Honda Civic 2005 and earlier

1181921232479

Comments

  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    first, those "ultra cheap" Firestones usually last around 60,000 miles...

    Your argument only proves the fact that no one car is right for everyone. It would be a boring place if we all liked and drove the same make and model.

    You should probably buy a Hyundai. You will get the equipment you like at a lower price, I guess.

    You will also pay later in resale.
  • carguy62carguy62 Member Posts: 545
    Two things:

    You ask "WHY would a merchant want to sell a popular prouuct for less than they paid for it?"

    I would answer because they still can make a profit from the holdback. Of course I don't expect Honda to sell below invoice but if they do we don't have to feel too sorry for them.

    When the current Accord was released for MY '98 it did not have break away (is that the right term?) side view mirrors. But they added them (I think for '00) based on consumer feedback. For '01 they added TCS, CD changer, etc. Every year the base price of a car goes up, why shouldn't the consumer expect certain things to be changed or added along the way?
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    Sorry, but I didn't understand the second part of your question.

    I always get a kick out of it when someone asks..."Can I buy a popular car for below invoice"

    And I sometimes respond, I guess, in perhaps a flippant manner. Don't mean to be rude...BUT...

    I sit and wonder what do they want?

    As a lifelong businessman and former business owner, I just wonder WHY someone would expect a merchant, ANY merchant to cheap sell a popular product for below their cost??

    And, please...I've explained holdback too many times in these forums...I won't do it again.

    Suffice to say that holdback is NOT bottom line profit to the dealer.

    All of this being said...hey...if a dealer want's to give away their product and profits, they can do that too!
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    I think I understand.

    It's a balance. Buyers expect and want changes and improvements in new models. They also do not like to see price increases. The breakaway mirrors are probably a great example.

    Lots of improvements in the 1998 Accords. The breakaway mirrors went away. The VAST majority of buyers (including me)didn't notice or didn't care. Personally, I didn't think it was a big deal.

    But I guess a lot of other potential buyers did care and they came back the following year.

    Like I said...it's a balance.
  • lngtonge18lngtonge18 Member Posts: 2,228
    I think this feature is very important. My mom used to have a 92 Accord and on a few occassions she came out to her car after shopping and someone had whacked her mirror hard enough with a truck door to push it in. If it had been immoveable, it would have likely broke something, like the mirror housing, the joint connecting it to the door, etc. Also, if you have ever read the warnings on drive-thru car washes it states to push in your mirrors, so you pose causing damage to the mirror by not being able to push it in. So, hopefully, Honda will readd this feature to the Civic. I know I would miss it.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    What is not at all important to the majority of people can be a big deal to others.

    I have sold, literally, hundreds of Civics and have yet to hear anybody mention the lack of break away mirrors.

    So, should Honda add breakaway mirrors and 100.00 (or whatever) to the cost of the cars to make just a few people happy?

    I'm sure the marketing people deal with questions like this every day.
  • civic_cx_92civic_cx_92 Member Posts: 87
    Aug. 7 -- Honda's new manufacturing system has given the automaker its most successful launch in its U.S. production history, said John Adams, senior vice president and general manager of Honda of America Manufacturing Inc.

    http://www.autonews.com/html/main/tc2001/hondatc807.htm

    Honda's goal in the weld process, Adams said, is to achieve a high level of consistency across product lines by welding as much as possible in a single process.

    The system also reduced the number of lost units due to changeover by 65 percent. One of Honda's goals is to shift the production of vehicles from a current model to the model's next generation without stopping the line.
  • jrct9454jrct9454 Member Posts: 2,363
    Actually, the point is that they are FOLDING mirrors, something that is universal in Japan because of tight garaging. Well, I can tell you from parking our '91 Accord [fold] and '98 [no-fold] side by side in our very tight garage, I was quite happy to have the '01 EX V6 [fold] replace the '98. When navigating around the cars, I was constantly snagging the odd elbow on the '98, and always aware of where the belt buckle was.

