Lincoln LS

1224225227229230299

Comments

  • reneleblancreneleblanc Member Posts: 144
    The redline on my 2000 3.9L V8 is 6500, but I expect the 2003 with VVT may be different.
  • leadfoot4leadfoot4 Member Posts: 593
    Have you tried going to another dealer? If you are truly interested in another car, I seriously doubt that a dealer would let you walk.....
  • luasluas Member Posts: 33
    I have to go to the original dealer in order to get out of the lease early. He has the car in stock and we are about 2.5% different in making a deal. OTHER dealers will go for my deal. The way I look at is, that I will stick to my LS lease payments for the next 8 months and then get a 2004 model of some comparable car. It's close to the end of the 2003 model year and unless the dealer will dip into some of his holdback/incentives I'm not that anxious to give him the extra money, for a 1 year old model.In many ways I like the 2001 model interior.What I do not understand, is that instead of leasing, they are going to sell me a car. Lincoln makes negotiating difficult by only letting me go to only 1 dealer.
  • funkcityfunkcity Member Posts: 100
    I was quite surprised to find that my friend's 02 5 series BMW had no storage in the center console...none! zip!

    The new 03 LS has made quite a huge opening there by going to an electronic parking brake.
    You really need to see this to know what I mean.
    The 03 interior is significantly upgraded.
    Check it out
  • se4b4ssse4b4ss Member Posts: 3
    Premise: I am mechanically challenged so speak slowly. :)

    The warranty on my 2000 LS V6 w/ convenience and sports packages is almost kaput. What known LS problems should I be aware of and checking during my last free visit to the dealer?

    Also, I have had a low humming coming from the rear end for about 6 months. It started sometime after new tires were put on. It starts at about 20MPH and gets louder with speed not RPM. I've replaced brake pads and rotated the tires and the sound is still there and coming from the rear. Any ideas?

    Thanks in advance,
    Steve
  • gerry100gerry100 Member Posts: 100
    The current economy and 2 kids in college means tht my 2000 LS8/sport will be replaced by a lesser company car.

    After 3 years and nearly 88,000 miles a few comments;

    Pluses-
     
     - engine still powerful and smooth, has never missed a beat.
     - body tight, squeak free and solid as first day.
     - shocks/struts held up for about 75k ( in the bumpy NE) before ride quality became noticeably bad. I'd recommend replacement at 50-60K to keep the driving experience one of quality.
     - interior holding up well, no significant wear/ rips in the leather ( no special care given).
     - tranny just starting to clunk ( u joints?). Sport Shift automatic useless for any serious driving,never used.
     - overall handling excellent for a Sport sedan.

    Minuses-

     - power window failure,various electrical/electronic gremlins whicjh are annoying but not amnnoying enough to fix.

     - Auto tranny as mentioned above.

     - interior storage.(lack of).

     Overall an excellent platform for competing with BMW etc. Resale for the car is low right now becuse the only rep the car has is Lincoln's. If FoMoCo realizes that it took many years for BMW to become BMW and keeps refining and improving I think the LS will be right up there with the German marques. Concern is that if they don't take over in 5 yrs they'll give up.
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,625
    If you haven't had your rear window regulators replaced yet, or had them done more than 18 months ago, they will fail. It's not a matter of if, but when, especially if you live in a hot climate.

    When you take your car in, mention noise from the rear windows when you operate them. If you have an experienced and cooperative dealer, both will be replaced. If you don't, and you get the infamous "could not duplicate," at least you're on record for when they take a dump later.

    At that point, there are these "after warranty adjustments," (AWA's) which are said to be not too hard to acquire.

    Make sure you have your transmission "reflashed." I'm assuming you don't have a manual, since you didn't mention it.

    Otherwise, the car is pretty well developed in terms of long-term failure items. You've already endured the little niggling crap that comes with a first-year car.

    Good luck.
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • intrepidspiritintrepidspirit Member Posts: 662
    I can't believe Lincoln/Ford won't let you turn your leased car in to another dealer. What if you moved coast to coast during your lease period. They would expect you to drive 3000 miles to turn it in?

