Subaru Impreza WRX

1165166168170171224

Comments

  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    that a lot of WRX owners are young motorheads, who are very hard on their equipment.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I think that the 227hp state of tune is unique to the US, plus they had no ODBII experience. Lots and lots of those problems reported are surely check-engine lights, for instance.

    Not to mention americans complain more loudly about little things like squeeky brakes. Euros gladly accpet that as a characteristic of semi-metallic brake pads.

    So, in that sense, it was a version 1.0.

    -juice
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    especially the ECU reflash to reduce the sensitivity of the OBDII equipment.
  • joe249joe249 Member Posts: 95
    Does Subie plan on having a sunroof as an option ,or does it compomise the safety cage?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The WRX sedan will offer the option in 2004, we're not sure about the wagon though.

    -juice
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    I got a hair over 26mpg, which pleased me quite a bit.

    Of course, this included a highway haul home from the dealer and a ~150 mile round trip into the Poconos.

    I'd set the "A" trip-meter after that fill-up, but accidentally reset it again mid-week while on a business trip (good thing I get to expense miles & fuel), so when I filled up this afternoon (12 gallons, almost $22! Yeesh! Let's get the Iraqi crisis solved, one way or t'other!) the trip-meter only said 285 miles.

    Like all of you, I anticipate a noticeable drop after I pass the 1000 mile mark and am cleared to explore the upper half of the "Spinning Needle Gauge o' Fun!" Not too much, as I'm not a speed-freak and most of my regular driving is highway-heavy. But I'm still glad I'm young, single, and can easily control my spending on things like food (more meals at home with less steak, more pork, chicken, & veggies) entertainment (my local library has a good DVD selection available for FREE!) and Friday beers to compensate for the rise in go-juice-budget.

    Speaking of Friday beers......

    IT'S 5:00!!! WAHOO!!!

    Don't worry, though. I do not drink & drive. I either have friends over, ride with somebody else, or play the DD myself (they pay for my bar munchies so it balances out)

    My home PC is NFG, so I'll be MIA until Monday AM. You all have a great weekend!!

    DjB
  • sensei1sensei1 Member Posts: 196
    is a good thing that we take lightly. Are we still talking about ratings? They're nice to know, be informed. But the ultimate rating that counts IMO is when you're no longer happy with your car. Then you start looking for what's wrong, what's the track record , etc.

    You're right Juice, too many little stuff. The WRX is still a no-nonsense driver's car, MO. Mine still gets me pumped up, that's my rating...counts in my book.
  • jmgregory5jmgregory5 Member Posts: 48
    The other thing you have to keep in mind with the results that CR posts is that they only represent ratings based upon information they get from their readership.

    This is the main problem I have with them. If they say that a particular car is below average, they are not telling you that this is because 4 people who both purchased the car and read and respond to CR had problems with the car. If the wrx got below average (even slightly) ratings, I highly doubt that it is because of people modding their cars had problems with them. Again, that would suggest that these people modding their cars also read and respond to CR polls, something I just can't see.

    John
  • cinosweivecinosweive Member Posts: 166
    I wish I could figure out how folks are getting such great mileage. I don't think I have ever topped 25 mpg. My normal day is about 80/20 Hwy/city - I do about 70 on the hwy. With that I am averaging 24 mpg. I have found that the mileage can drop significantly the faster you go. One long trip, going 80+ all on the hwy I didn't pass 25 mpg.

    I saw a post awhile back where somebody was claiming 30 mpg. With gas pushing $2/gal I'd like to know how that is done. Any high mileage folks like to share their techniques?
  • enetheneth Member Posts: 285
    Easy on the throttle - keep the rpms below about 2800 and the mileage improves significantly - once the turbocharger kicks in, mileage drops quite a bit.

    Driven with restraint, mileage isn't bad - drive with a heavy foot and you'll see 20 mpg at best.
  • gottawrxgottawrx Member Posts: 18
    i've been gettin around 23-25 in my break in period and i am at 1200 so i hope it doesn't get too much worse. Her in Nor. Cal. premium is at $2.23-2.33 a gallon. Too bad it is not a turbo diesel. So dont let me hear you guys cry about it is almost $2 a gallon. I would be happy with that.
  • dill6dill6 Member Posts: 120
    Hi! I haven't been around here much I bought my wagon over a year ago - 22K grinning miles ago. I've about burned off the orig. tires now and I'm thinking about getting some 17" rims and summer tires, keeping the stock rims for winter. A few questions about this:

    do the lower profile tires mean a much harsher ride? how about noise? (I know these will both be somewhat dependent on the particular tire, but generally?)

    what other handling upgrades can you recommend? sway bars?

