2005 and Earlier Chevrolet Impala

1151152154156157265

Comments

  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    I much prefer manuals, but traffic is difficult.
    My Camaro has a fairly easy clutch....until i do the stop and go thing for about 10 minutes. My leg starts shaking and my knee starts hurting.
    Not fun.
    I guess the clutch isn't as easy as I think it is. I was reminded of that when I sat in a friend's Acura Vigor and practically put the clutch pedal through the firewall when I stepped on it. Now that was some low clutch effort.
    Manuals are almost superfluous on a car with a lot of torque. But helpful on the Japanese small displacement engines.
  • base2001base2001 Member Posts: 20
    Would you care to back up that statistic that a residual value of an Impala is 49% after two years?
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Sure, here is the link to Kiplinger's magazine:


    http://www.kiplinger.com/php/cars/carcost/mini1.html


    First, select the manufacturer and then the model/trim level for the car you are looking for, in this case the Impala/Impala LS.


    The residual values are provided by ALG (Automotive Leasing Guide) and you can access residuals for several new 2001 and 2002 model year vehicles at:


    www.alg.com

    If you experience any problems trying to view the data, just go back to www.kiplinger.com and then select "Car finder 2002" under the "Tools" column located on the left portion of the page and then follow the screen instructions.

  • mediumfrymediumfry Member Posts: 239
    I like a firm clutch. Yes the Japanese ones are silky but they don't have any feel. No character. I like the one on my truck the best...hard as a rock.

    I know there aren't many that agree with me on that.

    However, if you're getting leg/knee problems with the clutch, I'd say get on that exercise bike. Unless you really do have bad knees (hereditary) in which case I apologize. Manual tranny's aren't right for everyone.

    brettca: Nathan has a complete pictorial on his website re: replacing the passenger compartment air filter. Check it out. impala@hawaii.rr.com
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    All I have to say about that Kiplingers cost stuff is this. Go to the site listed about three posts above--


    http://www.kiplinger.com/php/cars/carcost/mini3.php3


     Look at the service costs for the Impala (base, though it doesn't say so)--$2990. Then go look at Impala LS. $819. What gives? By the way, note that the Impala LS appears FAR below the Impala on the list of cars on the drop down.


    I think it is an error, but I have to wonder. If that is wrong, what else is wrong? If it isn't wrong, is the 3.4 engine THAT much worse than the 3.8?

  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    Has a fairly stong resale value. There are not that many of them out there. It is mostly base cars. They are a dime a dozen at the auctions due to the number of rental cars in service.
  • base2001base2001 Member Posts: 20
    Thanks Teo. Those figures are not encouraging. But a car is not an investment of course. But the impact will be felt at trade-in time.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Looking at Autotrader.com, used Impala LS' listings are hard to come by. However, the very few available command prices from $17K to $21K with anywhere between 8K to 27K miles. Interesting to note most of the private sale ads are LS models with just about a year of use.

    The LS appears to be reselling fairly strong in the used car market versus the *fleet* base sedan, which you can find tons and tons of ads. Even base sedans are selling between $14K to $17K.

    Cars are no investments, I have to agree with that. But domestics unfortunately come up short in the resale value dept in comparison to its Import competitors.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    The Olds Intrigue has truly lousy resale:

    At 2 years: 40%
    At 4 years: 29%

    No wonder no bank wants to issue a lease on a new one!
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    Kiplinger is by no means the last word in resale value of automobiles.
    There are many variables including some you might not think about -
    like color and geographic region.

    I just took the time to check out two other resources on the web.
    In doing so, my 2000 LS (stickered at $25,000) loaded with everything
    but a sunroof, 24,000 miles in "excellent" condition priced out at anywhere
    from 73% to 55% of original sticker price. (Naturally, trade-in value is less.)

    In general, kbb.com was higher.
    edmunds was lower.

    Retail on a dealers lot:
    18,325 or 15,067

    Private party sale:
    15,990 or 13,370

    At kelley you can actually link to dealers who have cars for sale in your area.
    I saw an LS for $19,888 with 23,856 miles
    and another for $17,700 with 43,743 miles !!! Go figure.

