By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
The ACC does not function the same way as a conventional HVAC system. In order to maintain the driver-selected temp., warm and cool air are blended together. In order to do this, the AC compressor must obviously be engaged and will cycle on and off as long as the ambient temp is at or around freezing. This is the nature of an ACC system and is not the arbitrary decision of Lincoln engineers. That's the whole point of ACC. You do not need to keep fiddling with the controls to stay comfortable. The system does that for you by mixing heated and cooled air together. Even in a conventional (American) system, when you engage the defroster, the AC compressor will engage, even in the dead of winter. Dehumidified air is supplied for window defogging purposes. I'm not sure how it works now, but I remember when many Japanese cars needed to have the A/C manually engaged with outside air setting in order to properly defog the windows in winter. I was in a carpool some years back and argued with one of the drivers season after season when he complained that he could not clear the windows even with defroster on high. He was running the system on recirculate with the compressor off. Some habits die hard. Same guy refused to turn the A/C on in summer until we were "on the highway." He was worried about overheating. No amount of explaining that the car had an electric cooling fan that would run under these conditions and was actually more efficient than an engine-driven fan could convince him. Of course, he never questioned why my car was fine with A/C running in the worst city traffic on the hottest July day.
Tom
LLSOC Member
So now the Manual LS has got real competition from Caddy and both cars will feel the heat from the coming Infinity G35 in April and it's rumored 6 speed version later in the year (after the 350 Z intro, which features the same tranny). My, my, aren't we having a real circus! Stanny1, who's gonna keep his seat belt fastened for this one. (And hoping Lincoln is thinkin', and they know that sister company Mazda has an overdrive RX-7 five-speed that has already been prototyped with the Duratech. And if the CTS has an LSD differential as well, you are just twisting the knife and it really hurts)
As I remeber, the collapse of the main circuit excites the secondary circuit, creating the spark at the coil. I believe the separate coils act the same; By giving the main winding a voltage and breaking it, it then induces the spark voltage.
I think that the only difference is that now the coil over system requires very small voltage (3.3 v.) to preform the duties, rather that the 8 volts required before.
The coil pack is widely used on the 4.6L V-8. It has four connectors on it, one for four of the plugs. The pack fires twice per pack, thereby firing once when a cylinder is at it's compression cycle while the other is at it's exhaust cycle. I know that the 4.6 used two coil packs, both driven by the cams of the cylinder heads.
But, the basic fundamental is the same, it is the induction of electrical energy that makes the spark, not the transformation of the energy. Oh, to meet Charles Kettering and discuss what's become of his electrical systems in cars!
More interesting though, in the Cadillac provided 2003 CTS Competitive Comparison the cars listed are the following:
· BMW ’02 3 Series 330i Sedan
· BMW ’02 5 Series 530i Sedan
· Lexus ’02 ES 300 Sedan
· MBZ ’02 C-Class C320 Sedan
All the cars had a higher base price than the CTS ($29,990 est.)
So it seems that Cadillac is more interested in comparing itself to foreign autos than the U.S.
Final note: The Lincoln booth looked awesome, alot of the same visual cues of the new dealers showroom!
Packv12 Re: Coil. Thanks for the correction/clarification. Like I said, I'm not an EE, so I don't know from transformers & inductors. Heck, I can barely stand to change my own circuit breakers.
I keep driving past the Cadillac dealer on my way home from work to see if they've got a CTS yet. Curious to see if the styling is any less, uh, "polarizing" in person. I've always thought the LS looks much, much better in real life than in photos. I had never seen one on the road when I drove onto the Lincoln dealer's lot. Good thing the salesman wasn't around to see my initial reaction. I'd have ended up paying over sticker for it.:)
Yup, you get what you pay for. But you can't BUY the wisdom & brilliant insight we get for free here in Town Hall.:)
Scott
LLSOC Member
Counting the days . . .
Just a thought.
They are three blocks away from Lincoln HQ and provide free shuttle bus transportation to and from John Wayne Airport as well as the Irvine Spectrum.
The registration form for MANIA 3 will be posted at the LLSOC website later today, both in the bulletin board under the LS MANIA 3 forum as well as the MANIA 3 link on the main page.
This time we are accepting checks as well as credit cards to make it easier for everyone. There is a 5 percent processing charge for credit cards. This event, as all our MANIA events are, is only open to LLSOC members so if you want to go you have to be a member.
