By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Of course the Cruze is nicer than a Cobalt...it costs significantly more.
Wow, that was fast...at the rate you're going, you'll be catching up to me in about 15 minutes! After 13 months, I only have about 5700 miles on my Ram!
A v6 just can't offer the same experience as a v8. Sure add a few turbos and power isn't an issue, but it will never sound like a v8. The hemi just sounds bad [non-permissible content removed].
I do through this dilemma every once in awhile when I think about getting a new car. A Charger is what I really want, if I get new. And I'm sure that even with the V-6, it's plenty powerful. Probably quicker than my Park Ave, and maybe about as quick as the Ram, since it's not as heavy and has two extra gears. But then I start thinking hey, the V-8 isn't THAT much more expensive, isn't THAT much thirstier, and if I'm going to get a car like this, might as well go all the way.
But then, something totally off-the-wall comes along and distracts me. Today, for example, one of my co-workers and I were talking cars. He has a 2008 or so Civic, that's in for repairs because of a crack in the block that's making it leak coolant. Apparently, this is an issue with 2006-08 and some early '09 Civics, and while Honda hasn't issued a recall, if it happens, they have been replacing short-blocks free of charge. Well, today he borrowed a 2002 Bonneville SLE from his neighbor.
In talking, I mentioned how I was going to look at a Bonneville before I bought my Park Ave, but when I called about it, it had already been sold. He mentioned that his neighbor, an older guy was thinking of selling this one. Hate to admit, but I'm a bit tempted, depending on how much he wants. It only has 45,000 miles. Leather, sunroof, nice looking wheels, plenty of power stuff. Only has the regular 3.8 instead of the supercharged, so I'd have to get used to the reduced power...but not having to put premium fuel in it would be nice!
It's silver, which I don't like. It's attractive enough, but just too common and a color I'm getting tired of. I also don't like the red gauges. And even though it's the same basic design as my Park Ave, it feels a LOT smaller inside. Legroom is still good, but it sits lower to the floor and there's not nearly as much headroom. Back seat is noticeably tighter, as well.
Gotta say, I'm tempted, even though I'm trying to force myself into something newer.
Aren't the Park Avenue and other H-bodies the same in the front, other than seat thicknesses, while the rear varies in legroom and perhaps headroom because of seat positioning in the rear. I believe the PA was 5 inches longer, but part of that was rear bumper overhang and front bumper shape. I need to do some research.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
By this timeframe, all these cars were technically the G-body, I think. IIRC it debuted with the 1995 Aurora and Riviera, and the Park Ave and DeVille were added to it for 1997. The LeSabre and Bonneville were added to it for 2000. At some point, the Seville even transitioned to the G, I believe, but I forget what year.
Compared to my Park Ave, the Bonneville's engine bay definitely looks about the same. Up front, it feels like the seat goes back about as far, but it's also lower to the ground, and the ceiling is lower.
As for dimensions, I think my Park Ave is 206.8" long on a 113.8" wb. I believe the Bonneville, and 2000-05 LeSabre, were on a 112.2", and around 202" long? The Bonneville's roofline is more rakish than either the LeSabre or the Park Ave, and I think that bites into back seat legroom, as if they had to move the seat up a bit, to maintain headroom.
Also, what was that timeframe that non-supercharged 3.8's tended to have intake manifold issues? Would this Bonneville fall within that?
LOL! Hopefully the rate of mile accumulation will drop off soon. Been busy the last few months going here and there.
Yeah, if buying a Charger or 300 with as few miles as you drive, the Hemi would be really hard to pass up on. The days of v8 power in something remotely affordable are probably numbered.
"In talking, I mentioned how I was going to look at a Bonneville before I bought my Park Ave, but when I called about it, it had already been sold. He mentioned that his neighbor, an older guy was thinking of selling this one. Hate to admit, but I'm a bit tempted, depending on how much he wants. It only has 45,000 miles. Leather, sunroof, nice looking wheels, plenty of power stuff. Only has the regular 3.8 instead of the supercharged, so I'd have to get used to the reduced power...but not having to put premium fuel in it would be nice! "
Aside from the hideously ugly dash and switch gear, those Bonnies have been growing on me as of late. I do think those were the years of the intake problem, but weren't they recalled?
You probably wouldn't notice a big difference around town as the 3800 is a good in town performer. It's probably above 40 where the N/A 3800 would be doggy compared to the S/C.
1996-1999. Then 2000-2005. The EGR metal stovepipe and surrounding upper intake material are separated better than original 96-99. The throttle body gasket was too thin, so there should have been a program sticker on the radiator support where they put on stronger washers (dished) and put in ground almond shells to seal seeps,. Better fix is just put on a new, thicker, standard aftermarket throttle body gasket. Require R&R throttle body only. However, eventually the lower intake gaskets can start to seep where they meet the intake manifolds. R&R and replace with GM metal-framed gaskets for about gasket cost 50$ and $250 for 3 - 5 hours labor MAX where the Upper Intake ($89) with throttle body gasket can all be replaced and you're done for life.