    Is this a make-or-break thing? Of course not...but if someone had asked me about the '98, I would certainly have encouraged Honda to fix it, which they eventually did.

    I am acutely aware that every decision like this is a tradeoff between keeping prices steady and making features available...when the tradeoffs end, you get to spend $60k and you get an LS430 for your trouble, which is no bad thing, assuming the money is there. In the end, in this segment, it's the competition that drives both features and price...vive la competition...
  • carguy62carguy62 Member Posts: 545
    Not to beat this subject to death but I don't think the Civic has had break away mirrors for at least a couple of generations, I'm pretty sure my brother's '97 does not have them. This may account for Isells comment that people don't seem to care. I do remember when the '98 Accord came out, practically every review I read about it mentioned the lack of folding mirrors. At a certain price point I guess things like that are expected, especially in a Japanese car (so to speak). To me it's a simple thing that probably cost a few pennies more and it pains me to say it but to me it typifies the direction Honda and others are going. I have seen quite a few torn off mirrors and the damage that was done would certainly be reduced if they had been able to fold.
  • shera07shera07 Member Posts: 2
    i'm planning to buy a honda civic 4 dr. ex 2001 (automatic with side air bags and possibly fog lights)very soon. can anybody tell me what they paid for theirs recently or what anybody thinks is a good price to bargain for. thanks
  • markd7markd7 Member Posts: 8
    I've got a 2001 LX with auto that has about 2000 miles on it, not driven much by me. Yesterday, I had occasion to floor it a couple times and it seemed somewhat reluctant to downshift. Once was on a ramp, it got up to speed, but seemed to take a long time doing so. The second time was heading up a very steep hill where it just seemed to not want to accelerate. Yes, it is only a 4 cyl, but it seemed like the car would accelerate faster at half throttle. OTOH, once the revs got up to 4,000 or so (and my eyes were not on the tach), it took off quite nicely.

    I seldom get to drive the Honda, and I have driven mostly manuals. Is this normal? I don't really have any complaint with the car; and I might not have depressed the accelerator fast enough to make the transmission downshift. In two weeks my daughter goes back to school and I can drive it again.
  • oxx93oxx93 Member Posts: 67
    has anyone had a problem with the radio resetting itself? i bought my 2001 ex 4dr last october and the radio resets itself at least once a month---anybody else notice this?
  • kimberskkimbersk Member Posts: 5
    I have a 2001 Honda Civic LX, four door. I bought it brand new in January and have not had any problems with it. I noticed the other day two areas where paint is chipping. I know it's not from regular "wear and tear". It's in the area above near the back left and right tires. It's in the area where the crease/crack area thing is. That's why I know it couldn't have done by somebody or anything else. Is this something that's covered by warrenty? Has anyone else had this problem?
  • soberssobers Member Posts: 496
    Are kind of more imp on larger cars like Accord/Camry than the Civic. Of course having on civic wouldn't hurt :))

    I have observed mirrors on my Accord partially folded out side of walkmart....so safe to assume that they would have sustained a damage without this feature. Civic is less likely to get touched in the parking lots than the Accord!
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    If memory serves (risky, yes) I recall threads a few months ago on the radio resetting problem. There might have even been a recall on it--easy to check with your Honda dealer. Re paint chips, somewhere (maybe on an Edmunds forum, but I forget exactly where) I remember reading that the tight panel fits in some new cars (like the Civic, which has very tight fits) can lead to paint chipping away. Anybody else recall this--would be useful to have some 3rd-party ammunition when kimbersk goes in to see the dealer.

