Subaru Impreza WRX

194959799100224

Comments

  • esqknightesqknight Member Posts: 78
    Relative to some others, I am a fairly new person on these boards, but I've seen the MT v. AT rehashed over and over and over... Can't we just say that the WRX is a great car with either transmission and there are logical reasons why people prefer one or the other along with advantages and disadvantages.

    New topic please :)

    Eric

    P.S. I think that quick sales for the silver-autos may in part be do to their being in scant supply...I'm _still_ waiting for mine :(
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    Where in Brooklyn are you?

    -Dave
  • firecricketfirecricket Member Posts: 1
    IMHO, the difference between VC-AWD and VTD-AWD is not large enough to push me toward the boring nature of AT. Yes, VTD is smarter, quicker... but by getting used to VC and learning how to control it properly, the gap can be much narrowed. I believe few of us would wanna go the harder way, so if VTD were available on MT WRX, most of us would choose VTD. But that doesn't mean VC is too much far behind.

    In short, I don't think VC will hurt the joy of driving a MT WRX enough so that MT fans must consider an AT WRX.
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    It's everyone's constitutional given.
    Be happy with what you've chosen. Never mind what the other chose, they're happy with it. :-)
    There are people whose only choice is AT - don't spoil their dream of being in a WRX. MT:AT which is superior - they each have their purpose.

    -Dave
  • dop50dop50 Member Posts: 162
    What bickering over something that is really a matter of personal preference. If you want an automatic, buy it. If you want to do the shifting yourself, go with the manual. The performance between the two is minimal at best. Also, you can only buy what is available, it's not like you can just go out and buy the rally version. If you have the money, you can build the damn thing!
    I think we have to admit, these cars have their own ablilities, and I don't think it's really fair to compare them with other kinds of cars for anything other than personal preference. They just are not the same thing, just like the auto vs the manual is not the same thing.

    I personally don't buy into the idea that you can make either one act like a RWD, or a FWD for that matter. A week or so ago, I was in a situation where I was making a turn around a blind intersection and low and behold, here comes a car, I nailed it, in 2nd, and the thing kinda just stood up and completed the turn all on it's own. Wow!! what a ride! It had a little bit of side skid, but it was very little and the front wheels pulled it right out of it. And I was up the road like a shot! This took place on a concrete surface with a slight dew on the pavement. The lady in the other car gave my car a strange look at the next stop light! like What is that!? It was kinda scary, but fun at the same time. :)

    Ken
  • bull3964bull3964 Member Posts: 65
    What i was saying is that if the VTD coupled with the AT reacted in that manner, that I would want nothing of it.

    IMO, MT + VC + Skilled Driver > AT + VTD any day of the week. Don't take the subtraction of skilled driver from one side of that equation as an insult. I'm simply saying the skilled driver part is deminished so far with the AT that it no longer becomes a factor. Yes you can downshift in the AT, but ultimatly the computer has the final say what happens which is why the car wouldn't react like the above example.

    I am not saying that rally cars don't meet my standards since they have the VTD because rally cars would never be equipped with an automatic transmission. It's the combination of the two that causes me to pause with the AT taking the brunt of the blame. No doubt that the AT with a VC would would be light years behind the MT in stability and handling.

    The reason why the auto has the VTD is probably to make it FEEL more like the manual when accelerating and handling. It is probably also to make up for the lack of control that happens when you equip a car with a automatic transmission.

    I'm not taking issue with the existance of automatics or the desire of the people to buy one. I am taking issue with the fallacy that the auto's are somehow superior to the manuals simply because they have the VTD. The VTD exists in the auto's in an attempt to level the playing field and to try to offer a consistant experience between the two transmissions and really should not be a consideration when you make your transmission choice.

    IF the VTD was avaliable in the MT, there would be no question that you would buy the manual.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Bull how do you explain:

    XT6 + AT + Rcompounds > WRX + MT + Kumho V712s

    I have #s to prove it too.

    I'm not a die hard AT fan (although that is all I drive) but driver skill and training is worth more than the small difference between the AT and the MT on the WRX. Drive what *YOU* feel comfortable in.

