By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Mostly I don't understand why C&D didn't test a 530 and an A6, which are both available with a manual, and are closer in size and weight to the LS and CTS. Unless of course they wanted to predetermine the results? Ya think?
But hey, Pat's my friend. Of course, she might be responsible for everything but, I have no knowledge of her actions.
I think that we should just click our shoes together three times, I mean you should., cause I actually got a brain.
When exactly is the "baby LS" due out? That's what Lincoln needs for these comparison tests.
Also, I have never had a fogging problem - even in minus 0 temperatures with by wife and inlaws in the car. If anything would fog up the windows it would be my mother-in-law. Sometimes the rear window will fog when there are rear-seat passengers but never the windshield or side windows. I very rarely use the "defrost" mode. Even in the "footwell" mode, it seems like a lot of warm air comes out the defroster vents.
Now for the Navigator. GM still has the lead in HP with their Escalade. But you could easily (?) drop in the SC 5.4L from the Lightning and beef up the suspension (maybe with Lightning parts). Bye bye Escalade.
Now if Ford would just build the GT40 to compete with the Corvette and Viper..........
G35 - I is my understanding that the new G35 will be closer in size to the 330i & IS-300 than the LS. I could be wrong but I thought that's what it said in an Autoweek blurb on the G35 a while back.
Reviews - Wow, it looks like I got my C&D over a week before everyone else! C&D ususally does comparo. tests cars with cars of similar price. This totally misses the LS value proposition. For my primary driver I'm not interested in anything smaller than the LS. I test drove a 328i before I bought my LS and it is just plain too small for me especially considering its tiny trunk. So look at is this way: with the LS you get a 4 dr sedan as big as a 7 Series that costs less than a 330i, can pull more G's on a skid pad than either and handles almost as well as either. It may be slower than the 330i, but who cares I'm not planning on ever buying a 330i.
As long as there's 1 LS that works the way I think it should, I'm calling this a problem. Also, I found on mine that the cold air is also coming out of the defroster up by the windshield.
So, time for a call to my friendly service dept. They were going to call me this week anyway to tell me that the parts to seal up my headlamps are in. Yep, my 2001 headlamps fogged up over the holidays as we had a lot of cold/wet weather here. I've been waiting since before Xmas when I first called in. I called back last week and no one had ordered the parts though the service advisor had promised he would. Now the next guy promised last week it would be fixed this week but no call yet. Am I rambling? Am I happy?
Brian: So we're gonna have some cool toys at Mania 3? I can't wait to try out the GTechPro and the ExtremeGeez! I guess I better register soon, eh?
I'm looking forward to Mania 3 for other reasons too. I'm going to do something I've never done since I've been out here: Take a few days and drive to LA via the Coast Hiway - Rte 1 - and explore and photograph. What a blast rte 1 will be in the LS. That's one of the reasons I never did it before - the road is so twisty that it can get very tedious in a 'regular' car or SUV.
George
Yeah, I know. That's another of the reasons I've not done this yet! I'll keep your alternate rte in mind, but I'd realy like to go all the way down the coast, if only to see it and hopefully add to my marketable photographs. This is probably the time of year when there are the fewest RVs out there and besides, my LS will be able to get me out from behind some situations that I would have been stuck in were I driving my van or Jeep.
I'll have to find a good car wash in Irvine to get Red lookin her best for Mania 3. I'm hopin you and I could swap cars for a run so I can get a feel for what your mods have done for performance and you can recall what yours was like when stock! Though I understand if you'd prefer not to let another maniac drive your car - I might hit some cones or something! :>)
George
Regards,
Airwolf
The Escalade offers a bigger 6.0L engine (345hp/385ft-lb) but only in the AWD model, not in the 2wd. That engine is what is usually in all the ads.
Well, if you can afford an Escalade, what's a little gas mileage...
Topanga Canyon Road and Malibu Canyon Road both are nice drives with great scenery.
The real fun drive in my opinion is Mulholland Drive which runs from Malibu Canyon Road to Hollywood. Runs along the ridge road that separates West side of L.A. and the San Fernando Valley. On Sunday there are a lot of motorcycle heading to the roadhouse.
I used to race a Mini Cooper and a TR8 on that road when I was in high school, it is curves deluxe with great views.
see ya in Irvine!
steve_ca
LLSOC Member
If you take pictures you can put a great drive article together for the club magazine, if you would like!
Registering soon would be a good idea. The Doubletree hotel rates that we got for the club are only good until January 24th then the remaining rooms will be released to the general public. So if you're planning on going or even seriously thinking about it make sure you have your reservation at the hotel in. George, you may want to also post looking for a room buddy on the LLSOC board under the Mania 3 topic in case anyone else is so inclined.
Brian
Regards,
Airwolf
To me, the area under either the torque or HP curve would be a better metric to use in measuring usable engine output, and predicting vehicle performance.
It's unit of measure would be:
For HP: FT # Rev/Min^2
For Torque: Ft # Rev/Min
If adopted, the measure would show the difference between a 300 HP 4.3L engine, and a 300 HP nearly identical 4.0L engine.
Is such a metric now in use? If so, what's it called? If not in use, what do you think of it?
