are 3 settings in the rear.
One of my driving school instructors and club race winner told me that if I make one change to the suspension, it should be the sways. I love the way the car handles but just like any mods, it is a tradeoff. I noticed a clunking/squeaking noise while turning the wheel at parking lot speeds today, so I'll have to check tomorrow if something needs to be tightened up.
BTW, thanks for the swaybar answers.
This guy though (much like one of my exes) has this ability to see all the cars on the road, judge distance and as if he were in a maze weave, jut, cut, pounce and jet through traffic at uncanny speeds. Times when I've tried to tail him through San Diego I arrive at our destination feeling like I need a shower and a Jack & Coke (I don't drink at all!). If I just stick to my laid back but swift approach I usually arrive at a destination 15 miles away at least 10 minutes after him. Yes, speeds in excess of 100 are not uncommon with him.
In the time I've known him he's never had an accident and swears he only had one about 15 years ago when his passenger mirror clipped a low hanging portion on the back of a semi. The semi didn't notice or slow, so it's not even on his record. He knows the edges of his car perfectly today and can squirt through spots without a hint of hesitation.
The only thing that really endangers him are the people who hit their brakes when he's coming up behind them. If people wouldn't brake when a car approaches from behind at a good clip I'd probably be more inclined to weave and bob through traffic. But the mercurial, skittish nature of drivers makes slaloming too dangerous. It's the paranoid that fear their cars and others that ruin the roads in all manner of driving in my opinion.
btw, is the Yoda Driving School a CCA sponsered event? hahaha
During high school a bunch of us had a 45 mile roundtrip from our area to our school. One of the guys had this Dodge Dart (the Hyper-Dart we called it) and he'd simply appear and disappear along the route. We all said Matt attended the Yoda School of driving as he never appeared to be rushing, slowing, stopping or doing anything beyond moving in and out of our field of vision. You'd see Matt on the freeway, then he'd be gone. Then you'd see him on a surface street and just as quickly he'd turn down some random street not to be seen again until you pulled up behind him at the light to turn into the school parking lot 6 miles later.
I would like to think this is cool to do, but driving in a such a way that puts other drivers at risk is simply not to be condoned. People who dart in and out, cut people off, hit the brakes after cutting one off, weaving, are dangerous and aggressive acts that I am sure is a leading contributor to traffic accidents. How many semis do we all say tailgating at 70?
BTW using your directional does not automatically give one the right to complete the lane change or turn.
OBTW, the BMW rechargeable flashlight sure came in handy last night!
"...as he never appeared to be rushing, slowing, stopping or doing anything beyond moving in and out of our field of vision."
I would like to think this is cool to do, but driving in a such a way that puts other drivers at risk is simply not to be condoned. People who dart in and out, cut people off, hit the brakes after cutting one off, weaving, are dangerous and aggressive acts that I am sure is a leading contributor to traffic accidents. How many semis do we all say tailgating at 70?
The Matt guy never did that - he drove like a Taoist wants to live - just constantly flowing. My former co-worker was never a cut-off or brake hard person either. He is one aggressive, white-knuckler, but yet he does it in a flowing fashion.
BTW using your directional does not automatically give one the right to complete the lane change or turn.
If there's room and you're not gonna force the drive to brake it sure does. anyone who is going faster than me is more than welcome to slip between the 7 foot gap between my front bumper and back bumper of the car in front of me.
I still strongly believe it's the nervous nellies who cause the most commotion on freeways and streets. Braking when a car approaches you from behind is just plain stupid. Getting onto a freeway at less than the speed limit is likewise selfish, irresponsible and stupid. People driving 70 or under in the fast lane qualify as absolute idiots. If only I had a .50 caliber that could pop out of my moonroof...ahh. Rubberneckers would get some lead too. Nobody else's business what happened with cars or the people in them after a crash - just keep going.
Oh my, I hit a rant. sorry.
/rant on
I see people who flow - they just move around with the traffic never hitting the brakes. However, most flowers just get in front of me long enough to leave 1/4 car length between my front bumper and their rear bumper - going at 65. No matter how much room they have in front of them. They take advantage of an opportunity and the driver in back of them be damned. Moreover, people just turn on their blinker and go. The correct series of events is: look and see if safe and there is ample room so you can yield by law to oncoming traffic, turn on blinker, flow into other lane. However flowers follow this sequence: turn on blinker, flow into other lane, thereby causing the driver you just cut off to apply the brakes; move into other lane.
