By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
No big deal, just thought it would have been of interest to you.
I have two cars now (Dodge Caravan and Kia Sedona) and we do ~24,000 a year on the primary vehicle (was the Dodge for three years, now the Kia). We do regular oil changes. We do regular maintenance (balanced -- what the manufacturer recommends but not way overboard either). Why would I want/need an oil analysis? Not sure what it would tell me/how much it would cost/if it is worth it at all.
Perhaps if I went synthetic and longer oil change intervals?
Actually, this is the first one I've ever done on any car- a curiousity that developed in the maint forums, and was no doubt influenced by earning my private pilot license earlier this year. The engine, and how it is running and wearing, is a bit more critical in the flight environment.
There was also quite a bit of discussion in the early days of this forum on the engine manufacturer, design, strength, reliability, and on and on.
No, the average car owner probably doesn't need it done, but it can provide useful information about impending problems with seals and excessive wear that leads to catastrophic failure. The early detection of something amiss _may_ reduce the repair expense if a problem is detected early enough. ymmv
Currently I am gettting the 15 miles to a gallon in town, it hasn't varied very much from this amount.
On the highway I get 22 to 26 miles per gallon, depending on traffic, the cruise control really improves the mileage on the highway. All of the long trips so far have been with 5+ people and fully loaded with luggage, coolers, strollers,...
So far this van has been much better in general than the GC I traded in to get the Sedona.
I'm not convinced that the cost of analysis is justified. I suppose if it really did allow you to avoid certain repairs or problems, that would clearly justify the cost of the oil analysis. But that would be a tough argument to make, since it's probably pretty unlikely that you'd end up making such a pre-emptive discovery.
The other main benefit of analysis is the ability to increase oil change intervals due to increased knowledge about how well the oil is holding up. I prefer peace of mind associated with 3,000 mile oil and filter changes, so there's just not a whole lot of benefit TO ME in knowing how long I could extend the change interval.
According to folks who know about this analysis stuff, I think you really need to keep doing the analysis, and see the trends that develop, in order to reap the benefit.
It's good to hear that the oil indicated better-than-average (read: "less") engine wear.
From what I can tell, our Sedona does not burn/consume any oil. Not sure if that's relevant to the discussion on analysis, though.
Metal Sedona Average
My understanding is that the average provided by the lab is an overall average for motor oil that has been subjected to 3500 mi of use.
I think I've gotten a benefit already knowing that the engine is exhibiting normal wear at a relatively young age when it could still be in a break-in phase.
I too am used to engines which do not burn any oil between changes. Now obviously I know that my engines do burn some oil, it's intentional, and yet the level does not drop between changes. Why is that? Is it that the oil collects contaminants at roughly the same rate as oil is burnt? Or is it that the amount actually burnt by a modern engine is so small that the effect on oil level is virtually negligible?
The only thing I miss from my GC is the souped up stereo system, but I don't get many chances to listen to Pink Floyd with the kids in the van. I bought my van in Canada, where I am currently living, It worked out to about $20,000 US including taxes,... for the fully loaded EX (sunroof, leather,...) I didn't have much time to negotiate the price, as the GC I traded in was preparing to wheeze and stop working.
I've had the Sedona for 4 months, and almost 4,000 miles. My only complaint is that my favorite driving sunglasses don't fit in the holder provided. My latest discovery was a little slot on the drivers side, perfect for putting the security card that I only need when I drive through the gate at work.
The Town Hall discussions helped me choose the Sedona, and have helped to figure out some of the tricks that are needed to remove and replace the seats in the van (without resorting to swearing).
Hope this info helps
I find it easiest to remove the head rest and fold the seat before removing it. Replacing it I usually open up the seat, and it slides in easily.
Someone else posted a more through explanation, keep looking.
