Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Thanks
.
I did that with my '98 Mustang, don't remember the exact code, but they recommended to replace the left O2 sensor, which I did and it fixed the problem. Cost of the O2 sensor was $70 at the auto parts store. Cost at the dealership, $90 to read the code, plus 1 hour diagnosis, $150 for the O2 sensor, another hour for verificiation. You can do the math.
Has anyone noticed that when, in an automatic transmission CR-V (I've got a 2005 LX AWD), if you are stopped at a light on an uphill, if you let your foot off the brake you roll backwards more than in most automatic transmission cars?
Thanks.
ALL cars will do this! That's what the brake pedel is for.
The only exceptions I know of are some Subarus and Studebakers that had a "hill holder".
These are what I found:
P0122 Throttle Position (TP) Sensor Circuit Low Input
P1457 Evaporative Emissions (EVAP) Control System Leakage (EVAP Canister System)
I believe there's a Honda Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) on both of these codes for your CR-V year; I know for certain there is one on the P1457. Please take your CR-V to a Honda Dealer with the paperwork from your mechanic that documents the codes he cleared.
Good luck.
Thanks! Julie
First have the dual pump fluid in the rear differential replaced. If the noise continues, have it replaced again. Sometimes it takes a couple of changes to eliminate the noise.
If after a couple of changes of dual pump fluid it is still making noise I'd contact Honda directly (not the dealer - the contact information is in the back of your Owners Manual), as I believe your owner manual doesn't list a rear differential fluid change until way past 45,000 miles. Even though you're out of warranty they may cover the cost, or at least part of it.
Good luck!
Interesting that the dealer said no point in changing the fluid now when I asked. And yes, the manual calls for a replacement of the fluid at 60,000.
Thanks so much!
Julie
When I called the dealer to ask about the fact the fluid was changed twice in 5 months, I was told that because I had waited so long to have it changed the first time (which I had trouble grasping since I always have the work done they recommend), it probably needed the change again only 5 months and about 5,000 miles later.
Frankly, this raises two questions in my mind. (1) was the second change really necessary (maybe they didn't carch the fact it was just changed in May) and the dealer's comment was just something to say so I wouldn't continue to question it and (2) if the fluid did have to be changed twice in 5 months, is this a sign of potential problems (the dealer claims it isn't)...thanks in advance...
Tires of different circumference can cause a problem, since the Honda RT4WD system is activated by the difference in rotational speed of the front and rear axle. If you have different sized tires, it could cause the RT4WD system to keep engaging, then heating up, disengaging due to the heat relief valve, then engaging again when it cools down, and then repeat the process. The RT4WD system will accomdate tires that are slightly different in size, but if there's a big difference it will cause a problem.
There's an FAQ here on the Edmunds board that explains How Does RT4WD Work better than I can.
Good luck.
JM2C
Find an empty parking lot.
Open the drivers window and stick your head out.
Drive slowly in a tight left turn, listening for a moaning/groaning sound from underneath.
Now do the same thing, but drive in a straight line.
Still hear the sound?
No - it's probably the rear differential
Yes - might be a wheel bearing. If you have replaced one or two of the tires, it might also be the rear differential, since it's somewhat sensitive to different tire sizes.
Good luck.
hmmmmm.....
thanks again for the speedy responses....you have been ever so helpful!
Julie
But I am waiting for my SE and won't bother test driving before I sign.
He either is or he isn't and I doubt if he is.
Still...I have yet to experience this in any of the hundreds of CRV's I have driven and ridden in including the ones that I have owned.
This is WAY overblown!
I did want to know your experience in owning CR-V's as you around them through work and home. Do you still own a CR-V?
I'm sure that, in your opinion, it is way overblown.
You have yet to experience PTTR in a CR-V, so that issue is overblown. You have yet to experience an engine fire in a CR-V, so that issue is overblown. You have yet to experience an A/C compressor failure, so that issue is overblown.
This is not scientific research by any means, but I did a google search on "honda crv pttr" and came up with 277 hits ... townhall-talk.edmunds.com, autos.yahoo.com, hondasuv.com, gocrvclub.org, forums.vmag.com, network54.com, vtec.net, etc., etc. It may turn out that, like the engine fire issue, PTTR affects only a small number of CR-Vs ... but if you're one of the unlucky ones, the problem is hardly overblown.
