Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
The gas gauge behavior you describe is not normal, but it is fairly common in Classics. The sender and fuel pump are a single module located inside the gas tank. The sender may be available as a separate part. List for sender and pump together is about $500; best price I found is Rock Auto. Tank does not have to be dropped for replacing the sender/pump module as there is an access panel in the floor of the trunk. However, it is far forward and not easy to reach AND you will need a special tool for removing the locking ring. At least I did.
I replaced the module last month in my '97. The fuel pump was working OK, but given 115,000 miles on my Classic and Henry's experience in the Lincoln Tunnel, I decided it would be penny wise and pound foolish to replace the sender without also replacing the fuel pump. The Kent-Moore J-39765 lock nut wrench cost me about $80 from SPX Corporation. I'd be willing to loan this tool to list members who want to do the job themselves. I'll be needing the special water-pump tool sometime in the future and I hope someone might make me a similar offer.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Les
My car has 130,000 on it and I'm not sure of the status of the pump.
paul
Let me know if you find anything out.
I was concerned about the fittings, too. Turns out they were easy; they are quick-connect fittings with small clips (latches) that need to be pressed to allow the two halves of the connector to be pulled apart. There was a fair amount of dirt and grit on top of the tank around the locking ring, so I used my shop vac to clean up the area. It would probably be a good idea to replace your fuel filter if it hasn't been replaced.
Les
But the Lesabre replacement doesn't have the personality of the Aurora and I'm thinking about a '99.
Were some of the problems solved by '99, or are the later Classics starting to experience the same problems now that they are getting up in age/mileage?
Thanks for any replies, this was one of my favorite resources when I owned the '95.
I will be runiing the code reader at the dealer on Monday to see if #3 is still the culprit, if so the coil pack, injector will be the next step.
Thanks again....
So basically what they're saying if the actually see a crack in the rail them they'll replace it. But I thought the point of a recall was to PREVENT a problem, not wait till there's one.
If you can talk them into a steel rail, I will give it a shot here. LMK.
http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/recalls/results.cfm
click on the box titled "document search" which will call up a listing of about 7 or 8 documents related to the fuel rail recall. Click on the 2nd document from the top which contains the official 25 pages of instructions that the dealers are to follow. Step #1 is to inspect if the rail has been replaced by a service rail. If the rail reads "GM 213M TYPE F" or "M-BOND" then it is a nylon service rail and is OK. Also if the rail is constructed of stainless then it too is a service rail and is OK to close the recall and submit for inspect only. You will also note that on page 22, GM will reimburse dealers 0.2 hrs just to inspect the fuel rail with no replacement needed. I think this is being misinterpreted by some dealers as meaning they are to inspect and see if leaking and if not leaking then do not replace. That is nonsense. If your existing rail is not stainless and you cannot see the letters GM 213M TYPE F or M-BOND then you are definitely entitled to a replacement.
The following procedure is for replacing the fuel lines from the fuel rail on the engine back to and including the fuel filter under the vehicle. The new fuel lines come complete with all necessary retainers. **It applies only to the 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora and is based on the fuel rail being replaced at the same time.** Therefore the steps or procedures for relieving fuel pressure, disconnecting the lines from the fuel rail, etc. can be found in the fuel rail replacement section of this recall bulletin.
Sounds like every 95 Aurora fuel rails should be replaced regardless of the rail type because of the chassis line swap.
Also, do you know where the codes would be on the fuel rails if it was the nylon?
ramy, I'm going to try on Mon. calling the dealer up here. Gonna try playing off the "college-student on loans" role. We'll see
I think the real issue is finding a reputable and reliable dealer.
Henri
P.S. I got stuck in the Holland Tunnel, not the Lincoln Tunnel.
The only tag of I found on the rail was between the two half on the left side on the metal conntector.
17095144
AC Rochester
94312.2
If that means anything
Norman Gale was an Olds dealer. Maybe that is the difference.