Most accidents are caused by aggressive driving behaviors and flowers are aggressive as they have no regard for the person in back. Those who had regard wouldn't flow and would change lanes only when safe. By definition a flower puts everybody at risk. You cannot convince me if people left the requisite amount of room between vehicles at high speed and drivers respected each others space, most car crashes would be avoidable.
And yes, I get very nervous when a flower cuts me off at 70 and is so close I can read the head unit on his radio through his rear window. So I step on the brake to put some distance between the cars and a chain reaction starts.
/rant off
I believe that keeping a safe distance between cars is crucially important for safety. There is no safe way to follow a car going 70+ mph just 7 ft in front. If you slot between cars, you have to take into consideration that the person behind you would like to keep a safe distance (that is called courtesy) and by slotting 5 ft in front of them, you'd be jeopardizing their safety and yours.
Lets see now, if I go 60, I can cover 15 miles in 15 minutes. If someone gets there ten minutes ahead of me,he/she covers 15 miles in 5 minutes. So, he/she must average 180 miles an hour along his/her journey. But wait, if I go 80 mph, I get there in only 11.25 minutes- so that means the person I'm following and who will always get there 10 minutes ahead of me gets there in only 1.25 minutes. That puts him/her at an average speed of 720 miles per hour- assuming 100% freeway driving of course. Wonder what rating his/her tires are...hmmm.
Seriously folks, where I drive there are only 2 lanes going in one direction and I see too many speed bullies who zoom off the on ramp and accelerate just so they can tailgate the minivan doing 70 that got in the fast lane to pass a truck going 55.
no because you're forgetting city driving too. On a surface street with 3-4 lanes on each side many people treat it like a freeway, even if the limit is 35 or 40. On city streets he'll turn down residentials, run yellows and generally moves at about 70-80 mph. You run one or two yellows and in san diego hellish traffic that means you've saved a good 5-6 minutes (sometimes longer) right there.
Yeah, yeah all the holier-than-thous can moan and groan about the dangers of running yellows. Sorry, don't buy it. Never will. I've been driving for 19 years and I've even been in a car that was t-boned by a yahoo who ran a red (he claimed he didn't realize it was red which is possible given that weird intersection), yet i'm infinitely more afraid of the person who continually taps his brakes than I am of some kid whipping down the road in his Civic.
In my experience whenever I see an accident it's because somebody wasn't paying attention or somebody freaked out and did something stupid.
What holier than thou attitude? You mean the one where one aggressive driver can kill a family of four because the aggressive driver needed to get someplace one minute sooner. That holier than thou attitude? As far as the person who continually taps their brakes, if one doesn't tailgate it becomes an annoyance seeing brake lights, rather than an imminent danger of a collision.
Sorry blueguy, I don't buy the story that it is possible to drive in a safe manner while being aggressive, tailgating, weaving, not safely yielding to the flow of traffic in other lanes, and going at speeds far and away are above the general flow of traffic, putting everyone at risk.
At least with a BMW you have the potential to stop swiftly should you need it.
And of course we have the "pull out in your lane to block you so they can get out" move! You'll get cut off left and right if you don't watch yourself. Oh yeah, and then, these same discourtesy road warts will STOP abruptly when you would expect it...WHY, you may ask? ...because
they want to be "courtesy" and let someone out of side driveway, street... causing a sea of brake lights and nose dives behind. So,if any of you guys are bored with your local drivers, come on out and you too can work on your motorcross skills and avoidance techniques. The scary thing is that sometimes I do something like "they" do and I say, "Oh my God, I am turning to one of them! When I first moved here I was also ticked off at a driver some move. Then after learning the local "customs" I no longer get upset or increase my blood pressure when I have a "maneuver" pulled in front me.
Bad things happen. If the family of 4 gets clipped, spun and sent into a Jersey wall because dad felt it was his "right" to do 70 in the left lane and he refused to move into the safe right lane when a faster car approached and blinked its lights...no sympathy. Drivers who pay attention don't hog lanes.
That holier than thou attitude? As far as the person who continually taps their brakes, if one doesn't tailgate it becomes an annoyance seeing brake lights, rather than an imminent danger of a collision.