    -mike
  • bedabibedabi Member Posts: 149
    I used up my Subaru/MBNA credit card coupons ($400 worth) on the OEM 4 piston calipers featured on JDM and Euro specs of the WRX wchich costs about $580. Cost me about another $100 to get them installed during a servicing.
    So how do they work? Well, they certainly feel a little stronger when I stomp on them. Others who have had the 4-pots for a while say the biggest difference is the lack of brake fade on the track. So, I'll have to wait a couple of months till track/autocross season begins. At any rate, they look great - big fat calipers painted black with a solid "SUBARU" logo on it. (Finally got my NASA card!)
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    You are knocked out of stock class now :(

    -mike
  • 1subydown1togo1subydown1togo Member Posts: 348
    Did you change your wheels? I read that the 4-pots don't fit with the OEM 16x6.5 wheels.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Hey I'll probably be at the queens meet from 11-12 on saturday if any of the NYCrew is going to be around.

    -mike
  • bull3964bull3964 Member Posts: 65
    Now you are comparing two different cars. Do the same with the auto WRX and we'll talk.
  • beanboybeanboy Member Posts: 442
    Whoa, not the VTD-AWD system is brutally fast! Wouldn't that make for some scary driving characteristics?

    -B
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    IMO, MT + VC + Skilled Driver > AT + VTD any day of the week.

    Why has one other possibility been ignored ?

    AT + VTD + Skilled Driver ???!!!

    Any skilled driver (after getting used to the vehicle) can capitalise on the strengths and minimise/mask the weaknesses of a car and/or its transmission. It does not apply to MT alone. A professional will extract every little bit of that tremendous torque-transfer capability of the VTD-AWD (through the torque sensing planetary gear differential + Multi-plate transfer clutches) and make sure that the better turn-ins provided by the stiffer springs would be utilized to the fullest.

    Nobody who is driving in a car beside mine, suspects that the Auto-WRX I drive is an Auto. Everyone thinks it is a MT. And I am not a driver anywhere close to a real professional who can push the envelope way beyond what I can do.

    Later...AH
  • dop50dop50 Member Posts: 162
    Must be a mind reader, as well as a skilled driver.

    Or a sign on the side that reads... "Bet you think this is a 5 speed, huh!"

    Or maybe he drives "incognito".

    Ken
  • dop50dop50 Member Posts: 162
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Well the XT6 is the same weight as a WRX, but has only 145hp and 156lbs torque, 14" tires, and is 14 years old.

    If you believe that a skilled driver w/AT will be beat by an MT driver then there is nothing I can tell you that will change your mind.

    In general I don't agree with AHs militant forcing of AT on people, but I think the MT guys aren't cutting enough slack to the power of ATs in 2002.

    -mike
  • rex_ruthorrex_ruthor Member Posts: 140
    "If you believe that a skilled driver w/AT will be beat by an MT driver then there is nothing I can tell you that will change your mind.
    In general I don't agree with AHs militant forcing of AT on people, but I think the MT guys aren't cutting enough slack to the power of ATs in 2002."

    AH also thinks a Acura TL will beat a GTP. :) Thats amusing in itself. The real problem with this issue is not which car is actually quicker, its which one FEELS quicker, and often, an AT will give a better launch to the same car and give the misleading impression of being quicker. In some cars, the impression is actually correct, as with the C5 corvette. However, Im sure it is not the case with most luxo barge sedans.
  • bull3964bull3964 Member Posts: 65
    My main point was that the AT is not automatically (excuse the pun) superior to the MT simply because it has the VTD.

    My secondary point is this. Even the auto drivers have said that manual can be (and for the most part is) more fun. Now since we (or at least I) believe that that VTD does not gain the AT any significant advantages over a VC paired with a MT, is the increase in cost of the AT plus the decrease in fun worth the increase in convenience? That's the question that only the individual can answer, but at least it's the CORRECT question.

    I just don't know why anyone would choose the convenience over fun, this car is meant to be DRIVEN, not steered.
  • beanboybeanboy Member Posts: 442
    FEEL DA P_O_W_E_R !!!! For the first time ever, come see the amazing Powered-by Paisan(R) XT6 take on the brutally fast AWD VTDATAH equipped WRX with killa springs! Tix are only 10 bucks, kids get in free! All proceeds go to the Loyale Urban Assault Vehicle League of America.