On Bonneville, take off beauty cover on engine to check the 3 circle stamps on top of the plastic UIM to see if the year date shows later than 01 or 02, indicated replacement with a GM upper. Then look at edge of lower metal intake gasket against the heads for a shiny metal edge or a new plastic edge to determine if lower gaskets have been replaced. If edge of lower gasket is dark metal, then it has a FelPro steel gasket. Also good.
PS: I have a factory service manual for 2003 leSabre--does not include Bonneville like my 98 FSM. Take photo of RPO tag on spare tire cover, may be on underside. From those RPO codes, you will determine all variables for trans and suspension and option packages. Then when you look at other cars, compare with the installed trans and suspension.
RPO Codes lookup: http://www.rpocodes.com/
I know that Touring suspension leSabres got a different final drive ratio, that was slightly higher, making them feel peppier (if a leSabre can be described as "peppy"). Same for Malibu Maxx when I was looking at them.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
I wonder what he'd take for it? According to KBB, a private party price would be around $6-7K! I didn't think it would still fetch that much at that age, even if the mileage is low. I have no idea how much he'd want for it though. And I'm just thinking about it casually right now.
The Grand Prix V-8 was a a 5.3, and I believe an aluminum version, of the truck 5.3. It was also offered in the Impala SS a few years, as well as the LaCrosse Super.
I think the Bonneville prior to the style you're looking at, I thought had real nice, deep-looking leather bucket seats. Seems like I never saw too many of that last Bonneville around here.
EDIT: Nevermind, I'm actually thinking about two Bonnevilles before the last--the one that looked a bit like it was scowling at you when you pulled up behind one!
Water pump went at 40K. Crappy car, as Diesleone will attest to.
A few years back, a guy at work bought one of those V-8 Impalas...and promptly started whining about fuel prices! Well, duh! :P
Were the GTP's V8's? I seem to remember supercharged V6's but I wasn't into Pontiacs too much, after the '70's.
The V8 Grand Prix I had in Baltimore was an '07 I believe.
Yup, the build quality was atrocious. And the rear seats were the most uncomfortable I have ever sat in. I remember they had the strangest contour where you could not slouch one bit in the seat without getting major fatigue in the lower back... But the thing did last.
He eventually traded it in 2008 (I believe) for a new one which after a month had to have the manifold replaced because it cracked. The build quality wasn't much better than the first one and the transmission puked its guts around 80 thousand or about 3 years later. To be fair, the dealer did replace the transmission for free but he had to cover the labor which I think came out to about 1200 bucks. When he dumped it it had just turned 100k or so and had a incessant whine from the new transmission and some other electrical gremlins like the "Door is a Jar" dinging even when the door was closed and the radio went dead.
That car was the one that got my folks to stop buying GM. Sure, maybe he got a "Friday car" or a the guys who built it were out drinking and smoking during their lunch breaks, but out of numerous "Company cars' since the 80's all it took was one jalopy to ruin it...
Lesson learned.
For 2006-2007 the base had the regular 3800, the GT had the supercharged, and the GXP had the 5.3 V-8. The GTP was dropped, although the designation was picked up on the G6 I think.
For 2008 the supercharged option was dropped, leaving just the base 3.8 and the GXP 5.3.
The supercharged V-6 the Grand Prix of this generation used put out 260 hp, so it was beefed up a bit compared to the 240 hp in my Park Ave.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-roads-black-boxes-20131027,0,6090226.story#a- xzz2iwnGrdMh
This sounds just like government inventing some more for itself to do. Sort of like the NSA - if they sense something they aren't capturing, then go get it...
" Those drivers will soon pay the mileage fees instead of gas taxes to the state"
If the gas tax is eliminated in favor of the "pay as you go" method, then folks who buy hybrids and EVs will contribute to the road maintenance commensurate with the miles they drive.
Ana, as the article mentions, it will modify behavior to reduce miles driven.
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and let us know! Post a pic of your new purchase or lease!
MODERATOR
2015 Subaru Outback 3.6R / 2024 Kia Sportage Hybrid SX Prestige
Overall, I don't really object to user fee structures that dictate the more one uses, the more one pays. There are a lot of toll roads that wouldn't exist today without toll/user fees, so it's not all a bad idea. It's the implementation of the pay-to-play structure I often have concerns about.
After all, shouldn't a driver that drives a Prius 20K miles a year pay more in road user fees than a grandma that drives her 1980 Buick 5K miles a year?
The Prius owner definitely gets more benefit from the roads in the example above.
As for tracking, I'd be willing to guess that can already be done today in most cars, since most cars have a passenger inside holding a cell phone. And, since most phones have cameras imbedded into them, what's to keep a prying government from remotely turning the camera on to see what's happening inside the vehicle?
