By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Buying an older one with hi-mileage is a different story.
Thanks in advance.
Don Gillespie
Some of the early EX's would lose their radio code. frustrating, but no big deal. Now fixed.
I know nothing about gas guage troubles.
Jace
Has anyone had a problem with window rattle? I took my car to the dealer this morning and they told me they were going to order parts for this problem. Is this a universal problem with the new Civic? It's an irritating slight rattle on the front passenger's window.
What's the more accurate way of calculating for mileage? WHen the Empty fuel comes on, how many more gallons would the Civic still have?
I'd appreciate any replies. Thanks!
See ya later
Currently, no problems with the car. Just qualms about the increasingly loud engine noise (which I have posted numerous times before), slow engine reaction after start-up in cold weather, so-so AC. The ride may be bouncy at bit after going over speed bumps if I were to sit in the rear. Other than that, it's a fun driving.
I myself am getting EPA figures on my Accord. 22 in city (23 is epa) & 32 on Freeway (epa is 30!)
Particularly the engine noise increasing after driving for a while. Is this a consistent problem with Civic owners? I don't want a noisy car.
I've sold lots of these and have heard not one thing about "mushy" shocks. Only in this forum have I heard this and haven't witnessed this myself.
Noise? You'll have to drive one to see what you think. The noise won't increase as you drive that would be pretty impossible.
They aren't as quiet as a Cadillac or even an Accord but I don't think they are bad at all. You'll have to be the judge.
Just don't get scared off what could be the best car you've ever owned.
Drive one and then decide.
Some Civic shoppers used to complain that the cars rode too choppy and the Corolla salespeople delighted in pointing out that the Corollas had a softer ride.
Hard to please everyone, I guess.
This debate is never going to be resolved to your satisfaction; I and others here maintain that Honda is only being rational in how they have engineered the new Civic. The Si takes it in a direction you claim you want to go, but then claim it won't be "available enough". How can you know, when the car is five-six months away from introduction?
And Bord, if you actually got the rear wheels off the ground going over railroad tracks, I don't want to think about the speed you were carrying at the time. I've driven the new Civic repeatedly, and simply am unable to make the rear suspension perform these horrific feats as documented here. I still maintain that Honda has hit its target audience's preferences, and as pointed out above, was reacting to a lot of perception that the old car was too hard-edged. Maybe you guys are just in the wrong ride - the Mazda Protege ES certainly will ride firmly enough for you, and if the Sentra is the answer, then why not get it? There is no shortage of these cars out there, that's for sure.
No reason for EVERYONE to like this car; that's why the marketplace provides alternatives. Personally, I think Honda did the right things with the new Civic, and beyond the usual first-year teething problems, see no reason why it won't continue to sell at the usual rate. For me, their real shortcomings are the lack of power and equipment [like ABS as an option] in the LX...but again, the real-world customer base doesn't seem to care all that much. It's the hardcore enthusiasts who are offended, and that's the target for the Si...of which I am confident there will be no shortage. They can produce all this market can absorb...
By the way: my horrific (notice no quotes there) speed was all of 30 mph...not exactly brain blowing. At 40 or so, you'd have a point. But 30 is not bad at all. Upper limits of acceptable, in my book.
Thanks for the Comment.
I am strongly considering purchasing a new 2001 Civic. I currently own an older Civic and know what great cars they are. The only concern I have is not so much related to the car as it is to me. I'm a pretty big guy (6'6"). Naturally, I'm a little concerned about whether someone with my height would fit comfortably in the new Civic. I have heard about how it's bigger than the older models, but the rules are a bit different if you're not the average car buyer. I'd appreciate hearing from others out there about how tall drivers fare in the Civic. Thanks.
As to the suspension noise, it sounds like a bad strut, not unusual on the '01s
As to the Si, the UK plant doesn't just supply the U.S. with the Si, but Europe also where hatchbacks are kings of the road. I doubt they would ever be able to supply enough Sis for the U.S. There are several hundred thousand Civics sold in the U.S. Honda isn't sending 10,000 Sis to the U.S. because they are worried they won't sell all of them. They are sending 10,000 because that is probably the extra capacity of the plant that is now underutilized
Also, with reference to some past oncerns on the paint chip or finish job, I spotted unpainted spots right between the right rear taillights and the body (above the EX plate, but toward the left). Got it covered with over-the-counter paint, though. It was obviously a poor paint job matter.
