Toyota Land Cruiser

12467101

Comments

  • janaschicagojanaschicago Member Posts: 11
    I too think that was a great job on the
    installation of the NAV. I usually install all of
    my car audio components and was wondering...

    How does the Alpine compare with the Toyota NAV in
    terms of compatibility/practicability with
    Nintendo & playstation (I have kids too). Does the
    Alpine have multiple configurations (i.e. placement of the screen(s)) or the ability to play DVD when the vehicle ISN'T in park?

    I am looking at purchasing a LC 2001 or 2002 next
    year and was inspired with nota4re photos yet
    cautioned by dianne4toyota's comments about cost.

    Any responses are greatly appreciated.
  • dianne4toyotadianne4toyota Member Posts: 343
    ...well, if you put it THAT way...

    O:>
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    #162
    Ah, then I concur with Joeblow1.
  • nota4renota4re Member Posts: 54
    As you are likely aware, the NAV available on the 2001+ TLC is also advertised to play video DVD's while stationary. I'd have to look at the shop manual wiring diagrams to get a feel for how easy it is to defeat - that is to view DVD's on the move. I suspect that it is probably difficult to bypass. However, one thing is for sure. You can't NAV and view a DVD simultaneously - something that is possible on the aftermarket Alpine system (with a seperate DVD player). Regarding adding aux displays, or additional aux inputs (for a Nintendo) this also may be really difficult with the factory head unit.

    Regarding the Alpine unit, it will ALWAYS give a video signal to the "aux out" monitor. With this, any video source can be seen with an aux screen - even if the vehicle is in motion. The front screen simply displays the message, "Picture off for your safety."

    To get a video source to the front screen (other than NAV which will always display), the Alpine needs to "see" a sequence of foot brake, parking brake on, momentarily off, then back on again while releasing the foot brake. (It's more natural to perform than it sounds.)

    In my pictures of the back of the console, you'll notice an extra switch on the right side. I've rigged this switch to mimic the parking brake (just giving a ground signal) and it effectively bypasses the Alpine safeguards and lets the video play while you are driving.

    The NAV unit is, unfortunaltely, a little smarter. The NAV unit will not let you access the menu (to set a new destination, for example) unless the vehicle is stopped with the parking brake on. Using the switch above, I can fool it on the parking brake, but it still "knows" the vehicle is moving because of the input it is getting from the satellites as well as the Vehicle Speed Sensor (VSS). I haven't tried to work a bypass.... yet.
  • janaschicagojanaschicago Member Posts: 11
    Thank you for the post - that is exactly what I wanted to know. Alpine seems to have one of the best aftermarket systems...did you happen to research any others?

    Please, if you could, post the methods if you decide to bypass the (GPS)-linked computer and speed pulse input sensors!
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    You've got it correct.
  • grantchstrgrantchstr Member Posts: 371
    Thanks for response on Fj80 start problem.
    It now appears that when I have the start problem, when I put the gear into reverse and try to start, the reverse lights don't come on. This indicates perhaps that its not a neutral safety switch problem. I am alsmost sure its a starter motor/solenoid issue. Thoughts.
  • lcboundlcbound Member Posts: 15
    Got it. Sounds great. Kudos to Toyota.
  • dmac8dmac8 Member Posts: 54
    I'm waffling all the time but the 100 is calling to me because of the V8.

    My 95 is a great truck but will the inline 6 last (150,000+)?

    I can lock all the diffs on my truck and even though it has a more traditional off-road suspension. I've yet to ever go off road.

    It's a bouleveard cruiser with a nice high perch.
  • dmac8dmac8 Member Posts: 54
    I suppose this may be a useful system, if, as can affect you in LA, traffic requires you look for an alternate route.

    But it begs the question, if you are out all the time in the same areas, don't you become familiar enough with geography not to need it?

    Where I've found nav systems very appealing is in rental cars in towns I'm not familiar with. Especially, if you arrive at night and have to go some distance.

    But at home (LA) I plan out my days travels on Map Quest or MS streets. You can even rig a Delorme to your lap top (buy a lap top) and have change out of $2500. Another concern is that the TLC will most likely outlast the factory nav system.

