Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
Since 1967, vehicles have been equipped with tandem master cylinders and dual brake hydraulic systems to provide redundancy in the event of a brake hydraulic failure. If a line or hose fails, half of the hydraulic system remains operational. As every 2nd year apprentice here knows, if rear or 4 wheel drive, front or rear brakes will be still work, depending on which line failed. If front wheel drive, one front and the oppopsite rear brake will still work, since we all know that the former uses a front/rear hydraulic split and the latter uses a diagonal split. However, the brake pedal will be significantly lower, leaving drivers with the perception that the brake system has completely failed. It hasn't, but braking has been reduced. To suggest that the parking brake will be more effective in slowing or stopping the vehicle than a partially operational hydraulic system indicates a profound lack of knowledge of brake hydraulic systems. You might want to sit in on my next basic brake course. We cover all failure modes, including those with quick take-up master cylinders.
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 105 (superseded by Standard No. 135): Hydraulic and Electric Brake Systems
Scope and Purpose:
This standard specifies requirements for vehicles equipped with hydraulic and electric service brake systems, and associated parking brake systems. The purpose of this standard is to insure safe braking performance under normal and emergency conditions.
Application:
Hydraulically braked or electrically braked passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses with a GVWR greater than 3,500 kg (7,716 lb)
Btw, there is one scenario where a single hydraulic failure could possibly lead to total loss of braking. Any takers?
I suspect that is a major reason that the parking brake is from time to time employed as an emergency brake. Combine a master cylinder failure with a loss of vacuum in the power brakes and the driver may get scared enough to step on the parking brake, or jerk on the lever, whichever is pertinent.
Something I tell every basic brake class when we get into m/c failures, if you get one in with a leaking brake line and the pedal's gone down, make sure you tell the customer up front that it might need a m/c afterwards due to piston seal damage from a scabby bore. If it doesn't, you're a hero. If it does and you didn't mention the possibility beforehand, all he knows is the pedal went down, you told him it was a leaking line, and now you're trying to gouge him for additional repairs.
What is the difference in European (import) brake rotors/disks and american brake rotors/disks? (I.E. Honda/VW)
Is it "normal" for Hyundai brake assemblies to fail due to rust at 11,300 miles? If this is a "normal" situation with Hyundai automobiles, its definitely an indication that we would not be recommending them to any of our friends. The service manager also suggested that we come in to have the rust and corrosion on the brakes removed on a yearly basis. Is this "normal" for Hyundai brakes?
We were told that these items were no longer covered under the warranty program (the Accent was purchased in October 2003). What is the "normal" expected lifetime of these parts? Should we be pursuing reimbursement from Hyundai (or the dealer) for the cost of the parts and labor for this repair? Could this be a manufacturer's defect?
Also keep in mind that Hyundai/Kia are cheep automobiles to begin with. One reason they are so inexpensive is because of the things you DO NOT SEE. The steel has a high pecent of poorly-recycled (to make it cheep) metals in it. The bodys rust out like a 1970 chevy and I am sure the brakes will too.
Since you saved so much $$ purchansing a Hyundai, you can use the cash you saved to get the brakes fixed. ;-)
Having a thick layer of rust around the perimitor of the rotors is a common occourance in the salt-belt. I usually just "turn" the rotors in -place with a steel bit to remove the rust. Installing HIGH QUALITY (ie..Bendix) rotors will elimintate that problem.
My 1970s and 1980s cars had brake rotors that froze up all the time. Even though I do all my own brake work, it was not worth it to install the same cheep OE equipment. I always shopped the autoparts stores for LIFETIME WARANTEE brake parts and installed those. Even if those parts did need to be replaced every 2-3 years, at least THEY coverd the cost of the parts.
I was going to wait for warmer weather to revisit the brakes and, as you've suggested consider replacing them with something of better quality. Needless to say, we're more than a little disappointed with the quality of this rather important part of the vehicle.
I think you easily got your money's worth out of the brakes and shouldn't feel the least bit short-changed on this one.