    My point:
    Prices on a used Impala LS are all over the place.
    A car - like most things - is worth exactly what someone is willing to pay for it.
  • hunter39hunter39 Member Posts: 375
    Since I plan on driving my car until the wheels fall off, I have no real concern with trade in values. I will take care of my LS all the way thru and we'll see how much I can get out of it past the car being paid off. I have a 5 year loan at .9% and I fully expect to get 10 years service out of the Impala. I suspect I will want something else at about 8 though if my past cars are any indication.
  • base2001base2001 Member Posts: 20
    Are we speaking apples and oranges? A resale value is market driven; a residual is a guess at future value. And the manufacturers were burned in the late 1990s by high residuals and now they now may be set artificially low to keep lease payments high. In fact when I saw the low residuals in 1990 after two, three-year leases I bought at 0.9%. I checked a Canadian re-sale site and year 2000 Impalas seem to run 65-75% of MSRP.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    KBB is typically too high. Most dealers will laugh at the prospect of even paying KBB wholesale prices for a trade-in. NADA.com is another good guide to get a ballpark figure on resale values.

    Marketwise, used Impalas (Specially LS models) are pretty scarce in South Florida and the few ones found in dealer lots and listings currently command 75% to 85% resale values some with very high miles.

    Colorwise, lighter cars tend to sell better than dark colored ones. White, Sandrift, Driftwood, Medium Regal Blue are preferred over Black, Navy Blue, Torch Red, Jade Green and Red Carmine. Dark colors in tropical climates are a big no-no.

    Interestingly, cars equipped with leather seats and front heated seats are for some wacky reason very sought after. People have a love affair with leather but leather is not the best choice for a hot and sticky place such as Miami.

    Cloth Impala LS are easier to found in the north than here.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    The Impala is selling strongly and the car appears to be popular. But keep in mind that as much as we like our cars, they are not among the three top choices in the class, namely the Camcord bore mobiles and the VW Passat. The Impala unfortunately suffers from the stigma attached to most domestic labeled offerings...not so good resale, questionable reliability, not the best build quality, etc.

    With that said, Impala's sales have been pretty steady and on the rise ever since the car was introduced 3 years ago (Quickly disproving the skeptics that claimed strong first year sales and then a decline by the second year, like it happened with the Lumina back in 1990). The car is making a niche for itself in the midst of fierce competitors such as the Nissan Altima. Impala's best weapons are value for the dollar, size/room, performance and safety.

    I hope that resale values keep stable for the next 2 years as I am thinking of selling the car near the end of the limited warranty. According to ALG, the car will be worth by then some 42% off MSRP so if I can get $10K to $11K for it at the beginning of 2004, I should be more than happy. But the more I can get for it the merrier.

    Resale values and residuals are based on different calculations that take into account sales, reputation of the brand/vehicle, popularity, reliability, geography, market audience, colors, etc. Unfortunately as good as our cars are, many people still perceive GM vehicles in the whole to be second or third tier products and the used car prices reflect such perceptions in the market place. Fleet sales are also partly responsible for the rapid depreciation of domestic vehicles.
  • base2001base2001 Member Posts: 20
    The year should have been 2000.
  • 00impala00impala Member Posts: 474
    I think Leather seats are very popular in the northeast, I remember in 1999 when I was looking for a car I was looking in western PA (Pittsburgh) and Ford had a special package going that included Leather Seats and a Sunroof for like $750 then it listed a special regional discount of $750, so they were technicaly free. this was on the Taurus and Sable. Alot of the cars I see at dealers here in Cincinnati have leather, I've only seen one LS with cloth way back in Sep 1999 that was dark blue..,they are always Leather in all the different colors. I always check out the Impala's at my selling dealer when I go there, Last trip they had the Newest "GREEN" with Leather (of course) interior LS on the lot. They seem to only order and stock the Top of the line LS with everything, such was the case when I test drove an LS, came back and was told that particular one was SOLD and they just recieved another that day, the truck was there when I was, and it was Loaded, turns out that was the one I have today. Don
  • >>>>Since I plan on driving my car until the wheels fall off,...<<<

