By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
If you push forward on the button and lift up slightly on the back it might work for you for a while. That's the way ours did though and before I tore it apart to check it my wife drove for 4 days with the window down about 3-4 inches before telling me it was stuck. I thought it may need cleaned or something but it is a sealed unit with all five buttons in one unit.
Hope that helped
LRCobra
LRCobra
Are they subject to the 00 hassles?
In my opinion, there's no credible proof that vehicles produced prior to 10/00 are subject to more "warranty related repairs" than vehicles produced after 10/00. Don't let others tell you otherwise.
I do agree that earlier model of 2000 Impala has some "bugs". However, since we are heading towards 2002 model, any remaining inventory of 2001 should be acceptable. Buy with confidence!
But to be sure I know what I'm talking about, I looked it up in my manual and found the module to apparently be different than those in older model cars. The component location for the "Turn Signal/Hazard Flasher Module" is right behind the hazard light button on the dash. This electronic module may or may not contain the relay that is likely responsible for the noise.
I'd check with some parts stores and see if they specify the old style relay modules for this car of if it's the 'black box' behind the hazard light button. If it's the old style module somewhere under the dash, it can be replaced for $5 or so to see if it quiets things down. If the module is responsible, it's probably pretty expensive.
I'd like to be more specific but this is what I can find for now.
Just for fun, I'll add that I like the louder sound. After installing the quieter ones in other cars, I find myself more susceptible to leaving the blasted thing blinking accidentally. There are a lot of things that drivers can do to make themselves look stupid, but leaving the blinker on is one of the top ones. I hate it when that happens!
RR
Thanks,
Brett in Little Elm, Texas...........
1. The front ones are most important. With the rear bumper being plastic, corrosion isn't going to be much of an issue there. Paint chipping and stuff still may be...
2. For the right price, I'll remove mine and ship them anywhere. Trouble is, I consider folks on this forum as friends and I wouldn't be able to ask a friendly price for these.
3. I know someone who might have a hazard flasher assembly for sale cheap though...
The reason they discontinued them is because they wouldn't fit the 2001 without modification. I never understood why they didn't keep it for the 2000, and introduce a new one for the 2001+.
Perhaps it costs GM too much money to tool the 2001 mud flaps? Who knows. Weird though.
Crazy man crazy.
Free T-shirt from GM!! Fill out this survey and get free t-shirt. I think you may have to be a GM car holder, cause they ask for the last 4 digits of your credit card.
https://www.gmcard.com/generic/a_indexcatsurvey.html
The link on this site only shows the survey. It does not say "free t-shirt". I try to provide a link that says "free t-shirt", but was not able to. You'll have to trust me on this. Otherwise, go to gmcard.com. Click on "offers and events". Scroll down. Click "merchant offer". Scroll down. Click on the t-shirt icon. It will then direct you to the address that I provided above.
FREEEEEE!
$33.00
http://home.hawaii.rr.com/impala/Rear_splash_guard.html
I said "I've been to that site!!"
You're awesome Nathan.
GM also has a TSB about delayed shifts from 1st to 2nd, as well as "bucking". That issue is caused by a stuck solenoid when the engine/transmission is cold.
1. With organic oil and good care a engine will probably go 150,000-200,000 miles. With Mobil-1 I expect 250,000. With Amsoil I'd bet one could get 300,000+ miles. However, after 1/4 million miles I've found I'm pretty much tired of a car. 266k and 10 years on my last one was all I was ready to handle. Cars like the Impala come out every 10 years and I get the fever.
I think the higher performance oils above Mobil-1 are past the point of diminishing return.
2. If I'm on vacation and want/need another quart of Mobil-1 for some reason, all I need is a Wal-Mart, Target, etc and I'm all set. Amsoil is harder to find, thus I need to bring an emergency supply along.
3. Water in the oil can be a problem with synthetics that are used for too long. However, highway driving can help this problem.
Amsoil makes some great products...I wouldn't steer a purist away from them, but I decided against them for practical reasons.
How many people you know who drive 35k miles per year? Personally, I have only two friends who puts 25k or so. One commutes 60 miles one way, the second 45 miles. Everybody else around drives 8k to 15k, seldom a bit more.
Great for traveling salesman, though.
Personally, I would swith to Amsoil as soon as find a local source. Will use Mobil 1 till this happens. With my 8-12k miles per year, the difference in specs probably does not matter.
I've had the dealer go over it and they changed a
sender in the tank (?) but it didn't help.
Does the computer get the fuel used from the tank or would it be more likely to come from the injectors flow meter? I have been accused of being to anal about this but it was an expensive option and it should be more accurate.
Anyone with the same problem ? Any ideas?
Personally I never expected the MPG trip computer to be 100% exact. I have had other non-GM vehicles with trip computers that unfortunately behave much in the same fashion (Not being exact all the time) like the Impala's DIC. I only paid $150.00 (More or less) for this toy. If I had paid upwards $500, $1000 or $2000, then I would be real upset by the lack of accuracy of the device.
I have a piece of software at home to calculate fuel mileage consumption and you can keep track up to 20 vehicles. I have found that the results provided by the PC program and the Impala's DIC are not that far off the line.
I am not that anal about it, but that's just me.
How much is the Trip Computer option up in Canada?
http://ghostwolf.xaper.com/
Its not much but I'm going to try to get more info up in the future.
-gw
gw
Especially like the dual exhaust!
I am getting some tint done soon, what is the ratio for yours? I have a black LS but don't want the tint to be too dark and look tacky but also don't want it too light either... yours looks just right!
Thanks!
RR
Since you know more than I do, congratulations! Too bad GM will not make a firmware patch to correct the 18% variant on the information display. I am a software/computer engineer and I can tell you that this is not a big of a deal from the technical point of view.... But I have no idea about GM's position on these issues.
I am anal about the correct operation of the engine/transmission, the safe operation of the brakes/steering/suspension, the correct operation of the A/C, stereo, power accessories, the body integrity, the tightness of the interior trim, etc, etc.
To me the DIC is waaay down the list of priorities, unless, one day it stops working. Don't take it personal, that's just me.
If I had paid $2K for the DIC, then I would be the one sending complaint letters left and right to GM's brass, but since it is a $150 toy, I just don't let it sour me over the whole car.
Of course, to each his/her own.
If GM has reimburse the $$$ paid for the DIC, get over it already. You got it for free.
RR
As an engineer, I'm surprised you find a +/-18% tolerance acceptable. I suspect it may be a matter of expectation. You never expected it to be accurate to begin with. Charts did.
Personally, I think 18% is too high. But, I'd be satisfied with +/-8-10%. I have a feeling charts is looking for something like 3-5%.
GM should at least refund the purchase price paid for the DIC option and if that's not feasible, they could extend the limited warranty as well. Not a bad perk if you think about it.
To me a failed engine/transmission is more serious than an 18% variance shown in the Trip Computer. I am not saying this is acceptable; however, it all depends like you say on the expectations of the owner.
I haven't yet seen a car Trip Computer that is at least 90 to 100% accurate. May be BMW or MB?
Not a bad idea!
How about one of how to replace the rear tailight bulbs and 3rd brake light as well?
I can see the Caddy but the Grand Prix's I see with them throw me for a loop. Oh well.