Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
All 1's and 0's.
Maybe we should change your name to "digitalman".
Who will be #11111?
I have a little too much free time on my hands in case you guys were wondering.LOL.
Anyway, this brings me to the Lemon Law issue...3 times in for the same problem, then its a lemon right?? I read in the past on this board that some people had GM buy their car back (invoice price - 2 cents a mile I think). Does anyone know how that whole lemon and buyback process work? My car has 33K miles on it right now, and warranty is almost over. I really hope I can get this resolved before then, if anyone out there can help me on this matter I would greatly appreciate it. I just dont want to get stuck with a car that pops and clunks.
BTW I have also had my ISS replaced at 24,000 miles. Thanking you all for your help in advance.
Chris
http://members.cox.net/2001impala
Right before taking the car on a long vacation drive to the Jersey shore I filled up on premium for the first time. Could it be my imagination? I am convinced my car is driving better.
Any thoughts?
Tires - Had the Eagle GAs replaced with Bridgestone Potenza RE910s on Thursday (found a good deal at local Firestone shop, was toying with ordering a set of Toyo Avid T4s from tirerack before I found these). The Potenzas are MUCH quieter than the GAs, and also hold the road much better. In addition, they're excellent on wet roads. Went out yesterday morning and it had just come a big rain; when I pulled out on the highway, the GAs would generally spin if it were wet, and traction control would kick in. I deliberately punched it when I pulled out (there was no traffic on Sunday morning), and I didn't get any wheel spin at all.
Here are a couple of websites that might help you out:
http://www.123car.com/lemon/lemonbystate.html
http://www.nationallemonlawcenter.com
and F.Y.I our 00 Impala now has a little over 46,000 miles , and its needed nothing besides , tires , brakes , (((( and a battery , which was covered under warranty )))) .
By the nossirahg , I have not really seen any 01 or 02 base modles with the 3800 v6 , like our 00's have , it seems like 95 % have the 3400 v6.
I cant wait till we get a police Impala in there , we had a 00 in there last week with a service engine light on , it had 88,000 miles on it and it had been driven hard .
thanks-------------mattmcdill
This is a completely new color for '03 right?
I had a nasty surprise this morning--apparently SOMEONE (in other words, my husband;) borrowed my car and got bubble gum on the interior carpet, where one would place one's left foot when the leg is fully extended. ARGH!
It really is an awful mess-there's quite a lot of it still on the carpet (not even on the floor mat--yeesh!)
I've been able to pick some of it out, but it's going to need more than that. Any thoughts on what I can use? I was thinking nail polish remover, but am worried it will cause damage to the carpet or worse--it's pretty harsh stuff.
I don't think my husband realizes he got gum in there (couldn't have been me, as there's no gum on my shoes). I'm hoping he will be chivalrous and offer to clean it, but we'll still need to know what to use.
Thanks!
Odds are you've got a jar of peanut butter around that you use to remove wax buildup from your black side-mouldings. ;-.)
May work.
http://www.gocohens.com/oops/carpet.html
The ice trick is in there.
I have had a lot of success with a product called Oops!, available at a number of hardware stores. I got my can at Walmart.
http://www.cornerhardware.com/hardware/Housewares/Cleansers_Sealers_Polishes/Stain_Removers-1074.html
Test it on an inconspicuous place first! I've never tried to remove gum with it, but I have used to to remove stains and it does a great job. However it did remove the dye out of one thing I was going to clean. After that experience I always find a test patch and wait a day to see if anything changes.
But, remember, you don't need to buy another air filter...ever! The K&N is permanent. It also filters better AND has better air flow than paper filters.
If you choose to continue using paper filters, don't buy Fram. Everything they make is crap, major crap, especially their oil filters. (Quaker State and Pennzoil filters are also Fram.) Remember...Fram=Crap.
On average, I seem to get an increase of 10PSI when the tires are warm, so I can gauge the ammount of air to be added pretty consistently.
Anyway, I started thinking *scary*, and came to the realization that if I abided by the normal 30-32 PSI that some use, the tire would look FLAT. it already looks low now with about 34 PSI.
I still may add air as the ride started pulling a bit to the left, indicating a low tire...
For what it is worth, I checked the other 3 and they were the same as the first, so at least they keep steady pressure all the way around.