    I have leased several cars and the dealers always send me notification that the car must be returned to them. However, when I checked with the manufacturer (they held my lease), I was told I could turn the car in at any dealer that was willing to accept it. My cars haven't been Lincolns (or Ford products), but I can't imagine the rules can be any different.

    Take it to another dealer of your choice -- I bet they'll give you what you want.
  • luasluas Member Posts: 33
    According to a few dealers...I would have to move over 75 miles from the original dealer. I gave the dealer, in writing, my offer. He said no. It has been 3 weeks and he has not come back with a counter. Lincoln found another way, original dealer only, to screw the buyer and not keep a loyal customer and not SELL cars. Maybe this is sour grapes because I couldn't get what I wanted from the original dealer. I can get it from other Lincoln dealers and this is what makes me angry.
    I guess when the time comes I'll start looking at the 2004 5 series Bimmer. Thats the series I drove before and liked it. I had great dealer service.
  • reneleblancreneleblanc Member Posts: 144
    I live in Scottsdale, AZ; a very hot climate for about 4 months out of the year. I have tried to get my rear windows to fail by always telling people they haven't failed even though I live in a hot climate, and I haven't avoided using them quite often. When the car has been parked in the sun (everywhere except in my garage) it is often 140-150° in the car, and I put ALL the windows down for a few minutes to let the superheated air out. I've had the car since December, 1999 and it has over 37,000 miles on it. The windows just won't fail! :-)
  • reneleblancreneleblanc Member Posts: 144
    I can't agree with gerry100 about the SST transmission being useless for serious driving.

    Perhaps he never drives in the mountains? I have found the SST nearly indispensable for keeping the transmission in 2nd or 3rd gear while traversing switch-backs, especially when going down hill.

    It is also useful for avoiding unwanted up-shifts during spirited driving on curving undulating roads when I want to control keeping it in 3rd or 4th. After training, my SST has become very responsive.

    Another time I use it is when trying to hold a slow steady pace in heavy traffic. Otherwise the car tends to shift up to 5th, and then it wants to go too fast and I need to keep riding the brakes. Running along in 3rd or 4th, depending on the speed, I can control the speed totally with the accelerator and don't need to ride the brakes.
  • leadfoot4leadfoot4 Member Posts: 593
    I will readily admit that I know very little about leasing, since I've never leased a car. However, instead of listening to various dealers' mumbo-jumbo, have you considered calling your lease holder(I assume Ford) YOURSELF, and getting the correct facts?

    I still believe that they wouldn't let a car go unsold due to something as insignificant as what dealer you turn the car into. Keep in mind, your original dealer has a vested interest in telling you whatever it takes to keep you coming back to them, instead of another Lincoln dealer.

    Also, didn't you mention in your post #11723 that another dealer would meet your terms?
  • grizzleydadgrizzleydad Member Posts: 15
    I have a 2000 V8 Sport on a lease and I moved from California to Mesa, Arizona; Ford leasing told me that I could return my car to any dealer who would take it. This was provided I had moved over 75 miles from my original dealer. I also asked about negotiating the buyout of my lease and they responded with an emphatic 'No Way!'.

    I'll check around and see who wants to deal.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    I don't know what it is about Ford Credit, but they do not negotiate at all, buyouts or dealer incentives. They are the toughest of all the captive financing companies to deal with. I have leased Lincolns for years, and while I'm generally satisfied with Ford Credit, I have found them to be rigid and inflexible in all ways. They do their job right, give decent deals, but a deal is a deal with them. Sometimes they offer to buy out mileage and offer incentives to re-lease, but it's not a case by case thing, and they do require you to use the same dealer to take advantage of them. I'm sure it has something to do with their deal with the dealer. Ford/dealer relations isn't good right now anyway, and I'm sure this doesn't help. It also doesn't sell cars.

    Fortunately for me, I have no reason or desire to change dealers, so I've been well taken care of. Makes no sense to me either.Ford Credit not only will not negotiate and early buy out, but if you want to sell your car yourself, you can't. It MUST go back through the dealer for the buyout. That's their way of getting your trade back.