    BTW, my wagon has been perfect in the reliability dept. except for a glitch in the alarm system, which I haven't put much effort into, so I can't really complain.

    Only around 21 MPG average but I can't resist using the boost every chance I get.

    What a great car!
  • nowakj66nowakj66 Member Posts: 709
    Just talked to my local dealer. He said to expect the plain (non-STi) WRX 04 in July. That seems like a ways off to me! Anyone else hearing the same or different?
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Hopefully our sedan brethern (and sistern) won't mind this discussion about wagons. :-)

    I just installed 215/45/17 Firehawk SZ50 EP's on P1 rims over the weekend. The SZ50 is an Ultra High Performance tire that uses a similiar technology to Bridgestone SO3's (a much loved Max Performance tire). I chose the SZ50 for it's long treadwear rating and good ride. It's slightly harsher than the stock tires, but my wife didn't mind it even on bumpy NJ roads. I haven't really pushed the tire yet since I want to put on some break-in miles. Check out tirerack.com for some great tire info.

    A rear sedan sway bar is a good upgrade for the wagon.

    -Dennis
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    http://www.forbes.com/2003/03/17/cx_mf_0317feat.html

    Go throught the slide-show and see what you think of the Subaru concept.

    DjB
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    Pulled the trigger on the Firehawk install, did you? Hope we won't get any late March/early April snowstorms. ;-)

    Did you install a sedan rear sway bar yet?

    Ed
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    It was a beautiful weekend!

    The weather forecast is mild over the next several days. I only drive to the bus stop during the week and I can take my wife's OB on the weekends if Mother Nature decides to throw a curve ball.
    No sedan sway bar yet, but I want to install one eventually.

    -Dennis
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    will we be seeing you at the Auto-X? :D
    Like to hear 'bout your impression inre stock ~16+23lbs =39lbs wheel/tire combo vs ~19.7+22lbs=~42lbs P1/Firehawk combo. Any take aways the extra ~3lbs might from handling/performance? I'm veering to the UK 17s and Firehawk route.

    -Dave
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    We did a lot of yard work over the weekend; cleaning up small limbs and the rest of the oak leaves knocked off by the snowstorms, and I was up and down a ladder cleaning the outside windows of our sunroom.

    In short, I was stiff as a board this AM. Glad the Forester has the AWP - hope all WRXes get it soon!

    Ed
  • bigdogzonlybigdogzonly Member Posts: 7
    N.Y. dealer told me end April early May.
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    Thanks for the feed back Dennis :)

    Well, speed isn't my primary concern as far as wheel/tire weight. Just looking to see if you noticed or felt any difference with extra wheel/tire weight against the WRX stock spring/suspension set up to stay on the ground. When I switched to the RS wheels/MXV4 215/60-16 on the OB [~39lbs], the wheels stayed in the air noticeably longer vs OEM 15/MXV4 205/70-15 [~37lbs] going over bumps - felt especially during turns.

    Mudflaps... I'm ahead of you on that. It's due to arrive Wednesday. :D
    My HID auxillary lamps should arrive next week.
    Next on the list, wheels and tires.

    -Dave
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    I was under the impression that you needed to keep the weight of the wheels the same, where 3 lbs. per wheel would have a noticeable impact on acceleration. The reason is, there are wheels I really like the look of that weigh 19.2, vs. a pair I like, but not nearly as much at 16.5 lbs. Both the same price.
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    Here's a link I came across last year
    http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-article?article_id=3464

    -Dave
  • sensei1sensei1 Member Posts: 196
    So Dennis, why didn't you go with 225/45 17's like most of the posts?

    Good article Dave, I'm thinking SuperLeggs with 225/45 17's for mine. Maybe Sumi HTR's. Thoughts/comments?

