By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Now the bad news, my driver side rear window mechanism craped out today. I took the mechanism off but was unable to fix it. The cable jammed up around the main pulley. I taped the window up and will contact the dealer tomorrow. I'm hoping they stock the part. Has anyone who has had the unit replaced with an updated one had the other still functioning one replaced by there dealer at the same time?
Per your post of the other day, are you finding that sitting further back allows you to hear more from the rears? I really wish the speakers were mounted higher in the doors. My ankles are going deaf. I've noticed that my Pioneer TSA6865's sound better when my wife opens the door to get out. However, this is a bit impractical for most driving situations. Seriously though, it does demonstrate (to me at least) either that the speaker placement is not ideal or the Pioneers are not the best for this application.
Enjoy your "new" sound system. I hope to see you at the NY auto show- Artie
Dropped it off Saturday morning, So the they could replace the mechanism. Not waiting until I am driving with the window in the slot. Tom 12253 I feel your pain, especially since it happened to us around the same time.
We'll see how the repair goes tomorrow.
Regards,
Victor
I separated the 3M tape from the piece and then used an Xacto blade to slice away the epoxy covering. When I got down to where the wood was supposed to be all I found was the plastic look-alike stuff. I'll be chatting with them tomorrow to see if they still believe that they have wood in their kit and asking them where it is.
I suspect they aren't the only ones though. Most of these kits appear to be manufactured by the same company so if you get a factory-match kit expect it to be the fake "wud" stuff.
It does still look very nice and matches the factory "wud" perfectly. So don't let that stop you from getting the kit. Just be aware that it isn't really wood.
Brian(who owes a humble apology to Joe for doubting his word!)
Good, because for once, or maybe our venting has finally done some good, Edmunds actually had a good write-up about their long-term LS car.
Brian
I have a similar situation in my S-10 pick-up.
Artie,
Have about 14,000 miles on my LS now. I called the dealer this mourning about the window. He is ordering the mechanism overnight and hopefully I'll have it repaired tomorrow. He said he never heard of this problem before. I told him there has to be some info on the window crash problem. Ford is obviously aware of the problem, since they redesigned the part. I have the window taped up and hoping that it gets fixed tomorrow. I wish they could replace the other side now instead of waiting for it to crash first.
Tom
This year marks the 101st anniversary edition of the New York International Auto Show, North America's first and largest auto show.
The show features more than 1000 cars, trucks, SUV's and minivans plus a large selection of futuristic concept cars, elegant classics, and exciting exotics.
In addition, the 2001 show will highlight the latest in automotive technology, safety and environmental enhancement.
Show Hours: Friday 4/13 1p-8p Public Sneak Preview
Saturday 4/14 11a-10:30p
Sunday 4/15 10a-7p
Monday 4/16 11a-10:30p
Tuesday 4/17 11a-10:30p
Wednesday 4/18 11a-10:30p
Thursday 4/19 11a-10:30p
Friday 4/20 11a-10:30p
Saturday 4/21 11a-10:30p
Sunday 4/22 10a-7p
Brian
My LS is a 4/99 build and I bought it in May of 1999. I think it might have been the first LS registered in Polk county. I bought it from Willey, Inc. in Ames, Iowa. I tried Stivers but at that time, supplies were a little tight and Stivers didn't have a car to suit me. I only tried Stiver's service department once for the creaking driver's window and they basically told me to just live with it. That is when I found that silicone lube down the track would fix it (at least temporarily).
We moved to Minneapolis in January of 2000 and I have used Prestige LM for the first reflash, the recalls, and the steering wheel retrofit.
Like your Mom's, mine is silver with the dark charcoal interior and moonroof. Mine is a V8, though, so the next time I am in Des Moines, I will look for your Mom and challenge her to a drag race.
Bruce
This info. came from BON. So far there are about 60,000 LSs roaming the streets.
Brian
I know aut manufacturers have to stay in business, but if you have a defect, live up to it. YOu may end up keeping some customers for the next vehicle.