    Speaking of tight fits, it's not just larger cars like the Accord that benefit from fold-away mirrors. My last car, a '97 Sentra, did not have them. My present car, a '01 Elantra, does. Both have mirrors that are quite large for a small car. Therein lies the problem. My other car is a '99 Grand Caravan, which is usually parked on the right side of my garage. My lovely wife likes to steer clear of the right garage door frame, leaving me with minimal space to dodge the left door frame. A couple of times with the Sentra (once for me, once for my wife) we didn't pay close enough attention to the door post, so I got to invest in two new power mirror assemblies at about $150 each including installation. I've brushed the door post with my Elantra a couple of times too. No damage, just had to reach out and push the mirror back into position. I've also found the folding mirrors invaluable in parking garages that either have narrow spots or where some jerk has not centered his/her car. I can fold the mirror and squeeze in real close to the opposite garage pillar. I am a big fan of folding mirrors.
  • carguy62carguy62 Member Posts: 545
    Who says a Civic is less likely to be touched? Your comment makes absolutely no sense to me. Folding mirrors are a good thing. Many cars have them, many do not. I wish the Civic had them.
  • tazerelitazereli Member Posts: 241
    WHAT I GATHERED FROM SOBER'S COMMENT WAS THAT THE CIVIC IS NOT AS WIDE AS THE ACCORD. SO WHEN YOU OPEN THE CAR DOOR, YOU HAVE TO OPEN IT WIDER TO BE ABLE TO HIT THE CIVIC. POOR LOGIC I KNOW, BUT HTIS WAS ALL I WAS ABLE TO GATHER FROM SOBER'S COMMENT.

    KYLE
  • civic_cx_92civic_cx_92 Member Posts: 87
    If VW can offer "Wolfsburg Edition" Jetta, a 1.8T model with 5-sp manual and sport suspension for $19,600. Honda should come out with "Special Edition" Civic Sedans, a 2.0 Si engine with 5-sp manual and sport suspension for $18,500.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    Some of the early 2001 EX Civics had the radio problem you described. Your dealer should be well aware of this and will probably exchange the radio.

    This was a pain in the neck for awhile. Honda blamed the radio manufacturer and visa versa. They finally got things isolated.
  • young77056young77056 Member Posts: 8
    Greeting all-

    I am new in this talk but have been reading this
    civic owner discussion for a while. It is really
    helpful, tons of information.

    Isellhondas -

    In your post(1018) saying Honda and Radio factory
    blame each other, have they got a solution yet?
    I went to the dealer in Feb. to order an new radio
    but upto now still unsuccessful. every time I call
    the dealer for the radio, they always said: we are
    still waiting Honda to get avaliable radio, and then
    I called American Honda, and the answer was
    being short of part. I don't know what could I do
    now. if you know the current Honda solution to the
    radio code problem or any news please let me know.
    It has been six months since the first visit to the
    dealer, and the code need be entered every week,
    very frustrated and dispointed with this radio
    and the dealer, even Honda. You know this is my
    first Honda car and it has been a bad experience.

    Thanks lot!
  • tlindeman1tlindeman1 Member Posts: 23
    I am approaching 5,000 miles on my 2001 Civic LX Sedan and aside from a driver's window switch that sometimes won't raise the window (a tap on the front of the headrest seems to get it working again) the car has been fine...great mileage (averaging 35-38 mpg) and a seemingly solid little car. My biggest complaint is the very soft and mushy suspension. The car seems to bottom relatively easily on these pot-hole roads and the incessant bouncing of the rear suspension is just plain annoying. To my knowlege, not one manufacturer has introduced a replacement shock or strut for this car...stock units are just plain limp. Anyone know if replacements are out yet? I'd sure like to install something with a little more control than these awful factory struts and shocks. Honda needs to reevaluate the suspension on the Civc...
  • tlindeman1tlindeman1 Member Posts: 23
    Oops...I meant a tap on the ARMREST to get the driver's window to work...can you tell it's Friday?
  • jlim1jlim1 Member Posts: 50
    Got the 01 Civic EX for 500 miles now. The engine noise is becoming more apparent compared to its first week. Then it was solid quiet. I used to own a 00 Elantra with 140-hp. I feel with 127-hp VTEC Civic it's laborious to drive uphill and yet not ignoring the grunt it's making. The not-so-loud grunt is there when you step on the accelerator, even if you want to get out from the lights. Is this normal to anyone? What may have gone wrong?

    Road noise is getting into cabin too. Is that because of the tire choice (Firestone) or suspension? Again, road noise was much lower the first week.