Imminent danger of a collision? If you're approaching someone from behind at a faster rate and said person brakes, what happens now? They've now endangered themselves because your speed differential is greater. It's typical on freeways and annoying. "Huh, BMW coming up behind me fast, I know I'll brake so now he's coming up even faster - yeah this can only help matters."
Sorry blueguy, I don't buy the story that it is possible to drive in a safe manner while being aggressive, tailgating, weaving, not safely yielding to the flow of traffic in other lanes,
Yielding to the flow of traffic - ie, nobody needs to hit their brakes. If someone slides into your lane be it 20 feet in front of you or 12 inches, if they're going X miles per hour faster than you, then you will not need to ever get near the brake as the person moving in front of you won't disrupt your flow.
This goes for merging onto the freeway, turning right on city streets, etc. The object isn't to simply get into a lane but to do so without causing any other driver to ever accelerate or decelerate because you've made your move.
How can you call it disruptive if the person NEVER impedes your way? Now if some idiot jumps into your lane 40 feet ahead but he's only doing 55 in his Expedition, he is disrupting the flow of the lane.
and going at speeds far and away are above the general flow of traffic, putting everyone at risk.
If done correctly, the other drivers are not hassled in any fashion. As I've said before someone can slip into my lane if they're going faster than me. I won't get agitated because I don't have to brake or change my flow because of their decision.
We view this very differently. I drive with two things in mind. 1. Don't get in anyone's way that wants to go faster - thus if i'm doing 80 in the fast lane and I see the lights of a car approaching from behind I will move to the right at the soonest opportunity. 2. Noboby else should stand in my way either. If someone wants to do 70 on the freeway, god bless em, just have the courtesy to move if a faster car approaches. But silly me, that's expecting drivers would pay attention, heed to faster traffic and respect the actions of fellow drivers.
You know what puts a smile on my face? It's late at night, i'm kicking it on a drive home. i see a pair of lights zipping up. I ease to the right and the car roars by me. Ahead I see another person in the left lane also slide over. The guy procedes, never having to change his speed. I continue to see this for a mile ahead until the speeder disappears for good over the horizon. That's nice. That's the way it should be. But I know eventually he'll come up behind someone who will say "this is my lane and I'm doing 80, so live with it."
At least with a BMW you have the potential to stop swiftly should you need it.
And with a BMW I'm treated to kids at stoplights revving their engines, random people talking to me regarding my car, and all manner of annoyances I never experienced in my days driving anonymous German and Japanese cars. I love my car, I just wish it were not a BMW.
Whoa, I don't do that. I pick a lane and stick to it unless I need to zip around someone. When people are in the car I don't even break 80.
KD, I hear you totally. In thick traffic I think it's taking a huge risk to move and dodge - yet i know people who do it. I don't like doing it - mostly because I want to keep my house.
I don't agree- the current discussion is about driving safely in your bmw. I don't buy the "everything is relative and we're all right in our own little way" argument for whatever it is applied to.There are certain objective risk factors that are proven to be associated with accidents and that is why they are written into law. Running yellows not dangerous? Don't make me laugh. Are you sure you can make it all the way across before it turns red? In California, if any part of your vehicle is still in the intersection when the light turns red, you're ticket meat. What about that mom with the baby carriage in a hurry to get home who steps onto the crosswalk as soon as it turns green? Do they deserve to die because they didn't see the [expletive] driver who prefers to run yellows but miscalculated?
2003 325i, 5 speed
Base: $27,800, xenon: $700, sport: $1400, premium: $2700, destination & hdl: $695, metallic paint: $475, mats: $150, and documentation fee: $198. Total: $34,118.
Wow. If you ever get cause an accident this line will come to haunt you. I would blow this up for the jury in my opening. Say goodbye to your house.
Ah, the law in california is that you last axle must be across the crosswalk line by the time the light turns red. I remember when the law changed a couple years back as it used to be front tires over the crosswalk line was enough.
Wow. If you ever get cause an accident this line will come to haunt you. I would blow this up for the jury in my opening. Say goodbye to your house.
A. It'd never be found. B. there's no way to prove it was me (the person being sued by money-hungry leeches), or even if it was my account you'can prove I wrote it over a friend using my computer. C. I may be medicated currently D. I have an entire site that shows a proclivity toward writing inflammatory arguments. But of course, A is the most important one.
Of course, I don't hit people, so this is moot. Scratch my ZHP, don't think so.