    That might not be as far off as you originally hoped. ;-)
  • 00impala00impala Member Posts: 474
    "ISS willing and the Cradle don't Crack" ;-) Don
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    To get my 2000 LS withOUT leather required a dealer trade from a dealer in Lima, Ohio. He was VERY reluctant to let it go, as leather seats are so pre-dominant he saw this one with cloth as a hot item. I do not like leather as it is hot in the summer, cold in the winter, requires maintenance and does not hold up as well as GOOD cloth. I wish I could say our LS's had GOOD cloth. The stuff reminds me of mousefur. Honestly. YEEPS
  • hunter39hunter39 Member Posts: 375
    Too true, however, I always have the option of putting my wheels back on! Really now, you've heard my complaints, and for the most part it sounds really bad. But I do really like this car. And provided I survive the wheels falling off, I should have a very nice lawsuit against GM!
    I sound like a man who has been spurned over and over by the love of his life and continues to take her back! It would be funnier if there wasn't a kernal of truth...
  • 00impala00impala Member Posts: 474
    Yea, Here is Southern Ohio they seem to be that way, I bought my LS from a dealer just over the State Line in Indiana. my Father in-law has a 1995 Lumina LS with the Z34 Engine the 3.4 one with the factory Dual exhaust and the Cloth seats are Lumpy and look like the material came from a Material Factory Floor, some kind of brush stroke design..and it is Burgandy. I'll take the Leather anyday! Don
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Cloth LS's are harder to come by compared to leather equipped cars. I think that neither leather or cloth is impressive for the price. GM really needs to improve the interior materials on their cars.

    After sitting in my sister's new (yeah she bought another car) 2002 VW Golf GL 5-door hatchback, the interior fit/finish and materials of that $16K "Econobox" (Very nice econobox by the way) blows the $25K Impala LS right out of the water.

    Her VW Golf has 6 airbags, standard ABS, superb paint, pristine interior, etc. The car looks and feels like an Audi, yet it is even below a base Impala. Yeah the Impala is much more comfortable, roomy and powerful but the small details in terms of the right interior materials and textures are not there.

    She now has a new 2001 Impala Base and a 2002 VW Golf in her driveway.

    Bob Lutz has stated that upcoming new GM products will feauture interiors in the realm of VW/Audi quality. I really hope he makes good on this promise. Imagine a nice new 2006 Impala SS RWD V8 with an interior as good as an Audi A6...
  • tpkentpken Member Posts: 1,108
    Yes Teo - I'd be trading my Bonneville in no time!

    Ken
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Trading your Bonnie? Why?
  • tpkentpken Member Posts: 1,108
    Teo - I have no intention of trading now - but your mention of a possible RWD V-8 Impala SS in about 4 years would certainly tempt me then.

    Ken
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Gotcha!
  • impalaboy2001impalaboy2001 Member Posts: 117
    I guess this is what the 2005 Impala SS will look like

    http://www.cheersandgears.com/chevrolet_cars.htm

    What do you guys think, I personally dont like it.

    Chris
  • wyoimpwyoimp Member Posts: 87
    Looks like one of those cars that need to be seen in person. The drawing may or may not do it justices. Same for the color and wheels. Wonder what the interior looks like. Would the SS hace full instrumentation? Manual Gear Box? Dual exhaust?
    Wonder how different the concept vehicle will be from the production model. Looks like oversized "Tear Drop" lights are the coming style along with angular shapes
    I like the present flowing lines of the current Impala. The "Chevron" rear light assembly has grown on me! My wife says you can tell the new Impalas by their "Big Eyes" on the rear.
    Anybody try to make the inboard lights do more than backup lights?
  • tpkentpken Member Posts: 1,108
    Good grief - a cross between the nose of a Focus and the side view of a Subaru according to that pic - what a nightmare.