Thanks
a
I think my build is feb '01, but that's from the window sticker. Does anyone know how to tell the actual date, I didn't notice it on the driver door sticker.
I seem to have a great tranny, switches through all gears with ease and no delay from P-R or D-R, both happen in about 1 second. So far, I am a happy new owner going out to show off the new toy.
Want to say thanks to all of you for your posts and feedback. This board combined with the long term test by Edmunds helped convince me this was the car for me. Your enthusiasm is unmatched.
I do think you can overdo it if you are not careful. Think carefully before you use the console top (the biggest piece), as it kind of just sits on the top of the plastic console with no transition so it looks like it is just stuck on the top. Also set the back door pieces on where they go and see if you like the look. I didn't, although I didn't realize that until they were stuck on so I might have to live with them. The overhead console (IMHO) doesn't need the wood trim and it too, looks kind of stuck on as opposed to built in. It is still a great kit and easy to do unless you are having a super klutzy day (in which case you might be better off waiting).
I think the Mark VIII died at the end of 1999 and was 'replaced' by the LS... so the remaining 13% would be the Continental.
Welcome to the fold and CONGRATS on your new toy.
You can find the build date on the frame inside the driver's door.
Have you checked out the Lincoln LS Owner's Club yet? www.llsoc.com Lots of good info there.
What part of the country are you in? Have you been warned of the mysterious disease that strikes all LS owners? It's symptoms are uncontrollable urges to take unneeded drives and a lapse in short-term-memory which results in the need to frequent the local convenience store. :-)
Joe
My 4/99 build has not had any rear window crashing problems but I am a little nervous. Since it is a known defect, I wonder if Lincoln would be helpful even after the warranty expires? I still have about 18,000 miles to go. I doubt that they would replace the window mechanisms with upgraded parts until a failure occurs. Is there anyway to tell just what percentage of owners have had the window problems?
Jeff, congratulations on your purchase! At first, I had a little bit of trouble justifying the price. I had come out of a 94 T'Bird V8 and the LS cost nearly twice as much but it didn't seem twice as good, if you know what I mean. Now, after 2 years and 30,000 miles, I like the LS better than when it was new. We just bought a 2001 Taurus for my wife, and while it is a fine car, the LS is definite step up in every respect.
Bruce
First of all, there is no attribution of the source of the sales figures. Where did they come from? Second, there is no explanation of the actual time period involved. Since the 2001 figures are said to be from Jan. 1 through Feb. 28, I assume that all the figures represent calendar year, rather than model year, sales. This, however, isn't explained in either the article or the charts; it SHOULD be, but it isn't.
In addition, the 1998 model year was the last for the Mark VIII. Any Mark sales in '99 could only be a handful of leftover '98 models. It seems apparent that the author simply copied the '98 chart and used it as a template for '99 through '01, but he neglected to remove the Mark and its '98 sales numbers. It's an obvious mistake, but to me it indicates a blatant lack of thoroughness in preparing the article, and thereby harms its credibility--if they missed something that obvious, I wonder what else they missed.
If one removes the Mark figures for '99 through '01, the numbers and percentages add up, but a legitimate news source wouldn't make its readers do their own math. I've learned to take ALL BON articles with a large grain of salt and a healthy dose of skepticism.
Note to Brian: This is not meant to be a potshot at you; hope it doesn't sound that way. I just wanted to point out that, as far as I'm concerned, BON is not a paragon of credibility, and its information should not necessarily be taken at face value.
I would also like to say that my purchase experience was handled very smoothly at Townsend Lincoln/Mercury in Carlsbad, CA. The salesman, Roberto, was friendly and helpful and although the bartering was necessary, he was forthright and helpful. He even offered to pick up my car and bring it in for the service visits if I wanted, and let me borrow his Town Car :-). Very nice and personable guy.
I will be joining the LLSOC page shortly, I also used info from that page to help make my decision. I especially was enthused by the LS Mania event, and am sorry I missed it. I look forward to the next event in my region.