Are the Goodyears giving the illusion that the tire is low on air or what? My girlfriend bought an '02 Cavi a couple of weeks ago. Ya know, the chrome wheels, low-pro tires and all... As soon as I saw it, I said ya gotta get some air in them thar tires!
Maybe I am nuts... maybe I like HARD tires- thanks for listening.
BTW: 21K on the '01 and *whispers* "all is well"...
RR
As for the gum , I use Ice and a small pair of sizzors , as well as some carpet cleaner .
To me the Berry red doesnt really look purple , when I first saw it before I ever knew what the color was called , I though to my self ......Raspberry , it really looks good on the LS . thanks---------mattmcdill
Comes with a swab on a stick in the lid enabling you to paint the rubber surfaces.
I read the recommendation in the manual (of all places).
I just went back to my fuel records, and averaged my fuel consumption since installing the K&N, and over 31 tanksfull, I've averaged 23.48 mpg. The 31 tanks prior to that averaged 22.73 mpg, so one could argue the K&N has given me a 3% decrease in fuel consumption. HOWEVER, looking at the same time period 2001 vs. 2002, I averaged 24.59 mpg (but that included a roundtrip to Orlando and back; 4 tanksfull - including my record 32.91 mpg tank). The K&N might have made a difference, but I think the main reason to switch to one it the longevity - paper filters run @ $10 each, and I think I paid @ $40 for my K&N.
One Is "Forever Black" http://www.autosportcatalog.com/index.cfm?fa=p&pid=28
Another one is "Eagle One Black Trim Restorer"
http://www.properautocare.com/eagoneblactr.html
and the 3rs is "Mothers Back to Black"
http://www.autobarn.net/ch06108.html
Or is there something different/better than any of these 3?
Thanks
gw
roderacer I have noticed the same thing with my front tires. They both always look so low, but I've had 'em checked and they have the correct amount of air.
Brad
one of the many selling points for me was the folding seats. The Impala hauls long stuff nicely.
My pseudo pickup.
Maybe it is the degree of rake of the vehicle that gives the illusion of low tires.
good luck with the ice and scissors. What flavor gum was it?
But the Impala is the ultimate pickup. '12 piece of vinyl siding plus room to spare. Or a 32" wide screen door. Too bad a 36" won't fit.
I don't think you can go wrong with a Mother's product.
Use regular gas. Premium is good if you need it for a performance engine or to reduce spark knock. But the 3.4s and 3.8s are designed for regular and work best on regular. Premium costs more and supposedly doesn't burn as cleanly as regular does. <==garypen I'm expecting some sort of reply on this. That's what I've heard.
Later
42-44PSI is average for my tires hot. No unusual wear anywhere on the tread. Remember - 34PSI cold.
so they got the key somehow... anybody you know or dealt with at the dealership that may have envied the "SS"???
All "SS 'ers" out there - BEWARE of new Ford in rearview.
quartermile 15.5 @ 91 mph
I have a May 2002 issue of motor trend that shows an Impala LS at 0 to 60 in 7.7 and quartermile at 15.8 @88 mph .
I also have another motor trend test from 2000 thgat shows it at 7.6 0 to 60 and 15.6 @ 90 mph .
The Impala has a weight to power ratio of 17 and the Marauder's is only 14.
In real life I believe the Impala to be a 8.0-8.5 second car and the Marauder to be 7 or a little less.
The Ford motor improves greatly once it has some mileage on it.
Didn't C&D say 8.5 secs for the Impala? With the Regal being inexplicably faster?
When we first got our 00 base model Impala W/3800 , after about 5000 miles , I could only get 0 to 60 in about 8.8 -9 after 20,000 miles , I was getting 7.8 - 8.1 0 to 60 , I guess it just needed to get broke in good ..... It will fly .... Camaros with the 3800 v6 and auto , are good for mid 7 - 0 to 60 times , and low 15's at 90 mph , one reason is the trannys 1st gear has a 3.06 ratio , and the rear end has 3.42's , much better gearing than the Impala .
We sold one of the last camaros yesterday , I got to clean it up , It had the 3800 v6 performance package , which comes with dual exaust , and limited slip , as well the same steering gear that comes in the Z28 , ..........any way , it had an auto , and It honestly felt quicker than any Impala w/3800 I have driven ,.... also that exaust tone the the dual outlets is sooooo sweet . thanks------mattmcdill
Motor Week did a piece on them recently, in memorium.
..but now that you mention it, the new Marauder does intrigue me, despite the manufacturer.
cheers!