By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Regarding bed covers. . .do they do anything other than protect the bed? An friend of mine uses his trucks, from new, without a bed-liner, then installs one just before selling. That way, when it's time to sell, the buyer sees a beautiful, unmarked liner, and theoretically is more prepared to open his wallet. I've also heard of some corrosion and scuffing problems with the bed liners. By the way, my current truck has a single sheet of hard-faced plywood on the floor because I frequently roll heavy crates on, and off the bed, and the ridges normally found on bed liners would probably mess me up.
Tundra, I've gone to the Frontier Crew Cab."
You bought that hideous monstrosity of a Nissan 850 compact crew cab with the open-air trunk!? Why didn't you just buy a Pathfinder, which has more passenger room AND cargo space?! That trunk is useless for hauling anything larger than a 12-pack of beer.. in cans.
I had a Nissan 850 4x4, and it was an excellent vehicle that only cost me oil, gas, a battery, and a battery cable in 10 years of service...
.. But I wasn't ABOUT to consider the Nissan Frontier with the comically small bed that looks like circus clowns ought to be riding in the back of.
But if YOU like it, I'm glad you're satisfied.
So the clicking I'm sure is the compressor cycling...I just find it strange to be able to hear this relay in the passenger compartment.
That is all my complaints.
Oh one more.. the radio/cd player we all know about...I can't take it much longer...it really does su#$...but if anybody thinks its great and are happy with it...great..I'm not putting you down...It just doesn't matter to a lot of people..and that's ok...but anyone replacing it knows what true high fidelity is.
The high-light of my week....a family of five in a Camary on the highway,all turning around as I came up on them giving me the thumbs up.....this is a great truck...I wouldn't trade it for anything...well.............. maybe a Hummer....
The Toyota owners manual that I looked at recommended 87 octane for the Tundra V8. I would assume that testing was done with that fuel.
There appears to be some misunderstanding regarding octane ratings of fuel. The octane # refers to the fuels anti-knock index, or ability to resist knocking - the higher the octane #, the more resistant to knocking. If the engine compression ratio and engine management system are optimized to run on 87 octane, then there is no benefit to running a higher octane fuel (contrary to what the gasoline companies would like you to believe since they make more $/gallon on the "premium" stuff). In fact, there may be a loss of power with the higher octane fuel due to it having less energy (lower BTU content) and being slower burning (helps resist knock).
To make the most advantage of high octane fuel, you have to increase the cylinder pressure by increasing the compression ratio or by forced induction.
The higher the cylinder pressure, the more likely the engine is to knock, and vica-versa. Cylinder pressure is related to atmospheric pressure since that is what fills the cylinders on the intake stroke. Higher atmospheric pressure = higher cylinder pressure, and vica-versa. Therefore, when you are in the mountains at a high altitude where the atmospheric pressure is lower, cylinder pressures are lower, the tendancy for engine knock is lower, and the minimum octane requirement is LOWER. This is why the minimum octane available at sea level is 87 octane, while in the mountains of Colorado for instance, the lowest octane available is 85 octane.
i bought my black tundra SR5 access cab 4X4 just a little under 3 weeks ago. got it for $1000 under sticker. i drove the dodge,ford and chevy first. all trucks i wouldnt mind owning except: the ford interior was, quite simply, plain; the dodge is going to have transmission problems; and the chevy that was available the day i bought my tundra had only THREE doors, and for my needs the door was on the wrong side(oh sure the door allows you to open it out of traffic, but when i pull in the driveway, i dont want to walk around the damn truck to get something out of the back)
i traded in my 93 toyota 22RE 2wd pick up with 100,000 dependable, no wait, DEPENDABLE miles on it. i have the dunlops with absolutely positively NO vibration problems. got a rhinoliner spray in bedliner for $450, my advice........ get one
i now have 1,100 miles on mine, if youre riding the fence on getting one- just break down and buy it-this is one incredible truck
and if you already own one- we got something special here guys
is it the perfect vehicle? of course not, no one has built that yet, but i can assure you all, it is the most perfect vehicle i have EVER owned or driven
P.S. why is it that you NEVER see a Dodge tow truck?
(and will we be seeing TUNDRA tow trucks?)
If so, how does it compare to the 8 or T100?
Thanks
Tom
Thanks
Tom
The Michelins(in my area) are a distributor installed option. Combined with the distributor alloy, they sticker for around $1100 or so.(I'm sure someone else here can tell you the exact price for the Michelin upgrades).
But from I guess the bench seat sucks! What is the deal there...any other opinions on the bench?
Thanks,
If you don't like your dealer try mine. See posting #393 above. Learie told me he can have a car shipped anywhere. Give him a call
I was looking at the Tundra specs and noticed - the fuel economy difference between the V6 & V8 was 1 or 2 mpg difference.