    I like this "toy" but I'd need a lot of help with the rationalization, so if anyone wants to give me a teeny bit of prompting?
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    First, the LA grid system of roads and highways is much easier to navigate than most of the East coast. As an LA native, I never realized how nice it was to not have freeways that go in circles.

    Second, go to a dealer who has the nav system in stock. Ask for a demonstration. in about 10 minutes, you will wonder why you never had one before. It is downright fun. Try inputting an address. You start with the number and go to the street. It will narrow down your search to only those cities that have the street and number combination you input. For instance, you may put in 6570 Roscoe Blvd. By the time you typed the "c" it would have narrowed the possible locations to two or three in the country. You would then select the one that was in the city you wanted. Then, you hit navigate and the system takes over and plots a route. If you deviate from the route (missing a turn), it recalculates the route to bring you to your destination.

    Very slick stuff. The only thing I would change is to make the voice commands more sultry.
  • janaschicagojanaschicago Member Posts: 11
    I think the ability to upgrade the factory unit will play a large role in my choice of a NAV system.

    Living in Chicago, traffic updates on the highways are always useful, and a NAV unit's ability to display this information will probably "reel" me in.

    Other than that, we like to travel, so the NAV and DVD are essential (kids)...but if one stayed locally, then a NAV might only be more of a "toy."

    ixixvi, did the shop happen to mention the method to bypass the NAV dashboard screen by any chance? Nota4re was very helpful in suggesting a ground switch to bypass the rear DVD screens.
  • fj100fj100 Member Posts: 97
    Has anyone out there upgraded to larger tires with an AT tread on their FJ100? I have a '99 with LTX MS's and they just look entirely to wimpy for such a great vehicle. I had the Bridgestone Dueler AT's, Size 285's on my '95 FJ80 and they looked so much better. I currently have 19,000 miles on the Michelins and it is going to take at least another 20,000 to wear them out, if then. Anyone want to buy some used LTX MS tires for half price?

    Any thoughts or pictures of FJ100's with larger tires would be appreciated.

    FJ100
  • dmac8dmac8 Member Posts: 54
    I'm really enticed by the V8 in the 100 series LC. Is it a false notion that the I6 in the 80 series won't hold up for a lot of miles, say 150K or more?

    Thanks for your comments on the Nav system. I think it could become indispensable in the likes of Boston, NY, DC etc., where the topography and freeway layouts are a lot more challenging than LA.

    Its just that my line of work has forced me to become aware of various locales and the internet makes planning trips very easy.

    An alternative is to buy a lap top computer and hook up a Delorme GPS. You would have a lot of change from $2500 and could take it into the house. Also, that type of set up would be more useful if you were to go into the "middle of nowhere".

    Aside from the various comments here about vibration, stereo etc., has the 100 series been as reliable as previous models?

    Thanks.
  • hicairahicaira Member Posts: 276
    Cliffy: Does the nav system also have unpaved forest and BLM roads in it? If not, then the damn thing is useless for me, or any off-roader. I'll take USGS topos (or a lap-top with them loaded) anytime. Actually prefer paper maps and a compass to my GPS unit anyway. The ability to navigate is a skill I hope my kids can learn by using low tech tools first.

    FJ100: I'm in the same boat. Have 27,000 miles on the 275 LTX's. Tread depth is right at the 1/2 mark now. Expect I will go to 285/75's when 4/5 of tread is gone on the LTX's.

    How'd you like the Duelers in 285?

    HiC
  • fj100fj100 Member Posts: 97
    They were awesome. Super quiet and really good in the rain and offroad in dry conditions. Check out www.bridgestone.com. I want Dueler MT's really bad but I am worried they may be to loud. The LC will look so much better with the larger tire and also perform better offroad with more traction. I do not have the fender flares on the FJ100 because they appear to me to be built in and I hope the 285's do not stick out to much. The 275 LTX's are 31.1" tall by 10.9" wide. The 285 Dueler AT's are 32.9" tall by 11.4" wide. The 285 Dueler MT's are 33.1" tall by 11.4" wide. Both Dueler's are D load rated which is good. Another good tire is the Goodyear MTR but they are like $175 a piece. Actually the Duelers in the 265 size are much to closer to stock at 31.9" and 10.6" and less expensive.

