By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Though I respect CR and its results, I always follow Regean's general rule: trust but verify. CR ain't perfect!
Bottom line: manuals on the lot-zero (about 15 models); fabric tops-one.
The dealer is going to stock what the buyer wants. (In fact, the black car had a "buyer acceptance" sticker on the window.) This particular dealer had a manual in stock when the LS was first announced, but I've never seen another one there since.
I also noticed that another dealer in the area has had the same cars in inventory for quite some time. A result of the economic slowdown? I hope so.
What we are questioning here are seeming inconsistencies in their methodology.
I reiterate: extra weight is given to engine,cooling, transmissions and driveline (although the latter is not shown in the chart for some half-assed explanation about 4WD). To my way of thinking, we are left no choice but to give equal weight to all the other categories. There is then, no way to differentiate a relatively "minor" problem from a "major"one. Some people might report a problem that you might not even consider. I've spoken to people who are annoyed that they have to replace brakes @ 40K miles. There are those who feel that an automobile is a no-maintenance machine and that nothing should ever wear out or break. I am not agruing that SOME Japanese makes have fewer problems initially. However, according to J.D. Power, these advantages disappear after 5 years of ownership.
My next beef": quoting from p.42 of the April 2001 CR "a model earns a "recommended" symbol when it perfroms well in our tests and when our reader-survey data indicate that reliability should be at least average. OK, I daresay that calling a car the best American sedan ever tested presupposes that it performed well in their testing. As to part B to qualify for a "recommended" rating, page 83 clearly shows an average reliability rating for the 2000 LS V8. So now, I await someone's explanation, then as to why the V8, at least, did not receive the big, fat check mark and "recommended" symbol on p.50 Oh, I know certain individuals will probably say that they can't differentiate between the 2 models. However, on p.31, they have another chart that does differentaite. To me, this constitiutes "damning with faint praise."
We are not blind to the first year problems with the LS. All we are looking for is a level playing field. I might add at this juncture that it should be obvious to all by now that LM is making a genuine effort to remedy the problems and ensure our satisfaction. If you are so unfortunate as to have a problem with one of the German or Japanese makes, I sincerely doubt that you are going to get the involvement from top execs and engineers that we have here.
Mike- I have had similar experiences to yours. With the exception of Panasonic VCR's and those mfd. by them, every product I ever bought on their recommendation (including a car) was complete junk.
1. 5-yr results: CR has an interesting twist on J.D. Powers' 5 years info. As CR points out on p. 13: "As part of trend analysis, we looked at what happened to the vehicles that were new in '95 and five years old in '00. Most of the time, we found, vehicles that were reliable in their first year remained reliable five years later...." Then discusses how unreliable '95 Mitsus are now average and unreliable '95 VWs are the worst of the group. Says Honda, Subaru, and Toyota start and stay reliable, as do BMW, MB, & Nissan. Chrysler & GM started and ended poorly.
2. USA-Japan-Euro Gap: CR claims to track relative performance here, too. P. 12-13 dicusses how US, Japanese, & Euro cars are more reliable over past 20 year. US dramatically narrowed the gap with both Euro and Japan, but Japan still in lead. US & Euro about same; both about twice rate of Japanese problems per 100 vehicles. (I'm surprised they claim Chrysler cars have been more reliable than Fords or GMs over past 20 years. Thinking all those Chrysler tranny horror stories!)
3. LS8: Is likely too bad that CR did NOT actually test an LS8. Their Oct '99 full report was for an LS6. The two part criteria for a "recommended", page 32, includes the car being tested. Thus it was impossible for LS8 to earn the coveted "recommended". The charts on pages 28-29 show the cars they tested. Page 28 shows the LS6 tested. Page 29 shows that the tests for BMW 5 Series and MB E-Class were based on station wagon models, 'cause that is what CR tested. Also, notice how great cars like Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, & MB S-Class are not "recommended". CR hasn't tested them.
4. CR claims to look forward as well as back. Pages 30-31 look at projected reliability, using the criteria as stated. Page 31 clearly shows different predicted reliabilities for the LS6 and LS8. LS8 rated above LS6 and within margin to get same prediction as Saab 9-5 & Audi A4. So maybe the report will boost LS8 sales??? Cause Lincoln to build LS8 manual?????
5. As I pointed out about the pretensioner mistake, CR does make mistakes, typos, etc. Might have happened in regard to LS6 & LS8 reliability scoring vis-a-vis BMW 3 Series (comparing ratings on pages 77 & 83)? They do make simple mistakes, sometimes.