    Seems like after the second week, Civic drives more and more like my old Elantra with loud engine noise and road noise noticeble inside the cabin. I heard 01 Elantra drives much better and is more capable with 140-hp but the interior/exterior look doesn't impress me. I like the Hyundai warranty, but the designers have got to be more sensible with their overall car contour and styling. After all, that's how Japanese and American car makers get to win the sharemarket for 25-35 yr-old market segment. Just a thought.

    Other than those and the so-so AC, I have no problems with it. 02 Civic will have new evaporator for AC because I'm in the auto HVAC industry. I suspect my so-so AC is due to the current evaporator. But if the current evaporator is not performing well in some cars, can I take this as a warranty case to the dealer? I have had a miserable time cooling the cabin down during the heat wave period. Not a problem with my old Elantra.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    Yhe problem was isolated long ago. It's a defect in the radio. I understand that there was a delay in replacing all of the defective radios.

    It shouldn't be THAT big of a headache?

    Just have to reenter the code every few days as it loses it's memory.

    Not all cars were affected by this.
  • dudkadudka Member Posts: 451
    the civics in japan have elecrically folding mirrors, actually most cars in japan have those. as soon as you turn the ignition off the mirrors fold. also you get a button on the mirror adjustment pod for the mirror to fold on demand. my cr-v is made in japan and has breakaway mirrors, not electric though (elecric adjustment, but not fold)
  • mdrivermdriver Member Posts: 385
    tlindeman1: you are right about the rear suspension. Not only is it evident from driving the Civic, but is obvious when following one. There seems to be no damping for the first inch or so of travel which creates the "bobbing" effect one sees and feels. The damping is fine on larger dips, it's just the small undulations that set the rear in motion. My gen 6 Civic with almost 100k rides much better than a new '01 with 5 miles. isellhondas: do you know when the '02s are coming? I bet there will be some suspension recalibrations for '02. Since I could tell how bad the rear suspension was on the '01 after just a few seconds of driving on a first test drive, I will be able to tell if there is any improvement once I drive an '02. I'll let you know.
  • justinjustin Member Posts: 1,918
    do you think Honda will step up and offer some sort of retrofit for the bouncy 01's? It makes me wonder though, as much as I dislike the bouncyness, why didn't I care so much to not buy the car? Guess I was just excited to be getting out of a loud Elantra....
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    Seriously. What I've read here was the first and only comments I've heard about "bouncy" rear suspension.

    Seems like this would be easy to correct by simply using stiffer rear shocks. It's entirely possible the 2002's will have these.

    Expect to see some 2002's early next month.
  • bordsourcebordsource Member Posts: 95
    One other question that's kind of off-topic: Have you seen the new CR-V and when is it due out?
  • jjpcatjjpcat Member Posts: 124
    I have a 2001 Civic LX auto and it's my 8th car. One thing I notice is that it's so hard to push this Civic down by pushing the hood or the trunk lid. I was told if the car bounces more than once, that means the suspension is in bad shape. For all the other cars I had (including Honda's own Accord), I had no problems to push them down for something like 1-2 inches. But this Civic hardly moves, especially for the rear suspension. Why? Does this mean the damping of the suspension is too much or too little? I am so fed up when I have to drive this car over at least 10 speed bumps each day. If anyone knows of a 3rd party product that can solve this problem, please let me know. Also, please post the cost.

    My car has 8500 miles now. The engine noise is louder than what it was at 2000 miles. But it's still bearable for me.

    The paint is kind of easy to be chip away. Even a very very minor scratch will leave a trace. But, hey, this is a cheap car. I am not expecting it to have 9 layers of paint found in my ex-Lexus.

    In general, I think this is a solid car with one major design bug.
  • soberssobers Member Posts: 496
    I know many guys who like 2001 civic better than 2000 due to its smoother ride !! So Honda is can not be blamed all the way. I certainly don't like the way rear suspension behaves on irergularities. Yes it does bounce more where 2000 civic was nimble...but many guys out there like it !!