If you have any questions, please email them to me at: brian.gowing@llsoc.com
Brian
LLSOC President
Does anyone know the cause of this problem? My dealers usually very good but this one currently has them baffled.
I'd try another dealer. All season pkg is still an option and it does seem to find it's way on most cars but the heated seats are now at no charge. Ditto for the Alpine stereo when car includes Sport Pkg. I just purchased a 2002 LS Sport without the pimpmobile chrome wheels for almost $5,000 below sticker. That put it just short of $1500 below invoice. The purchase was made in November. Sticker was $41,700. Paid $36,900.
Must have been a special X plan or something similar. If not, are you available to negotiate my next purchase ;-)
Gary, LLSOC non charter member
Must have been a special X plan or something similar. If not, are you available to negotiate my next purchase ;-)>>
Don't know what an X plan is. I started out shopping for a 01 because of the 5 year financing. Pricing was not much better than 02s. I figured why buy a 01 if I can buy an 02 at the same price. Quotes were averaging around $2K-2.5K off sticker for either one. I'm on the road with my job therefore I was able to stop at a number of dealers to look and talk price. Some acted like they were selling some hard to get item and others wanted to sell a car. I wound up buying from Dulaney LM in Maryland. They wanted to sell a car. Salesman said they had "money" from Lincoln to move some 2002s. I don't know if that was a line or not but as I stated they sold me the car just short of $1500 below invoice which was almost $5K off sticker. The great part was I never even had to go thru the salesmanager bullcrap of "we can't sell a car for that" and argue for an hour. The salesman went back to the salesmanager to get approval. Like I said I bought the car w/$41.7K sticker for $36.9K and other dealers would only do $38 something and they didn't have the communication package. Now my car did come with the communication package and I did hear a conversation at another dealer that Lincoln sold some cars to dealers with that as a no charge item to get salesman to try it out although I don't know how they would do that since it must be activated thru Sprint by the owner. It was not shown as a no charge item on my sticker or invoice therefore I can't confirm the story. I didn't want the feature but my wife has totally fallen in love with it because of her job. I bought a set of Firestone Firehawks from Tire Rack . com also. Friends don't believe that one but you know all about it.
By the way, in changing the equipment packages on this car for MY02, Lincoln Ddid increase the invoice price more than the MSRP by around $300. So the Roseville dealer wasn't totally wrong.
Again, I remember that from playing with the numbers early in the MY switchover.
Jim
LLSOC member
I have already picked up another car (a mistake, I now realize), but he said the incentives that will be introduced for all Lincoln vehicles will be amazing. He said I could get the same options on a 2002 sport for about 30.00 less than I have been paying for my 2000. Higher residuals, cheap money factor, etc. He doesn't have all of the details, but I am going to talk to him Wednesday, so if I can get specifics I'll post them here.
By the way, I found out the hard way how much content the LS actually has compared to European vehicles. I thought I wouldn't miss some of these things, but if I could get out of my current lease and go back to an LS, I would.
Brent
I have already picked up another car (a mistake, I now realize), but he said the incentives that will be introduced for all Lincoln vehicles will be amazing. He said I could get the same options on a 2002 sport for about 30.00 less than I have been paying for my 2000. Higher residuals, cheap money factor, etc. He doesn't have all of the details, but I am going to talk to him Wednesday, so if I can get specifics I'll post them here.
By the way, I found out the hard way how much content the LS actually has compared to European vehicles. I thought I wouldn't miss some of these things, but if I could get out of my current lease and go back to an LS, I would.
Brent
Brent
I had this happen once 2 winters ago. Seems to occur around 28 degrees for me (like tonight), and last time, when the tow driver came, he told me that the car just has a very fast starter and if I cranked it for a while it would start. After about a minute that time, it fired right up and I did not take the car in to the dealer.
Tonight, I didn't try to crank it, as the starter whine is loud and waking the neighbors kids would be a bad thing. It will work tomorrow, I am sure.
Brent
I have a copy of the invoice and the $36,900 was almost $1500 below the dealer cost. There were no free moonroofs etc.
By the way while I was shopping around the oposite extreem from the dealer where I purchased was another dealer in Baltimore who added a sticker next to the factory sticker on his cars adding $2,000 to the price stating "limited availability markup" His pitch was the car was hard to get but he would knock that $2,000 off and sell you the car for sticker. I told the guy he was an [non-permissible content removed] since Lincoln was spending a fortune in advertising and finance buy downs to get customers thru his doors during tough times and he proceeds to piss them off. What an idiot.