Gary
Charter LLSOC member
Haven't you heard? H. L. Menken (I think it was) said that no one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public. A similar truism could be generated regarding the intelligence of the same group, but why bother. Lincoln introduced the LS in the face of this, and the jury's still out.
I live and breathe metrics and completely agree that your suggestions have merit. Now, do you really think the automotive press can: 1) understand what you're talking about or 2) use an actual measurement system that doesn't allow them to flog their: a) biggest advertiser or b) preconceived notions.
I'm with you, but I don't think many others are.
I strongly doubt there was anything unique about this problem for the V8 model. It was a very simple problem to fix, but very tricky to find (Thanks Laura Hazebrouck! (Lincoln engineeressa who designed the PATS)).
I think it's possible if they can "discover" it, if it can be given a catchy buzzword, and it demonstrates that it is a better output measure and performance predictor.
"Applied Horsepower", or "AHP" vs. peak horsepower comes to mind as a buzzword/buzzphrase that is descriptive, and could catch on. For an auto transmission vehicle I would use the area under the curve from torque converter stall speed to red line. But this has a problem ... a higher stall speed would likely out-accelerate one lower, but have less Applied Horsepower. This clearly needs work.
Maybe area under the curve from 0-60, 0-100, etc. In these cases, higher stall speed would also have more Applied HP, and better performance.
I'm getting an uneasy feeling that this isn't the proper forum for this discussion. If so, please jump in anyone. If possible, suggest an alternate forum. I feel strongly about this concept, and Steve's comments indicate that I'm not completely nuts ... (or we both are)
You could even normalize the Applied Horespower on cost, but that's another can of worms . . .
Also, they never seem to get much inside info from the people inside the car companies to verify their (mis)information or just ask "why".
Most of these articles are not even semi-techo. The average reader is probably able to understand a little more. Personally, I long for those very occasional tech articles in R&T.
Another problem with the product is what it does to the seats. The leather remains without a sheen but the vinal (bad spelling) shines. This simply lets everyone know what is leather and what is not.
One more point. I am 6'2" tall and the car is designed for people a little shorter. What can I do to remove the handle above my seat. My head keeps hitting it when I hit a bump or make a quick turn to the right. If I remove the handle, what do I do about the holes in the headliner.
Tony
I haven't really seen a "Automotive" publication that comes close to the level of technical integrity as the publications I cite above. If one exists, I hope someone would be kind enough to let me know.
You didn't so much make a mistake as learned a Lesson: With minimal effort and expense, you can do a much better job of caring for your car than the low-wage Detailing Professionals employed by the dealer.
Scott
LLSOC Member
Tony
Sorry this took so long to get, but here is what the dealers in Colorado are offering on new leases:
- No out of pocket expenses on drive away.
- They pay the first months payment.
- Very good money factors.
The quote I got, which was for a loaded sport V8 (very siumilar to my car when I got it 2 years ago), was 497.00 per month, which is 8 dollars a month less than I paid.
I looked at a 2002 in the showroom, and they really have made improvements, althought I didn't like the textured leather on the seats.
Brent
If the leather in the showroom car that you saw is different from yours, then I'd guess you were looking at a Premium package LS. The leather with that package is called "Nudo"; it has a sort of basket-weave pattern in the middle section of the seats. Premium comes with the Sport wheels and suspension, but it has the chrome/polished bumper strips and no SST shifter. (Moonroof is also included with Premium.)
The Sport and "regular" models still have the same leather (both pattern and colors) in '02 that they had the prior two years.
Good advice. I'm headed there as soon as I recover from installing a cooktop and built-in oven. (She made me do it)
It's probably payback for your faux-pas of a prior event
LLSOC would love to have this discussion on engineering metrics and other engineering discussions on our board. As a matter of fact I'll set up a new forum called Engineering Forum specifically to group this tantalizing discussion and highlight it.
Brian
LLSOC President
Brian
Yep.
Engineering forum sounds good. Before I go there, I have a request of the Edmunds' participants:
I need dyno data for engines, or cars run on chassis dyno. Ideally, for two or more engines that are different, but have similar HP output. The engines can be disguised as engine A & engine B. The output data can even be disguised by de-rating each point by the same percentage. I'll return the favor by calculating "Applied Horsepower", or something similar, & sending it to you for your comparison with known vehicle performance.
Torque or Horsepower, by RPM, in a format that can be read by Excel.
Also, I remember a regular here that has software that predicts vehicle performance, but I've lost his name. If listening, please send me an email at gary4444@chartermi.net
The more I think about performance metrics the more I believe that there is a much better one than peak HP or peak torque. Think about it: each of those metrics is stated at a SINGLE RPM for a device that has an operating range of ~500 to 6500 RPM. What's up with that? At best, they are very coarse measures for an automobile engine. Probably good measures for stationary engines,(What James Watt had when he created the horsepower metric) or even aircraft piston engines.
But those applications are a far cry the automotive application. I see evidence of the industry's frustration with these single-point measurements when I read statements like "it produces 90% of it's peak torque from 2000 RPM up"
I sense glassy eyes, so I'm done with this issue on this forum.