I heard about ways to increase the engine performance in a Civic like changing the air filter. Is it ok to do so, and if so what kind of air filter should I be looking at?
Thanks !
Actually, I have a '91 Civic 4WD wagon with decent headroom, even for me. But I think that's only because of the fact that it's higher off the ground than other passenger cars. Even then, I have to duck a little more closely than I'd like.
On my way home from work, on a 35 MPH road, there is a relatively hard curve to the right. In the middle of this curve is a significant "ridge" between two slabs of concrete. When I go over that ridge with the front end, I notice almost nothing, but when the rear end of the car goes over that ridge, I feel the back of the car "skip" out a bit to the left (as I'm turning right.)
It's not catastrophic, but it is definitely noticeable. Good to hear that Honda will stiffen the springs for the 2002s.
Well I know very little about cars - and this is my first car. So can anyone tell me if I should go by the schedule given in the book (the manual)?
Oil changes, if you want to be ultra-conservative on any LEV or ULEV car, can come at 5000-7500 mile intervals. The rest should be by the book. When conversing with a service advisor, have the book in your hand and open to the relevant page, and stick by your guns. Never had a problem using this approach...once they know you're not going to roll over for this, cooperation usually comes immediately.
I'm looking to get a Civic, but I'm just about to graduate and can't afford to get a Civic at the prices here in Chicago...
Any help would be appreciated-- thanks!
I'm graduating in December and could probably afford one then, but I was assuming by late October/November the 2001 models would be all gone..
Thanks for your help!
Thx for all the posts - made for very informative reading leading up to my recent purchase. I was happy to have just bought a 2001 Grn EX 4 dr 5 Spd for $15,200 including destination, floor mats and splash guards. They did get me for an extra hundred or so for documentation, and of course tax in addition.
I asked up front about the issues mentioned here (gas line, radio code) as was assured that these had been addressed at the dealer. However, took the car to work today for the first time, and when I came out the radio had reset and I didn't have the code with me, so drove 1 hr home in silence. Made me miss my 1990 Civic Hatch with 160K miles which I was driving until today. Not at all happy that this problem was not fixed by the dealer as promised, and concerned that it may not be fixed promptly.
The other thing that troubles me a bit is that it turns out the car was manufactured in 10/00. Although it had only 4 miles on it when I picked it up, why was it sitting so long? Should I be concerned? Thanks!
On the other hand, dealers typically have end-of-year clearance sales at the end of December, so if you can't find a '01 you could go for a '02, preferably on December 31, 6 pm, in a blizzard.
Heck, just buy a 2002. They wouldn't be much more money.
Cheers!
Enjoy your Hondas !!!
As I understand things the theft rate has gone WAY down. The car would have to be towed away to steal it.
Secondly, I'll keep beating this drum: LEV and ULEV cars do not dump all of that crap in the oil that older cars do. This is the source of the dilution of the oil that requires a change [mostly products of combustion and unburned hydrocarbons]. It is a complete waste of both oil and money to change the oil on these cars at intervals of less than 5k miles, and frankly, even that qualifies as extremely conservative.
If you want some reassurance, have a look at the oil on these cars [after the first change, mind you]...it will look as good at 3000 miles as the day you had it changed. On our Accords, it takes at least 5k miles after a change before the telltale discoloration starts to show. Trust the manufacturer - Honda is not trying to blow up your engines...their reputation is important to them, and the recommendations in the manual will keep the car running well after you are sick of looking at it.
Oil changes: Honda recommends 7500 for Accord & 10,000 for Civic UNDER NORMAL DRIVING CONDITIONS!
If you drive frequently distances less than 5 miles & drive in a stopnGo traffic a lot then cut this in half !! i.e. 3750 for Accord & 5000 miles for the Civic. DO NOT LISTEN TO THE CRAP & MINDSET OF 3000 miles. Service department need to earn money so they are promoting 3000 miles !
Also it would be a GREAT HELP OVERALL IF WE DO NOT WAIST A LOT OF OIL & $$ on it !!
They have posted 2002 Civic Pricing.
Not too big a change 50-100$ higher on MSRP.
Tim