    Now the retro 69 style Camaro just above it on the other hand - that's NICE!
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Those are "doctored" pictures, by the way. The 2005 "Impala" in reality is the next generation Opel Vectra sedan (A.k.a Saturn L Sedan). Actually, it is likely thatthe next generation Malibu will look like the new Opel Vectra.

    I predict the 2005 Impala will have more of a retro-look possibly to the highly successful 1960's models.

    Most of what you see in that site is just hear-say and altered pictures.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    How many 2000 & 2001 Impala owners have had their Intermediate Steering Shaft (ISS) replaced on their cars more than one time? At mileage?
  • malibu99malibu99 Member Posts: 305
    Those are nice cars!
    The reality is, people no longer want the boring sedans, they want the European looks and feel in cars and if GM follows those designs it will be a big hit. Just think about it..no more vanilla Impala and Monte Carlo designs, yuck!
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    The direction of upcoming GM products will have heavy OPEL influence in them. However, the pictures on that site are doctored, altered, re-done whatever you wanna call them and therefore are far from reality.
  • >>>after sitting in my sister's new (yeah she bought another car) 2002 VW Golf GL 5-door hatchback, the interior fit/finish and materials of that $16K "Econobox" (Very nice econobox by the way) blows the $25K Impala LS right out of the water.<<<

    Now do you understand my posts about the very same topic, after we got the CL? There is no comparison. The Chevy leather is subpar compared to any other make/model leather I have ever seen.
    The plastic panels are flimsy, and have that hard, brittle consistancy, unlike the firm, dense, and softer plastics found in other cars, even other domestics.
    The knobs, buttons, and switches, especially the temp selector, feel like they'll come off in your hand.
    The cupholder liner keeps coming out, getting stuck to the bottom of the drink container. I don't know how many times I've brought a drink up to my mouth, to find this huge plastic appendage hanging off the bottom of it. It's embarrassing, as well, like TP on your shoe.
    Don't get me started on seat build quality. :-)
  • 00impala00impala Member Posts: 474
    I will let you know the mileage when I had my ISS Replaced in my 2000 LS, Remember, I had the newer P/N and it was a week before they went to the LUBE KIT, I had that done on my Base. Will let you know the particulars tonite.

    I think that Impala pic still looks like a FWD, and that Camaro front end looks like a 1976 Pontiac Firebird or Trans Am. Don
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    The door panels as well as the top of the dash don't bother me that much. At least the door panels don't "Breath in and out" when lowering and raising the windows like in the '99 Accord.

    But yeah, the Dash Fascia, the dash bottom and the center console could be much better plastic. Ditto for the Leather and Cloth seat coverings.

    Otherwise the design of the dash is simple, controls are well placed and everyhthing can be operated with very little distraction.

    The Glove Box is another item in need of major improvements.

    Just improve the interior materials, please!
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Also remember that your Acura CL is about $8K (More or less) more expensive than a loaded Impala LS after haggling. Not exactly the most fair comparison. (But not invalid)

    On the other hand, you get this $16K compact VW Golf with an interior that can even put your CL to shame...

    The message is written in the wall, GM.
  • spence30spence30 Member Posts: 52
    By the look of those pictures, the camero and impala have the front look of the 2002 cadilac CTS. Now there is a RWD car that comes with either a 5 speed manual or auto. No V8 though, and a touch under 40k. If chevy makes a rwd impala, it would probably be based off the new caddy.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    GM has made it clear that the Sigma RWD platform on which the current Cadillac CTS is built on, will not be available to any other divisions below Cadillac. So in essence, the CTS will be the lowest priced Sigma RWD car available now and in the future.

