By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
The story includes a photo of the vehicle with two wheels off the ground.
The story is covered in the December 10 edition of AutoWeek and seems to independently confirm the results from AutoWeeks tests that resulted in a rollover.
Mine just hit 600 miles and still loving her. Got a question... when would be the ideal time to get the oil change. I have heard that the first one should be earlier (milage wise)... is this true??
Oil Change: I checked my oil every 500 miles or so, and ended up getting it changed around 2600 miles (was taking it on a long road trip, figured it was a good time as any to get it completed).
As for the recall, I'm waiting for the 2nd one regarding the "wire rubber fix" to come in, and get that and the panel looked at the same time.
I wonder why Jeep doesn't share its own crash test results? I would hope that they did similar test and had a video to show it. This would be good damage control. I am sure they can sell more liberty's with a good rating instead of a marginal rating.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2001/12/11/crash-tests.htm
Direct quote:
"Except for the head-injury score, Liberty's results were "good" or "acceptable."
Per the organization who actually performed the test, the evaluation is: OVERALL EVALUATION: MARGINAL
http://www.highwaysafety.org/vehicle_ratings/ce/html/0127.htm
"Except for the head-injury score, Liberty's results were "good" or "acceptable." EXCEPT.
Now, on the link that you provided:
Liberty:
Structure/Safey cafe: G (Good)
Injury Measures:
Head/Neck: M
Chest: G
Leg/Foot, left: A
Leg/Foot, right: G
Restraints: A
Total Score: M
-------------
Here's the others: (sample taken)
Ford Escape: Total Score: M
Mazda Tribute: Total Score: M
Honda CRV: Total Score: M
Hyundai SantaFe: G
GMC Envoy/Jimmy: M (2001 model = P)
Isuzu Amigo: P
--------------
The Santa Fe is the only vehicle here that has a "Good" rating, but to tell you the truth, I wanted something that can go off road.
So, out of all of these vehicles, which one would you drive? According to highwaysafety.org, we should all be walking.
your post said "Just read on USA today that the Liberty was issued a "Good"/"Acceptable" in the crash test after the wiring was corrected. Cool."
That is not a correct statement. I understand you later tried to back off from that statement in later posts.
Happy Holidays!!! (bah hum-bug)
---Gypsy---
Matt
I will keep you all posted... right now I am waiting for the phone call from his insurance claims office.
---gypsy---
Wife and I took our Liberty Limited (what an oxymoron!) to Death Valley this past week and covered 250-plus miles of off-pavement driving, ranging from graded dirt to 4WD-only. The Liberty handled it all with no problems and wanted more. Very solid and smooth ride off-pavement. I can't for the life of me understand where the complaints about the Liberty's ride and seating that have appeared in some auto magazines have come from. My bones weren't rattled, and my head wasn't jerked. I have a bad back, so if the seats were lousy, I'd sure know that. In reality, they're great. Only disappointment was leaving the wide-open spaces for the land of traffic lights and stop signs that is home in SoCal.
A better comparison would have been Liberty/CRV/RAV4/Escape/Sportage/. Which vehicle would rank above the others in this crash test in the same segment.
---gypsy---
Gypsy116: The only thing I could think of is that te other car hit some kind of electical connection in the back of your Liberty or pinched a wire somewhere. It sounds like something was knocked loose.
Matt
Then of course, some people don't even consider it an SUV.
But as long as we are cross shopping . . .
In comparison to other SUVs that also weigh more than 4000 pounds the Liberty scored near the bottom.
However, we were discussing the OFFSET crash tests that the Liberty only got a marginal rating as did the Escape, while the Forester scored good.
Many people view the offset tests as more representative of real world crashes.
Thus, the Subaru commercial is NOT misleading.
The Liberty has not yet been tested for frontal or side impact, so the discussion was not obviously not about those tests.
In fact I think the governments test is actually more comprehensive. The insurance company's test only tests the driver, whereas the Government's test covers the Driver and Front seat passenger, as well as Front and Rear side impact protection.