    Sorry for the rambling but I am ready to switch.
  • bloodybeefbloodybeef Member Posts: 18
    Unless you have a place to strap down your laptop, it will fly out of the seat during emergency stops. My laptop costs more than three grand so it hurts to hear it crash onto the floor. Although I've never had a nav program on my laptop, I have used my ricochet (wireless radio signal driven doo-hickey) modem to download maps/directions and such on the fly as needed. Now that I have the Nav I really appreciate not having to wait for the computer to boot up whenever it's off. You don't have to worry about the computer just sitting out in your car. There are many times when I left my laptop at home thinking I will not need it, only to regret that thought later. So you basically pay for the convenience and it looks good.
    My only complaint about the Nav system thus far is the fact that they made everything else overly Nav dependent. I have this big thing about changing the between my six preset radio stations randomly. In a regular radio you have your six big buttons that you can reach over and push without looking down, in the Nav you have to hit a audio button which will display the six buttons on the Nav screen, at which point you have to look down for just a moment to see what is where then hit that button.
    Oh, and I agree with Cliffy about the sultry voice thing, right now she reminds me a bit of the automated lady voice from Bank of America's customer service hotline.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    The old I6 was pretty bullet proof. I've seen them well over 200K with routine maintenance. They were a bit slow and loud and the ride wsn't as good but they'll go anywhere and wont quit.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    I don't know about BLM or logging roads. I don't have one in stock to check. I would be very surprised if it didn't. My marine GPS on my boat even has driveways so I imagine a car based system would be at least as detailed.
  • joeeblow1joeeblow1 Member Posts: 238
    The 1fzfe motor will last as long as you continue to maintain it. The issue for you is if you consider spending an additional $20k worth it for a new vehicle. I would venture a guess that the 100 rides much better than the 80 on the road.

    If you want more power, you could consider a TRD supercharger. It's about $2500 to $3000. I'm very happy with my 80, but I would probably be as happy with a 100. I would rather have a traditional differential set up for offroad than the new 100's system.
  • joeeblow1joeeblow1 Member Posts: 238
    Just as a warning, the bridgestone dueler does not enjoy a good reputation in the offroad community. They do not hold up very well.

    The MTR seems to be popular, but it's a very new tire. The yokohama geolandar does very well, but its soft compound makes for a short tread life.
  • edsel4uedsel4u Member Posts: 39
    I own a 1991 FJ80 and a 2000 FJ100. The FJ80 is much more oriented to off roading than the FJ100. With 130,000 miles on the FJ80 I suspect the seats will wear out before the engine and body. The FJ100 on the other hand is wonderfully quite, comfortable, has “real” brakes, but feels more suited to boulevard cruising and is subsequently equipped for that role.

    If “Armageddon” were to strike tomorrow, the FJ80 with 130,000 miles would be my vehicle of choice, not the FJ100.
  • dmac8dmac8 Member Posts: 54
    Thanks for your various comments. For some strange reason, I think if I traded my 80 for a 100, I might miss it.

    Good option to own 2 trucks, except that poses another possibility. Keep the 80 and for several thou more than a new 100, drive the new LS 430.

    A true boulevard cruiser and off-roader side by side.

    TRD supercharger is an intiguing option with, as I understand it, major torque and horsepower increases.

    Does this type of installation dramatically shorten engine life, and, is it suitable for a truck with 80K?
  • joeeblow1joeeblow1 Member Posts: 238
    The supercharger is too new to say how it will affect the motor, but there are many out there running it with relatively high number of miles on their vehicles. I don't think 80K would be a problem, but I would go over the motor with a fine-toothed comb and make sure it's in top shape. Check valve clearances, compression, etc.

    I think your plan of a Lexus car is very good. I would love to have one.
  • ixixviixixvi Member Posts: 24
    janaschicago,

    I was not told how the installation was accomplished. I was also told that they were working on some other modifications but the owner needed the vehicle back and they would continue at a later date.

    This shop is not the kind of shop [unfortunately] that would do a bypass of the front screen. They have been around a long time and have a lot to protect.

    Regards.
  • clivusclivus Member Posts: 1
    Just picked up our new 2001 LC yesterday.

    Knowing how compassionate and demanding audiophiles can be, I was hoping that the discussions here about the "booming" stereo might have been a little exaggerated...but wow, that thing is not only bad, it is clearly flawed in some way. It's absolutely intolerable and fatiguing particularly at low levels when the bass doesn't seem to decrease in volume linearly with the rest of the sound. Apparently it's that way even in the upgraded NAV/stereo combo?

