By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
After seeing other Tribute owners going through their trials with that Ford manufactured product I was wondering if anyone here looking to get a Mazda6 had any concerns with the 6 being produced out of Ford's Flat Rock, MI plant. I don't know much about the plant itself and the quality of the cars coming out the plant but I think the quality of any car that rolls out of a Ford plant remains questionable.
Just playing devil's advocate. I'm elated that Mazda is beginning this "comeback" with the 6. Hopefully it'll be benchmark vehicle for the company.
"Overall, driving the car is a blast. The Mazda 6 is more fun than most midsize sedans on the market. Plenty of the credit for this goes to its superior blend of steering, brakes, suspension and driver comfort. It's like a Protegé ES, pumped up a couple of sizes. Lots of fun, and we can't wait to sample the V6."
sounds good to me!
It rains a bit here in the Northwest and my next car is going to have that. If Mazda doesn't offer it, I'll get a Passat or an A4 which will.
The effectiveness of the headlights remains to be seen (or unseen, as the case may be.)
I have an 93 (first year of the model) 626 which is the first foreign branded car classified as a domestic (based on contents). It was manufactured in 12/92 and has been reliable with zero recalls.
This is beautiful. First pleather, then plood and now plasticanium.
Folks, you saw it on Edmunds first. thanks for the chuckle VC.
Anyway, there is a two page spread on pages 18 and 19 The pic takes up the top 4/5s of the page and shows a blue sedan cruising along an urban street from left to right at a slightly up angle. In the glass building behind the street is the reflection of a blue MX-5. The tag line reads "Where does the sports car end and the new Mazda6 begin?"
The ad lists the price as 14,995 pounds including metalic paint, VAT, number plates, delivery, 12 months road fund licence and 1st registration tax. I love trying to read this magazine...
I'm glad I'm not buying a car for just over two years -- too many choices! Mazda 6, or maybe a Honda Accord (again), or maybe the JDM/Euro Accord to be sold here as an Acura. Looks like lots of test drives are in order!
From what the First Drive article here on Edmund's said, the 6 was created in the same regard. I haven't read the reviews in CAR magazine yet, but I am sure they say something about the handling. Just keep in mind that the US market vehicles usually have different suspensions, because of the different (worse) roads here in the States.
Almost? With some dedicated summer performance tires, a Protege ES will hang with just about any sport sedan. Have you seen the slalom speeds that the Protege ES is capable of with ALL SEASON tires? Heck, the MP3 lays waste to many so called "sport sedans" when it comes to handling.
"The Mazda 6 is no sport sedan."
Why isn't it? Because it's FWD?
the funny part is the Mazda 6 is everything it has been represented as and more.
Some people have had the benefit of driving the Mazda6 and it will exceed 95% of consumer expectations.
And the Protege sedan can hang with or beat many "sport sedans" in the twisties. The only thing it lacks in comparison is straight-line acceleration. Bring that up to par (as with the Mazdaspeed version) and it'll put many vehicles costing much more to shame (especially when you figure reliability and integrity into the picture as well...for instance, the last A4 [a vehicle that easily costs 2-3X more upfront] requires replacement of the front control arm every 30k miles or they may catastrophically fail...they call it "normal" maintenance...yeah, right).
~alpha
Mazda really hasn't done any marketing of the 6 yet(web site/auto show are exceptions). All the comments about it are coming from the automotive press. Take issue with them and leave the SA remarks aside.
Hatch should make carrying bulky items more feasible than the sedan format.
Wagon's a wagon (albeit a slightly shortened tail, but that's to keep the driving dynamics more sporty by keeping all that extra mass closer to the center of the body).
The sedan's probably the tightest-handling and tightest feeling of the three since they can more easily stiffen the rear suspension and you don't have the large hatch opening.
Feel free to clarify your statement...
The sedan claims to have 17.something cubic feet of trunk space. The hatch is a little smaller because the car is shorter.
The double hinges for the trunk are a big plus. Passat has them. Camry doesn't have them and it looks like the '03 Accord won't either. I don't know about the Altima.
Lets not start this whole "whats a sports sedan" debate. It is easier to say that the Mazda6 will top comparable sized/priced cars in most performance measurements...
"By July 1, combined orders for two versions of the Atenza reached 6,000 units, six times an original monthly sales target in Japan, Mazda said in a statement. The company began selling the car in Europe under the name Mazda6 from early June and has already booked about 30,000 orders.
The Sport Wagon, for its part, achieved its domestic monthly sales target of 1,500 sales in the first two weeks after launch.