    It is also weird that many guys who mourned the loss of front bones don't have problem with the front struts but with the rear bones !! Maybe it adds injury to insult !! Who knows !!!

    2001 Civic drives more like Corolla -:))
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    I have no problem making a Civic move when I push on the rear end...

    And, if anything, this would make for a stiffier and not a bouncier ride.

    And, yeah...if they do stiffen the spring and shock rates to reduce bounce, these forums will probably have some folks complaining about a rough ride! It's hard to win sometimes!

    It'll be awhile before and 2002 CRVS are seen.
  • jrct9454jrct9454 Member Posts: 2,363
    I'm with Isell on this one - Honda set out to broaden the market for the car, and in the process are going to inevitably disappoint some number of people who preferred details and features of the previous generation [s]. Such is life in the car business.

    I've owned a lot of Honda products over the past 20 years [our current drive is an '01 Accord EX V6, a truly wonderful piece of work], and recently helped a friend's daughter buy her first new car, a 2001 Civic LX coupe. She thinks she went to automotive heaven. It's my unscientific opinion that there are far more like her out there than are posting on this board.

    I think the hardcore are going to be very happy with the upcoming Civic hatch, produced in Swindon, UK, and arriving here early next year. The mainstream are going to continue to buy the Civic sedan and coupe for all of the reasons that people are attracted to these cars, and 99% of them care little about the suspension details. For those who do, aftermarket struts will no doubt be the only successful answer; or get a Mazda Protege EX, as long as you have a trustworthy Mazda dealer in your neck of the woods. No car maker can be all things to all people...Honda obviously feels it needed to "refine" the Civic sedan more than some of you cared for. It's too soon to tell if that was a good or bad marketing decision, but I for one understand why they made it.
  • fritz1224fritz1224 Member Posts: 398
    Does Honda make a EX V6 with cloth upholstery?
  • nimmo9nimmo9 Member Posts: 4
    Anyone swapped out the front speakers in a 2001 model? I'd like to replace the ones in a new EX, but the days of simply popping off the grill for access are gone. Now it looks like you have to take the whole door panel off. Wondering how easy it comes apart, how well it goes back together, and how will my partner react to seeing the front doors of her week-old Civic in pieces. Thanks. (The last question was rhetorical.)
  • jrct9454jrct9454 Member Posts: 2,363
    Not for the US market, no....
  • mdrivermdriver Member Posts: 385
    There are seven Civic models:DX,LX,HX,EX, 2 and 4 door (no 4-door HX). Why couldn't Honda at least make one of them with a slightly firmer and more controlled ride. Leave the other six models with the "Corolla" type suspension, which by the way, is probably the least capable handling small car today. That's what I call real choice. Nissan does it with the Sentra SE, Mazda does it with the Protege ES. It's not true that 99% of people don't care about good handling, especially in a car like the Civic coupe, which looks sporty, but doesn't handle that way. They may not care how the suspension is constructed (struts or wishbones), but most care about good handling.
  • carguy000carguy000 Member Posts: 55
    I have a 2001 Civic EX 2 Dr. w/ 5,400 miles. I, too, have noticed that the rear of the car seems to bounce a little more than I like on bumps. However, I can live with it. It's really not that bad. My tires were at 30 psi all around, which is what the sticker on the doorwell calls for. I increased pressure to 32 on all four tires, and that seems to have helped the bounciness a little. I also added a strut tower brace on the front, and I did this at the same time that I added the pressure to the tires. I'm not sure which one made the biggest difference, but my car seems to handle a lot better after this. It's much flatter around curves and doesn't seem to roll as much. Overall, I'm extremely pleased with my Civic, and the 33 MPG or better that I'm getting on every tank, even around town with the A/C on. :) I hope each of you has a great day! Take care.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    It'll still outhandle the cars you mentioned with the possible exception of the Sentra. I've driven all of these on a professional track.

    The Corolla wasn't even close.

    Still, I can't ever remember a shopper telling me they didn't like the way they handle nor have I lost a sale (that I know of) for that reason.