    If anybody is making any progress with regard to getting a dealer/Toyota to do something about this I would love to hear about it. It's either that or spend the big cash on an aftermarket system.

    Otherwise....spectacular vehicle so far!
  • jam1000jam1000 Member Posts: 182
    What exactly does this button do? (2000 LC) Earlier posts and owners manual suggest it provides extra acceleration. Anything else? How much extra fuel does it consume? Does it engage instantaneously when you press the button? Other than consuming more fuel, is there any danger to keeping it engaged a significant portion or all of the time?

    Towing question: Is it better to use the ECT Power or the O/D Off to achieve extra power/acceleration when towing (a 2-horse trailer)? People who've done a lot of towing seem to say O/D Off (but they may not have had the choice of ECT Power), while the Toyota 800 number rep said ECT Power, but she didn't really seem to be too knowledgeable.

    Cliffy (or anyone else, for that matter): for the upcoming ice/snow conditions in the DC area this winter, is there any reason not to keep the 4WD settings in their normal position (i.e., HNL set at H, center differential unlocked)? (Be glad I didn't ask this on the Sequoia board)
  • mobiweldmobiweld Member Posts: 99
    Changes the shift points.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    The ECT button changes the shift points. It will rev to higher RPMs before shifting. This is good for a bit better acceleration and should be done when towing. When towing, you should also have the OD off. Even though you have a transmission oil cooler, it is still best to leave the overdrive off.

    As for the 4WD settings, leave it in the high and unlocked condition unless you get really extreme. Even then, I'm not sure how much better off you would be since you have the TRACS/VSC based system.

    Also, where in the DC area do you live? I live in Manassas and sell in Springfield.
  • kurtl100kurtl100 Member Posts: 11
    My initial inclination was the same as yours: I figured the people complaining about the stereo were audiophiles and the problem would'nt be that noticeable (esp since a suffer from a hearing loss on the low end of the scale). Boy, was I wrong.

    Anyhow, please send me your email address and phone number. In fact, anyone who has the stereo problem please contact me. I think we might be better off in getting this situation resolved if we band together. At any rate I would like to start and email group so that we may share information regarding our experiences with Toyota. At some point it might be wise to gather affidavits and present them in mass to Toyota.

    I am willing to be the focal point of any concerted effort. Certainly, as both an engineer and attorney, I am uniquely qualified to deal with both Toyota legal and their engineering staff.

    Please email me at kleyendecker@usa.net

    Thanx
  • jam1000jam1000 Member Posts: 182
    ##194 & 195 -- thanks for the info.

    Cliffy -- I think I once tried to use both the ECT Power and the O/D Off at the same time, but couldn't. If I started with Power, then hit OD, the Power light would go off, and vice versa. Is one preferable to the other as the "default" setting when towing? BTW, I'm in Silver Spring.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    That's news to me! If I was to have a choice, I would turn off the OD. I was unaware that one shut the other off. That doesn't make any sense to me but I'll take your word for it.

    Did you buy yours at DarCars?
  • zuma13zuma13 Member Posts: 35
    For all of you who purchased new 2001 TLC's and are experiencing the blistering bass problems (a situation that is not mutually exclusive), there is "light at the end of the tunnel". I visited the service manager at my local Toyota dealer today and discussed the stereo bass problem. He advised me that the QC "top-gun" from Toyota had been there this last Thursday and revealed the fact that Toyota has been flooded with complaints about the sound system. The Toyota and JBL engineers have been working overtime on a fix and it should be available within weeks (not months).

    I've been driving and enjoying the 2001 TLC very much. However, since I did not receive a navigation system manual (non were apparently available when I picked-up my vehicle), neither I nor the sales persons were familiar with its use and operation.

    I like to consider myself computer literate and the use of this system is not all that difficult. I would rather read about the proper operating procedures than field test the unit. Thus far I cannot attest to the actual accuracy of the unit. When searching for an address and location, the navigation system gets me to within one block of my destination and proceeeds to state "you are at your destination". Perhaps I'm a stickler for accuracy; but for $3,000.00 I thought "being there" was right in front of your destination. The Lexus salesperson (I did test the LX470 before deciding on the TLC) claimed the nav suystem to be accurate to within 12".