NHTSA Action Number : PE03050 NHTSA Recall Campaign Number : N/A
Make : OLDSMOBILE Model: AURORA
Manufacturer : GENERAL MOTORS CORP. Year : 1995
Component : FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:FUEL INJECTION SYSTEM:FUEL RAIL
Date Investigation Opened : October 30, 2003
Date Investigation Closed : February 3, 2004
Summary:
THE FUEL RAIL ASSEMBLIES USED IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES WERE MANUFACTURED BY DANA. THE FUEL RAIL JUMPER TUBES WERE MADE OF MONOLAYER NYLON 12 (PA12). IN MODEL YEAR (MY) 1998, THE JUMPER TUBE MATERIAL WAS CHANGED FROM PA12 TO M-BOND (A MULTI-LAYER PTFE/PA12). IN ADDITION, ALL SERVICE PARTS PRODUCED SINCE THE END OF PRODUCTION 1997 USE THE M-BOND JUMPER TUBES. MATERIAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED BY DANA ON FAILED FUEL RAILS SHOWED THAT THE MONO-LAYER NYLON 12 JUMPER TUBES ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS CRACKING (ESC). GM BELIEVES THE ESC IS A RESULT OF HEAT, TIME, ALCOHOL BLENDED FUEL, FUEL PRESSURE CYCLING, AND DESIGNED IN STRESS. EIGHT OF THE GM COMPLAINTS ARE DUPLICATIVE OF ODI COMPLAINTS. ODI HAS RECEIVED 77 OF IT'S 123 COMPLAINTS IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS. FUEL RAIL PART SALES OVER THE LAST THREE YEARS RANGE FROM 3.0 PERCENT OF PRODUCTION FOR THE MY 1997 CADILLAC VEHICLES TO 13.1 PERCENT FOR THE MY 1995 AURORAS. AT LEAST ONE OF THE FIRE INCIDENTS OCCURED WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED WITHIN A GARAGE ATTACHED TO THE CONSUMERS HOME. THE FIRE RESULTED IN DAMAGE TO THE DWELLING AS WELL AS THE TOTAL LOSS OF THE VEHICLE. THIS INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN UPGRADED TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS.
Lately, my 97 seems to be making almost what sounds like a grinding noise when going over small dips or bumps in the road. It is coming from the left front of the car. I only notice it at speeds below 35 mph. Car has 79,000 miles on it.
John
I'd get some contact cleaner from Radio Shack or wherever, and first clean your key. Then spray the cleaner into the ignition (blow out crud with compressed air first). If you have two keys, does the second key have the problem as well? If so, it's more likely to be the ignition than the key...
--Robert
Les
--Robert
Darryl
lately my 97 has started a creaking sound in the dash area at low speed turns. Has anyone had this problem??
John
Do check the left-hand corner of the dash (where the top curves down to meet the "middle" - this piece is frequently "caught" or pulled during driver egress and can cause the material to separate from the dash. Seen this on many Auroras.
--Robert
Is the driver’s side on a different circuit/fuse than the passenger?
Thx..
I've noticed some recent flakiness in my car (passenger-side seatback wouldn't go back, driver's power door lock switch wouldn't lock yesterday (unlock worked fine) in the -1 degree temps.
--Robert
They told me the light was on because the cold temp caused a part on the car to fall below 23 degrees and abbra caddbra - the SES light came on.
What was the fix you ask? He started the car inside the shop where it was warm. Total cost for his technical expertise - $50.00.
I don't get it. I have had my 95 since January of 98 and the cold weather has never triggered a code.
Has anyone else come across this???????
Henri
It could have been something like a heated O2 sensor that isn't heating anymore or is slow to heat. Just guessing.
I quote:
DTC 121 Will Set When: . . . A/C high side temperature sensor less than -5C (23F) or greater than 215C (419F).
It's a relief to know that it will go out when started in a warmer climate.
Pete
today she said it started shifting bad, getting worse and worse, harder and harder. i took it to checkers, did a scan, and its code P0742, "torque convertor clutch circuit stuck on".
it started when she was waiting for her dad, he car sat idling in a parking lot for about 3-4 hours. almost imediatly when she started to drive it started shifting hard, and it got harder and harder. she said she got home, and her dad checked the tranny fluid level with the car running, and it was way above the mark. he checked it 3 times, all above the mark. when she met me at checkers, she said it drove 100% ok (had been sitting for about 4 hours), and when i checked the fluid level, it was EXACTLY were it was supposed to be, then back to my house, then home, it drove fine.
anyone know whats up? did it just mildly overheat, and the car is really ok? i know it probably built up heat just idleing there for 3-4 hours, but here in minnesota, its about 12* F!!
thanks for any help
On the other hand it managed to light up the space-saver-spare on the driveway with 7 or so cylinders lol.