But the new '01 MB C-Class just came out a few months ago. Not sure how CR could've gotten enough reports back for new C-Class to report on actual reliability results so far. CR did not even make a forward projection for C-Class. CR had insufficient data for '00 C-Class and the '97-'98-'99 were only average reliability.
OK, real wood, or wud? Well folks, if real weren't so good then why imitate it? Yeah, real wood is cool--better than plastic. That being said, another thousand or so and I for one would not be able to AFFORD such a gem of a car. DONT'T RAISE THE PRICE TOO MUCH MORE.
V8 manual. You're damn right brother. Where do I sign. Actually, a beefier V6 is a better idea. Hmmmmm, good balance...etc...200+ HP, (actualy get off the the HP stuff....it's tourque that mattters). Anyway, V8 is good, manual is better; the vehicle's BALANCE is best. Actually, as much as I enjoyed the V6 manual, I bought a V8. I need an auto. Way tooo much time on the cell phone doing business in trafic. The deciding factor, I figured the engine wouldn't work quite as hard if it were a V8. Beside, the V6 auto sucked almost as much as the under $40k BMW I tried. $55k+ or forget it in BMW land.
Hey, it doesn't take much engineering savey to produce a great car for that much doe.
So, where are we now?
Keep refining this car and some day CR, C&D and R&T will all be comparing a Lincoln LS to to some new upstart and NOT a BMW. That is what 30+ years of sleeping at the wheel gets you.
BTW, 12k+ and still loving it. If I get the longevity I have gotten with my wife's 240 at 190k+ at 18 years old, I am sold (man is that car easy to fix). But hey, is that car a dog to drive. This car is all one could ask for at a price that is only somewhat above average.
New topic.
Based on the lack of responce, I must assume that no one elses LS "carries" water on the windows a couple to three days after washing as does mine. I will be persistant and bring it in to the dealer again.
With regard to milage...I am often asked about home appliences and the worth of buying energy-effiecient products (used to be an energy consultant). To this I answer, "An 'energy-efficiant' refrigerator that is open (i.e. used) often will most certainly consume more energy that one which is left unattended." Hense I say, lay off the throttle and you will achieve 20+ mpg no problem. Then again, one must have some fun once in a while also. That from a man who serves his time in stop and go Boston traffic.
Enjoy folks. It's a great car.
Thanks again Lincol.
Hey! With this car we back.
Scott
I had a friend who was deep into the audio business when Bose sued CR, and CR lost. One of the CR founders was on the stand, and said "Look, it's entertainment! People read our magazine to hear about cockroace feces in cereal.'
Yes, after washing the LS, water will appear on the windows after lowering/raising. Depending on the weather, this might go on for 2 days. In the summer, I leave the car in the sun for a while and this seems to help. Also, lower and raise the windows a few times in succession after washing. This removes some, but not all, water. It is annoying and sometimes I have to make a concerted effort not to open the windows after a wash.
I don't think it's a "defect" and I don't think the dealer is going to be able to do anything about it. I have noted the same thing on my previous Mercury Sables. The drain holes are clear, so it's unlikely that there's any retained water. I guess the window rubbers/felt/whatever retain water.
From justauto.com:
....Nasser, 53 and a straight-speaking Australian, told analysts at the Detroit auto show in January that he was "totally pissed off'' with recent costly and problematic vehicle launches. He also said product defects and production delays had cost the company more than $1 billion in the previous year.
With that in mind, perhaps, he had a quick response when asked what automakers are the global leaders when it comes to the mass production of top-quality cars.
"The Japanese are,'' Nasser said.
I wouldn't pursue your line of reasoning too far. Didn't Ford build the Pinto? Explorer? Thinking Henry Ford II had lots of personal problems as he was running the company into the ground in the 1970s. Ford family, which dominates the company, oft times has & can behave like Britain's royal family or the Carringtons on Dynasty.
(It is interesting that purported Eco-Saint & All-Around Good Guy & Corporate Crusader For the Little People Nader is a multi-millionaire. At least it shows he is a shrewd business person. He and Mr. Jackson. As personal injury lawyers figured out a long time ago, you really can make a lot of money strong-arming businesses!)
In contrast, I think their frequency of repair reports are flawed (especially for automobiles) because they don't precisely report the nature and scope of defects. Their survey sheets don't even provide the right questions, so they can't get the right answers.
Of course, I dry the windows again after rolling them back up.
Brian
P.S. I'm wondering if a screw-up in this limiter would have any effect on the starting problem some posters have mentioned.
Brian
If it's a squeak, lube the weatherstrip with vaseline, silicone, etc.