    I think they handle great. They could be made to handle better I guess, but as someone else said, 99% of the buying public wouldn't care.
  • jrct9454jrct9454 Member Posts: 2,363
    The "one model" you are asking for is coming in the form of the Civic Hatch Si [or whatever they will choose to call it] next year. The reception this car receives [it is getting rave reviews in Europe] will go a long way to determining if there is a market for this version of the Civic formula. It is firmer, faster, and with the hatch, actually more practical, than any of the current lineup. Let's see if everyone who says they want a sportier Civic actually lines up to buy one...
  • jlim1jlim1 Member Posts: 50
    Do all 01 Civic's have Firestone tires or Dunlop? I have seen automotive enthusiast websites stating that Dunlop is the standard tire provider for 01 Civic. Mine has Firestone.

    Also, my new Civic had 39-41 mpg. Only 550 miles on it, well ahead before the first oil and filter change. The first (41 mgp) was a shock to me because I had read comments from others in this forum about their 20-something mpg. I only drive in the city (60 mph max). Engine noise is noticeable, though.
  • mdrivermdriver Member Posts: 385
    That goes to show that there is no real break-in period to speak of, and you should get excellent MPGs right away.

    It's too bad the Civic Si will be a seriously limited production model. High prices and low availability essentially make this a non-choice.
  • hvtec2000hvtec2000 Member Posts: 12
    Civic 2001 LX, 20,500 miles, I change oil for my car, got arm rest, rear cup holder, key less entry, CD player. Installed by myself. http://www.handa-accessories.com/.

      My car has a weird sound during a raining day and it has been happening for couple months. It sounds like it's sucking in water and I can hear the engein shaking a little. I called the service department and reported about this last week and they said that they will give me a call back but I am still waiting for their phone call.

      I think we should call dealers or Honda Automobile Division to report any problems that we have so they can check for it.
  • fritz1224fritz1224 Member Posts: 398
    Thanks for the response.
  • jdiggyjdiggy Member Posts: 3
    i've been looking to buy a 2001 lx with 12,500 miles on it. THe lowest price i got was for a civic with a 3 inch scrape on the back...
  • jdiggyjdiggy Member Posts: 3
    I have been looking into a 2001 LX sedan, silver with gray interior. The only extra feature it has is the keyless entry. It has a 3x1.5 inch scrape on the back right portion of the bumper. THe car has approximately 12, 500 miles on it, and is in good condition other than the scrape. I was given a buying price of $12,300. Is this a good, fair, or not so good deal? Please let me know.
    Also how much money would it take to get the abrasion fixed. A guess would be fine.

    PLEASE REPLY..Thanks!
  • silver_bulletsilver_bullet Member Posts: 1,339
    Is it a manual or automatic? The Edmunds TMV for a manual equipped car is about $14.4K -- do you think saving only $2K on a used car with over 12K miles, a scrape that will require repainting the bumper to fix -- and a car that is about to become "last year's model" -- is a good deal? Not for me, thanks.
  • dudkadudka Member Posts: 451
    a 2001 civic lx 2 door with 5 spd is $13,800 including destination, and no scratches not 12K miles. you decide
  • jdiggyjdiggy Member Posts: 3
    The LX i'm looking into is automatic....i know that makes the price move up a little, but not by much.
  • howachowac Member Posts: 52
    Local dealers here in the SF Bay Area are advertising 2001 Civic LX sedans with Auto for just $14,388. That's just a little more than 2K over the used Civic you're looking at. Even though the used car has keyless entry, I personally would go and buy a new one (or wait for a 2002 model) instead of taking a hit with a scratched bumper and 12.5k miles. That's about a year's worth of driving! The bumper scrape would probably cost you an additional $400 or more to be repaired. Plus you won't get the full warranty if you bought the used car. The peace of mind of knowing that you own the car from the beginning is probably worth quite a bit too. Look in the papers and check online (or dealers' sites for price quotes) for prices. You might be able to find great deals (prices and finance rates) with the Honda clearance. Good luck!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.