    I don't think mpg and WRX go together. Wrong car to think of saving gas. Driving a WRX under 3K rpm or around 65mph would be torture. Life's too short.

    mpg = $2.25+ (premium)
    adrenaline rush = priceless ;-)
  • raybearraybear Member Posts: 1,795
    AWP will be an option for 2004.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    225s on a wagon will rub if you lower it (not sure if yours is a wagon or sedan) The Sumitomos may seem like a good deal initially, but we've found several people have been developing bubbles in their Sumitomos similar to the ones that people were developing in the Kumho 711 and 712 tires that were popular "low-buck" alternatives. I'd stick to the Firestone/Bridgestone/Dunlop/Mich/Pirelli/etc tires the "1st tier" manufacturers.

    -mike
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    I've read that, but I've also read that AWP will be limited to sedans. Can you confirm? At this stage I'm considering either a WRX wagon or a Forester XT as my next car and the availability of AWP may be a factor, albeit a minor one, in my choice.

    Thanks,
    Ed
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Just to reiterate that I haven't pushed the car at all, so I haven't noticed *that* much of a difference. Didn't notice much of a change going over bumps either. That's a plus in getting a UHP tire over a MP tire. You give up a little grip for a better ride and longer life.

    sensei - Yes, mike said it. The primary reason I chose 215's is the concern over rubbing. Although I might eventually lower it, I have a Thule Excursion cargo box that I will load up a couple of times a year for vacation. The other reason is that SoA recommends 215's so I figure I would get less hassle in the event of problems down the road.

    -Dennis
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    It really depends on degrees of increase.

    You have to consider the change in weight when you change wheels. Adding two pounds in the wheel and then another two pounds in the tire may not be noticeable (say 10% overall increase). But adding 30% to everything will be. The difference in acceleration might be not noticeable, but the ride difference is.

    I went to wheels that were 40% heavier. Did I notice the difference. Heck YES! There was a real penalty in the ride, and even my wife could notice it.

    I strive to not lose any performance for the sake of looks, and I chose a great light wheel that didn't break the bank. I wanted a margin of safety because once you buy them you are stuck with them.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Elaborate for me, what is this? I am not a Subaru owner, so don't yell at me for not knowing.. :)
  • dill6dill6 Member Posts: 120
    Where are you guys finding the weight specs on wheels and tires? I can't find anything on tirerack.com. I wouldn't consider spending the $ to go to 17s if I weren't shedding some unsprung weight by doing so - so, for comparison sake, what do the stock wheels weigh?

    One other question - since I'm lazy and don't love the idea of changing wheels twice a year, how do the best handling all-season tires stack up these days? It does snow where I live so I need winter tires that have at least decent snow performance, even with AWD.
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    AWP = All Weather Package. Consists of heated front seats, heated side view mirrors, and a heated strip along the base of the windshield (just like the rear window defogger) that keeps the wiper blades warm and free of ice.

    Ed
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    SP5000s are your best bet for "not removing wheels" but remember you need to remove them every 5K miles to rotate them... This is very important on AWD vehicles.

    -mike
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    www.wheelweights.net

    Tire weights are harder to come by....you'll have search or ask the manufacturer directly.

    Re: all-season tires. The best all-season tires still have poor snow performance compared to winter tires. The high performance all-seasons have the worst snow traction of the all-seasons. That's not likely to change since the requirements for designing performance tires are completely opposite to designing tires good for snow.

    Nokian NRW and WR are the only all-seasons I know of that passed the snow tire testing standard (snowflake symbol branded).
  • sensei1sensei1 Member Posts: 196
    Also check WRX Aftermarket Tire Choices posts. #22 has a good reference link.

    TY Mike, Dennis, trying to get the biggest bang for the buck like everybody else. More and more sounds like All-Seasons are out of the equation based on general opinion.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Thanks for your help!

    I can surely see one's appreciation for heated seats. I have them in my VW (first time I ever had them), and I will never be without them again!
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Said it before and will say it again, my SP5000s did fine on the SVX (in 245 width) during a 400 mile treck through a blizzard on the NYS T-way during the 48hrs of Tri-state. And through several 10-25" snow storms in NYC this winter. I'm not sure what else would qualify as more snow. They weren't perfect and you had to be careful, but unless you live in an area that gets >5-10ft of snow a year the SP5000s or Sport A2s should do fine for you @ a price of ~$100/tire.