Scott
My son pointed this out to me when I had the last Taurus loaner. I was skeptical, but sure enough, the rev limiter kicked in. However, on this car it was 4,000 RPM. Standard Vulcan V6 engine. So, I guess it's on all Ford products.
"P.S. I'm wondering if a screw-up in this limiter would have any effect on the starting problem some posters have mentioned."
Only if the engine cranks above 3000 RPM!
Mark
One of these days I'll have figured out how to get all these software packages to talk to each other and not need more than one log-in. Until then please bear with me.
Brian
P.S. to Mark: What, I haven't shown you my modified starter that spins at 4,000 RPM
It is true that parts will wear when manually shifting that won't wear if you don't manually shift. By the same token if you don't drive the car it won't wear, either.
We designed this transmission with manual shifts in mind. It can take it.
Mark
My Calibration was 9WHABAHA. If it was missed in the TSB will it get added so others don't have to go through this ordeal. Also please let me know what they need to reflash. I am going to printout the e-mail and give it to them that way it is as straight-forward as possible for my dealership. Thanks for all of your help. We all really do appreciate it.
Regards,
Victor
We are working on expanding the Lincoln branded merchandise to offer distinctive items that speak to Lincoln and what the customer is looking for. I am speaking more of the personal accessories at this point, rather than the very important aftermarket accessories/products.
As you are a core Lincoln LS Owners Group we would value your feedback in terms of the items that people would look for. Items anywhere from exclusive, limited, high end items to less expensive, distinctive items such as die cast models, the LS chrystal flutes, driving gloves, etc.
The second part of the question is, where would you look for the merchandise? Our Lincoln dealers are key, but what other venues, such as auto shows, website, Lincoln events? Your time and feedback is always appreciated.
Phil
The software is available to reflash your car. I don't know if my word is enough to authorize them, but here is the information.
APPLICATION: DESCRIPTION: Service Calib: Service PCM PCM Replaced Service for previous calibration levels:
50S SPORT 3.9L V8 AT SST 1LQ18S0506 1U7A-FA XW4F-AFG/AFH/AFJ 9WHA-BAH/BAG/BAF
1W4A-HB 1LQ18S0506
I can't seem to get this to line up correctly. E-mail me at mkovalsk@ford.com and I can e-mail you the information.
Mark
They sell everything from board games to umbrellas Think their web site is www.chevymall.com.
So I'd recommend creating a catalog, sending all new owners at least one copy & have dealers pass some out. And set up a dedicated web site.
I've purchased the the long sleeve and short sleeve shirts through I-collection. I like them a lot, but we need a LS shirt.
I personally would like to see an extruded model of the LS. I actually want a copy of "How a Car is Built", filmed at Wixom, following a LS through the process!
I'd almost prefer to get an "I-Collection" magazine regarding Lincoln products, gift items, and wearables. I think this would be a great venue for Lincoln, but personally, I want LS items.
I'm sorry, but you did ask.
Ray
When I ask to go to message 1444 why does the page start with message 1400 and message 1444 is not displayed??????
:-)
I think a catalog mailed to the owner would be a good start...maybe also one included in the documentation that comes with the car. Certainly a link on the LM web site and at special events like car shows.
The Stuff:
- A car model is always neat especially if its in your color! (mine's Aqua Blue, hint, hint)
- A CD pouch w/logo for holding your CDs in the car.
- The usual collection of caps, T-shirts and polo shirts with the LS logo/image.
- A fold-up umbrella w/logo for the glove box.
- A small pad and pen w/logo for the center console. I got an LM pen with my '92 Mark VII that I still use in the LS.
- LS key fob
- How about a classy LS watch with leather band.
- And finally, a nice pair of LS underware... choice of briefs or boxers! :-0 Who said something about out-of-the-box thinking?
That's all I can think of in five minutes. Thanks for the opportunity to print my wish list...
Joe
PS: What about a nice do-it-yourself Coach Roof kit for JR!
I personally would go for some performance oriented t-shirts of the LS, and definitely a Model of the LS... I probably won't have mine forever (Planning on getting a New BMW 540 in about 3 years unless of course Lincoln comes out with a 6 Speed LS) so a model will remind me and my family of my first American Luxury Sport Sedan... Ahhh the memories.... maybe a nice key ring, and the standard polo shirts. Definitely a calendar also. What about a calendar with LSisms.... I.e. In the ASM (whatever the test is.. Ask Jonathan) braking test the Ultimate Driving Machine stopped under 40 meters at 39.3meters (Whatever the figure is) the LS in 36.2.... A picture of an LS passing a BMW 5 with the caption LS:1 BMW: 0 etc....
Regards,
Airwolf1000