Any advertisement that asserts a fact (our vehicle does better than yours in a crash) should not conveniently ignore information that does not agree with the assertion they are trying to make. The fact that independent government data exist that is opposite to what Subaru asserts on their commercial does, in my humble opinion, make their ad misleading.
With any of these tests, it is best to gather data from multiple sources, multiple tests before making any kind of claim or determination of relative safety. Same holds for the Liberty, not all the tests have been done on it yet, though it certainly has not done well on those that it has had (bumper test, offset test #1, offset test#2, Auto Week handling test, etc.)
It's Awesome!
No pulling to the right, no dealer hassles, no skidding in the rain, no safety worries (the thing's solid like a rock!), no recalls, no (undesired) noises,... just... pure... fun. It had been so long since my test drive, I'd forgotten what a blast it is to drive, not to mention the interior quality & feel.
Only the day before, a pothole ruined a $500 rim on my wifes car. I took the Liberty right over it and I swear I heard the Liberty scoff at it.
Hope you enjoy your Liberty as much as I have been enjoying mine.
--gypsy--
I ordered a white Limited with tow pkg,tint glass,heated mirrors & the security grp nothing fancy and I am wondering what the hold up is?
It was suppose to be built first wk of DEC. There are no restrictions either. The dealer called and said they put a "Hot" on it ( whatever that is) and he will call me tomorrow with an update.
We'll see!
Thanks
Thanks!
--gypsy--
PS... have your vin # or your von # handy when calling DC.
fyi - I ordered a pretty well loaded Limited on 10/25, It was built 12/5 and left the factory a few days later... and the dealer received it 12/17 (I live in Massachusetts).
Best of luck & Happy Holidays.
p.s. it's worth the wait!!
Now I really want to know what's up. I even asked him the day I ordered how they're allocation was and he said fine. I wonder if that is the problem. This ship date is not a problem only that if it is off much longer I have to turn my Camry in bye Feb 12th. I ordered early to avoid any problems and was hoping to take delivery early. I am over on my lease mileage also and was hoping to avoid any more expense with that.
It really makes me mad when you have that gut feeling about something and someone tells you not to worry. Well, we have all read about once the truck is shipped and sometimes takes a couple of weeks right? I guess now I will have to wait until next Wednesday to call DC again.
Thanks for listening!
Stevek18: what dealer or where in MA did you order from if you don't mind my asking? I ordered from a dealer in Worcester.
Thank you
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/23/automobiles/23AUTO.html
I also looked very seriously at the Land Rover Freelander, but just could not be convinced to pay an extra $4k for a 5 speed shiftable tranny, less HP & torque, etc. I also felt the quality of the inside materials was much better in the Liberty, not to mention the extra space, 4WD Lo, etc.
Anyway, thanks again for all of the advice!
tidester
Host
SUVs
-mad
Went to the Jeep dealer on Monday, ordered my new Steel Blue Sport and am trading in my 1999 CR-V. The dealer said it would take about 8 weeks to get it in. I am going to have a hard time waiting for it.
Who's right :-)
I purchased my Liberty Limeted back in August and have about 8300 miles on it. My wife drives the SUV every day to work and we have taken a few long trips to the beach. We noticed a thompping sound at speeds over 50 mph back in early December and finally found the time to take it in to have it checked out. After 2 days of run around, between the dealership and a tire center, they finally checked out the alignment and determined that the problem was that I was not rotating my tires enough and needed to rotate them every 4000 miles. The tire center informed me that the front end was out of alignment but the dealership informed that the tests proved that the alignment was fine. Couldn't get any satifaction over what to do about the wobbling sound and the dealership even recommended switching to Michelins when those tires wore out. So I guess that I am stuck with a noisy wobble for the next 20000 miles. This is outragious for an SUV costing as much as the Liberty. Either they picked a cheap tire for these SUV's or I am being fed a lot of bull. Anyone else have such problems?
This reminds me of the "air conditioning charging" myth too. Why would you need to "recharge" a cyclic system unless there was a leak in it?
Good luck.
I live in MA. Maybe that is it!
Thanks for any input.