Thanks again,
Jeff
On a separate note...We noticed when I took out the CDs this weekend from the Alpine system they were very hot to handle. We had been driving all day and took them out just when we got home..I think I saw this addressed in a earlier Alpine CD question a month or so ago...any updated info on why this happens and is it normal?
Bill
Ortega Highway is a blast in the LS. I drive it every day to work and back. Friday I was coming home late from a consulting appointment and Ortega was deserted. Took most of the 30mph turns at 60. Didn't even have the car sliding. Don't know if I would recommend doing this to anyone who doesn't know the car and the road intimately since just about all the turns are blind and shoulder up to mountains on one side and cliffs on the other.
But the LS handled the trip with nary a ruffle. Me, on the other hand, had a serious case of pucker power from the drive.
The Southern California LLSOC contingent still needs a chapter coordinator, if anyone want to volunteer. I'm going to attempt to plan an outing from San Diego to Julian after the NY Auto Show for the far south members.
johnnylinc: No worries. I too, usually take BON with a grain of salt. I was more interested in the percentages which if accurate, show that the LS is VERY important to Lincoln and supports what we've been told by Lincoln.
Brian
Given the LS's moderate weight and engine size (both 3.9L and 3.0L) fuel economy isn't a strong suit of LS. My 5.7L V-8 '96 Impala SS weighs about 600 pounds more and gets better mileage, esp. on highway, then my '00 LS8 Sport. And the LS8 requires premium. Is it due to gearing? Drivetrain inefficiencies? I drive both cars in a similar fashion.
Personally, I don't see a problem with my fuel mileage.
or
Tom
I also printed out both of them, but using a bubble jet. A little difficult to read either one, but then I took it a step further and made a copy (thinking about the intro letter) of the print out. The light one came out with no lettering at all, about half of the horizontal part of the star and a poor rendition of the LS. The dark one ended up as just a black rectangle with a smidge of gray inside.
I think we will need a version of the light one, but in solid black, if we plan to do any printing/copying.
Bruno
It seems clear that neither picture is "clear".
I like the general idea but the lighter one needs to be darker and vice versa.
Although the black one is classy looking, be sensitive to the printing issues it may cause not only on letter heads but on clothing as well.
Perhaps something between the two would work... Medium gray background, dark gray car/LM symbol, and black lettering.
Should you explicitly show the web address?
Joe
It will be sharpened and made more viewable as we go along. Eric is going to play with the color schemes to get them more noticeable. And the website will be added to the bottom. I may have an updated one tomorrow that I will post.
Brian
Brian-sorry, but will there be any other logo choices? Although classier than the original, I'm finding these a little too understated even for my conservative taste.
Artie
The SST has never had the ability to start in 1st gear from a standing start. Everytime the car comes to a complete stop the SST start gear is 2nd. You can upshift to start in 3rd, but you cannot downshift to start in 1st.
Does this answer your question?
Mark
C&D had previously reported the following: (1) 15 mpg in their 600 mile LS8 Sport road trip (5/00), (2) 17 mpg in their LS6 5-speed manual test (11/99), and (3) 21 mpg in their 1,050 mile LS6 automatic trip (2/00).
As of 2/01 MT reported their LS8 Sport averaging 15.2 mpg over 12,126 miles; it had been averaging 14.7 mpg over first 10,300 (11/00). As of 12/00, R&T reported their LS8 Sport getting 19.7 mpg for first 28,390 miles. It had achieved 19.1 mpg during the first 13,988 miles; 19.3 mpg during first 8,525 miles; and 20.1 during very first 1,670 miles. Consumer Reports saw 23 mpg in their LS6 automatic (12/99).
I think the car is a great car, I really enjoy driving it when my wife will let me. I just cannot or will not accept this level of service from Ford.
A 3,600 pound car like the LS with either a 3.0L or 3.9L motor should be able to get at least 26 mpg, if not more, while cruising at 65-75 mph on interstate. In '00 EPA said Aurora 3.5L V-6 gets 28 mpg hwy, Pontiac Bonneville 3.8L V-6 gets 30 mpg & 3.8L V-6 Supercharged gets 28 mpg, Cadillac DeVille 4.6L V-8 gets 28 mpg, & Cadillac Eldo & Seville 4.6L V-8 get 26 mpg. My '00 LS8 Sport has 23 mpg EPA sticker; I count myself fortunate to get 23 mpg on interstate. This is an area Lincoln should address. Possibly change 5th gear ratio?