    Again, I like my dealer, and I like the product, so I'm ok with things, but I do scratch my head about the militant stance they take.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    You seem to be forgetting that this offer is not a normal end of lease transaction. It's an early termination and is an incentive to sell new vehicles and apparently the requirement for this specific offer is tied to the selling dealer. This mose likely means the dealer is participating in the offer and may explain why he's unwilling to eat the last 2.5%. And let's don't forget - Lincoln doesn't sell or lease cars. Dealers do and Lincoln has no control over them. FMC just provides the financing for the lease - it's still a vehicle sale to the dealer.

    Why doesn't FMC negotiate lease buyouts? Let's look at just Lincoln and let's say they sell 100K/yr and 50% of those are leases. That's 50K leases a year or just under 1000 per week. How are they supposed to individually negotiate 1000 lease buyouts every week? And if you throw in all the other Ford and Mercury leases it's a lot more than that. What they can do is to modify the lease buyout prices en masse which they apparently did with some LS leases as one owner reported getting a lower buyout offer. It's just not feasible.
  • luasluas Member Posts: 33
    Your absolutely correct. Ford credit is rigid and they rarely if ever negotiate individual deals......But, to tie you to 1 dealer is not a very good way to sell cars. Their attitude seems to be, now we got you and you must do what we say. Where is the competition. How many people buy a car without comparison shopping? It's nice to like your car....it is still only one of a lot of nice cars. Lincoln gave the early lease incentive to move inventory of a car that has slowed in sales. In my case they also discouraged me from being loyal to the good car LS. It does not make sense. I am converting from a lease to a sale.They will not have to sell the car at the end of another lease.I'BUYING. Their gain is immediate, they move inventory. According to dealer profit information, from the web, the dealer will still make close to $1000.00 plus, if he took my deal. I told the dealer about the competition and discussed holdback/incentives. I am still waiting for him to get back. Maybe he didn't like that I balked at his $279.00 dealer services charge. Thats for preparation of documents,affidavits,notary services and all handling etc.. etc. By the way, I am dealing directly with the sales manager...no sales mans commission for the dealership. It seems , from the responses, that some of you agree, that Lincoln (READ..FORD) is not doing the right thing.
  • intrepidspiritintrepidspirit Member Posts: 662
    This type of anal retentiveness is counter-productive to what should be their primary goals -- sell cars and retain customers!

    The leasing/financing operations of the major auto manufacturers are far too rigid in administering their leases. It may be they are held so accountable for their own operational results that this takes precedence over the overall profitability of the whole company. Some companies are that disfunctional.

    My wife had a 4 year lease through Bank of America and surprisingly, they were very willing to cancel the lease after 2 years. I think it cost us a total of $187. It had to be a loss for them as they had to dispose of the car!

    So, if a bank is willing to deal (with no reward), you would think that a car manufacturer would be ecstatic to deal with another new car sale/lease as the outcome!
  • gserep1gserep1 Member Posts: 92
    I also had a similar experience with Bank One on my Explorer. I leased one about 3 1/2 years ago, and wanted to convert it into a buy at lease end. Bank One had better rates than Ford at the time, and Bank One took the contract.

      Bank One called ME, and offered to sell me the vehicle at a discount. Apparently there are too many Explorers on the road, and they did not want to go through the trouble of taking it back and selling it. They reduced the residual by $3000.00 and offered to finance the balance at 3.9% for 3 4 or 5 years with no down payment. I was shocked, and took the 3 year deal. I was able to finish the balance in 7 months. It was truly a pleasureable experience from beginning to end. The dealer was not part of the transaction at all. Everything was handled through the mail, complete with Bill of Sale, taxes and notarization. I have a feeling that if this was a Ford Red Carpet Lease, I would be stuck with the previous residual regardless of the fact that it did not accurately reflect the true current value of the vehicle. Walking away would be easy, but buying it would be expensive. I had 3 previous Red Carpet Leases, but I walked away from all of them. They have been wrong on their residuals before and would not bend on their projections.