Do not forget that the biggest contributer to "frozen calipers" is contaminated brake fluid. All brake fluid should be changed every 2 years to reduce caliper freezups.
You may find with calipers, there is no "better quality" all you will find is "rebuilt originals".
When I mentioned better-quality, I was talking about the ROTORS which can vary widely in quality based on the material they are made of.
Your vehicle has seen at least 2 winters of salt-laden roads. That is plenty of salt to make your rotors start to rust.
As for brake pads, I run nothing but CERAMIC-based pads. The reduction in black dust on the wheels is wonderful thing 8-)
Well okay, my answer is still basically the same....you got salted roads, you got problems. It's a harsh environment. Maybe this particular car's design traps salt and moisture more than most, I don't know, but if you think about what brake calipers have to go through on slushy, salted roads, it's a wonder they survive two years at all.
So is this repair "normal"? No, I wouldn't say that. Can it happen now and then? Sure.
A common "ceramic based" pad is available thru NAPA as their "Ceramix" brand. (Made by Raybestos for NAPA) Virtually all friction-materal manufacturers have some "ceramic based" pad in their lineup. (Raybestos "QS" is their own Ceramic pad)
The performance difference for "ceramic based" pads include... very quiet(no squeels), Low dusting, and Long life. Some folks say that they are a bit more aggressive on rotors, but I have NEVER worn out a rotor. (mine always rust into oblivion.)
Here is an example:
http://members.aol.com/peebs4u2/powerslot_after_3winters.jpg
If you telephone any auto-parts store and ask for pads for your vehicle, they will offer you AT LEAST 3 "grades" of pads. The cheepest ones will make so much black dust that you will never be able to keep your wheels clean.
If you click on the links below you will see a comparison between several types of friction material.
http://www.nationalfleetparts.com/3types.htm
http://www.discpads.com/our_product_pads.asp
http://www.raybestos.com/usa/brakepads.htm
If you are suggesting that replacing REAR components make the STEERING WHEEL shake go away, then you are describing a near mechanical impossiblity. !?!? (I am assuming you DO NOT have 4-wheel steering)
As with all mechanical problems, one must identify all of the clues (symptoms) no matter how diverse they seem. I have over 30 years of troubleshooting complex mechanical systems and have learned that once the ROOT of the problem is found, all the clues make sense. (hindsight 8-)
With that said, are there any other symptoms besides shaking steering wheel that you can elaberate on.
Does it happen only when braking?
Does a bumpy road exagerate it?
Does the brake-pedal pulse?
Can your passengers feel it in their seat?
Is it more pronounced while turning to left or right?
If it is warping rotors, there are several things that can cause new brake rotors to warp prematurly;
1) Over-torquing lug nuts
2) Not seasoning the rotors
3) Dragging brake caliper
4) Cr@ppy rotors
The following webpage has a good description of how to season new rotors.
http://www.shotimes.com/brakes/part1.html
Any GOOD! mechanic would be able to do some hands-on testing of the front-end components to determine if you have dragging calipers, excessive runout, bearing endplay, loose tie-rods,...or any other issues that may be contributing to the situation.
So for example in one of my publications for a vehicle:
technical data, brakes
Front brake pad thickness is 14MM or .551. The wear limit is 7mm or .276.
On the front brake disc, thickness it is 22MM or .866. The wear limit is 19mm or .748
So if most folks eyes aren't glazed over by now, lets do the math.
So you have basically two wearing surfaces one rubbing off and providing friction(pads) and the other rubbing off and disipating heat (hence having to have a certain MASS to disipate in specification heat): rotor.
Brake pads can wear (14mm-7mm= or .551-.276) 7mm/.275
Brake rotors can wear (22mm-19mm= or .866-.748) 3mm /.118
The upshot is when the it is time to change brake pads, the rotors do not have enough "wearable" material to last the mileage the last set of pads probably did before it hits the wear limits (on the new set of pads).
So turning them (to true or zero run out them) CAN remove too much "wearable" material to leave enough buffer material before the new pads are KAPUT.
