By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Can't imagine the Aurora V8 being described as sounding "rough", especially compared to 4-bangers...
kirstie_h
Roving Host & Future Vehicles HOst
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
Any help would be appreciated.
It would be like laying carpet, but upside down. Not impossible to do with some help, but fairly tricky.
On the new Aurora, the headliner is a removable piece that you can just pull out. Much easier to replace when this eventually happens. I recall a negative review about it when the tester (maybe because an Olds product person pointed it out?) decided to pull down hard on the trim around the sunroof and then derided the car because it's easy to pull the headliner down... I can only imagine what damage would have been done had the car had a normal headliner... So, it's a nice feature unless your a fidgety idiot.
As always, rjs200240 is right. The foam backing dissentegrates and cannot be reattached. Even if you manage to spray some adhesive where the foam has separated, it will quickly tear away ago. I know from experience. There are headliner kits available with the right foam-backed fabric and suitable spray adhesive to replace the sagging headliner for ~$30; lot of effort, though. As a temporary measure you can use straight pins with large heads -- insert them horizontally. If you're lucky, you will be able to find a color to match your Aurora's interior.
I'm upset that GM had not solved this problem by 1995. My '80 Delta 88, '86 Toro, '86 Fiero and my parents' '88 98 all had this problem.
I am about to resort to my friendly desk top stapler.
Henri
Greg
On another note I saw a bike with a v8 engine. One guy said it was a chevy engine, but it looked like the Aurora engine to me. However, I was too far away to be sure. But a Nortstar powering a motorcycle? Talk about "catch me if you can."
Henri
the problem is caused by the transmission shop not putting in the correct tranny fluid. NEVER put Dextron in a Chrysler.
Check out the Acura and Lexus boards and see all the transmission problems they are having. But oh, somehow you're still smarter to have problems with an import. Big problems.
And all the while, trouble free or not, you are driving a glorified V6 Camry or Accord too.
Good luck with your Honda.
I've never heard of any stereo problems with the new Aurora. Mine has never had anything wrong. I wonder if your car has some other problem with the voltage and it is just manifesting itself in burnt-out bulbs?
P.S. Did you get your 4 foot wing and type "R" badge yet. Oh and the glowing tail pipe.
Fellow Aurorians- I apologize for my crass nature of this post. But people like this really piss me off. When Taylor sold his Aurora he didnt act a fool like this guy.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Steve
Henri
stickking1- how soft are the Bridgestones? just curious because when I bought my Aurora it had the original GY's on it. I didnt like the traction, but they felt very soft and caddie like. When i switched to the Michelin MXV4's there was a tremendeous difference in the hardness. They are much harder then the GY's . Although I love the performace of them I wish they were a little softer for a smoother ride. Anyone else notice this.
StickKing, I wonder if the non "+" MXV4's had less grip? I've taken turns aggressively enough to activate the stability control, and never heard any squealing. They gradually fade away, but never make much noise about it.
LOL Kayaman, you're right. This is the first time I've ever seen 8 new posts in an Aurora section!
I will mount Continental ContiExtremeContact 255/50-17 tires; they are wider than the 2001+ stock 235/55-17 size and have the same weight rating (100) as the stock classic 235/60-16 size. Traction and treadware ratings (AA and 400, respectively) are excellent and better than other tires I researched.
Thanks,
Steve
Henri
The warranty is from National Auto Care Corporation
Henri
It depends on the coverage, but I'd consider another 24/2400 warranty for $1800 on mine because I know my oil leak is going to cost me that or more. Actually, I paid that much for a GM bumper-to-bumper warranty when I bought my car 2.5 years ago. Only used it once for a $150 claim. Oh, well. I'm pretty sure I'd get my money's worth out of another one this time.
Wonder if they'll insure in Florida??
Greg
-Brian
My warranty runs out in about 2 weeks. I have 102K on my '95 so I don't know if I can renew my warranty or not or if I want to. I'm not sure, with some of the warranty companies going under, if the $1500 is worth it or it might be even be higher now.
I don't mind at all -- eBay. They don't show up often. There was a set with starting bid at $950 then at $850 second time around; neither auction received a bid. I feel really fortunate to get the price I did -- as I mentioned, I have been looking for two years. The timing for me is great as my current tires are about shot.
Take a look at www.car-part.com; there a many Aurora wheels there. $50 to $200 each for non-chrome. Chrome prices are higher.
The sets they have listed are 255/55-17...that's 20cm wider than my classic. You 2001+ 4.0 guys: Are those the correct size tires for the new rims? Garnes...do you have any clearance issues?
Daveshonda, you might be surprised to know that Buick beats Honda and Acura in initial quality and three-year quality. :P
I would totally expect you shouldn't have any torque-steer issues or driveline problems from cars that put out such unispiring amounts of torque. That said, Acura and Honda have a lot of tranny problems, and the Aurora has zero torque steer despite making more torque under 2000 rpms than an S-type Acura V6 does at its peak... Enjoy!
I gave them an E-mail to see if they still had the set with the Michelins on 'em....we'll see what they say. They were advertising all four 17" aluminum rims with the orig. tires (Michelin Energy MXV4, I think) for 900 bucks. Seems like a good price to me. The real selling point is the tires still mounted...those Michelins go for $150 a piece on tirerack.com and much more at the local dealer. If they are new tires and still have plenty of tread, I might just buy the set.
Schram? I considered those wheels and tires, but shipping cost with the tires would have been too much for me. The 255/55-17 diameter is about 3.5% taller than stock Classic 235/60-16 and 2001+ 235/55-17. rjs200240 cited the implications of the taller tires. I will use 255/50-17 tires, which are within 0.2% of the OEM diameter. javidogg reports no clearance problems with his 255/35-20 tires on enkei kapone wheels
-Brian