Perhaps what is truly overblown is Honda's reputation - once deserved, I believe - for quality vehicles.
Thanks
I believe it states in the OWNER's MANUAL that only the bottom cushion is heated.
All cars can have problems. Things get amplified in forums like this.
I own a CRV and have driven a ton of them and gone along on rides in even more.
NEVER ONCE have I felt a pull or had a customer mention this.
And our shop has changed the oil in hundreds of CRV's...no fires! Imagine that?
Sure, some people will always have an oddball problem and Honda needs to be ever vigilant on quality control. No question about that.
Still, misery loves company and the people with troubles go to the forums to complain and tell their tales of woe.
This does not discount isellhondas' comment that he has not experienced PTTR in hundreds of drives/ride-alongs. I believe him. Again, this does not mean that the problem does not exist. It is, however, an indication that it is may not be as widespread as some believe.
As a teenager, I convinced my friend that he needed to replace the air in his tires. I told him that the frigid temperatures in Minnesota cause the air to accumulate on the lower portion of his tires when he parked and since he parked in the same location every night, the build up was severe. Now, of course, I was pulling his chain. Nonetheless, he was so convinced that he did it. I got a great laugh out of it and told him it was just a joke. He continued to replace his air for several years.
Why am I telling you this? Once you get something into your head it can be very difficult to separate the fiction from the reality. The way that a number of people describe PTTR points to road crown issues, torque steer, or normal drifting... but the PTTR issue is all they see.
Is PTTR real? YES
Is it as widespread as some believe? NO (IMHO)
I would also be curious as to how may of the 277 Google hits were ongoing conversations about the same vehicle... across several forums. I believe a number of us here frequent other forums too.
BTW- These forums draw the same types of people.
One would be the dutiful shopper who researches every aspect of a vehicle before laying their hard-earned cash on the table.
Another is the one who has a very real problem and is seeking information on how to best deal with it before laying their hard-earned cash on the service counter.
Another is the enthusiast who loves to discuss their vehicle.
Another...
Just an observation.
Ummm, I think you are mixing his quotes. He said his shop had none hundreds of CR-V oil changes, and that he had driven a "ton" of CR-Vs.
Since a CR-V weighs almost 2 tons, that is 1.75 CR-V's he has driven... :P
On another note, I have noticed that these forums attract people that work for Honda that will attempt to minimize every complaint that they read about regarding someone having less than a pleasant experience with Honda. If you search the extensive postings by these people, you wonder whether they have enough time to do anything else but read these forums and downplay any perceived problem by the public. Steve
If Honda issues a TSB, there IS a problem (possibly limited to a very few % of CR-Vs, but STILL a problem). The fact that you have not experienced it does not mean that there is not a problem.
I also searched Ford Escape PTTR (45 hits), Toyota RAV4 PTTR (14 hits), and Jeep Liberty PTTR (10 hits) ... and many of the hits were CR-V discussions that mentioned these SUVs only as alternatives to the CR-V. (I didn't read all the messages, but in glancing at the short blurb that google gives for each hit, my impression was that the other small SUVs don't have a problem with PTTR, or, if they do have a problem, it isn't as serious as Honda's) There were also multiple hits on the same source document, and the numbers are climbing due to the flurry of messages here in the last couple of days.
Like I said, this was not a scientific search. But when PTTR is searched in conjunction with Honda CR-V, there are many more times the hits as with other small SUVs. That shows that a number of people are talking about the problem. Is it widespread? Probably not. Is the issue overblown? No, not at all, especially if your CR-V has PTTR.
Was the engine fire issue overblown? Absolutely not, according to Honda - otherwise, why would they have issued special instructions to their technicians, sent letters to CR-V owners, and included special stickers to put on work orders for an otherwise "simple" oil change?
There may be more CR-Vs affected by PTTR than by engine fires, and more still by A/C problems.
I wonder what the next problem will be?
And, steveroyal, you can think I'm a liar if you want. I've still never felt a PTTR!
I'm sure you'll let us know when there is one.
It shouldn't take a "special sticker" to alert a person changing the oil on a car to make sure they removed the old gasket, but I guess in some cases it does.