      I would have no reservations about leasing another vehicle from Bank One. I am not sure if it always goes like this, but it worked well for me.

    GSEREP1
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Banks do it differently, and will never be the same as the captives, (that's Chrysler Credit, GMAC, Ford Credit, etc.), because their cost of funds is so different. Also, banks have been notoriously BAD at projecting residuals in the past, and have lost their butts at lease end. Bank of America has been SO upside down on this factoring, they no longer to auto leases, and are working on early terminations on all leases nationwide. They will call the customer about 4-6 months prior to termination, and offer the car at below residual in most cases, and waive the final payments of the lease to dispose of it. It cheaper for them to take that loss, than to try to process the cars through the auction, where they will probably take about the same loss. When I bought my 99 Navigator in 98, they had my 4 year lease residual at 74%! I immediately recognized this as the mistake of the century, and took the lease! Great bank leases are over for now, folks.

    Conversely, Ford, Chrysler, GMAC are much better at projecting residuals. But it's still a crap shoot and sometimes they're still quite wrong. But even if they are wrong, they have the mechanism to deal with the lease returns all in place everywhere, and can deal with it better than a bank can. Nevertheless, I have had GMAC leases, and Ford leases (and one from BofA), and with GMAC, you can sell your car to a third party, they don't care. You just go to the local GMAC office with the buyer, he pays off the lease, they sign off the title, and you're done. With Ford, you MUST go back to the dealer, who takes the car back, marks it up and sells it to your buyer. Otherwise, you have to buyout the lease yourself, pay sales tax, then sell it to your buyer, who again pays sales tax!!!!!

    All personal experience, and I had a dealers license for a while, so I'm not blowing smoke. I love Fords, but Ford Credit is very heavy handed with lease ends. I don't agree that they can't negotiate lease end residuals, they could, right there at the dealer. It's alllllll negotiable. But they have their policies, and that's fine too, I signed the contract.

    No car company can give their cars away. I don't expect them to.
  • heyjewelheyjewel Member Posts: 1,046
    akirby said: "What they can do is to modify the lease buyout prices en masse which they apparently did with some LS leases as one owner reported getting a lower buyout offer."

    If you're talking about a certain well-regarded, MANIA-maniac early LS buyer who hails from around the Big Apple as the owner who reported a lower buyout order, then I must disagree with this statement. I remember when he posted that and I followed up with him and upon further review, he realized that the buyout was not lower, but in fact was the same.
    If you're referring to someone else ...
    Also regarding the selling dealer thing: I don't know all the ins and outs but when I was investigating my lease end options I found out that the selling dealer is is either part or full owner of the vehicle, Ford Credit is the lienholder and has some kind of legal rights over pricing and disposition, but the selling dealer is very much part of the process. So if your dealer is a meathead, I dunno what to say. Calling LINCOLN Customer Service hotline might get to the right person, who knows.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    George - I just remember someone saying they got a lower buyout offer in the mail. Maybe it wasn't true.

    You have three issues here. One - FMC won't negotiate the buyout price. You can't let the dealers negotiate the buyout price. Some dealers would use that to their financial advantage (translation: ripoff FMC). FMC could do it but how do you do thousands of renegotiations a week? That in itself would be expensive.

    Two - you must use the early termination offer at your selling dealer. Did it ever occur to anyone that the selling dealer may have to fund at least part of the early termination? If it costs the dealer $500 then they have to sell you a new car to make up the difference. I don't know if that's the case but it's certainly possible (even likely). That would explain the dealer's behaviour.

    Three - your dealer won't give you as good a deal as other dealers. Blame the dealer, not FoMoCo. They have NO control over the dealers. Also - see #2.

    You could just stick with your original contract, wait a few months and then get the deal you want from the dealer you want. If you don't want the early termination, don't use it. It's just an offer.
  • reneleblancreneleblanc Member Posts: 144
    Am I the only LS "owner" who actually bought his car outright? It seems everybody else is leasing... For my personal situation, I couldn't see that leasing brought me an advantage. What am I missing?
  • leadfoot4leadfoot4 Member Posts: 593
    I'm with you on this one. I bought my 2000 LS, and my wife is the primary driver. It just turned 3 years old, and has 23,500 miles. Had I leased it, I'd be giving it back to the dealer now, with hardly any miles on it. Yeah, right!!
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,625
    and it just turned three years old, w/ 51K miles on it. If one drives over 15K miles a year, leasing is considerably more expensive.