Please send data, or recommend a good source.
Last month my front brakes started to squeal on slow braking and the dealer mentioned that the wear indicators are already touching the rotors. Brake pads are on back order and will take around two weeks. I guess I can wait for them since it is under warranty. The dealer isn't sure if replacing the sport brake pads with the standard ones will void the warranty. They will let me know shortly.
Wes aka 'MSN LNC'
Out of 20 test vehicles, only three were from USA companies. Why? Because USA car companies would rather sink development dollars into SUV's/trucks rather than cars. That's why you don't have a 6 speed manual V8 LS with 300 HP or a 6 cylinder that can run with the foreign crowd; the bucks went into the new Explorer platform and the rear seats in the new Expedition and the Lincoln Blackwood.
GM kills the Camaro/Firebird, instead of correcting it's obvious deficiencies, and introduces a new line of trucks/suv's. Two American icons die.
BMW, Volvo, and Acura each bring one new SUV crossover to the market, while we design/build/market Silverado's, Explorers, Tahoes, Mountaineers, Expeditions, Navigators, Blackwoods, Escalades, Escapes, Escursions, Durangos, Lightnings, on and on and on.
Maybe, just maybe, the BMW's and Audi's are better cars, and all the automobile editors are not on the take, because the foreign dollars were spent building better cars, cars built for drivers, not SUV/truck products to beat the "other guy's" SUV/trucks.
You can't blame the US companies; they are building what most of us want. We can build cars as good or better than the foreign brands; we just don't want to.
Me? I wouldn't be caught dead driving an SUV, but, unfortunately, I'm in the minority.
I have nothing against SUVs but don't understand their appeal. I don't believe they're especially safe; when I see one off the road during a snowstorm, it's usually on it's side. When someone tells me their $40k "truck" drives and/or rides like a car, I reply, "Not a $40k car."
But, to each his, or her, own. And if Ford can make a pile of money selling Explorers and Navigators, they'll spend some of it on developing cars for those of us who prefer driving to riding.
My brakes (2000 Sport) started to squeal at around that mileage also, but the dealer diagnosed dirt and glazing. At 19K miles, there was only about 5K remaining.
I'm sorry that your window crashed after only 5 times of use, but those of us that attended LS Mania 3 learned from Lincoln engineers that the windows are less prone to crash if used more frequently. By the time yours are repaired, the "final fix" parts should be in the pipeline. Make sure that they fix both sides per TSB. Don't let them bamboozle you.
Artie
Charter Member-LLSOC
Let's try to think that maybe the billions in profits these things generated for Ford in the 90's provided the funding for the development of the LS.
I agree with you 100% about driving one. Unfortunately, many others have been "caught dead" driving one.
I haven't had a window failure (yet), but asked my dealer about the status of the new part. He said they already had them in stock and that was about a month ago.
stanny1, Edmunds already has a bunch of forums on how bad SUV's allegedly are. IMHO, drive what you want, where you want. Like scottc8 pointed out, we benefit a lot from the income from these things. Like a minivan, I wouldn't be caught dead owning one. However, if you want one, to each there own! High gas prices are an annoyance to me (one less trip to In-N-Out), but to most families here, they force radical lifestyle changes.
Mike
LLSOC Chapter Director
I bought my Expedition in October, 1997 (a 1998 model Eddie Bauer), because of a snow storm. Yeah, OK, I'm a wimp. See, it happened like this:
I spent 2 hours driving 19 miles trying to get home in my 1993 Mazda MX-6. I loved that car, but even with new tires on it I was just crawling along in a blizzard. I drove past a Ford dealership to get home, and I called my wife and told her I was going to stop and get a truck. She chewed me out, told me to do what I wanted, and then called a friend to complain that I had gone nuts. (Actually she was very supportive, and got a new couch for the family room a couple of weeks later). So, I pulled in to the dealership to buy an Expedition.
I got a great deal on a new truck. Waited about an hour, until they came in and told me they couldn't find it. I couldn't really blame them, because the now 16 inches of snow on the white SUV they were looking for made it, um, kinda disappear.
So, I went home. The next 6 miles took another 2 hours, and I ended up with my car not being able to pull its way up the driveway and into the garage. We had almost 3 feet of snow on the streets by morning. So, I didn't go anywhere for about 3 days.
When the storm was over, I went and picked up the truck, giving away my MX-6. We haven't had more than 3 inches of snow since.
The next day, my wife drove the Expedition for the first time, came home and told me she was keeping it and I could feel really good about driving the mini van. So I went a week later and leased a Continental (remember, the LS wasn't available yet, and 260 HP sounded good at the time).
So now I justify the thing by pulling a popup camper with it, and making sure my wife is safe driving the kids around in the midst of the other soccer moms. And on weekends, I go back to where trout just love to suck down dry flys.
So, overall, they have their place. And just because they aren't fast, and suck fuel, and don't handle well, and ... OK, I can't think of a reason to justify it right now, but I'll work on it.
The real benefit to the SUV, in hindsight, is that my wife likes to drive it, so I get to get things like Lincoln LS's and Jag X-Types. Which ain't all bad.
Brent