    We are all Subaru fans here people. :)
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Bull: "My main point was that the AT is not automatically (excuse the pun) superior to the MT simply because it has the VTD." I have to agree with that. As for the VTD gaining an advantage, it depends on the situation. In snow and slippery conditions I'd probably throw it to the VTD, in the dry to the 5MT. As for fun factor? Fun is a relative term, and once you are up in highway speeds, the AT can be driven like an MT forcing the boost on, etc. Also if you live in an urban area or want re-sale value, live in an urban area, share the car with non-MT drivers all of which are valid reasons to have an AT.

    rex author: My uncle has an acura TLS, and I'd put my money on that over a GTP, if there are some curves involved. Off the line the GTP may be faster. It would be close though.

    Sunday SUnday SUnday: Anytime AH wants to auto-x his AT WRX v. my AT XT6, I'm there, he can have his springs, but I get my R-compounds :)

    -mike
  • rex_ruthorrex_ruthor Member Posts: 140
    Sure, a Type-S, no doubt about it. But AH made no mention of it being that. A GTP has more power and torque than a regular TL, so it should be faster. I think they are about similar weights.

    I read the Type-S can click off a low 6 second time; although Edmunds has it at 6.6, Ive seen it as low as 6.2 something. Not too shabby for a slushbox FWD. The Type-S would likely be my choice over a GTP, if I had the money to make the choice.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I believe that AH has a type S, so it was probably an oversight on his part. :) I agree on the TL being mildly spanked by a GTP. Isn't a regular TL just a honda accord?

    -mike
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Actually, the 3.2TL has 6.7secs as the best time 0-60 (Motortrend). The best time obtained by the GTP (info from all magazines) is also 6.7secs (Motortrend). The GTP feels faster off the line due to 280lbs/ft of torque but is not faster than the TL.

    In the exact same comparison test where the TL got the 6.7secs 0-60, the Infiniti I-30 which has both hp and torque greater than the TL and is lighter by a couple of hundred lbs, fetched 7.4secs 0-60. This is on the same day, same time under the same conditions. So it is not merely a matter of HP/Torque/Weight alone. Gearing plays a very important role too. Also, the TL spanked the I-30 in 0-30, 0-40, 0-50, 0-60, 0-70, 0-80, 0-90 and the quarter mile. So it was a rout.

    The TL-s best 0-60 time is about 6.18secs, which is faster than any of the above cars, including the supercharged GTP. Also, the TL-s has 260hp vs the 240 of the GTP, even though torque is larger in the GTP. Now that the TL-s has come out with the 6-speed transmission, the GTP does not stand a chance at all.

    TL is very similar to the Accord V6 except that the TL has a larger engine (3.2L vs 3.0L) and a 5-speed transmission (vs 4-speed) with very aggressive gearing. It also has more torque and horsepower in addition to having a more aerodynamic body. Top speed of the TL is about 155mph while the Accord loses steam at 125mph. Also, they do not share even a single body panel, even though quite a few of the suspension components are shared.

    When I purchased my car, the TL-s was not available.

    Later...AH
  • twrxtwrx Member Posts: 647
    Remember in each movie Godzilla is destroyed and then reappears? Sometimes he battles Rodan other times it is Mothra. How many times now has come back now? By the way does Godzilla drive a MT 5 WRX or is it Mothra. No maybe Mothra has the auto trans.
    Can't remember.

    TWRRRRRRRRexxxxx

    I hear Subaru is reading these posts and solving the problem by taking the tranny out of the WRX and just connecting the turbo directly to the wheels.

    Hope all of this gives us all a laugh....
  • bedabibedabi Member Posts: 149
    Yup, the 4-pots will NOT fit in the standard 16x6.5" wheels. Being a sleeper kind of guy, I just swapped wheels with a 2001 RS which came with 16x7" wheels. Fit perfectly. If I ever move out of NYC, I'll probably get 17" wheels, but the potholes here are just too big and often.

         In fact, a friend took me out for a spin in his new Boxster. It wasn't much of a ride though because he had to slow down anytime something even resembling a bump or pothole appeared, which is every 200 feet or so on the local highways.

         By the way, while at the dealership, they showed me the new OEM 17" wheel available with 5 spokes. That thing was a beauty. It looks a lot better than in the pictures, and it was incredibly light! It couldn't have been any more than 16 lbs. If you're looking into 17" wheels and want factory rims wihtout paying that ridiculous $3000 for the BBSs, they are definitely the way to go. This site has a picture of one (bought my calipers here as well):

    http://www.subaruwrxparts.com/per_wrx.html

         Also, Whalen Tire is selling a gorgeous 17" Enkei forged aluminum wheel, 16 lbs, for just $181 each. If you're in the market for one, you should check it out. They apparently go for over $360 MSRP. Guys on i-club are buying them up pretty quickly.

    http://www.whalentire.com/wheeldetail.cfm?wheelnumber=34377080HS&size=17
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    those look like wheels from the B4

    -Dave
  • bedabibedabi Member Posts: 149
    You are correct, Sir!