As a result, Mazda has lifted monthly production capacity at it Hofu No.1 plant in Yamaguchi to 14,500 units from 10,000. It hopes to keep the pace of sales high in Japan by released a four-wheel-drive version of the Sport Wagon in August."
And now the bad news:
"The Atenza/6 is will go down as Mazda’s most important model worldwide, and especially in North America. In the US market the bland 626 and Millenia are winding down and will soon be completely phased out. All new tooling for the 6 is being installed at Mazda’s assembly plant at Flat Rock, Michigan and locally built four-door sedans will hit American showrooms in the fourth quarter.
The five-door hatch and station wagon will go into production at Flat Rock about a year later."
For the complete article:
http://www.auto-asia.com/viewcontent.asp?pk=7343&full=yes&char=421
Rich
(which also appeared in print two or three months ago)
The 60-degree V6, though it's based on Ford's Duratec 3.0-liter, uses the addition of the S-VT system to produce 219 horsepower compared with the 200 hp normally generated by this motor. Maximum torque, however, is only slightly increased over the standard-issue Duratec with 202 pound-feet available at 4,750 rpm compared with 200 lb-ft at the same rpm. These ratings give the 6 a 27-horsepower advantage over the 2002 Camry V6, but leave it 21 ponies shy of the 240-horse Altima 3.5SE. The Mazda 6 is also short on torque, with the Camry generating 209 lb-ft at 4,400 rpm and the Altima producing a whopping 246 lb-ft. at 4,400 rpm. We think Mazda's got some more work to do on the Duratec V6.
The following are what I consider decent sport sedans(and some I just threw in for comparisons sake):
BMW 2.5L 6 - 184hp, 175ft-lbs
BMW 3.0L 6 - 225hp, 214ft-lbs
Audi A4 3.0L 6 - 220hp, 221ft-lbs
Acura TL 3.2L 6 - 225hp, 216ft-lbs
Acura TL-S 6 - 260hp, 232ft-lbs
Lexus IS300 6 - 215hp, 218ft-lbs
Infiniti G35 3.5L 6 - 260hp, 260ft-lbs
Jaguar X-Type 3.0L 6(I think its the Duratec too) - 227hp, 209ft-lbs
Jaguar X-Type 2.5L 6 - 191hp, 180ft-lbs
Lincoln LS - 3.0L 6 - 220hp, 215ft-lbs
Mercedes C-Class 2.6L 6 - 168hp, 177ft-lbs, pfft
Mercedes C-Wagon 3.2L - 215hp, 221ft-lbs
Maxima SE 3.5L 6 - 255hp, 246ft-lbs
Saab 9-5 3.0L 6 - 200hp, 229ft-lbs
Subaru WRX 227hp, 217ft-lbs(4 cylinder)
Poopssat GLX 2.8L 6 - 190hp, 206ft-lbs(just for S&G)
Volvo S60 5 cylinder 2.4L - 197hp, 210ft-lbs
Volvo V70 5 cylinder 2.3L - 247hp, 243ft-lbs
I got them all from this site.
Based on the above I agree with Mr. Edmund that the MAZDA6's V6 is short on torque, but not really hp. And I also agree that Mazda could probably do some more work on the Duratec, for no other reason than the above examples.
Also, I think the MAZDA6 styling is probably more aggressive than most of those cars, but not all.
Even more, the following cars do not have a manual transmission option for the listed engines:
Acura TL
Infiniti G35
Lexus IS300 - only the base model comes with manual... so I guess that passes, so I shouldn't list it here
I have to say that any bad critizism on the 6's V6 is unwarranted.
The following are what I consider decent sport sedans(and some I just threw in for comparisons sake):
BMW 2.5L 6 - 184hp, 175ft-lbs
BMW 3.0L 6 - 225hp, 214ft-lbs
Audi A4 3.0L 6 - 220hp, 221ft-lbs
Acura TL 3.2L 6 - 225hp, 216ft-lbs
Acura TL-S 6 - 260hp, 232ft-lbs
Lexus IS300 6 - 215hp, 218ft-lbs
Infiniti G35 3.5L 6 - 260hp, 260ft-lbs
Jaguar X-Type 3.0L 6(I think its the Duratec too) - 227hp, 209ft-lbs
Jaguar X-Type 2.5L 6 - 191hp, 180ft-lbs
Lincoln LS - 3.0L 6 - 220hp, 215ft-lbs
Mercedes C-Class 2.6L 6 - 168hp, 177ft-lbs, pfft
Mercedes C- Wagon 3.2L - 215hp, 221ft-lbs
Maxima SE 3.5L 6 - 255hp, 246ft-lbs
Saab 9-5 3.0L 6 - 200hp, 229ft-lbs
Subaru WRX 227hp, 217ft-lbs(4 cylinder)
Poopssat GLX 2.8L 6 - 190hp, 206ft-lbs(just for S&G)
Volvo S60 5 cylinder 2.4L - 197hp, 210ft-lbs
Volvo V70 5 cylinder 2.3L - 247hp, 243ft-lbs
Based on the above I agree with Mr. Edmund that the MAZDA6's V6 is short on torque, but not really hp. And I also agree that Mazda could probably do some more work on the Duratec, for no other reason than the above examples.