Considering the lower resale value of the V6 I can't think of any possible reason to buy a V6 Tundra, unless you must drive a 5 speed manual. Maybe some people are *afraid* of all that power.
The gas mileage is hanging around 20 miles per gallon.
There will not be any lower resale value on the V6. I sold my 94 T100 more than i paid for it two months ago and it was a 4 cylinder. The reason to buy a V6 Tundra is monthly payments. I paid 16000 for mine and its not a stripper. I have driven the v8 version and it is powerful, but the V6 isn't that far behind. Besides i could add that supercharger to the v6 and have more hp than the V8 and still come out cheaper if I bought the v8 version. Getting the V6 Tundra is one of the best deals from Toyota.
PS: The T100 was a great truck, but I needed the V6 to pull my camping trailer.
I asked him about the bench seat problem and he said that he hadn't heard of any info on it. I will keep asking him and see what progresses.
My opinion on belt vs. chain has changed upon talking to him. I used to love the chain due to the extended life of it, but wasn't that happy about the cost of replacement. Major $$$$$. I changed my mind once I learned that belts keep much better timing than chains due to the stretching of the chain and wear of the sprockets. Belts also rob less horsepower from the engine due to friction and weight. Just my added thoughts. Let me know what you think.
I got that statement from the Toyota web page, and that means that they are averaging 5670.33 trucks a month. To meet the 100,000 a year goal they need to move 8333.33 trucks a month. That is great news for me because it means that Toyota might start coming down on the price by January when I want to purchase my truck!!!
Where I live must be the worst.
7.5% sales tax
$550 registration fee (tax!), this is annual
not to mention 87 octane gas sells for $1.65 per gallon here
The great (sarcasm) state of California, northern to be specific.
Has anybody else notice this price changing, and have you seen it go down at all??
I'm hoping they raise the prices on the weekends, or maybe for the holiday, and will be checking daily in hopes that it does drop.
I'm trying to decide between an over rail or under rail bedliner. What is the difference (besides the obvious)? Are there any advantages/disadvantages to either?
Thanks in advance for any help.
I'm teatering between adding it and not, and was curious what the experience is like.
Thanks
Now that I think it is ugly, and I know for sure it is uncomfortable, it is obvious to me that Toyota has managed a "strike 2" with the Tundra. And we thought they learned a lesson with the T-100. Once the hard-core "Toyota at all cost fans" buy up a share of Tundras, there will be lots of them out there - don't pay what the dealers are asking.
Honestly, you may never see the kind of problems the other big 3 have, because I doubt that the Tundra will ever be worked very hard. Buyers looking for serious work trucks will never buy these in large numbers. Tundras will live out their lives as family cars - babied and pampered. Even so, I read of rattling seats that can be cured by shoving a chunk of wood under the seat? Maybe the owner should have shoved the back seat under the front seat - that way there would be more storage in that little cubby-hole back there.
The truth does hurt. I am as disappointed as anyone that Toyota couldn't build a decent full-sized truck.
Good luck toy owners - hope someday your resale is better than the T-100.
Maybe your comments are true, but at least the Tundra is of better quality than anything the Big 3 puts out. Believe me, I know from experience.
GM builds nothing but junk!
Any info would be great.... thanks.
I'm convinced my ABS brakes on my 4Runner saved me from a high speed accident allowing my to brake and steer out of harms way. I wouldn't get the Tundra w/o them as it is a heavier vehicle and bound to do even higher speeds.
Two more minor points. You can have the belt inspected by removing the covers enough so you can see the belt. If your belt breaks when you are pulling a load or at high RPMs you can do major damage to your engine - valves,pistons ect that will make the $1,000 maintenance seem like chicken feed.
PS it's funny you find the Tundra noisy, I can hear any of the big three a mile down the road.
Thanks again, and good luck with your Tundra's.
Contacted Carorder and response was "sorry price only good for 7 days." Today (Tuesday) price is $500 under MSRP. Far cry from the $1000 over invoice from last week. Carorder rep said they are not sure why price has gone up so much and was told "Go to dealer if you are unhappy with the price". She must of worked for a Toyota Dealer before going to Carorder. She may be looking for new job when Carorder's orders go down/down/down. Checked other cars on Carorder and those prices are way up too. It's a shame that Carorder has done this.
Tundra 4wd Access Cab V8 = city 14 Hiway 17
Chevy 4wd Extended Cab both V8s = city 15 Hiway 18
Ford 4wd SuperCab 4.6 V8 = city 15 hiway 19
Ford 4wd Supercab 5.4 V8 = city 13 hiway 17
Dodge 4wd Club Cab 5.9 V8 = city 12 hiway 16
Uh....it looks to me like they're all gas guzzlers.