    Also, unless you're in a position to write off car expenses, leasing almost never makes long-term financial sense, unless it's a heavily subsidized deal.

    However, the monthly payment is always lower for a leased vehicle. You own nothing at the end of the lease, and for many that must make sense. Never has to me, though.
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • lobsenzalobsenza Member Posts: 619
    I have never leased a vehicle because I keep them too long. I feel it is much better economically.
  • stanny1stanny1 Member Posts: 962
    If you are a wage-earner, leasing's only advantage is low drive-off and lower monthly payment. You have to have a "rental-mentality", and you may like the fact that every three years or so, you get a new car and you turn it in before the belts, hoses, thermostat and spark plugs need replacing. In today's complex cars, an out of warranty car can be an expensive time-bomb.
    On a lease, you pay 3 things: rent on the money borrowed (money factor), depreciation based on the residual value, and sales taxes.
    The dealer has no control over residual but he has over the negotiated price and the money factor (rent %) which is usually between .0017 and .0025.
    The mysterious "Money Factor" depends on the lease term, your FICO/Beacon score, and the miles per year.
    Many lease managers will give you their MF, some won't. I have the formula for translating the MF into $ if you need it.
    Now leasing really is great if you are self-employed. I write-off 80% of my monthly lease payment -the total payment. Right now I am looking at a replacement car for the wife unit.
    Almost no drive-off and $840 a month. It sounds like a lot, but $650 of that is kind of paid for by Uncle Sam.
    That's why you see so many expensive cars out there. Most of them are self-employed leased cars.
    If you see alot of Hummers, they qualify for Farm and Industrial Equipment depreciation write-offs and tax credits for Capital Equipment.
    I could kill my taxes with a Hummer. It's just that I could not stand driving a pig.
    Nissan is bringing out the Titan-based SUV this Fall to take advantage of this tax-loophole. All we need is more huge 6000+ lb road hogs to slow down our LSes.
    So leasing makes sense to the self-employed. I either make a big lease payment or I give Uncle Sam more money. I might as well drive and enjoy my tax-deduction.
    In an unrelated subject but of some significance, I just got Whitey (2000 Manual) back from the hospital. I had a rear end noise over the past year that kept getting worse. More noise on left turns than right. I thought it was a right rear axle U-joint going. Well, it was real simple. It was the outboard wheel bearing.
    Whitey is as quiet as new now, except for the Borla.
    As for negotiated lease buy-outs. They are possible, and I just talked to an LLSOC member of some prominence at Manias 1 and 3, and he did it. But it takes work and you have to burn up the phone and get attention. Otherwise your LS will be taken back by Ford Credit and auctioned off at a loss. It's easier for corporate type zombies to just do what they always do and lose money with auctions than to give the consumer a break and save some money. After all, the auction buyer has to buy low enough to make a profit. I figure the total FMC loss on Manuals is in the thousands. Start your negotiating early with the Finance Guy at the dealership ADN find out who the honcho is at Ford Credit.
    But remember, you can always walk away and let them have it. You can buy new and they will really bend over on a new LS. I'd doo that but I can't buy a new 2003 LS Manual. But if I could drive an auto tranny, I'd jump at the 2003 V-8 LS. They will do anything to sell a returning lease customer one of these. You can't believe the stuff I get in the mail. 0%, $5000 cash back, dealer's wife for a week (oh, that was the Caddy offer), but there are like 53 2003 LSes at my local dealer and they want to throw the keys in my hand if I get near the place.
    This is a great time for an LS. They even have 2002's on the "Build Your Lincoln" LM site!
  • heyjewelheyjewel Member Posts: 1,046
    Stanny1 said
    "$5000 cash back, dealer's wife for a week (oh, that was the Caddy offer), "