It is an ADDITIONAL TAX. You will still pay gasoline tax and they will probably raise that too. Also more information to add to the NSA data base. I worked at NSA during my tour in the US Navy. That is one GIANT organization. Bottom line is more money for them to spend as they see fit.
Seriously, after exceeding $15 T in debt, who really thinks the governing bodies (at least, at the federal level) really care if there's any relationship between what taxes bring in .vs. what monies are spent?
After all, haven't they already been spending money as they see fit?
In many ways, that ship has already sailed. Many states allow for the inspection of vehicle data recorders to be examined to ascertain speeds, brake application, etc., especially after accidents. There are disclaimers about that very thing in most new car owner's manuals.
Many toll roads already monitor speeding by time-stamping toll tickets, and will assess speeding fines if a driver gets from A to B too quickly.
"Just raise the damn gasoline tax - less complex and less costly to administer."
But, that gets us back to the core issue, which is everyone crying about paying more than their fare share. Is it fair for the hybrid/electric car owner to pay little to no road use fee?
" Except force Congress and the White House to only use that revenue for roads. If monies had been properly partitioned off in the past this country wouldn't have gotten into the big financial and infrastructure mess we now have."
So true. Unfortunately, representatives are selected by votes, not by taxes paid into the government. And, we all know that the only thing more important than a dollar to a politician is a vote. Get enough votes, and he can obtain all the dollars he wants.
There simply isn't any way to force legislatures to spend monies collected for one use on that use. Remember, the same folks doing the spending make the laws that let them spend any way they wish...
I'd love to see actual proof of this. AFAIK, it's a legend.
It would be relatively simple for Tollway authorities to put in software that would determine if your speed between toll stations was within or outside the law. Perhaps they do that already just for their own information purposes. Whether or not they contemplate imposing fines for exceeding speed limits is not known.
I'm quite aware of that. I have an EZ Pass here in MA and we can get the same information. But in the 10 plus years of using EZ Pass and having possibly exceeded the posted speed limit through 8 states up and down the east coast, not one ticket has been issued.
What I asked for is proof that toll tickets or electronic tolling has been used to issue tickets as the OP said currently happens.
As for the car data recorders being accessed, that's absolutely factual. You can find examples fairly easily.
At the end of the day, those feeling the threat of tyrannical government arising from modern automotive technology are a little late to the game, as the threat has existed for decades.
Gathering and collecting information is quite different than deciphering and using it.
A recent example... The guy on the National Security staff sending all the tweets. How long did it take him to get caught? He'd been doing it since February, 2011.
If it takes that long to catch a White House staffer acting up, I feel pretty secure for now, especially considering the non-volatility of my communications.
http://nsa.gov1.info/utah-data-center/
Sifting through raw data looking for meaningful patterns is the more difficult, time-consuming part of the task.
Frankly, I think the growth of data collection by governments was predictable and is inevitable. It's just too irresistible a lure to not do it.
If he had ever looked at the statistics showing the number of deaths caused by not wearing seatbelts in car crashes, he would have realized just how wrong he was...
The thing is, though, is this.... Taxes are going to go up, because the road systems are crumbling. The only real question is by what method the additional taxes are going to be based on...
That's a very valid (and maybe a bit ironic) point. I think it will end up with higher state license plate fees for everyone and possibly a national highways and infrastructure type charge each time a car is sold. It will also likely end up on all cars because it will be difficult for government to single out hybrid and other alternative vehicles after they so promoted them to the public. Government, business, individuals all have the common restraint of very short sighted decision making. It was the oil shortage. Now it's we're going to fix it all through fracking. Of course, I've been seeing more and more information that fracking sites are going dry much quicker than conventional drilling sites, so give it a decade or so and we'll be back on the oil shortage and alternative energy kick. Long term national energy plan balancing all forms of energy and multiple possible scenarios - not gonna happen!
1. Lexus
2. Toyota
3. Acura
4. Audi
5. Mazda
6. Infiniti
7. Volvo
8. Honda
9. GMC
10. Subaru
General Motors’ brands performed better than its domestic competitors. GMC is ranked 9th and Buick finished 12th.
“All Buicks except the V6 LaCrosse were average or better. The only dark spots for Chevrolet are the Camaro and Cruze, both of which earned below-average reliability,” Consumer Reports said.
GM's Cadillac brand fell the most in the survey, dropping 14 spots to No. 25 as its CUE infotainment system suffered from issues similar to Ford's. The GM brand also lost the benefit of older cars that typically have fewer problems than newer models.
The next question is what is the percentage difference between top and bottom?
Basically, they failed the IIHS small over-lap test.
What got my attention was that the Prius v also failed. And that's another excuse I can use to keep driving our van, even though it's in the shop again, this time for a bad injector. :-)
Hopefully the van (and/or Subie) will last until the 2015 Prii come out; rumor is that the v, if not all of them, will get some major refreshing. And hopefully Toyota's #2 CR reliability rating won't suffer (Lexus is #1).