    Hypov, you're in Brooklyn? I'm in Porspect Heights. Come to the i-club meet in Queens this Saturday.
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    Soo-
    Might be going bowling (my neglected past-time) this Saturday and get achy all over again. If nothing churns from it, I'll probably come by...
    [I can hear Paisan, "come on, forget bowling and head on over to Queens!"] :-D

    -Dave
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I may bail on Queens myself. I have to go to Philly sat afternoon and there is gonna be an XT6 meet there (3 of us anyway) so I may have to go to that instead. Dave you should make the Feb 17 trail ride though it's gonna be fun. Even have a VX coming! http://isuzu-suvs.com/events


    -mike

  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    Do tell! Meeting up w/our PB friend who drowned his?

    Ed
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Not with paul actually. Kevin Thomas from DE and a kid who recently bought an XT6. I have to be in philly anyway so I'm gonna go a little early and meet up with em. Paul is actually working on making his into a show car. Go figure.

    -mike
  • dbreauxdbreaux Member Posts: 23
    there are 3 different kits that boost 30 or so hp for around 1000.00. VISHNU, COBB AND TURBOXS. Does anyone have one of these or know which would be the best system or so called bang for the buck, and does either one give overall better or more fluid performance than the other. I am leaning toward Vishnu because he seems to do it without all the bolt on parts. Any feedback or alot would be great.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I've heard good things about cobb in general as an establishment. Although I'd wait and see what rallispec comes up with cause i think they are the absolute best subie tuners around.

    -mike
  • tetsujintetsujin Member Posts: 9
    AH: I've driven my friend's 3.2 TL before, and I know it will take my Pontiac! I never meant to say that it wouldn't, and in fact my car is auto anyway so I also never meant that a manual stock Sunfire GT would beat the TL...so I don't see the point in your statement. But regardless...thanx for the links and info you've posted up, you've gone a long way to reassuring me that the Auto-WRX isn't as bad as sometimes portrayed.

    That said, MT sounds like fun - heck why do I always choose MT when playin them arcade racing games anyway - but being from a mostly urban place, I dunno about the practicality. Games are games, and heck I'm not even that great at those, and in real life I think I'm just more comfy with AT. Although as someone has said, it could just be that I've never had a chance to experience MT. Plus the point about the better AWD in the auto sways me in that direction. So does that huge thread at i-club with all the slushboxers supportin each other. And finally add the fact that yeah, I'm admittedly not the most coordinated person, and that I've never driven an MT, makes it hard for me to choose the MT, despite the probable decrease in "fun" to be obtained from the AT...

    In any case it was great to see everyone posting info up and helping me out. In the end, my conclusion: head down to the Subie dealer, ask to test drive the Auto-WRX, and actually see how it goes. Of course that's not gonna happen tomorrow, but (hopefully) in the near future.

    I guess everyone's tired of hearing the whole MT/AT thing anyway, so let's just say case closed... =)
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    When you test drive one, try to test drive one that's already broken in, or see if you can hookup with an I-clubber with a slushbox in your area. The AT tranny is adaptive and "learns" driving patterns over a few thousand miles, so a "green" car will not exhibit the best feeling on the AT.

    -mike
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    Does anybody have hard info on whether Subaru is changing the car for US MY04, and if so what will happen?

    If nothing's official right now, what would be the most-likely date for Subaru to release genuine info?

    I was planning to buy a WRX this June, but if there will be real improvements to the car for next year I might wait, and either buy the new/improved version or get a good deal on the "old" version. It's hard to keep waiting like this; I have the money now, so that's not the issue, but the longer I wait the more I have for down payment without tapping into my emergency-living funds.

    DjB
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    We haven't even gotten info on the MY03 WRX, let alone the MY04!

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I can't believe noone else caught this, but that guy on i-Club mentioned his wife's RAV4 "seems to do better" than his MT Subaru.

    Well, guess what? Toyota uses a VC, too!

    So it boils down to the tires, basically. His criticism applies to the difference in tires or other factors, not the nearly identical AWD sytems.