    Yeah, but she's liable to have all the slimness, smooth curves, good looks and sex appeal of a CTS! :>)
  • stanny1stanny1 Member Posts: 962
    I actually sold the local Caddy dealer's old house and put him into his new one, so I know the wife. Just a joke and I'm glad he's not on this board.
  • luasluas Member Posts: 33
    Your correct about leasing in general. Another factor to consider is the residual value assigned to the car by the leasing company. This number translates into how much they THINK the car is worth at the end of the lease. Ford guessed wrong on the LS. The depreciation was about 20/25% greater on this car. If you leased you ended up with a better deal, if you change cars every 3 years. My dealer is not only NOT giving the $5000 off but he is single. I hope that one of the suits from Ford/Lincoln reads these boards and takes some action to get another LS sold and not lose an LS fan ,cause the way it's going, my dealer looks like he thinks a captive client will HAVE to deal his way, and does not have to be competitive to other dealers. WRONG.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    to make a lease pay, and some have been mentioned above. They take guts though, and some luck. For example, I always lease, and always take the minimum mileage allowance, even though I often drive way over the allotment. Example, leased my 99 Navigator with 12,000 per year mileage allowance. At the end of my lease, I had 65,000 on the car. Was hoping the deal could eat that to get me into another one. Timing was not on my side, he couldn't, so I just bought the car out of the lease. Residual value was in the "ok" range. Put the car up for sale, sold it in 1 hour for $3,000 more than I paid for it, which covered the sales tax I had to pay to buy it 2x, and made a little money. Bought new Navigator, with 12,000 mile allotment again. Now, why risk it? Maybe I just like the game. But often, the dealer has been able to eat the overmileage to re-lease me, and has. Also, if you buy up the mileage up front, and don't use it all, you don't get a refund unless you buy up > 15,000 miles. I hate turning them in under miles.

    HOWEVER- right now, the BEST DEAL BAR NONE out there is the 0% deal for whatever months, 60 is best. You can't beat that anyway you slice it, and if I were in the market right now, I'd grab one, don't car what the car is, (almost). That deal is a steal.
  • jerrym3jerrym3 Member Posts: 202
    So, amongst all this exciting car talk about leasing (never have, never will lease a car), nobody knows what the redline is for a 2003 3.9V8?

    I guess there's going to be a lot of 2003 3.9 V8 engines falling apart out there due to over-revving.
  • stanny1stanny1 Member Posts: 962
    Every time I go over redline in my 2000 LS Manual (often), the rpm limiter kicks in!
    The first time that happened, I thought the engine came apart. I think it's fuel and ignition cut-out at redline.
    So redline your 3.9 and watch the tach. That should give you an idea where your redline is!
  • stanny1stanny1 Member Posts: 962
    Today the "light bulb out" light came on. The right rear brake light filament blew out.
    I thought "No Problem".
    Pulled off the faux fuzz covered panel OK.
    Could not find any bulb sockets.
    I'm lost guys!!!
    Help!
    Do I get out the wrenches and sockets and remove the light unit?
    This has to be simpler than that!
  • emc3emc3 Member Posts: 39
    don't have an '03 so I can't look at it's dashboard. However the red line on a 2000 3.9 V8 is 6500 rpm. I'll bet that's close enough. My guess is it would be hard to over rev a car with an automatic transmission anyway.

    BTW, I don't lease, never have and likely never will...
  • circleacirclea Member Posts: 21
    hey stanny my light bulb out light came on this week too and yes you have to get the sockets and take the whole light out to change the bulb.it really doesnt take that long but it is a pain if you accidently drop your sockett down in the bottom. hope this helps

    circlea
  • stanny1stanny1 Member Posts: 962
    I went to the LLSOC website, and the pictorial on "Removing the Rear Bumper Cover" took me through it.
    Sounds kind of drastic for a light bulb change, though.
    It's not the kind of thing the average CPA is going to do on the side of the road or even in the parking lot of the parts store.
    I bet alot of people just take it in to the dealer.
    Makes me wonder if the windshield has to come off to replace the wipers.(just kidding).
    Instead of those two nuts holding the tail light assembly in, they could have put on wing-nuts instead and made it easier (sure).
  • kelleyokelleyo Member Posts: 182
    took my wife with me since she had not seen one. Then I went and drove an A6 2.7T Quattro. Nice car. I also drove some used Porsches, Boxter's, 911's etc. She liked the 03 but liked the Porsche's better.