Also, I think the MAZDA6 styling is probably more aggressive than most of those cars, not all.
(tangent)Why oh why was the RX-7 ever removed from the US!
Even more, the following cars do not have a manual transmission option for the listed engines, which I think is a huge minus (and automatically removes them from my list of purchasable cars):
Acura TL
Infiniti G35
Lexus IS300 - only the base model comes with manual... so I guess that passes, so I shouldn't list it here
Jaguar X-Type 3.0L
Mercedes C-WagonJaguar X-Type 3.0L
Mercedes C-Wagon
Saab 9-5
But then the MAZDA6 is not RWD, which would be cool. I personally don't like FWD cars. RWD is much for fun to me. But supposedly theres an AWD 4cylinder with a ton of hp to come out in the future, but it doesn't really count for now. But it does come in hatchback which is a really cool+. I'm sold on hatches, as I've had more hatches than any other car. A mid-sized hatch, neato! Those wild and crazy guys.
I'm sure there are tons of cars I left out, but I have to work and stuff in the morning
Anyway, I think the 6 will be an excellent alternative to the other "stuff" that is currently on the market, I won't mention names. I've always liked Mazda for the spirit they put into their cars (which is currently lacking but comin back - Miata and Protege). And right now, the 6 is #1 on my list of new cars to purchase(having test driven nothing hehe). So unless it drives and feels like a POS and the competition doesn't...
"While you cannot rewrite history, you will have 30 minutes to make any changes or fixes after you post a message. Just click on the Edit button that follows your message after you post it."
Anyway, I can't wait to test drive (and probably buy) a Mazda6. Like many of you, I wish the hatch and wagon were coming out the same time as the sedan.
A while ago I asked if anybody knows why the Mazda6 has four headlights. The obvious are one low beam, one high beam, and one amber signal. Reading a review of the Renault Vel Satis may give a clue as to the fourth. The Renault has a separate halogen bulb for a "flash to pass" function. In the pics of the Mazda6 from Autoweek where the lights are on, the inner most bulb is larger and more yellow in color that the outboard ones. This light could also be for DRLs as well as flash to pass...
And then again, the BMW 325i (admittedly stick shift) felt WAY quicker than the Altima (automatic) when I test drove them.
In any case, I seriously think the 180+ range is a washout, and 180 or thereabouts is all you really need to merge/pass with a loaded (4 passengers and stuff) sedan! But then again, that's just me - I'm making do just fine with a sub-100hp 4-door sedan, and frequently take 5 or 4-person road trips with loads of hiking/camping gear ;-)
In fact - my config of choice would be
- Mazda 6
- 4 cylinder
- Sport Hatch
- 5 speed
- Sport suspension
The current Protege is similarly rewarding to drive and makes a fine daily commuter and small family vehicle as well.
FYI, the last RX7 was pulled for both lower-than-expected sales (got too expensive I think, like the Nissan 300ZX and the Toyota Supra), but they couldn't make the emissions clean enough for EPA either. The Renesis rotary will beet EPA emission regulations and be a bit more fuel-efficient too, mostly by moving the intake and exhaust ports to the sides of the combustion chambers than the outer faces (too much unburnt fuel was sent out the exhaust). You can read on Mazda's site about the developments and improvements to the rotary.
Still, even though they pulled it out of the US, a few "grey-market" ones have been imported. They look nice.
Oh - and make mine yellow please (although I'll probably end up choosing either of the yellow or the red or blue when the 6 is released!)
I sat in, and played around with the gadgetry, folding seats, controls etc in the yellow hatchback at the NY Auto Show - and it was sweet! Everything just where I'd like it, with the promise of exceptional (or at least better-than-vanilla) handling, and some exclusivity - although they could loose some of that plasticanium!