    Impala/Montecarlo are scheduled to be moved off the W-body platform to the new RWD Mid-lux large car platform.
  • spence30spence30 Member Posts: 52
    A 2002 impala LS at the dealer. I was in shock, it has the sticker in the window, and plastic covering the seats still. What was the shock you might ask.... It was totaled. I ask the service advisor how a brand new Impala not sold gets to look like that. He said "that's what happens when you do a locate for someone, and the person who drives it back looses control" He also told me that most of the people who shuttle the cars for locates are usually older retired people. Shortly after that, the same guy wrecked another car...
  • night_owl1night_owl1 Member Posts: 760
    Those "lights" are actually only reflectors. There is no reflector back there and because of the sheetmetal behind the panel, there is no room to install one. I have been toying around with building a LED array for it, but I have other ideas actually. I want to relocate the reverse lights to the bumper and create two smaller brake/turn lights in the trunk panel. Then rework the existing tail lights and make them smaller. So what I would end up with are three tail lights on each side.

    At night, popping the trunk with the remote turns on the reverse lights. Pretty blinding if you are not expecting it.
  • Actually, the CL was only $2000 more MSRP than a fully equipped LS. The negotiated price was also about $2000 different. Where'd you get $8000 from?
    $2000 is not really alot, considering the mechanical improvements alone would usually cost that much. The build quality is an added bonus.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    I ran Edmunds' TMV for new cars...here is the comparison:

    2002 Acura CL 5 Speed Auto/No Navigation:

    MSRP: $28,510
    Invoice: $26,319
    Target Price: $27,611

    2002 Chevy Impala LS (Loaded)

    MSRP: $26,666
    Invoice: $24,394
    Target Price: $24,893

    Deduct current $2002 rebate plus 5.9% financing:

    OTD price $22,891

    Difference = $4,720

    Besides, no one pays MSRP for an Impala. Acura TL and CL's were selling for MSRP and above for a long time but as these cars have begun to age, it seems that Acura dealerships are beginning to deal on them more than in the past. Still the CL after haggling, discounts, etc comes up to be a more expensive car. To me a $4K to $6K price difference is quite substantial.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    I paid for mine $21K even. LS model with everything except leather, sunroof and cassette tape player.

    $6,611 difference between the CL and my LS. Big difference.
  • Leather, sunroof, and tape add up to about $1600. What do you consider "everything"? It sounds like your only option was the PEG. Did you get the comfort seating? That another $425.
    My car has everything except for Comfort Seating.
    As for pricing, I was comparing 2001 models, as mine are 2001's, purchased in April 2001. I am not including financing or rebates, as there was none available at that time, and I like to compare apples to apples.

    2001 Impala LS with all options:
    MSRP $26,419
    Invoice $24,163
    TMV N/A (My price was $24K w/o Comfort Seating)
    No rebate available at that time.

    2001 Acura CL Premium
    MSRP $28,460 ($2041 more than an LS)
    Invoice $25,988 (Less than $2000 difference from the LS)
    TMV N/A (We paid $25,995. Also, less than $2000 difference. Dealer also threw in Splash Guards, Wheel Locks, and Custom Floor Mats at N/C)

    Obviously, these are two different types of vehicles, and a sport coupe may not suit someone in the market for a family sedan. But, my point that for less than $2000 difference, there is a huge difference in interior materials, besides the various mechanical and luxury improvements.

    Your point that a $16K econobox has better interior materials than our $20-$24K Impalas is even better than mine!
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    OK, but if you want to compare Apples with Apples, again I paid $21K OTD for my Impala LS. So if I pair that up to the best possible OTD price for a new 2001 Acura CL coupe, the difference would still have been well over $5K between both cars.

    MSRP to MSRP yea the difference is about $2K, but you don't pay sticker on either car. OTD pricing is the true measurament.

    But I am in agreement that it is bad enough that a VW Golf can put to shame the interiors of cars costing $10K to $15K more...
  • But, you didn't get any options with yours, except for the PEG. So, yeah, you're Impala "apple" did indeed cost much less than an Acura "orange" would have. A base Impala would have been even less.
    However, if you would have chosen a fully equipped LS, much closer in level to the CL, the difference would have been less than $2000 "OTD", without your GM Card and/or factory rebates.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    ...and you were lucky to get a new CL for invoice. So that makes your Acura more like a mango.
  • Mmmmmmm...Mango.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Speaking of Mangos, I am in the mood for some mango sorbet....
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.