    I fell in love with a nice 02 Boxter low miles for 39k however my senses told me the low mileage '01 A6 for 29k was better.

    After I got home my senses told me that buying my 00 LS V8 sport was even better. I just hit 30k miles. Transmission repaired and seems to be good. Crashed windows repaired a year ago. New tires and Brakes (I already spent that money so why throw it away?). The only issues I want to resolve are the fogged headlight's and the rear view mirror has changed colors and does not darken. All of that will be under warranty.
    Other than that no Squeaks or rattles. Paint looks good, few chips on front that can be touched, but no dings.

    Had her detailed today and thought, wow it cleans up well! Still looks great!

    So I am going to negotiate a deal with my dealer. The residual is 20K. Think they would talk for 18.5k? I have seen 00 V8 Sports in the Atlanta paper for 17k...

    Would it help If I went there with a check in
    hand?

    I have really decided that I am going to shy away from new cars and go with slightly used from now on.

    The Porsche will have to wait until my kids are out of High School and baseball etc. :))

    One other thing: I plan on a few minor upgrades.

    Is the 02 airbox worth it? I already have a K&N Panel.

    How hard is it to have the rear facia modified (cut out) for straight back exhaust tips? I would like a new stainless performance exhaust.
  • brucelincbrucelinc Member Posts: 815
    Has anyone ever removed the moulded plastic on the backs of the front seats? If so, could you let me know the procedure for removal? Also, I am wondering if the clips that apparently hold them on are separate pieces or if they are a part of the moulding, itself. The dealer's parts breakdown was not very clear but it shows no separate clip.
  • gerry100gerry100 Member Posts: 100
    Just got new struts all around on my 2000 LS8 sport. ( 87,000 miles).

    Car drives like new,handling is back. I wish I hadn't waited so long. It's like the frog in the pan of water on the stove, things go bad too gradually.

    Total tab at the Lincoln dealer was $448.( you do not need an alignment you might expect with front struts because of the way the suspension is configured).
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,625
    Thanks for the excellent information.

    I have a sport (by default, a manual transmission) and have wondered about the shock replacement that I'm sure I'll need soon.

    There are a couple of new dealers where I live, so it'll be interesting to see if they match the cost you've quoted. Sounds like you've got a good dealer. Not to nit-pick (well, yeah, otherwise I wouldn't say anything), but the LS doesn't have struts. What it has is unequal-length A-arms, all aluminum. Probably one of the more sophisticated suspensions you'll find on earth, let alone in the U.S.