    -mike
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Here's a great chart with Impreza wheel weights:

    http://wac.addr.com/auto/obs/wheels.html

    Another good all-season is the Sumitomo HTR+. IIRC, the SP5000 is not available in 215/45/17. The ultimate UHP A/S is the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S for a bargain price of about $200 ea.

    All-seasons have definitely improved in snow over the years. There were quite a few folks on the SP5000's on the Tri-State drive paisan is referring to.

    Do a search on the Tire forum of nasioc.com for reviews.

    -Dennis
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Poor quality in my findings. So far I know of at least 4 tires that have bubbled due to potholes in NY/NJ area this winter out of maybe 20-25 tires that I know of.

    -mike
  • sensei1sensei1 Member Posts: 196
    That's what I was thinking (dreaming for now) of getting for my WRX sedan. 225/45/17 on Superlegerras maybe.

    RE92's will be bald if I keep waiting for the stocks to go up. ;-)
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Like you said in an earlier post, I guess it's better to pay more for a really good brand.

    -Dennis
  • sensei1sensei1 Member Posts: 196
    How about the Potenza RE730's Mike?
  • cinosweivecinosweive Member Posts: 166
    How forgiving are the SP5000s? The Potenzas may not be the stickiest things on the road but they sure do give way in a friendly sort of way.
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    He really likes them, and they look good too.
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    I have SP5000's on my 2.5RS, and they're very progressive as they reach the limit and easy to recover (unlike the S-03's on my Prelude). Overall grip is very high, but there's a bit a sidewall flex before the tread really starts working (that's where the comfy ride comes from). They also stay quiet and reliable as they wear.

    Obviously, the SP5000 is not an auto-x tire, but it does great in the wet (better than the S-03) and dry, and is far more capable in the snow than the RE-92.

    I also ran 2 sets of the Dunlops on my GS-R, and they rocked there, too. If they were available in the correct size for my 'lude, I'd have bought them instead of the S-03's.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Another option would be to purchase cheaper tires and wheels for auto-x. On one of the SBD's, there was a guy that had gold RS wheels (purchased used)and Falkens(?). The RS wheels are 17 lbs according to http://wac.addr.com/auto/obs/wheels.html

    What's the deal with the guy that gets the Prodrive mudflaps? Who is he and how does he get them? Is that a case similar to vsigma? Just wondering if they'll eventually be cheaper if Irvine Subaru starts selling them.

    -Dennis
  • prayerforprayerfor Member Posts: 161
    Here is how Luke from TireRack.com ranks the Ultra High Performance All Season category:

    1.) Sport 5000
    2.) Michelin Pilot Sport A/S (best in class but expensive)
    3.) HTR+ (really good ride quality and low cost)
    4.) BFG G-Force KDWS
    5.) AVS DB

    Standard Performance All-Season:

    1.) RE950 ( great steering response for this level )
    2.) SP Sport A2
    3.) SH30
    4.) Pilot XGT H4 (harsh feeling)
    5.) Srixon 4

    The SP5000s aren't available in either 225/45/17 or 215/45/17, and to me the Michelins are too expensive, so that leads me to the Sumitomo HTR+s. The owner surveys and reviews available at tirerack.com suggest this is an outstanding tire:

    http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=Sumitomo&tir- - eModel=HTR%2B

    Follow Survey and/or Reviews.
  • dill6dill6 Member Posts: 120
    I pulled the trigger on 17" ASA FR1s with S-03s (225-45-17). I'll put some skinnier snows on the stock rims when the time comes.
    I was pretty surprised to see how much some of the aftermarket wheels weigh. I wound up spending more for the ASAs than I had planned, but out of the wheels whose looks I liked they were the most "reasonable" and weigh the same as stock (16.5#) so at least I'm not increasing the unsprung weight.
    The S-03 may be overkill for me since I don't race, but I'll give at least one set of max. perf. tires a shot, what the hey.
    The tirerack guy assured me there would be no fitment probs with 225s - hope he's right!
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    You won't run into any fitment problems as long as you keep the stock suspension (you're going to have more wheel gap with a 45/17), and you don't load your car down too much with people and/or cargo.

    -Dennis
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    Have fun with the S-03's! It's an awesome tire.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.