    -juice
  • thecatthecat Member Posts: 535
    gets past the Juiceman.
    - Hutch
  • cinosweivecinosweive Member Posts: 166
    Thanks for the link on roll bars.
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    AH: I've driven my friend's 3.2 TL before, and I know it will take my Pontiac! I never meant to say that it wouldn't, and in fact my car is auto anyway so I also never meant that a manual stock Sunfire GT would beat the TL...so I don't see the point in your statement.

    The point in bringing the TL into the equation was to compare its acceleration to the Auto-WRX, since both are Auto and TL is a pretty fast car as a reference point. Since the Auto-WRX is as fast or maybe even faster than the TL, you certainly would notice a huge difference when moving from a Sunfire to the Auto-WRX. That was the point I tried to make.

    Take care,

    Later...AH
  • tetsujintetsujin Member Posts: 9
    AH: point taken. Thanx for clearing it up. As you said, I'm pretty sure there's no doubt that moving up to a WRX, AT or MT, will be significant upgrade over my current vehicle.

    Anyway, it just hit me that while everyone replied with lots of info on AT vs MT, how about the possibility of a manumatic/tiptronic/sequential sportshift in the future for the Auto-WRX? The MT can keep it's 5 spd, but is there a chance Subaru would add some type of manumatic for the AT WRX, like what Acura did with the the RSX (NOT the Type S, just the regular or premium) and TL. I've read that the performance from using manumatic is roughly the same as having it in automatic, but it's just the ability to "feel" like I'm shifting gears that I'm looking for. In my mind it's just a nice option that some people (like me) might want for their auto cars.
    Please, no replies telling me I should go learn real manual instead...I'm just curious about this possibility for future (say, 2003) models of the auto-WRX.

    Thanks...
  • jftamjftam Member Posts: 8
    I think the Legacy B4 has an option for a 4 speed sport shift, so if Subaru could fit that into the WRX, there you go.

    However, before you go ahead and choose an automatic/manumatic. Let me get in a few words in the MT/AT debate. :)

    I drive a manual as my daily driver (Civic SiR) in Vancouver, but on occasion get a chance to drive the g/f's Celica GT-S, which has a manumatic. I've also taken a Prelude w/ Sportshift and IS300 for test drives and all I can say is that these "lower-end" manumatics are nothing but a fad. I found that I tended to leave it in drive and let the computer do the work. If I need to pass on the highway, I'll just hit the overdrive button, pull the lever to 3, or mash the gas and wait. Maybe I just haven't had a chance to live with a manumatic on a daily basis. So IMO, a manumatic is a nice feature, but only slightly more valuable than a regular auto.

    That being said, a manual is not just about shifting the gears. It's about being in more direct control of the car. I find that I feel more of a part of a car when driving stick. That's the "fun" part. The car and I as one. :)

    The convenience of autos is definitely a great plus, but IMO, does not outweigh the loss of connection to the vehicle.

    I also think I've become a better driver after I learned manual; my SiR is the 1st one I've driven. I'm more aware of the road/street conditions. I've got to pay more attention to the lights, to the other drivers, so that I'm more ready to react. Could I pay more attention while driving an auto? Sure, but the mere presence of the manual forces me to focus more.

    If the main item in your CON column is that driving a manual is a "hassle", then I think you deserve to give a manual a try. Trust me you won't regret it in the long run.

    I too used to think that there's no point in getting a manual when an auto will do most things I ask of a car. But, after driving a stick for 3 years now, I can't imagine buying an auto. I know my future WRX/STI Wagon will definitely be a manual, in 6-speed please.

    Cheers,

    Jim
  • tetsujintetsujin Member Posts: 9
    Hey, you're from Vancouver? Cool, that's where I'm from. =)

    I see what you're saying about being a better driver using manual, but from my own experience as an AT driver I would think otherwise. I pay close attention to lights, conditions, openings, etc., and that's how I manage to get around fairly quickly. However, I think that if I had a manual car, my mind may be occupied with gear selection as well as these other things. Granted, after driving manual long enough I suppose that shifting would be "automatic" (hmmm...maybe use another word? heh) but as I've mentioned in posts before I'm worried that due to my lacking coordination skills I might screw everything up!

    In any case, if I WERE to get an MT WRX, it wouldn't be anytime soon, cuz I'm not sure I wanna lay down the dough for a nice car and mess it up trying to learn MT in it. I'd have to go learn it (prob. from some driving school as someone said so I can beat on their cars...heh) first.