    Perhaps my system is not calibrated correctly. Does anyone know if there is a calibration procedure? Or am I expecting too much? How close to your designated destination is this navigation system supposed to guide you? I supposedly will receive my navigation operation manual this tuesday.

    LBN
  • jam1000jam1000 Member Posts: 182
    I bought it at Jim Coleman. Had a terrible shopping (not buying) experience at Darcars with my previous vehicle and swore never again. I like your approach on this and the Sequoia boards, so you'll be at the top of my list when I'm in the market again (which, if the reliability and durability of the LC live up to their reputation, hopefully should not be for a while :)).
  • dmac8dmac8 Member Posts: 54
    Dealer wants to give me $16K in trade for my 95LC against 2001. Since I live in LA and Chicago, about 85% of my mileage is highway. That and the fact it's extra clean and very well maintained, inspires me to keep it.

    If I could buy this truck for $16K, I would.

    Still like the 100 series and am looking at the possibility of having both, especially if the value of the 95 has declined so much.

    Thanks for all the comments and input.
  • winogradwinograd Member Posts: 2
    I posted a message a month ago on this topic but never got a response so I'm trying again.

    Does anyone know of a source that sells 6 disc cartridges for a 2001 TLC with the Nav system for less than the $50 that my dealer is charging?

    I called JBL and they said that I could get them from JS International in MO for $25 but it turns out that they are slightly different and won't work.

    So I'm back to square one. I'd like to buy around four of them.

    Any suggestions?

    Thanks
    David
  • zuma13zuma13 Member Posts: 35
    I noticed another peculiarity with my new nav system. When the audio and navigation are on simultaneously, I was of the opinion that the audio should default to the voice emanating from the nav system to aid in hearing the audio directions.

    That is not the case with my nav system. If an audio source is on and the nav system is searching and giving directions, the stereo audio does NOT default and you cannot hear the navigational directions.

    Is this again a setting problem with the navigation system? If not, I'm not impressed with this design.

    LBN
  • redwoodyredwoody Member Posts: 6
    We test drove a Sequoia Limited a couple weeks ago, along with a LC, and noticed that the JBL 6CD stereo had a booming bass sound. We decided on the Seq 2wd as the best vehicle for us, since we see very little snow but tow a horse trailer frequently. We worked out a good deal with another dealer who had one in stock, and picked it up yesterday. In the meantime, we read the LC posts (most recently 192-203) about the complaints/amplifier problem in the LC. Sure enough, the booming bass goes away in the Seq when the engine is turned off. The booming quality is quite noticeable in FM stereo, but not very detectable in CD or cassette. Is this the case in the LC also?
  • bloodybeefbloodybeef Member Posts: 18
    According to what I've read in my Nav manual (I don't have it in front of me at this moment so don't shoot me if I'm a little off), the GPS system works by bouncing a signal off three-four satellites depending on where in orbit it is. Depending on certain conditions there can be an error of something like 300ft, so whoever told you the one foot thing was waaaay off.
    The worst this thing has ever done for me is about half a block off, but because she warns you before you get there whether your destination is to the left or right, it still gets me places.
    Regarding the help volume, it's designed to lower the sound of your stereo whenever she speaks. Although I must say I've never been able to set her volume lower than 6...usually I leave it at the max, 7, in order to hear her.
    Now if Toyota will fix the stereo thing, I will not have to set audio to play only from the back speakers, so things may change.
  • jam1000jam1000 Member Posts: 182
    You're right -- ECT Power and O/D Off can be used in tandem (at least they could today when I tried). I don't know what I was thinking of -- perhaps Power and 2nd Start, which makes sense.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    #201

    The problem and the opportunity with TLC's is that they depreciate. Having said that, if you look at 5/6 year cycles, the Landcruiser proves its worth in the long haul, i.e., 2nd and 3rd cycles. In 1986 I bought a TLC for 16k. I have put app 250k miles on it with about 2.2k of unscheduled maintenance to it. I see them advertized in the local rag for between 9-13k.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    Current GPS technology should be far better than 300 feet. Even in systems that track less than 12 satellite, you should be within less than 100 feet. Most systems track at least 12 and that should get you within about 30 feet now that the military turned off the built in error.