Does anyone have any knowledge on this subject.
LMAO......You beat me to it Isell.....LOL
And what scientific data do you base this on? Please share it with us. I think you should go buy a Chrysler product.
Today, just out of curiosity, and because the car was STILL listed in their inventory, I called them back and asked them about that stock number. The sales manager said they still had it and it was a manual tranny model. Imagine my surprise. So I decided I would bite the bullet and give it a shot.
Drove 3 hours and sure enough I was able to find it on the lot, a MANUAL tranny 05 EX that was one of my first color choices. I said lets give it a drive. This CR-V didn't exactly pull to the right, but I think it followed road crown and tire grooves a lot more than any car I have driven. This is the 4th CR-V I've test driven, and the first 2 definitely pulled whereas this one and the last one (both manuals) were much more "darty" than any other vehicle I have driven, but didn't go hard to the right when you let go of the wheel like the first 2 did (on level streets and not on the gas).
I drove the CR-V about 20 miles today and I was ready to buy it, but we couldn't come to terms on the price and my possible trade, so I drove back on home. Long trip to end up short, but the long drive back gave me a chance to realize that the CR-V may not be right for me after all, and I will start expanding my search.
I spent enough time in the seat of the CR-V to feel the unusual narrowness of the bolsters, and it felt like it was pushing my shoulders forward. I can see how the seats could be uncomfortable on longer trips. I also didn't think that it really had enough power, even with the manual tranny. You really need to rev it to get it going, and it is kind of loud under that kind of acceleration.
Still a very fine car with a lot of features for the price, just probably not the "truck" for me. The sales manager offered me 3000 less for my 2001 Audi A4 than CARMAX was going to give me to buy it outright, which was still about 1000 less than the average trade in value according to KBB, Edmunds and NADA. So we were WAY to far apart to even get into serious talks, I told him where I was at and if they got serious at the end of the month or year to give me a call.
I'm just about ticked enough at them for not giving me a correct answer over the phone before and their lowball offer for my trade that I probably wouldn't go all the way over there to buy it anyway.
I haven't had much luck with my local dealer salesman to try to go and find me a manual model (I bought an 04 Ody from him 2 years ago) so I am kind of at my wits end with the Honda salesmen. Another reason to start looking around at some other brands.
Good luck to all and thanks for the posts about their deals in the past.
Hey, for once, we agree! ;-) But what does that tell you - about the technicians doing the oil changes and the vehicle being worked on - when Honda felt they needed to send out the stickers? Have other manufacturers had to take such steps? Has Honda had to take such steps with any other model? No, it hasn't been "in some cases" ... it's been with the CR-V.
"I'm sure you'll let us know when there is one."
Well, I wasn't the first to let anyone know about the engine fire issue, I haven't had any PTTR, and my A/C compressor is just fine (knock on wood). So I think that the odds are, some else will be letting us know of the next problem. But what are the odds that, no matter what the problem is, you'll be the first to say, I've never experienced that, I've never heard of that, that is WAY overblown?
"And what scientific data do you base this on? Please share it with us. I think you should go buy a Chrysler product."
And here I thought I was being clear by saying "there may be..." I was just expressing an opinion, like your opinion that I should buy a Chrysler product ... unless there's some scientific data that supports such a purchase?
How about "In my opinion, it's possible that there may be more CR-Vs affected by PTTR than by engine fires, and more still by A/C/ problems" - any better? Or are only those who say good things about Hondas allowed to express opinions?
However - and I know it's not "scientific" and therefore will be dismissed - I checked the NHTSA website and the complaints filed for the 2005 Honda CR-V.
Out of the 44 complaints files so far, and eliminating duplicates,
Engine fires: 3 (this problem is increasingly behind us, thank God)
PTTR: 25 (maybe this is leveling off as fewer 2005 CR-Vs are being sold?)
A/C: 0 (this problem takes time/miles to show up)
I didn't have time to look closely at all 127 complaints filed so far for the 2004 CR-V. I know from looking at the complaints before that the number of engine fires was a lot higher than 3, and in glancing over the complaints, I spotted only one that mentioned PTTR. Happily, there are no 2006 CR-V complaints filed yet.