    Anyway I'm just rambling, thanx for your post! =)
  • twrxtwrx Member Posts: 647
    yes shifting a manual becomes pretty "auto". I have a 20 minute trip to work, about 10 miles. I have been driving a manual for 32 years. I had an accident last year (my first unfortunately). I was tuning the radio. I don't think the MT had anything to do with it. I counted one day and I made 60 shifts in my trip to work. The only times I notice using manual are when I am driving a car with an unfamilier clutch or when I'm really having fun with the manual (like in the mountains or when I'm driving my WRX). So I guess I'm having fun all the time with my manual being a WRX owner.

    TWRX
  • bull3964bull3964 Member Posts: 65
    My previous three cars were all automatics. A corolla, tercel, and protege. It wasn't really my choice since my parents were the ones making the purchases. I basically got what they could find for cheap and that was it.

    I learned how to drive manual from my roomate in college. He owned a 3000GT which I drove from time to time at school. He also owned a hot rodded 1972 240z. This was the car that I learned how to drive manual on. Mmmm, 260HP on a very very light car.....Anyways...

    I never had a moment's doubt in my mind that I wanted a manual WRX from those experiences. The MT drew me in and really made me feel like I was DRIVING, not just steering. Sure on my auto cars I got to the point where I knew where the throttle position had to be in order to make the auto switch, and i was known to downshift it manually from time to time. However, that just wasn't the same enthralling experience. IMO, what draws you in is the clutch.

    Now, after a month and a half of owning my first day to day manual, I have to say it's become second nature. It's not a hassel in any way what so ever. I'm from western PA (pittsburgh specifically) and we have LOTS of hills IN the city itself. Bascially conditions that you would think would make you long for an AT. I frequently have to do the start and stop routine on very steep hills and such. But, it's become no more difficult to slip the clutch and feather the throttle than it was to point and shoot with the AT.

    I'm also noticing other things about my driving style that has been altered by driving a manual. I do like that it makes you focus more. It makes me scrutize the road in front of me. "Ok, there's a car with it's brakes on three cars in front of me, should I downshift, back off so I can keep my rpms so I don't have to downshift, or brake?" MT in many instances forces you to think far in advance of your actions, and that is never a bad thing. It takes no skill to drive an AT (not to say that you can't in fact HAVE skill though), but you must develop some level of skill to drive a MT. And once you get that skill, it will never be a hassle for you.
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    In 10 years of driving only about 1.5-2 years was in an AT car. The only times I really notice I'm driving a manual are when I'm driving really hard, when I'm pulling away from a toll booth and have to shift, steer and roll up my window at the same time (but the WRX has power windows, so that's not a factor) and when I'm coming to a stop in traffic, and either am in neutral or in the lower-end of a particular gear, and suddenly the need to stop goes away and I need to accelerate quickly.

    DjB
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    "It takes no skill to drive an AT (not to say that you can't in fact HAVE skill though), but you must develop some level of skill to drive a MT. "

    It doesn't take skill to drive an AT or an MT poorly, but it does take skill to drive an AT or an MT quickly/properly.

    -mike
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    It takes a great deal of practice and skill to drive an AT very well. Holding the gears in an Auto car is a skill while in a stick-shift, all you need to do is to shift it into that gear. Basically, I donot drink/eat in my car, nor do I ever speak on the cellphone while driving. Iam always alert while driving and I drive pretty fast and aggressively. I cannot do that if I were indulging in the aforesaid activities while driving (eating/smoking/drinking etc) nor can I do that without a lot of concentration. If you are of this type, and drive an Auto well, then it does require a lot of skill. You slowly learn the nuances of the car and the way the trans behaves and adjust the driving accordingly. The transmission also adjusts according to your driving style (since it is adaptive). You are basically concentrating on the other characteristics of the car (weight shifting/torque transfer etc) including the behavior of the transmission. I can hold a gear at will in the Auto-WRX and also downshift at will, something a new Auto driver can never do. Of course you can hold the gear better in a manual car.

    I am not including people who drive Auto-trans cars who are eating, drinking, talking on the mobile and barely keeping the car in the lane. That kind of driving requires no skill whatsoever.

    I would presume that anyone who buys something like an Auto-WRX is an enthusiast and is not of the eating/drinking/cellphone type of person. Someone who concentrates on the driving experiences and the behavioral differences of the car under various conditions and circumstances.

    Later...AH
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.