    It used to be that units had to average its position because the clocks were broadcasting slightly incorrect times. By averaging the positions, you got pretty close. Now, there is no need for position averaging unless we ever go to war and the military reimplements the error.

    The reason you are probably getting within only a block is becuase the software can't narrow down a street address. I have not used one of these very extensively, but try marking a waypoint at your front door. Go to work and then navigate to the waypoint. I bet you end up parked right on top of it.
  • bloodybeefbloodybeef Member Posts: 18
    I've tried both method (i.e. address and marked point), on certain day/time it seems to get me within half a block, other days a block. I've had my home and work place marked as you mentioned (I sit in the parking lot and set my position as "marked point") and it does the exact same thing. Like I said before, this still gets me where I want so I have no problem with it. It's just that if people are expecting one foot accuracy, it's just not going to happen. The up-to-300-feet-margin-of-error thing is actually in the Nav manual...I went back and checked...I think it's on page 35.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    One foot accuracy can't happen without either a differential antennae or a military unit. I still think 300 feet is too much. 50 I can understand. It is possible that you live in an earea that just gets the edges of the overlapping satellite coverage areas. Does the unit tell you how many it is actively tracking?

    My marine unit tracks 12 and locks on to 4 to 8 at a time and is extremely accurate.
  • janaschicagojanaschicago Member Posts: 11
    Sorry to hear about the troubles...but I think its great that you are protecting your interests (as well as comsumers' in general).

    Nota4re, that after-market alpine NAV/DVD system is looking more and more like a steal, all things considered. Thanks again for your posts.
  • darby124darby124 Member Posts: 8
    Does anyone have an opinion as to whether or not the rear wind deflector actually does prevent the accumulation of dirt on the rear window as the options brochure claims? This time of year in Colorado seems to produce a good amount of film on the rear window.
  • mobiweldmobiweld Member Posts: 99
    Worthless
  • y2ktlcy2ktlc Member Posts: 6
    I saw the below msg on LX board and posted my response over there. I wondered if any others have the same experience. Please forgive me, since I know only how to cut and paste.

    Topic#2703 Lexus LX470-II
    Msg#281:
    I have been experiencing what seems to be lifter
    noise right after starting my 2000 LX 470 the last
    couple of very cold mornings. It is a slight
    noise(tack-tack-tack) that I don't hear once the
    car has been on for about a minute. Has anyone
    else experienced this on cold mornings? Thanks for your help.

    Msg#283:
    tmorales: I have 8k on my 00 TLC. Since last 3 week or so I also experienced a similar noise when
    engine cold start in the morning or late night. It
    has a short "puu" sound and occurs only once or
    twice in the first minute. I went to see the
    service manager, and was told he has never heard
    about this kind of compliant. Please post if you
    found out what the problem is.

    Well, other than this everything is fine. It runs
    18 on highway. I measured at least 6 times. 363
    miles to Boston, and filled to top with 20 gal. 20
    gal is when the fuel light flashing and needle
    pointing to E. I don't know the reason behind the 5 gal reserve, but I don't mind it as long as I know I still can drive for a while until I found the gas station.
  • bloodybeefbloodybeef Member Posts: 18
    This really stinks that Toyota seems very happy to lie through their teeth about these things. Like I said before, they actually told ME that I agreed that there is nothing wrong with my stereo.
    In hindsight, as much as I've enjoyed the Nav system maybe I should have gotten a standard system that I can easily swap out with an aftermarket thing and not worry about breaking the three thousand dollars system. Oh well, live and learn. I was hoping Steve's case would be the first of the many fixed stereos to come.

    Cliffy: No the Nav does not show you have many satellite you have locked on. I live in Seattle...not too sure if that's a overlapping satellite region.
  • fj100fj100 Member Posts: 97
    Post # 213 - Does the removal of the rear wing leave any marks on the vehicle? I took off the wind deflector for the sunroof and it had caused the white to yellow a little. I took it off because at 80 mph it would start vibrating and scare the hell out of me and my wife and passengers.

    Post # 215 - I have a '99 LC and I do not have the noise you are speaking when starting the vehicle.

    Post # 215 - What speed were you maintaining when you acheived 18 mpg? The best I have done is 16 mpg but I run 80 mph all the time when I am on the highway.

    Thanks!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.