You need to make sure that they flashed (as in installed new software) the power control module. This only addresses a problem when the engine is dead cold. I can't tell by your reference to A/C, but if the problem re-occurs depending on the length of the traffic light or stoppage, you might have a bad PCM or some other problem altogether. :< (I think someone did have a PCM that went bad.)
Hopefully, the new seal around the oil pan will have seated properly and that issue will be gone.
My experience on repair duration for a warranty item (actually 2) was similar, but they were searching for an electrical glitch, so I can be a bit more understanding - they took their time and did it right. Subsequently, they found out that the module that controls those system had gone bad (I suspect it overheated). That discovery also extended the repair time, but still better than having to go through the hassle of mutliple visits.
Now, I've only got ~5900 miles on mine. I'd be curious to know how many miles on your van since the PCM was supposedly adjusted last.
As for accessories, headlights I leave on auto, mostly, and radio I typically leave on. I try to avoid leaving the A/C on. I believe, subject to discussion, that leaving the A/C on places an extra load on the starter and engine during the cranking phase.
I do my own oil changes....
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
Does anyone know if the EX comes with Mich. tires
or the Korean tire found on the LX?
From what I've read it seems that the Korean tire is sub-par and tends to "whine".
Thanks,
Pete
There's no whine on the Hankook - they offer a great ride, as long as the pressures are adjusted from shipping spec (~45lbs to the 35lbs indicated on the door sticker).
You might try asking your dealer about it - e.g. 'This plastic is really wearing fast. I don't think it's acceptable. Is there anything you can do?' Who knows, they might have no problems replacing it under warranty.
Pete
The EX's most often came with the RA07 Hankooks which I agree with Bluedevils is a good tire. The LX's generally seem to come with the Kumho's. But I have seen the Hankooks on the LX's also. I believe the Hankooks are a better tire, at least from what my research gathered before I purchased the Sedona. The Kumho's, as I recall were more slippery on wet surfaces. I now have almost 14K on my Sedona's Hankooks and I am already starting to question what I will replace them with, I mostly likely will not go with the Hankooks. The Sedona could use some help in the handling department, tend to lean and roll to much for my taste. I have been very impressed with the Yokahama touring tires. Also, I had a very good experience with Dayton Daytona's, which I recently put on my Toyota Previa, a great value for an H rated, performance tire at about $300 for a set of 4. Handling was vastly improved and the ride was softer, but yet very firm. They also had a very nice, noticeably wider "footprint" in the same size as the original tire, which one would think should offer better cornering and manueverablility. I have to say, my Previa would have run circles around the Sedona in the handling department, because of it's mid engine configuration, center of gravity was superior, and the weight of the vehicle was also a factor at 3700lbs, the Sedona is at 4709 lbs. EX3
Just think of how happy you will be when your van is blessed with another award, and what all the hoopla does to the resale values.
Remember, this form is an investment in the future value of your van. and being cheap every penny counts.
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
(hey, I'm not going to do their market research for them for free!).
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
I do love it and my silver car gets lots of compliments. I am in process of checking to see if each of the two cars have the same tires. I believe I have the Hankok, but am going down to check now, after reading above comments.
I hear you about taking a leap of faith when you bought your van and having the closest dealer 260 miles away. We are seriously considering buying a new Sorento and our nearest dealer is about 120 miles away. I'm not sure if we should as I have read some real horror stories about kia's past vehicles problems and could not imagine having to drive so far all the time to get it worked on. Especially when their are GM dealers on every other block.
Hmmmm
I would also say that there is a pause in the transmission selection process as you describe, but again, I haven't noticed that it is unusual compared to other vehicles I have driven.
I think the folks over on the transmission and maintenance boards would be able to shed some light on the exact mechanics/physics involved. I certainly do not hear a whirring noise in the transmission of our EX.
Which reminds me: We did travel on one county road in Michigan for a good ten miles where I thought we were going to have a problem. I had an unusual vibration in the accelerator pedal that made me greatly concerned -- turned out to be just that particular road. I think they paved it with more sand embedded in the tar for traction.