I wouldn't want much different overall gear ratio in the LS. It's .75 overdrive and 3.58 axle (or 3.31, depending on the build date) is not that aggressive. In real world conditions, I haven't heard much economy advantage to the 3.31 axle over the original 3.58. It just seems to me that there is more potential for fuel efficiency and power in the 3.9 than the engineers have found so far.
On the plus side, the 3.9 is probably the smoothest V8 I have ever seen. It also has a very expensive sound that I love to hear at 6000 RPM. Hmmm....You don't suppose my desire to hear that sound has any effect on gas mileage, do you......? :-)
Bruce
"LS automatic's 5th should be numerically lower. That would increase top speed (if not otherwise drag limited),..."
With the .75 overdrive and 3.58 axle ratio, the 3.9L power peak occurs at about 160 MPH. A lower numeric ratio would put the power peak at a higher speed, a speed at which the power required would be well in excess of power available.
It's possible, that with a lower numeric ratio, top speed would be greater in fourth gear than in fifth.
This is based on my belief that the maximum speed a vehicle can achieve is when the power required curve intersects the power available curve at its peak.
I only hope that Linclon's new design guy from England doesn't destroy what the LS has been able to accomplish! In addition to good designs, Linclon needs to shore up it's dealer network. Buying a Linclon shouldn't be like buying a Ford Focus!
http://www.autonews.com/html/main/index.html
I like it for its content and classy looks.
This past winter, we averaged 18.5 MPG during all around, but mostly city driving. We haven't been on any extended highway trips yet this year, but the annual vacation is coming up again in a couple of months. Last year, with the car virtually brand new, it returned 28.5 MPG at a steady 65-70 MPH cruise.... Now for the disclaimer, all figures are by way of the car's computer.
My historical experience going back about 20 years is that I almost always get higher highway mileage than the EPA highway estimate. My '96 Infinit G20t automatic had EPA highway estimate of 28 mpg. I would always get 32-33 mpg on interstate doing 74 mph with wife and kids. My '97 Camaro 3.8L V-6 w/5-speed manual had a 30 mpg EPA highway estimate. I would get 30-32 mpg. My '96 Impala SS has a 25 mpg EPA highway estimate. I beat that on interstate, including last May with wife, kids, and trunk full of luggage while on a 1,500 mile trip, averaging over 80 mph and spending a lot of time in Colorado mountains. I beat the EPA highway estimate in my '93 Concorde. Only car I remember I couldn't was my '95 Plymouth Neon Sport w/5-speed, but it had a ridiculous 39 mpg estimate. Now matter how hard I tried (including windows up and no a/c while using cruise control going downhill on a still moderate day), I'd get about 34-36 mpg at 74 mph.
Now I work hard at just meeting the EPA highway estimate in my '00 LS8 Sport, even with tires inflated to 35 psi and using cruise control on ordinary days. And it ticks me off a bit when I fuel up next to the big boat, big engine Caddy who gets better mileage and uses regular octane!
I find it fascinating that the '01 LS8 & LS8 Sport lost lots of little "goodies" due to EPA considerations. Had to drop a smidgen of weight to stay within EPA targets. I prize my Audiophile sound with 6-disc CD changer, adjustable rear headrests, and full size spare with alloy rim!!! IMHO, I think Lincoln can leave final drive ratios alone but 5-speed manual should have an overdrive 5th and the LS automatic's 5th should be numerically lower. That would increase top speed (if not otherwise drag limited), increase highway fuel economy, leave most acceleration times alone, and reduce engine RPMs on highway. Best of all worlds? Heck, most people downshift from 5th to 4th or 3rd to pass, esp. on 2 lane roads. Who passes in overdrive, unless you have no one up ahead coming towards and lots of room to pass?