    That's part of why the LS is so much fun to drive.
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • mrgdrmrgdr Member Posts: 50
    The redline on the '03 3.9L V8 is also 6500 RPM.
  • ls03goldls03gold Member Posts: 2
    Just picked up a 2003 LS Sport loaded. Love the car. A bit concerned after first day of ownership when the electric emergency brake failed to disengage. Drove 1/2 block (short thankfully) to my garage, whereby I played with it for awhile and it disengaged but left a service message on in the console. Dealer had to reset message and could not find a problem? Has anyone had trouble with this new brake design? I'm concerned if this should happen on a trip and the car is not drivable. Dealer stated on owner of an 03 got stranded when the brakes locked up.
  • mrgdrmrgdr Member Posts: 50
    Until now, I thought perhaps it was just my car that was exhibiting strange parking brake behavior. I've had intermittent issues with "Service Park Brake" messages since February. It occurs randomly at start-up. Dealer couldn't duplicate the problem when I took it in. Restarting the car resets the message and apparently, the brake as well. While the warning is in effect, the sound of the brake engaging/disengaging is definitely not normal; although I can't confirm that the brake is actuating at the time. The OM indicates that the message may occur when the battery has been disconnected or IIRC, the car has been towed. In these instances the brake may "forget" its position and need to be reset. Curious to know if anyone else has had similar issues along these lines and what, if anything, their service personnel have done to identify and resolve the problem.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    because I think this is one of the coolest ideas ever.......
  • cjs2002cjs2002 Member Posts: 341
    well I originally was gonna get a CTS, yet cadillac decided that they were goin to give the CTS a new breath in the form of a 3.6 V6 with a 255 HP, not bad more than I'll need but the only problem is that I don't know how much the price is gonna raise, I've been told by dealors they don't for see any price hikes (cept for the CTS V) but I don't want that one... unfortunatly I can't drive an Manual so I've got to have an Auto, the 03 CTS I love and can afford (bairly) but for 04 the only way to get an auto is to get the 3.6, and for 05 both a many and auto will be with the 3.6 and the 3.2 will be eliminated. well I drove a LS today and sorrta liked it and sortta didn't I don't know what I didn't like but I figured I'd ask ya'll about your experiences with your LS and see if you've enjoyed them as much as the people I've talked to on the CTS board... any info would be appriciated.. thanx... also considering a G35 but don't know its down to these 3 cars... thanx
  • gerry100gerry100 Member Posts: 100
    They are struts,and have to be disassembled with a spring compressor etc, the difference is they are mounted on aluminum A arms like shocks and are not part of the alignment equation.

    Here's a tip- bring the car to the dealer so his parts man can 'eyeball' your orig eqpmt struts to order the right replacements. Apparently LM made so many running changes in '00 assembly that there are multiple part numbers for the struts. My parts guy insisted that he take a look before he ordered. Doesn't seem right but seems to be true.
  • ezaircon4jcezaircon4jc Member Posts: 793
    Sorry, gerry100. By your own definition the LS has shocks. Struts combine a shock with the upper suspension components. The strut turns (twists) with the turning of the steering wheel and affects the alignment. A shock doesn't, it just dampens spring rebound. The LS uses a coil-over shock. I replaced mine at around 30K. Believe me, they are shocks. Just because they are of the coil-over design (same as NASCAR), doesn't mean they are struts.

    cjs2002.
    I've had my LS for almost 3 years and just shy of 65K. I like it so much, I bought my wife a CPO 2001. We both have the V6, and with a few "upgrades", the six is plenty powerful. The '03 is even better! There is a large group of enthusiasts out there. Most of us are very satisified with our cars. Most people that I know that leased, leased the new and improved '03. The V6 base is a fine car. I read somewhere (can't remember where) that they sticker for ~30K. The V6 premium also a good choice. This Saturday on Speedvision there is an in-depth review of the LS. Check www.speedtv.com for times. Drive the LS. You will soon have the not-as-yet-patented LS Grin!
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    I have concluded that the CTS, while not bad, is Cadillac's answer to the LS. But the LS is more fun to drive, you sit in a better position, and as I have found to be usual, Lincoln paid so much more attention to the details than GM does. Like the theatre seating position in the back seat, the 50/50 weight distribution, the transmission that will do a 4 to 1 downshift in one shift, and the automatic that will burn rubber in an upshift from 2 to 3, or do the same thing in a downshift. I could go on, but I run the risk of boring you. Can you tell I'm a fan? It's a driver's car, pure and simple. And most of the owners just love them. Those that don't, don't, but if you do, you really do.
  • lobsenzalobsenza Member Posts: 619
    I have an 02 LS V8 Sport. It is a terriffic car. Minimal problems and it drives fabulously. I am really looking forward to attending a driving school next month to learn more about the capabilities of the LS.
  • cjs2002cjs2002 Member Posts: 341
    I love the CTS, G35 and the LS now... which is really starting to anoye me since I'd originally ben set on the CTS, but then they had to go and change everything and of course I had to go and drive both the G and the LS for the first times and fall in love with them as well... oh well... I'll keep you updated as to what I decided... question any idea where I can find some reviews of the LS , CTS, or G35 thanx
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.