Tom
LLSOC Charter Member
Continuing in the CTS review, they state "Overall value champ is the Cadillac, by a good margin." Huh? The article compares the BASE price of the CTS ($29,350) to the LIST price of the LS ($35,265), when on page 114 of the same issue clearly shows the base price(Which R&T refers to as "List Price" for some reason. I always thought "List Price" was MSRP, what the car "Listed for" on the window sticker") of the LS (automatic) as $30,915. Was the editor asleep or a GM stockholder? Is this not blatant deception?
My previous 2 cars were GM prior to the LS, as I have family members employed by both GM(GMS discount) and Ford (A-Plan purchase). I guess my gripe is more with Road and Track than GM, as anything that give competition to the LS will only improve the breed. As for the CTS's looks, well, IMHO, it is DEFINITELY polarizing.
My last next door neighbor was a GM at a large Cadillac dealership here in south Florida. When news first came out about the CTS redesign, he told me candidly, "I hope they put a V-8 in it. I don't care what kind of horsepower numbers a V-6 makes, my customers want a V-8." I guess we will see what customers want.
I can't be sure but I don't believe the engine actually ever turned over. This would tend to agree with the bendix theory mentioned. It sounded to me like the bendix was attempting to engage the flywheel but couldn't. It sounded like the starter was turning far too fast for the engine to be turning over, even with some loss of compression due to fuel on the cylinder walls.
Sounds like some kind of moisture / freezing problem based upon the temperatures involved. I've experienced similar problems with unsealed relays in this temperature range. Moisture condenses on the contacts freezes overnight and prevents electrical contact until the ice melts. Sounds weird but true.
Hard starting sounds like the flooding problem. Also from a bit of Mania 1 trivia, it seems that when the engineers took the first LSes up to the Northern Territories for cold-weather testing the starter gears would freeze. So some hapless junior engineer would need to crawl under the car in -30 degree weather and whack the starter to free the gear. This was fixed before production started.
The picture spread of the CTS that R&T reviewed says more than words. There is quite a bit of lean in that car compared to the LS. They took an automatic Sport model LS and compared it to the CTS. Keep in mind that no matter what the CTS is brand new, the LS they compared it against was a 2000. I don't like the interior setup. The wheel looks like it came out of an older Caddy and the center stack looks added on. Putting the traction control switch in the glovebox shows you how much priority Caddy puts on sporting driving.
Though no matter what, I'm glad another American manufacturer is getting into the fray against the B-boys. Competition only improves the breed and the LS has a three year headstart. Don't think for a moment that Jonathan, et al, are going to be standing still and letting Caddy take over
Brian
LLSOC Prez
http://www.thehollywoodextra.com/lincoln/lincoln.html
If the compass is important to you, be sure it's available with the option package you want. On the '00 models, I think the compass only came with the factory phone/RESCU package.
Scott
LLSOC Member
Brian
LLSOC President
Does anyone know an easy way to follow up on this?
It is also interesting that the LS is about 2/3 as loud inside at 70mph, coasting or cruising, than the Catera, er CTS. The LS they tested was a 2001 V6 not the 2002.
I not only saw the invoice I have a copy of it. A souvenir kinda thing. I agree with you the one never knows what the real truth is when it comes to buying a car. It must be tough selling a car with everybody that comes through the front door of your store armed with what they think are all the numbers. I'm sure there are many things behind the scenes today that have been put into place to aid the dealer in making some money. I have felt for years that the holdback was not the only thing in the background. My big belief however is that they give the cars away and make the real money in the service dept. In my case all I know is that one dealer beat 10 dealers by thousands so I signed at the bottom. Hell, 10 years from now that difference won't even be remembered or cared about when the car is driven away by the new owner who will probably buy it for a couple of grand.
LS - 3.07(diff) X 1.0(5th) = 3.07 overall
CTS - 3.73(diff) X .82(5th) = 3.06 overall
Hmmmmmmm..... Do you want the 6 or the half dozen?
:-)
Curious what others are paying for same type lease. I know the current deals end on January 14th so when someone knows what Ford will be offering I would love to know. Hope it is similar to GM $2002 cash back.
Thanks
OLD NEW
1st 3.22 3.22
2nd 2.41 2.28
3rd 1.54 1.54
4th 1.00 1.00
5th 0.75 0.71
Rev 3.25 3.25
As you can see only 2nd and 5th ratios changed.
Mark