Friend's Porsche model's literally eat brake pads (and rotors) yet Porsche is known for having "bullet proof" pads and rotors. Brother in laws BMW 330i eats brake pads and rotors. Corvette Z06 which has been written up as having "less than Porsche brakes" have more than half the pads left with 68,000 miles (driven hard and put away wet, so to speak) rotors still have close to new thickness specifications.
I have VW Jetta TDI brakes which have developed a reputation for short lasting pads and rotors are on track at 49,000 miles to go to at least 100-150k miles fronts and 100-120k mile rears.
Also there are some auto stores that offer lifetime gurantees on very high quality brake pads (Performance Friction Z pads) to name one. All they require within wear specs, you bring back the old worn ones and they will give you a new set.
Some of the new exotic road-going/trackable Porsches (new GTs) use ceramic rotors that cost $8,500.....EACH! But then, for stopping at 210 mph or so, what's the problem with that?
Personally for the cost of new Porsche GT, I'm not going to quibble over a lousy $16,000 if I can stop ten feet sooner than a Corvette or Ferrari, especially if 5 of those 10 feet are occupied by a brick wall.
As you are no doubt aware, as one achieves perfection in anything, the last couple percentage points are astronomically expensive. It costs more than 10% to go from 200 mph to 220 mph, and a couple pounds off an already light mountain bike is going to be more than the cost per pound of the heavier bike.
Conversely, and getting back on topic a bit more, saving $5 by installing inferior brake rotors when you are building 500,000 of something is very very tempting for an automaker.
Are there defects or problems? Yes and No.
I don't think that remedy for my Toyota Landcruiser's would be applied to me unless it was demostrated in court. (the money I received for 4 sets of Toyota Landcruiser pads and brake rotors)
To me and I would hope to others, it is fairly logic that if one wants to track or drive hard that one should be prepared to change out pads and rotors on a fairly frequent basis compared to one who does not. Very simply, this is the real price for "flogging" the vehicle.
The concern, as folks have expressed it is when they do not tend to flog the vehicle BUT still have to change the rotors and brakes very frequently!?
I never had a car where it didn't eat brakes. Every car I ever owned. So obviously I'M THE PROBLEM!
small shop replaced front pads, ever since then high-pitched screaming from front right tire, beginning at 35-40 mph with no effect from braking...winds down with deceleration to a stop...have had relubing and clips checked, new set of brake pads, new rotor, still the sound continues, mechanic is at a loss and looking for advice from mechanics, so I'm doing my own research...HELP???
Dave
Apparently there's a design flaw in (at least) the 2000 SLK. The metal contacts for the brake lights are either the wrong type of metal, have the wrong type of rustproofing or both. After some time the contact between the brake light bulb and where that bulb is inserted into the light framework is burned away/corroded. This happens first to the brake lights which are either higher amperage or used more often. What happens is the brake light stops working and a warning light comes on on the dashboard. If you remove the bulb you find it intact. The Mercedes dealer will charge $800 each to replace the rear light assembly, but the issue can be solved for a little less than 5 cents plus labor if you can use a soldering iron. I felt I just had to share this with others.
Remove the rear brake light assembly by opening the plastic covers inside the trunk. The brake light assembly is attached with four metric nuts which are a little hard to get to, but the only fasteners for the whole assembly. There may be other components behind the plastic cover that make the brake assembly tough to get to, but they can be removed without removing screws/nuts.
Unplug the brake light assembly, remove the light bulb and examine the place where the brake light plugs into the back of the assembly. On either side where the light bulb holder contacts the assembly you will see a darkened/corroded area. This corrosion/lost metal are preventing the bulb from getting power. Scrape the corrosion away and put a layer of solder over the pitted metal so that the bulb will get good contact.
Replace the bulb and assembly. Plug the assembly back into the car and close the plastic panels. Spend the $1,600 (!!) you just saved on something nice. Send me an email saying how wonderful I am.
Hope this helps someone - I'm quite glad I figured it out and couldn't find it anywhere else.